Brazil's Bolsonaro, others formally accused in spy agency case
FILE PHOTO: Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro reacts as he leaves the Federal Police headquarters after testifying, in Brasilia, Brazil, June 5, 2025. REUTERS/Adriano Machado/File photo
BRASILIA - Brazil's federal police have formally accused former President Jair Bolsonaro, his son Carlos Bolsonaro and others in a probe into the alleged illegal surveillance by spy agency ABIN on authorities during Bolsonaro's presidential term.
In a statement without citing names, the federal police confirmed the conclusion of the investigation, detailing the "existence of a criminal organization focused on the illegal monitoring of public authorities and the production of fake news, using ABINS's systems."
The final report reached the supreme court, but it is under seal, according to a federal police statement.
Bolsonaro, who is already a defendant in a coup attempt case, was allegedly aware of Abin's illegal surveillance scheme and benefited from it, according to a federal police source.
His lawyer told Reuters that he was not aware of the case and had not seen the federal police report.
Carlos Bolsonaro, a Rio de Janeiro city councilor, was indicted on suspicion of using information obtained illegally through the scheme to attack targets via social media.
Alexandre Ramagem, former head of ABIN under Bolsonaro's administration, and Luiz Fernando Correa, the current head of the agency, were also indicted.
Correa is suspected of obstructing the Federal Police's investigation during President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva's administration.
Abin declined to comment. Ramagem's press office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Carlos Bolsonaro could not be reached.
The government is monitoring Correa's situation, but there is no decision so far on his permanence or possible replacement, according to a source.
Last year, Reuters reported that the parallel structure in Abin set up under the Bolsonaro government monitored at least three supreme court justices.
After the indictment, it will now be up to the attorney general's office to decide whether to file charges against the Bolsonaro and the others involved in the case. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
11 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Appeals court hears arguments on Trump's Los Angeles troop deployment
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Marines stand watch as people protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies and federal immigration sweeps during a No Kings Day demonstration in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/David Ryder/File Photo A federal appeals court began hearing arguments on Tuesday on Donald Trump's legal authority to deploy the National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles amid protests and civil unrest, days after a judge ruled that the Republican president had called the National Guard into service unlawfully. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's ruling last Thursday was put on hold hours later by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Trump administration is seeking a longer pause while it appeals. Justice Department lawyer Brett Shumate told a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit during arguments on Tuesday that Breyer "improperly second-guessed the president's judgment" about the need to call up the National Guard in order to protect federal property and personnel from "mob violence" in Los Angeles. "There is no role for the court to play in reviewing that decision," Shumate said. Breyer, in San Francisco, had ruled that the president unlawfully took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops to Los Angeles against the wishes of Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard, but Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marines' mobilization. Breyer said Trump had not complied with the law that allows him to take control of the National Guard to address rebellions or invasions, and ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom, who sued over the deployment. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in a city in the midst of protest and turmoil over the president's immigration raids. Political unrest spread to other parts of the country over the weekend, when a gunman assassinated a Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota and large protests took place in many other cities to coincide with a military parade that celebrated the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary on the same day as Trump's 79th birthday. California's lawsuit, filed on June 9, argues that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violate the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they were instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The administration argues that the law gives the president sole discretion to determine whether a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" requires a military response and that neither the courts nor a state governor can second-guess that determination. In Thursday's order, Breyer said the protest fell far short of qualifying as a rebellion. "The court is troubled by the implication inherent in defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion," Breyer wrote. The 9th Circuit panel consists of two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and one judge appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Russia says Israeli attacks on Iran are illegal, notes Iran's commitment to NPT
Iranian and Russian flags are seen in this illustration taken, April 24, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo Russia's Foreign Ministry denounced on Tuesday continued Israeli attacks on Iran as illegal and said a solution to the conflict over Tehran's nuclear programme could only be found through diplomacy. "The continuing intensive attacks by Israel on Iran's peaceful nuclear sites are illegal in terms of international law and create unacceptable threats to international security and push the world to a nuclear catastrophe...," the ministry said in a statement posted on Telegram. It said that widespread condemnation of Israeli actions showed that Israel had found support only "from those states who are in fact co-participants and act for opportunistic reasons." The ministry noted Iran's "clear statements about its unaltered commitment to the obligations of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and its readiness to renew contacts with the United States to work out possible solutions" removing all doubts about Tehran's nuclear programme. "Moscow supports this stand and firmly believes that the settlement that is being sought can only be reliably achieved through diplomacy and negotiations," it said. The statement also said Moscow was waiting for the International Atomic Energy Agency to provide "as soon as possible a detailed written report ... with an objective and unvarnished assessment of damage" to Iran's nuclear facilities. The Kremlin said on Monday that Russia was ready to act as a mediator in the conflict between Israel and Iran, and its previous proposal to store Iranian uranium in Russia remained on the table. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
UAE warns of ‘uncalculated, reckless steps' amid Israel-Iran air war
The foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates, Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed, has warned of "uncalculated and reckless steps" that could spill out beyond the borders of Iran and Israel, according to a statement by the foreign ministry on Tuesday. UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian discussed in a phone call the Israeli strikes on Iran, the Emirati state news agency WAM reported later in the day. The Emirati president said the Gulf country is conducting intensive talks with concerned parties to calm the situation, WAM said. He also expressed solidarity with Iran and its people during the current circumstances, it added. Abu Dhabi in recent years mended ties with Tehran after years of tension. The Gulf country, along with Bahrain, also normalised ties with Israel in 2020. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
