logo
Australian mushroom murder suspect told 'lies upon lies': prosecutor

Australian mushroom murder suspect told 'lies upon lies': prosecutor

Yahoo10 hours ago

An Australian woman told "lies upon lies" to cover up her murder of three lunch guests with a toxic mushroom-laced dish, the lead prosecutor said Tuesday.
Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents and aunt in July 2023 by spiking a beef Wellington with death cap mushrooms.
She is also accused of attempting to murder a fourth guest -- her husband's uncle -- who survived the lunch after a long stay in hospital.
Patterson has denied all charges in a seven week-long trial that has made headlines worldwide.
She said the traditional English dish, which she cooked in individual portions, was poisoned by accident.
Prosecutor Nanette Rogers summed up her case saying Patterson told "lies upon lies" because she knew the truth would implicate her.
She accused Patterson of lying to her in-laws to lure them to the lunch, telling them she wanted to discuss a serious health issue and then falsely claiming to have cancer.
- Intent to kill -
Patterson also provided police with a "dummy" mobile phone and concealed her main mobile, which authorities never recovered, the prosecutor said.
She also initially lied to police about never owning a food dehydrator.
But security footage then captured her dumping one at a rubbish facility days after the lunch, Rogers said. It later tested positive for traces of death cap mushrooms.
Jurors should "reject" Patterson's claim that she accidentally picked death cap mushrooms, Rogers said, adding that all the evidence pointed to her "deliberately" seeking out the fatal fungi.
Patterson intended to kill all her guests by serving them death cap mushrooms secreted into the meal, she charged.
- 'No reason at all' -
Patterson's defence lawyer Colin Mandy told the jury they needed to consider two key issues in the case: firstly, if there was a reasonable possibility that the death cap mushrooms were accidentally placed in the meal.
Secondly, if there was a reasonable possibility that Patterson did not intend to kill or cause serious injury to the lunch guests.
If either of those statements were true, the jury must find her not guilty, he said.
Patterson was in a good place in her life: she was financially comfortable, had a beautiful home she shared with her two children, hoped to return to study and had plans to do something about her body image -- which she had long struggled with, her defence said.
Patterson loved her parents-in-law as they had always been kind and understanding towards her. They were the only grandparents her children had, Mandy said.
"There was no reason at all to hurt them in any way," he said.
Patterson never planned to kill anyone, but when her guests got sick, she "panicked" because the spotlight would inevitably turn to her.
"She never intended this to happen," he said.
- Rejected lunch invitation -
The accused originally invited her estranged husband Simon to join the family lunch at her secluded home in the farm village of Leongatha in Victoria state.
But he turned down the invitation on the eve of the meal, saying he felt uncomfortable going, the court heard earlier. The pair were long estranged but still legally married.
Simon Patterson's parents Don and Gail, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, attended the lunch.
All three were dead within days.
Heather Wilkinson's husband Ian fell gravely ill but eventually recovered.
The trial in Morwell, southeast of Melbourne, is in its final stages.
lec/djw/dhw

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Sean Combs Trial: A Timeline of the Testimony
The Sean Combs Trial: A Timeline of the Testimony

New York Times

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Times

The Sean Combs Trial: A Timeline of the Testimony

Sean Combs, one of America's most influential music moguls, is standing trial on federal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and transportation to engage in prostitution. Prosecutors accuse him of leading a criminal enterprise that committed a series of crimes including kidnapping, arson and obstruction of justice. He has pleaded not guilty, and his lawyers have said all the sex at issue in the case was consensual. Read the indictment here. The Latest: The Jury Sees 'Freak-Off' Videos and a Juror Is Dismissed As the trial enters its sixth week, the prosecution has highlighted key pieces of evidence to summarize its case. Among them were a trove of text messages from Kristina Khorram, Mr. Combs's former chief of staff, which prosecutors said showed that Ms. Khorram was closely involved in planning the intensive sex marathons that Casandra Ventura and a woman who testified as 'Jane' said they endured. Over the course of the trial, those events have been called 'freak-offs,' 'hotel nights' and 'wild king nights.' Prosecutors also showed jurors brief excerpts from videos of those events, which were taken from devices that Ms. Ventura, the singer known as Cassie, provided to the government. That evidence is sealed, and was not visible to the public or the news media. Jurors watched the videos on screens, and listened on headphones; one juror, frowning, snatched the headphones off after the first clip was played. The defense has called the footage 'powerful evidence that the sexual conduct in this case was consensual and not based on coercion.' On Monday, the judge dismissed a juror who gave inconsistent information about where he lives, raising concerns that he had been seeking a spot on the jury of the high-profile case. Prosecutors are expected to rest this week, and the defense will then call its own witnesses, who are expected to include a former human resources manager for Mr. Combs's company and a forensic psychiatrist. Week 1 Opening Statements and Cassie's Testimony Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Sean 'Diddy' Combs probably won't testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days
Sean 'Diddy' Combs probably won't testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Sean 'Diddy' Combs probably won't testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days

NEW YORK — The possibility that music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs might testify at his federal sex trafficking trial all but vanished Tuesday after his lawyer predicted a defense presentation lasting as little as two days and a judge said jurors could begin deliberations as early as next week. Attorney Marc Agnifilo offered the hint when Judge Arun Subramanian asked him for an estimate on the length of the defense case, and the attorney said their presentation could last less than two days — but not more than five. If Combs testified, it was likely his testimony would take longer than a week. Testimony by two of his former girlfriends consumed two of the trial's six weeks. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges. He has been jailed at a federal lockup in Brooklyn since his September arrest at a Manhattan hotel. Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey said prosecutors would rest as early as Wednesday and no later than Friday morning. The estimates were provided Tuesday after the irate judge scolded prosecutors and defense lawyers, saying information about a closed court proceeding involving a juror last Friday had leaked to a media outlet. The judge said he believed someone who was at the sealed court hearing violated his secrecy order. In the future, Subramanian said, he would hold Comey and Agnifilo responsible for any slipups, and any violations of his orders could result in criminal contempt penalties 'at the most extreme level.' 'This is the only warning I will give,' he said. Meanwhile, prosecutors resumed showing jurors evidence Tuesday of text messages, phone calls, hotel records to support charges that Combs oversaw a racketeering conspiracy that utilized his employees and associates and his stature in the hip-hop industry to help him control and abuse women, including two former girlfriends. Ex-girlfriends Casandra ' Cassie ' Ventura and a woman who testified under the pseudonym ' Jane ' told jurors that Combs used threats and monetary incentives to coerce them into frequent multi-day sex marathons where Combs watched, directed and sometimes filmed them engaging with male sex workers. Defense lawyers say prosecutors were trying to criminalize consenting sex between adults by targeting Combs. Ventura's relationship with Combs lasted from 2007 to 2018 while Jane dated him from 2021 until his arrest last fall.

Sean 'Diddy' Combs probably won't testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days
Sean 'Diddy' Combs probably won't testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Sean 'Diddy' Combs probably won't testify as defense says its case could be less than 2 days

NEW YORK (AP) — The possibility that music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs might testify at his federal sex trafficking trial all but vanished Tuesday after his lawyer predicted a defense presentation lasting as little as two days and a judge said jurors could begin deliberations as early as next week. Attorney Marc Agnifilo offered the hint when Judge Arun Subramanian asked him for an estimate on the length of the defense case, and the attorney said their presentation could last less than two days — but not more than five. If Combs testified, it was likely his testimony would take longer than a week. Testimony by two of his former girlfriends consumed two of the trial's six weeks. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges. He has been jailed at a federal lockup in Brooklyn since his September arrest at a Manhattan hotel. Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey said prosecutors would rest as early as Wednesday and no later than Friday morning. The estimates were provided Tuesday after the irate judge scolded prosecutors and defense lawyers, saying information about a closed court proceeding involving a juror last Friday had leaked to a media outlet. The judge said he believed someone who was at the sealed court hearing violated his secrecy order. In the future, Subramanian said, he would hold Comey and Agnifilo responsible for any slipups, and any violations of his orders could result in criminal contempt penalties 'at the most extreme level.' 'This is the only warning I will give,' he said. Meanwhile, prosecutors resumed showing jurors evidence Tuesday of text messages, phone calls, hotel records to support charges that Combs oversaw a racketeering conspiracy that utilized his employees and associates and his stature in the hip-hop industry to help him control and abuse women, including two former girlfriends. Ex-girlfriends Casandra ' Cassie ' Ventura and a woman who testified under the pseudonym ' Jane ' told jurors that Combs used threats and monetary incentives to coerce them into frequent multi-day sex marathons where Combs watched, directed and sometimes filmed them engaging with male sex workers. Defense lawyers say prosecutors were trying to criminalize consenting sex between adults by targeting Combs. Ventura's relationship with Combs lasted from 2007 to 2018 while Jane dated him from 2021 until his arrest last fall.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store