logo
‘Intimidating player': Sam Bennett becomes the villain again after unpenalized Anthony Stolarz hit

‘Intimidating player': Sam Bennett becomes the villain again after unpenalized Anthony Stolarz hit

New York Times06-05-2025

TORONTO — The first game in a series between Florida and Toronto ended with Maple Leafs goaltender Anthony Stolarz in hospital for evaluation, his coach Craig Berube crying foul about the unpenalized incident that sent him there and a usual suspect likely to escape any further discipline from the NHL.
Any joy the Leafs felt following Monday's 5-4 victory was overshadowed by concern for Stolarz and exasperation about a forearm to the head he received from Panthers forward Sam Bennett shortly before becoming physically ill.
'Elbow to the head,' said Berube. 'Clearly. Clear as day.'
It was not clear to referees Chris Rooney and Graham Skilliter, neither of whom called a penalty when Bennett skated out from behind the Toronto goal and caught an unsuspecting Stolarz on the left side of his mask at 7:20 of the second period.
The force of the blow knocked Stolarz to the ice, and the officials stopped play. He initially remained in the net and played another two-plus minutes of the game — spanning roughly nine minutes in actual time — before skating over to the Leafs bench and throwing up.
Sam Bennett makes contact with the head of Anthony Stolarz who is slow to get up 🫣 pic.twitter.com/BjnhbA4Ysm
— Gino Hard (@GinoHard_) May 6, 2025
That prompted backup Joseph Woll to come in for the remaining 29:46 while Stolarz was tended to in the Leafs dressing room. He was eventually wheeled out of the building on a stretcher during the third period and taken to hospital for evaluation, according to league sources.
'He's being evaluated,' said Berube. 'That's all I've got for ya.'
Bennett did not speak with the media after the game. He was requested to talk, but Panthers PR said he would not be made available.
To be fair, this is routine for teams in the playoffs who may worry about the NHL Department of Player Safety entering the picture, not wanting a player to say anything publicly that may incriminate himself before he has a chance to explain his actions to the league. So while frustrating from a media perspective, it was probably wise for the Panthers not to have Bennett talk after the final buzzer.
As per league sources, Player Safety was looking at the incident, which is no surprise because Player Safety looks at anything that's even remotely close to crossing the line, but that doesn't necessarily mean it will rise to anything. Sources indicated early Tuesday that Bennett was unlikely to face a fine or suspension stemming from the forearm to Stolarz's head, although the decision wasn't considered final.
The Leafs, internally, felt Monday night it was worthy of a suspension.
Part of the discussion, perhaps, within the group at Player Safety might also be the fact Stolarz took a wrist shot to the head in the first period from Sam Reinhart, which knocked off the goalie's mask. Could that have also contributed to Stolarz's eventual exit?
first save of the night for Stolarz off the chin pic.twitter.com/9MF4tJSgqA
— Omar (@TicTacTOmar) May 6, 2025
Only captain Aleksander Barkov and forward Eetu Luostarinen spoke with the media after the game among Panthers players. Stolarz is a former teammate of both and was part of the Stanley Cup-winning squad last year.
Barkov said he didn't see the incident involving Bennett and Stolarz.
'I can't really say anything about it at the moment, I didn't see it, but I hope he's OK,' Barkov said of his former goalie. 'He's a big man, so hopefully he's OK.'
Panthers head coach Paul Maurice was asked what he saw from his vantage point on the visitor's bench.
'Not nearly as good as the referee's vantage point,' Maurice said, pointing to the fact there was no penalty called on the play. 'He (the ref) was standing right there. He saw it. Coaches coach. You know what, hopeful for Anthony and his health. We love that guy and we hope he gets better real fast.'
Maurice was asked a second time by late-arriving media at his news conference about the incident and reiterated his stance.
'The referee is standing right there when it happened,'' he said. 'You (the media) will do your thing, the league will do its thing. And I'll coach the next game.'
Bennett has been down this road before. He's an expert at getting under his opponents' skin and straddling the line between right and wrong.
Two years ago, he knocked Leafs forward Matthew Knies out of a second-round series in Game 2 with a concussion when he picked him up behind the net and drove him into the ice. The puck was nowhere nearby, but no supplemental discipline was handed out.
Similarly, Bennett faced no punishment during the second round against Boston last year after catching Brad Marchand with a sneaky gloved punch in Game 3 and knocking the former Bruins captain out of the series for two games.
'I think he got away with a shot, but I'm not going to complain,' Marchand, now a Panthers teammate, later said of that incident. 'S— happens. That's part of playoff hockey. I've been on the other side of a lot of plays. I think that he got away with one, but that's part of the game and definitely part of playoff hockey.'
In the heat of the moment, the Leafs didn't seem inclined to be quite so understanding.
Knies called Bennett an 'intimidating player' after the series-opening win and expressed hope that the NHL would look closely at the incident and 'protect our players.'
'When you see your teammate go down like that, it's not good,' Woll said. 'When he goes down on the ice or when he wasn't feel well coming to the bench. These guys are trying to create a family atmosphere in here, so it's just like one of your family members.'
(Photo of Anthony Stolarz: John E. Sokolowski / Imagn Images)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wild Forward Signs Contract In Czech Extraliga
Wild Forward Signs Contract In Czech Extraliga

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Wild Forward Signs Contract In Czech Extraliga

One of the Minnesota Wild's pending unrestricted free agents, Devin Shore, has signed a contract in the Czech Extraliga with the HC Sparta Praha. Shore, 30, recorded one goal and five points in 55 games for the Wild during the 2024-25 season. He was on a one-year contract worth $775,000. Advertisement He also recorded two goals and ten points in 15 games with the Iowa Wild of the American Hockey League (AHL) this season. Wild's Brock Faber Receives Norris Trophy Vote. Wild's John Hynes Receives Vote For Jack Adams Award. Wild AHL Head Coach Takes NHL Assistant Coaching Job With Vancouver Canucks. The 6-foot-1 forward has played in 498 career NHL games and recorded 52 goals, 92 assists, and 144 points in ten NHL seasons. He played on six different NHL teams and has now signed a contract in the Czech league. Photo Credit: Mar 29, 2025; Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA; Minnesota Wild center Devin Shore (19) shoots against the New Jersey Devils in the second period at Xcel Energy Center. Mandatory Credit: Matt Blewett-Imagn Images.

Miami Marlins join efforts to restore defaced Jackie Robinson and Minnie Miñoso mural
Miami Marlins join efforts to restore defaced Jackie Robinson and Minnie Miñoso mural

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Miami Marlins join efforts to restore defaced Jackie Robinson and Minnie Miñoso mural

MIAMI — The Miami Marlins are joining efforts to restore the defaced mural of baseball legends Jackie Robinson and Minnie Miñoso in Miami's Overtown neighborhood, which was marked with racist graffiti last week. City of Miami Chairwoman Christine King announced Wednesday that she along with the Marlins, Urgent, Inc., Omni Community Redevelopment Agency, Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency and other community activists will lead the restoration at Dorsey Park, where community leaders said a 7-year-old boy first discovered the vandalism last Sunday and asked his mother what the words and the Nazi symbols meant.

Prosecutor calls Michael McLeod the architect of Hockey Canada sexual assault
Prosecutor calls Michael McLeod the architect of Hockey Canada sexual assault

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Prosecutor calls Michael McLeod the architect of Hockey Canada sexual assault

LONDON, Ont. – The prosecution described Michael McLeod as the 'architect' of the 'group sexual activity' at the center of the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial and said he told 'outright lies' to portray the complainant as the aggressor in the sexual interactions of the night and advance a 'false narrative.' Advertisement Attorney Meaghan Cunningham provided Justice Maria Carroccia an outline of the Crown's argument, showing a power point in a closing submission on Wednesday that she said will demonstrate E.M. did not voluntarily agree to the charged sexual acts of the night. Cunningham began that presentation by telling Carroccia that she intended to prove E.M. did not want to engage in group sex and that McLeod repeatedly lied about his role as the orchestrator of the alleged incident. McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote are all charged with sexual assault after an alleged incident in June 2018 in which a 20-year-old woman — known as E.M., whose identity is protected by a publication ban — has said she was sexually assaulted over the span of several hours in a London, Ont., hotel room. The players were in town for a Hockey Canada event celebrating their 2018 World Junior Championship victory. McLeod is also facing a second charge for 'being a party to the offense' for what the Crown has asserted was his role 'assisting and encouraging his teammates to engage sexually' with E.M. All five players have pleaded not guilty. Cunningham highlighted that a key factual difference between the Crown and defense cases is what prompted McLeod's teammates to come to his hotel room after he and E.M. had consensual sex. She said that the factual issue will 'shape how the evidence is viewed.' The defense has asserted E.M. encouraged McLeod to invite his teammates in seeking what McLeod's attorney David Humphrey described as a 'wild night.' E.M. said that she did not know McLeod was inviting others and was 'surprised' when other men showed up in the room. Cunningham said there was no evidence to suggest that E.M. encouraged McLeod to invite teammates back to his room and laid out five elements to demonstrate why Carroccia should accept E.M.'s version of events – that she did not want group sex and was surprised by men entering the room. She pointed to 1) McLeod's 2018 police interview, 2) the June 20 text exchange between McLeod and E.M., 3) E.M.'s testimony, 4) the witness testimony of Taylor Raddysh and Boris Katchouk, and 5) McLeod's actions in 'recruiting' others to his room. Advertisement Cunningham said that McLeod was well prepared for his November 2018 interview with London Police, which took place under negotiated terms in Toronto with his attorney in the room, and yet did not make any mention of E.M. encouraging him to text his teammates. He also did not disclose the text messages he sent to a 19-person group chat and to Raddysh in the early-morning hours of June 19, 2018. He texted the group chat 'Who wants a 3 way quick' with a follow-up message providing his hotel room number. He also texted Raddysh separately to ask if he wanted a 'gummer,' which is slang for oral sex. Cunningham asked why McLeod would omit these messages in his interview with Detective Steve Newton and why, if it was true that E.M. was the initiator, he wouldn't disclose that in the interview, considering that would bolster his narrative. 'There is no logical or plausible reason why he wouldn't if it was a true fact,' Cunningham said. 'McLeod lies repeatedly to Detective Newton in that interview but it's the Crown's position that he's doing that in furtherance of a false narrative about what happened. The false narrative that Mr. McLeod is trying to craft is that he and his friends are completely innocent and that (E.M) was the instigator and the one demanding sexual activity.' In the interview, McLeod initially told Newton he didn't know why guys 'kept showing up in his room.' When asked directly whether he texted teammates, McLeod acknowledged he texted teammates he was ordering food and had a girl in his room. Cunningham said that if E.M. was the instigator of the group sexual activity, McLeod also would not have expressed the surprise and shock he conveyed to Newton in his interview about what he said was her sexually aggressive nature. 'It's not just that he forgot, it's not just that he didn't mention that he sent those texts. He outright lies to Detective Newton,' Cunningham said. 'He lies to Detective Newton repeatedly but in particular he lies to Detective Newton about the text message he sent or didn't send that night.' Advertisement Cunningham showed Carroccia the text exchange between McLeod and E.M. from June 20, 2018. In that exchange, in which McLeod asks E.M. if she went to the police, E.M. tells him she was OK going home with him but that she didn't expect others to come to the hotel room. She said she felt the players were making fun of and taking advantage of her. McLeod responded, Cunningham said, by re-framing what she said and responding that he was 'sorry that she was embarrassed' but warned about the serious 'implications' if the police matter moved forward. Cunningham said that if E.M. wasn't the instigator, as multiple players had testified, McLeod should have expressed surprise that she was upset about the other players joining them in the hotel room. Cunningham said E.M. was pressed repeatedly on the suggestion that she had prompted McLeod to invite others back to the hotel in pursuit of a 'wild night' but 'never wavered' in her testimony that she was surprised when players arrived in the room. 'Time and again she is pushed on this very same issue and her evidence is always the same, that she was surprised when other people started coming into the room and she does not think she would have ever asked for him to invite other people,' Cunningham said. Cunningham said that Raddysh and Katchouk both testified about E.M.'s behavior that was consistent with the Crown's assertion that E.M. was not seeking group sex. Both players said that they observed E.M. in bed, with the covers up to her shoulders and neck, and that she did not participate in any conversation beyond asking Katchouk for a bite of pizza. She said this was behavior consistent with someone who felt uncomfortable, not someone who was looking to engage others sexually. She said that if the defense theory was true that she was asking McLeod to ask his teammates to come over for group sex — and wanting to engage in group sex — Raddysh and Katchouk's testimony defies logic. Advertisement 'It would make no sense she would make absolutely no effort to engage or attempt to engage with Mr. Katchouk or Mr. Raddysh, not a single offer,' Cunningham said. Cunningham also pointed out that the testimony of both Raddysh and Katchouk differed significantly from other witnesses about E.M.'s behavior that night. Crown witnesses Tyler Steenbergen, Brett Howden and defense witness Carter Hart all testified that E.M. was the aggressor, asking players to have sex with her and insulting them when they declined. When Carroccia pointed out this divergence in stories, Cunningham replied: 'I agree these things are irreconcilable and someone's not telling the truth,' Cunningham said. She noted that Raddysh and Katchouk's description 'is completely at odds' with the testimony of the players who were on the June 26, 2018, group chat. In that group chat, players strategized how to handle the impending Hockey Canada investigation and discussed what to tell investigators. Cunningham said that they were the only two players who saw E.M. in Room 209 that night who were not on that June 26, 2018, group text chain. Cunningham pointed to McLeod's actions from the night to make the case that he was the instigator instead, and facilitated a group sexual encounter unbeknownst to E.M. Cunningham used a visual display of the '3 way quick' and 'gummer' text messages, sent at 2:10 and 2:15 a.m. respectively. She said McLeod made no efforts to vet who came to the room or took any efforts to get people to leave, but instead was 'trying to drum up more business' and 'recruit more people.' Cunningham cited McLeod's phone call to Hart, his recruitment of Katchouk from the hallway and his knocking on Raddysh's door as evidence of this. '(E.M.) was doing nothing either verbally or through her actions to communicate that she was at all interested in engaging in sexual activity with them,' Cunningham said. 'But the evidence does establish that someone was offering sex to Mr. McLeod's teammates in Room 209 and it wasn't (E.M.).' Advertisement Cunningham ended with the fact that by McLeod's own admissions, he said he was consistently checking in on her throughout the night, telling Detective Newton in his 2018 interview that he and his teammates had a 'no phones' policy and that at one point he 'calmed her down' because he said she was upset no one was having sex with her. Cunningham said McLeod was intervening to 'take some responsibility for managing the room' while all the events were unfolding. 'The reason he is doing that is because this was his idea to begin with,' Cunningham said. 'He set this up.' Earlier in the day, the defense teams finished their closing arguments. Julianna Greenspan, who represents Foote, said that her client performed the splits over E.M. as a 'party trick' that was both 'non-threatening,' not sexual and a 'momentary interaction.' Foote is accused of doing the splits over E.M. while she was lying on her back, grazing his genitals over her face. Greenspan said that E.M. was seeking sexual encounters and attention and that Hart's testimony that she was laughing was 'consistent with her performative behavior in the room generally.' 'In plain language, Mr. Hart's evidence was, this was in a playful manner, this was a playful trick, and (E.M.) was absolutely in on it,' Greenspan said. Greenspan spent significant time returning to the issue of E.M. referring to the players as 'men' throughout her testimony, painting the decision as intentional. Greenspan hammered this point repeatedly in cross-examination, but reinforced on Wednesday that E.M. had 'an axe to grind.' Greenspan undermined the credibility of Crown witnesses Brett Howden and Tyler Steenbergen, both of whom said Foote asked in a phone call to leave his name out of what happened in the hotel room prior to the players' participation in the Hockey Canada investigation. Advertisement Greenspan said Howden was in 'protect Howden mode' and suggested that Steenbergen was influenced by Henein Hutchison investigator Danielle Robitaille in his 2022 interview with Hockey Canada; she described that as 'an investigation intended to support and corroborate the complainant's civil lawsuit, one that Hockey Canada had just settled.' Greenspan ended her closing argument by suggesting that the intense level of publicity and interest in the case has compromised the presumption of innocence and subjected the players, their families and their legal teams to unfair treatment, such as bullying and taunting. Lisa Carnelos, attorney for Dubé, finished her closing submissions on Wednesday by arguing that her client did not engage in any collusion via the group chat he participated in with teammates on June 26, 2018 — 'This is the most lame attempt at collusion I've ever seen in my life,' she said — or in either of the phone calls he had with Tyler Steenbergen and Brett Howden. She explained the group chat as 'the banter of young men' who were 'confused' and 'expressing nervousness and shock.' Carnelos described the phone calls Dube had with both Howden and Steenbergen prior to the Hockey Canada investigation — asking them to leave his name out of interviews with Hockey Canada about the incident — as 'innocuous,' and 'context specific.' (Steenbergen testified that Dube asked him not to mention what Dube did in the room to investigators, adding that he wanted to speak for himself. Howden previously told investigators that Dube made the same request of him.) Carnelos suggested it was 'reasonable' that the call was about Dubé's desire to call Hockey Canada staff member Shawn Bullock to tell Bullock himself about what happened. Carnelos also suggested that the Hockey Canada and London Police reopened their investigations as a result of a 'media frenzy' and described the situation as a 'political hot potato.' — The Athletic's Dan Robson contributed reporting remotely from Toronto. (Courtroom sketch of Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham and Justice Maria Carroccia from earlier in the trial by Alexandra Newbould / The Canadian Press via AP)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store