Plans to scrap Shrewsbury relief road revealed ahead of election
Three opposition parties on Shropshire Council have written jointly to the government to say they will scrap Shrewsbury's north west relief road (NWRR) if they win May's election.The controversial bypass is being pursued by the current Conservative-run administration, which is hoping construction will get underway later this year and said it remained committed to it.Liberal Democrat, Labour and Green groups want it scrapped, claiming it is too expensive and will not solve traffic problems.The relief road would complete the ring road around Shrewsbury, but its cost, construction and impact on the environment has divided opinion for many years.
Funding for the road has yet to be secured by the council, despite the Conservative government promising in 2023 to "fully fund" the project using money from the second leg of HS2 being scrapped.Labour has since put the road under review, leaving a huge question mark over how the council would meet a funding shortfall of £136m should the commitment be withdrawn.It is widely predicted the project would cost more than £200m."The cost is absolutely vast, and the case for the road hasn't been made," said Rosemary Dartnall, leader of the Labour group and author of the letter that was sent to the Department for Transport."Building roads alone does not solve traffic congestion – the evidence is clearly understood. "We must be far more inventive and deal with local congestion problems where they exist while offering real alternatives to encourage residents to travel by other means," she added.
Tens of millions of pounds have already been spent on the project, and cancelling it could result in the council having to foot a bill close to £40m.Dartnall said a new administration would ask the government to help with the expenditure that has already been incurred. The NWRR would connect Churncote Island on the A5 to the west of Shrewsbury to the A528 Ellesmere Road in the north, completing an A-road circuit of Shrewsbury.It has received the backing of several healthcare and emergency services, including the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust, Shropshire Fire and Rescue Service and Police and Crime Commissioner John Campion.
Conservative council leader Lezley Picton insisted: "The Council remains clear that the case for the NWRR is strong. "It underpins the future sustainability of the local economy, the move to more sustainable transport, more effective delivery of the services local people rely on, and tackling congestion."She added that she looked forward to demonstrating the scheme's value to a government which "has stated it is determined to ensure Britain overcomes organised opposition to schemes that benefit the country".A key report into the feasibility of the bypass is unlikely to be discussed by councillors until after May's council elections.The road cannot be built until the full business case (FBC) is approved by the council and sent to the Department for Transport for its approval.A number of conditions agreed after the road was granted planning permission will need to be fulfilled before the FBC is signed off.A report will go to full council later this month, which will provide information on the cost of the road and outline possible funding options, including other sources should government funding be withdrawn.
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer warned against creating 'two tier' benefit system after U-turn
Keir Starmer said the Government's welfare reforms 'strike the right balance' after he made major concessions to Labour rebels to avoid a potential Commons defeat Keir Starmer is battling to push through watered down cuts to disability benefits as he faced warnings it would create a "two tier" system. In a dramatic climbdown, the Prime Minister offered a series of concessions to Labour rebels opposed to moves that would see hundreds of thousands of disabled people lose lifeline benefits. But campaigners said it risked "betraying the next generation of disabled people" - and some Labour MPs remain opposed ahead of a Commons vote next week. After fraught negotiations on Thursday, the Government agreed to protect all existing claimants from losing Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Plans to tighten eligibility will now only apply to new claimants from November 2026, in a reprieve to around 370,000 people who were due to lose around £4,150-a-year. And existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The original plans to reform the welfare system were designed to save around £5billion from the benefits bill by 2030. But economists said the changes will cost around £3billion, on top of around £1.5billion for the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance, leaving Chancellor Rachel Reeves to make up the shortfall. No10 failed to rule out such raising taxes to foot the bill, saying 'tax decisions are set out at fiscal events'. Today, Mr Starmer said the reforms now "strike the right balance". "It's very important that we reform the welfare system, because it doesn't work and it traps people, and therefore we're going to press ahead with the reforms," he said. "We need to get it right. That's why we've been talking to colleagues and having a constructive discussion. We've now arrived at a package that delivers on the principles with some adjustments, and that's the right reform, and I'm really pleased now that we're able to take this forward." Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the Government had listened to concerns. She told broadcasters: "I think we're in a good place now, alongside the huge investments we are putting in to create the jobs that people need in every part of the country, to get waiting lists down in the NHS, to ensure stronger rights at work, but also to make sure there's employment support for those who can work and protections for those who can't." She insisted it was "very common in the welfare system that there are protections for existing claimants". Leading rebel Meg Hillier said she would now support the bill and is expected to drop her amendment, which had been signed by 126 Labour MPs. Ms Hillier, who chairs the Commons Treasury Committee, said it was "a good deal" involving "massive changes" to protect vulnerable people - and said disabled people would be involved in designing future reforms. She said: "It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed." But Labour MP Nadia Whittome said "Even these revised proposals are nowhere near good enough and frankly are just not well thought through. It would create a two-tier system in both PIP and the UC system when somebody became disabled.' Andy McDonald, the Labour MP for Middlesbrough, said: "I'll be voting against it because it hasn't dealt with the totality of the is bringing about the change, it's just poverty delayed, or poverty postponed for millions of people in the future." Charles Gillies, Senior Policy Officer at the MS Society and Policy Co-Chair of the Disability Benefits Consortium, said: 'These supposed 'concessions' to the cuts bill are just a desperate attempt to rush through a disastrous piece of legislation. By pushing the cuts onto future claimants, the government are betraying the next generation of disabled people." He urged MPs to "stop this impending disaster" when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill comes to the Commons on Tuesday. Mikey Erhardt, Policy Lead, Disability Rights UK said: 'We completely reject the imposition of the two-tier system on offer. It is not a massive concession to have a benefit system where future generations of Disabled people receive less support than Disabled people today." He added: "By attempting to push through cruel cuts to the benefits of Disabled people, the Government prioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of Disabled citizens... the Government needs to stop playing politics with our lives." James Taylor, director of strategy at disability equality charity Scope, said: "It is encouraging that the government is starting to listen to disabled people and MPs who have been campaigning for change for months. "But these plans will still rip billions from the welfare system. The proposed concessions will create a two-tier benefits system and an unequal future for disabled people. "Life costs more if you are disabled. And these cuts will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work. "We urge the government to properly engage with disabled people and MPs on how best to reform welfare and create an equal future."
ITV News
32 minutes ago
- ITV News
Inheritance tax poses difficult decisions for Northern Ireland farmers
Getting your head around numbers can sometimes be a difficult task. Even more so when it comes to exactly what Northern Ireland's farming community has had to do though, in just a few the end of 2024, the Labour government said it was going to remove relief on inheritance tax for farmers. From April 2026, agricultural assets which total over £1m will be taxed at a rate of 20%.That includes animals, buildings and land - with change now looming for many farms in Northern have been exempt from Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief for many years but that could now be was a decision not welcomed by many farmers then, and even now, including dairy farmer Keith runs a large operation just outside of Newry, Co Down.'The simple fact is that the sector isn't profitable enough whenever you count the valuation of property, to be able to sustain this for one generation, never mind two.'Keith spoke to UTV at Markethill Livestock Sales in Co Armagh. Dairy and beef cattle were being sold on the day of filming and interest was still strong, but under it all, lay concern for what the future Hewitt is the man behind the microphone and the man who coordinates the sales. 'They (the government) have brought these proposals in, genuinely without thinking about it and not realising the knock-on effect,' he added that he was worried about the 'long-term' effects on farmers and other way farms can be exempt from the new proposals is if the family farm is gifted, but the donor must live on it for seven years Kinnear was forced into adapting, not by his own father John died in 2017, leaving the family farm in Derrynoose to his mother Shirley before she passed it on to Timothy.'Something so simple can absolutely obliterate farming,' he told UTV.'If they (the government) don't watch themselves, they will do away with Irish produce.'If inheritance tax hit me today, I would have to sell a third of the place and if I was to sell a third of the place there wouldn't be enough income to support me or if I was to have a future family.'The Ulster Farmers' Union is urging the government to take on the concerns of farmers in Northern Ireland.'It is gut-wrenching and really does pull on the heartstrings, some of the things which farmers are actually considering,' said James McCluggage from the union.'We need to see some sort of morality clause in there for the elderly, for the disabled, for those who are incapacitated, that [sic] can't make a decision or cannot get plans in place at the moment.'The government says the changes won't affect every farmer and that they are necessary to better fund public a statement, a spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: 'Our commitment to farming and food security is steadfast, which is why we've allocated a record £11.8billion to sustainable farming and food production over this parliament. 'We are also slashing costs and red tape for food producers to export to the EU, have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to recommend reforms to boost farmers' profits, and we're ensuring farmers get a bigger share of food contracts across our schools, hospitals, and prisons.'For now, the industry looks determined to continue speaking up as farmers prepare to count the cost of change, whatever it may be. On Friday UTV were joined by Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir to address the central issues within the farming community.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Welfare row shows how Keir Starmer is Labour's Liz Truss
KEIR Starmer has been hanging about with Donald Trump too much. While the US president can get away with disregarding his legislature, Starmer cannot. As the leader of a parliamentary democracy, the Prime Minister does not have the luxury of signing executive orders and changing government policy with a stroke of his pen. Starmer is frequently compared – by the kind of nerds that do this stuff for fun – to Rishi Sunak. Both men are charisma vacuums, neither's vibes align with the messages they send out, both come across like dull technocrats infected with more than a little entitlement. But is Starmer actually more like Liz Truss? I think so. Starmer is less obviously mad than his predecessor-but-one. However, they share a key defining detail: both would happily dispense with democracy if given the chance. It's a little bit too much like hard work. The Prime Minister has tried to compromise with his welfare cuts rebels – after more than 100 Starmerbots suddenly found a spine this week and threatened to kill his benefits reforms. The minor concessions they've reportedly extracted result in a strange offer where existing Personal Independence Payment (Pip) claimants get to keep their current rate of support, while new claimants will be subjected to tougher qualifying tests. Among other issues, it undermines the Government's insistence that this is about getting people off benefits. Who would now ever risk coming off Pip faced with the threat of it becoming much harder to qualify if they reapply? READ MORE: Labour's 'minor' climbdown will leave benefits system 'woefully inadequate' Truss's greatest failure as prime minister, beyond her truly batty policy platform, was her inability to bring her party with her. In the end, they came for her. Starmer may have avoided total humiliation in this week's welfare debacle, if the rebels decide his terms are acceptable. But this fight was the result of his complete lack of political instincts. It reeked of a man who had grown used to people enquiring about height when he makes demands with regards jumping. Through the persecution of internal enemies and aided by the desperate belief that Starmer and his consigliere/puppet master (delete as you see fit), Morgan McSweeney (below), knew what they were doing, dissent became a foreign custom in the Labour Party. But, still smarting from the humiliation of defending the Winter Fuel Payment cut only for the Government to U-turn, MPs found their voices. Ministerial jobs and rewards for loyalty are few. Many MPs sit on majorities which must keep them awake at night. They resolved to take a stand; whether that was done entirely selflessly is up for debate. The Prime Minister has shown his MPs vanishingly little respect and it is in this that I have the most sympathy for him. No one understands better than I what a dismal prospect it is to spend your precious time on Earth talking to Labour MPs. But if that's the job, then you grow up and get on with it. Starmer's authoritarian instincts may prove more successful were he not so indecisive. But, like his mentor Trump, he picks a position, defends it with every fibre of his being, then discards it without a second thought. While he may have won the benefits battle, it has exposed rifts and a level of ill-feeling towards the PM among his own troops that suggest his woes are far from over. You can get the Worst of Westminster delivered straight to your email inbox for FREE every Friday at 6pm by clicking here.
