Shoplifting pals handed themselves in after being featured on ‘Crimecall' stealing €1.6k groceries
Caroline Collins (27) and Nellie Collins (29) filled a shopping trolley with goods and walked out of a Tesco without paying, a court heard
Two friends who stole €1,600 worth of groceries from a supermarket handed themselves in to gardaí when they saw the theft featured on RTÉ's Crimecall.
Caroline Collins (27) and Nellie Collins (29) filled a shopping trolley with goods and walked out of a Tesco without paying, a court heard.
Judge Aine Clancy said she would spare them criminal convictions if they paid compensation to the shop.
The accused, both with addresses at Cara Park, Coolock, Dublin, pleaded guilty at Blanchardstown District Court to theft.
Garda Sergeant Maria Callaghan said the accused entered a Tesco in Adamstown, Lucan, on January 3, 2024, put €1,600 worth of assorted groceries into a trolley and then passed all points of payment.
The incident was captured on camera and subsequently featured on RTÉ's Crimecall programme, Sgt Callaghan said.
Nellie Collins, charged with theft.
The pair handed themselves in to Coolock garda station, where they were arrested and charged but the property was not recovered.
Caroline Collins, who was from a Traveller background, was having difficulties at the time and was 'racking up debts', her solicitor Simon Fleming said.
She had since got a job and was now working as a healthcare assistant after getting a diploma, the court heard.
'She came forward when she saw the photos' on Crimecall, Mr Fleming said.
Caroline Collins would lose her employment if a conviction was recorded against her, he said, asking the judge for leniency.
The court heard the circumstances were similar for the co-accused, Nellie Collins.
Judge Clancy asked if the accused were related to each other and Mr Fleming said the two women were friends.
The judge said it was a 'very serious theft' and said the quantity of groceries taken was 'a lot' but she would strike the case out, leaving both accused without criminal records if they made 'full restitution' of the €1,600 between them.
However, she said she would convict them and fine them €800 each in default.
The accused were remanded on continuing bail to appear in court again on a date in November.
The court heard free legal aid had been granted.
Caroline Collins, charged with theft.
News in 90 June 4th
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, June 7th: on nursing home revelations, Trump versus Musk and bird droppings
Sir, – It is 20 years, almost to the day, since RTÉ broadcast the Prime Time Investigates documentary which revealed the horrors of Leas Cross nursing home in Dublin. On Wednesday, further outstanding investigative journalism by RTÉ revealed yet more horror stories in Ireland's private nursing home sector. I have no words to adequately describe the anger, profound sadness and deep frustration I felt as I watched frail, vulnerable, elderly people being denied the most basic care. As I listened to frightened residents begging and pleading for help, I also felt an overwhelming sense of the deepest fear. READ MORE My mother lived with dementia for 20 years. She has a strong family history of dementia and all her siblings have either succumbed to, or are living with, Alzheimer's disease. I cared for my mother at home for many years. I am forever thankful that she received excellent quality care, and extended care, in both our acute and voluntary hospitals. Developing dementia is one of my greatest fears. I have no family. There will be nobody to fight for good care for me, or to advocate for me, should I also succumb to dementia. When I watched frail elderly residents with dementia being treated so horrifically on the RTÉ Investigates documentary this week, I despaired. Those residents were the victims of blatant abuse. Residents with advanced dementia would most likely be unable to accurately explain their experiences to anybody, or to identify their abusers. That also makes them easy targets for such abuse. I concluded that, should I ever be diagnosed with dementia and reach that stage of illness and dependency, I would rather not be alive than be at the mercy of such so-called 'care providers'. Twenty years after Leas Cross such horrors are still happening. What does it take to make this stop? Or will this latest horror simply result in more transient outrage, more eloquent statements and yet more empty promises, until the next time? Is there always going to be a next time? – Yours, etc, BERNADETTE BRADY (PHD), Rathfarnham, Dublin. Sir, – The RTÉ Investigates programme, Inside Ireland's Nursing Homes, was truly disturbing. RTÉ and all who contributed to the making of the programme, both to camera and undercover, deserve our thanks. It does however raise some important questions which a follow-on programme might wish to address. Twenty-five years after the Leas Cross scandal, and the follow-on establishment of the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa), how come care in congregated settings is increasingly provided in large for profit facilities (a worrying trend to which Hiqa has drawn attention) and what difference would it make if the Health Service Executive (HSE) were to build and run more such facilities? How come private and voluntary (non-HSE) nursing homes are not part of the overall planning process for integrated services in the six new regional HSE organisations, despite a clearly identified need to improve clinical governance across the sector as suggested by the expert group on nursing homes which reported during the Covid pandemic? Where is the evidence of follow through on all the recommendations for the development of a wider range of alternatives to nursing homes, including the development of small scale 'Household / Teaghleach'models of nursing home and congregated care? Why is the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF), essentially a medical procedures agency, still involved in 'purchasing' care for older people through a nursing home support scheme (Fair Deal) administered by the HSE across all nursing homes (most of which it does not control) while the regulator, Hiqa, has no role in regulating the payment levels to those nursing homes? Why is the Law Reform Commission report on adult safeguarding, published in April 2024, not being progressed with urgency by the Oireachtas given that the report included draft legislation? The RTÉ programme concerned two nursing homes owned by Emeis, formerly Orpea. There is plenty of information available concerning Orpea, particularly in France (where it was partially nationalised), to have at least raised concerns. There must have been some awareness of this and consideration of the possible consequences for older people in Ireland when they were allowed operate in the Irish market. It is interesting to note that the group's facility in Portlaoise is described as a nursing home but with a capacity for 101 residents it is not far off the size of Portlaoise hospital. To describe such a facility as a 'home from home' is seriously mistaken. The images of abusive and cruel behaviour and of residents corralled into one room are more suggestive of a human warehouse than a home. Finally, for all those many staff currently providing care in nursing homes to the highest standard they possibly can, in the often difficult circumstances in which they find themselves, it would be helpful if they could rely on a public system of support and guidance, including clinical support and governance, to deal with issues and concerns at short notice rather than having to await an occasional inspection from the regulator followed by a report some while later. Regulation and inspection are important but they are no longer enough. Practical supports to encourage quality care are far more likely to pick up on issues and have them addressed as they arise. – Yours ,etc. MERVYN TAYLOR, Stillorgan, Dublin. Sir, – The RTÉ Investigates programme laid bare the inhumane treatment of vulnerable residents in private nursing homes – many of whom are paying exorbitant fees of €1,400 per week. At such a staggering cost, these individuals could instead receive dignified, high-quality home care in the comfort of their own communities. That these abuses persist is a damning indictment of systemic failure. Hiqa, tasked with safeguarding standards, has clearly failed residents, families, and the State. Paper-based inspections and sporadic visits are not enough to prevent cruelty behind closed doors. If we are serious about accountability, Hiqa must have a permanent, on-the-ground presence in every facility, with 24/7 monitoring via live video feeds covering all areas – excluding only private bathrooms for dignity. Modern technology makes this feasible; what's lacking is political will. Why not implement this? If prisons and childcare centres can adopt stringent oversight, why not nursing homes, where our most fragile citizens reside? Until real-time transparency is enforced, families will never trust that their loved ones are safe. This isn't just about regulation – it's about basic humanity. – Yours, etc, PETER MALBASHA, Co Dublin. Sir, – This nursing care scandal has scared many people. My 80-year-old mother has just told me how, as she was lighting her candles for her grandchildren sitting their Leaving Certificate, she also lit one for herself. Her prayer is that she doesn't fall, break her hip and end up in a nursing home like that. Calling for help, with no one answering. I hope our Minister for Older People is listening, because this is a loud voting issue. – Yours, etc, CARMEL DOYLE, Beaumont Woods, Dublin 9. Trade union dues Sir, – Do I get a hint of disdain in Barry Walsh's letter (June 5th) about unions suggesting all should pay dues whether a union member or not ? He wonders why the general secretary of Fórsa earns three times the average pay. Does he suggest they earn the same as a shop-floor worker? I have been lucky to have been a union member most of my working life especially having been made redundant once. I do think it unfair that some colleagues refuse to join a union but at the same time are more than happy to accept the pay and benefits that a union has negotiated or earned, often by its members having to strike. – Yours, etc, ENDA SCANLON, Ennis, Co Clare. Trinity College and Israel Sir, – In deciding to boycott and divest from Israel, Trinity College Dublin has, in my view, abandoned the key principle of institutional neutrality which should underpin the actions of a serious university. In 1967, the University of Chicago led the way on this fundamental issue during the white heat of the campus riots across America during the Vietnam War and apartheid in South Africa. The faculty debated how a university should respond to the burning political and social issues of the day. When passions are running high, what should a university say or do when activists demand it choose sides and take action? Chicago's conclusion was straightforward: the university must remain neutral in order to meet its long-term core mission of the 'discovery, improvement, and dissemination of knowledge'. This did not mean ignoring difficult issues. Faculty and students must have full freedom of criticism, dissent and open inquiry, but the university itself 'is the home and sponsor of critics; it is not itself the critic'. Bizarrely, the board's chairman noted explicitly in a message to the college community that while Trinity is engaged in a number of EU-funded research consortia which include Israeli partners 'here is no evidence to associate any of these with breaches of international humanitarian law or human rights violations.' So what is Trinity's problem with individual Israeli academics and universities who are often eloquent critics of their governments' actions and policies? Is it not overreach to insist that the 'college should seek to align itself with like-minded universities and bodies in an effort to influence EU policy concerning Israel's participation in such collaborations?' So many questions remain unanswered. Can Trinity's decades long partnerships with Intel continue when the tech firm is thought to be Ireland's biggest importer of Israeli goods, most from its sister factory in Kiryat Gat? Are Trinity's teaching hospitals, St James's and Tallaght, now prohibited from accessing Israeli medical products and pharmaceuticals? Can Trinity's partnerships with American universities and companies continue given stringent US anti-boycott legislation? What now for Trinity's Herzog Centre, the only institution in Ireland offering Jewish studies, when your university has decided to boycott the world's only Jewish state? In singling out Israel alone for boycott and divestment while maintaining ties with other countries with well-documented human rights violations, Trinity has opened itself to the charge of institutional anti-Semitism and racism. I am ashamed of my alma mater. – Yours, etc, DR JANE MAHONY, BA (Mod), PhD, Trinity College, Dublin. Birds dropping Sir, – Reading Frank McNally's column on the provenance of James 'Skin the Goat' Fitzharris's reflection on informers , I wonder if it may come from the belief held in many places that being shat on by a bird is a sign of good luck? Personally I have never held much store in this, having been the victim many years ago on Brighton seafront of a seagull who had had a very large lunch, resulting in my repair to the nearest boutique to purchase a fresh T-shirt. That said, perhaps the informer never overflown will never again have the gift of good luck? – Yours, etc. JOHN F MCELHONE, Co Donegal. Critical climate omission Sir, – That there is a report by the Environmental Protection Agency about global warming´s effect on Ireland is welcome. ( 'Communications, transport and health of older people at increased risk from global warming, says EPA,' June 3rd). Frightening as it is in its current form, the report has a critical omission. It is has not addressed the dramatic effects of the weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (Amoc). In lay man's terms, this ocean current keeps Ireland habitable. Otherwise it would have the climatic conditions of southern Alaska and Canada's Hudson Bay. The weakening or ending of the Amoc is probable. It is certainly an existential threat to Ireland. Ireland is not geared for an average winter temperature of –18 degrees. It is presently comfortably above 0 degrees. It is very surprising that the EPA has decided not to include this essential element. Policymakers need all the information to get to comprehend the scale of the challenge. The Irish Government, regardless of its political hue, needs to understand the new business as usual will involve planning and action to protect the State and its citizens. I don't believe that the timescale is as long as many politicians assume. One of the stand-out facts from my Earth Science education (1992) was the speed of climate change. The Younger Dryas climatic period ended over less than 50 years, so starting our current phase. Climate systems are stable until they are not. – Yours, etc, RICHARD HERRIOTT, Aarhus, Denmark. Trumping Trump v Musk Sir, – We can all now relax and enjoy watching the world's two biggest egos burn themselves out in front of a potential audience of billions. Could this be the template for settling all global disputes in the future? Yours, etc, NIALL GINTY, Killester, Dublin. Sir, – The very serious online and very public spat between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man is a 'big beautiful example' of how reciprocity works in real time. – Yours, etc, NOIRIN HEALY, Goatstown, Dublin. Sir, – In the very public, very dirty divorce between Trump and Musk who will get custody of JD Vance? – Yours, etc, BRID MILLER, Athlone Road, Roscommon. Sir, – I wonder did Elon Musk realise how his social media platform X would become really so apt! – Yours, etc, AIDAN RODDY, Cabinteely, Dublin 18. Funding and the arts Sir, – The tenor of Yvonne O'Reilly's letter about funding the arts in yesterday's letters page chimed with the findings of a research project I recently undertook with colleagues from Queen's University, Belfast, and Liverpool University into a wide range of 'Arts for Peace' projects in Northern Ireland. Too often what passes for evaluation is really about accountability with funded organisations wanting to assure funders they have achieved their set goals. Funders for their part tend to see it as a purely administrative process, with vasts amount of data going largely unanalysed. But the value of this data must be questionable given the limited scope for acknowledging what is learnt from unsuccessful aspects of funded projects and outcomes that were not envisaged at the time of application. I can reassure your correspondent, however, that there are examples of good practice out there that will hopefully in due course inform a more productive evaluation culture. – Yours, etc. DAVID GRANT, School of Arts, English, and Languages, Queen's University, Belfast.
Irish Examiner
7 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Gareth O'Callaghan: A woman's house should be a home – not a place of fear and fatal control
A wise man in criminal law once told me that a defendant who has pleaded not guilty to a crime he knows he committed fears nothing more during his trial than the eyes of the judge. Perhaps that explains why Richard Satchwell rarely looked up at the bench during the trial that found him guilty of the murder of his wife. A chilling silence descended on the packed courtroom at the Central Criminal Court last Wednesday morning just as Mr Justice Paul McDermott handed down the mandatory life sentence to the former lorry driver. I wondered what Satchwell must have been thinking as he kept his head bowed – if he felt remorse; then I realised that a man who had hidden his wife's body for six years in a secret grave he dug under the stairs of their home, while courting national publicity in an attempt to convince people he loved her, and would give anything to welcome her home, was emotionally stunted. His only regret was that he got caught. Did he love his wife? It's possible. Love is just one ingredient that feeds into a narcissistic relationship, and the coercive control he exerted on their marriage. Richard Satchwell leaving the District Court in Cashel, Co Tipperary, in October 2023. Did he love his wife? It's possible. Love is just one ingredient that feeds into a narcissistic relationship, and the coercive control he exerted on their marriage. File picture It's not the type of love most decent people understand. It's a love perverted that stems from slavish ownership, with terms and conditions that become more brutal as time passes. Sexual jealousy, anger and control are a deadly cocktail. Self-absorbed and selfish, Satchwell now takes his place in that rogues' gallery of notorious wife killers who include, among others, Joe O'Reilly, Brian Kearney, and Eamonn Lillis. O'Reilly murdered his wife Rachel in 2004 by bludgeoning her to death with a dumbbell, while staging it to look like she had disturbed a burglar who panicked and killed her. His appearance on The Late Late Show, sitting beside Rachel's mother, as he suggested 'theories' to an incredulous Pat Kenny on who could have murdered his wife, was a jaw-dropping moment in television history. Joe O'Reilly's (right) appearance on The Late Late Show, sitting beside Rachel's mother (left), as he suggested 'theories' to an incredulous Pat Kenny on who could have murdered his wife, was a jaw-dropping moment in television history. File picture: RTÉ/Rose Callaly He even showed journalists down the dimly-lit hallway to the bedroom in their home where he had murdered his wife barely three weeks earlier, as though it was a magical mystery tour. Her murder was meticulously planned, or so he thought. Siobhán McLaughlin was murdered by her husband Brian Kearney in 2006, while her three-year-old son played downstairs. Kearney strangled his wife in her bedroom with the flex of a vacuum cleaner, before trying to hoist her over the en-suite door in an attempt to make it look like suicide. He then locked the bedroom door, slipped the key under it, and left, leaving the three-year-old alone in the house. Siobhán was in the process of 'trying to leave a very unhappy marriage' when Kearney murdered her, her sister Brighid told Newstalk. She had even taken to hiding money in the hot press so that she could eventually escape from her husband's abuse. Kearney was refused parole last year. Eamonn Lillis beat his wife, Celine Cawley, to death with a brick in 2008, making it appear – like O'Reilly – as though she had disturbed a burglar. Following his release in 2015, Lillis picked up more than €1 million from his share of business and property assets owned by the couple. He served barely five years for the manslaughter of his wife. He now lives abroad. What's equally damning is that the attacker in each of these killings could have stopped his vicious assault and called for immediate help while his victim was alive, but didn't. In Lillis's case, he delayed calling an ambulance by almost 15 minutes to give him time to change out of his bloodied clothes and hide them. Following his release in 2015, Eamonn Lillis picked up more than €1 million from his share of business and property assets owned by the couple. Photo: Julien Behal/PA So if they loved them, then why did they kill them? Why not just call it quits and walk away? Why would a husband kill his wife when the chances of avoiding a conviction and prison sentence are massively stacked against him? According to recent statistics from Women's Aid, 275 women have died violently in Ireland at the hands of men since 1996 – an average of nine women every year. 87% were killed by a man they knew. 179 of them were killed in their own homes. Lucy Freeman, the American writer best known for her articles on psychiatry and mental health in The New York Times, once wrote: 'Murder is the apex of megalomania, the ultimate in control.' Her words resonate with relationships that are hinged on coercive control, where the man demands to know his female partner's whereabouts at all times, where social connections to family and friends are discouraged, where freedom of movement is restricted. Years of research has shown that it's mostly inadequate men with fragile egos who kill women. They hate their own vulnerability, which can only be overcome by the subordination of others – mostly their wives and female partners. Sarah, the partner of a close friend, agreed to talk to me recently about her former husband who she eventually left after years of physical and emotional abuse, including a threat to her life that finally made her realise he might kill her. 'It was only in hindsight, when I'd left him and it was all over, I realised I'd lost contact with everyone. If my mother asked us over, he'd always find an excuse. "'We're not going,' he'd tell me. He wouldn't allow me socialise with them. He refused to give me money, even though I paid all the bills out of my own wages. If I walked the dog, he'd follow me. 'Anytime I disagreed with him, or if I tried to defend myself, I'd get the silent treatment for days. Then he'd force me to say sorry. Whenever he hit me or kicked me, he'd pretend to be upset and apologise. 'Why don't you hit me back? You'll feel better,' he'd say. "Some days I came home from work to find he'd emptied the fridge of the little treats I liked; then he'd tell me I'd eaten them – 'because you're a fat pig,' he'd say laughing. 'One day I overheard him saying to someone on the phone that he'd kill me, if only he could get away with it. I packed what I could and went back home to my mother.' Richard Satchwell now takes his place in Ireland's rogues' gallery of notorious wife killers. File picture I asked Sarah if she had ever told him she would leave him. 'It was all I thought about but I was terrified to tell him. I actually thought he'd kill me on the spot. I left in the middle of the night when I knew he was asleep.' Research shows the time of highest risk for a potential victim is during the period where she has made it known she plans to end the marriage. That's almost always the trigger for the abuser because the person they have so successfully controlled for years is now choosing to leave them. Richard Satchwell told gardaí his wife had 'mentioned 200 or 300 times over the previous 15 years' that she was going to leave him, but, as with the rest of this tragic story, we only have his word for this. Even after leaving her abuser, a woman is still not safe – as the tragic case of Australian Hannah Clarke showed in 2020. Clarke was stalked by her former partner Rowan Baxter, who doused her and their three children in petrol and burnt them to death in the family car before killing himself. It's hard to believe that the family home is the most dangerous place in the world for women (and children), when it should be the safest. It's far more effective to disrupt violent male partners than it is to change them. That disruption can only come from family or friends who detect a shift in behaviour. If you're being shut out by someone you love, you have a duty to them to know why. A strong indicator that all's not well in the life of your daughter – or your sister or friend – is that persistent feeling you get that something is just not right. Act on it. At least you'll always know you asked. If you don't, it could be the cross you'll bear for the rest of your life.
Sunday World
13 hours ago
- Sunday World
Man jailed for peeing in Garda cell after his arrest
When he was put into the holding cell, Andrew O'Neill urinated on a cell door A Dublin man has been jailed for two months for urinating in a Garda cell in Co Donegal after he was arrested. Andrew O'Neill appeared at Letterkenny District Court after a drunken episode at Letterkenny bus station on April 3rd, 2024. The 34-year-old was drunk and becoming aggressive with a bus driver at 1.35pm on the day in question. Gardai were called and O'Neill, of Gardiner Street in Dublin, was arrested and taken to Letterkenny Garda Station and was searched. Stock image News in 90 Seconds - 6th June 2025 A quantity of drugs with a street value of €40 was found on the accused. When he was put into the holding cell, O'Neill urinated on a cell door. He was charged with causing criminal damage, being intoxicated in a public place and failing to comply with the directions of An Garda Siochana. O'Neill, who has 58 previous convictions including many under the Misuse of Drugs Act, is currently in custody on other matters. Solicitor for the accused, Mr Rory O'Brien said his client had come to Donegal from his native Dublin in a bid to kick his drug habit. On the day he was under the influence and Mr O'Brien said his client regrets all that happened. He added that when this happened he was on a "downward spiral" through alcohol and that he continues to need a significant amount of assistance for his addiction. Judge Eiteain Cunningham put it to Garda Sergeant Jim Collins that she presumed the station cell required a "deep clean" following the incident adding that this was simply "not acceptable behaviour." Judge Cunningham sentenced O'Neill to two months in prison for the criminal damage charge and took the other charges into consideration.
