logo
L.A. City Council approves $14-billion budget, scaling back Bass' public safety plans

L.A. City Council approves $14-billion budget, scaling back Bass' public safety plans

The Los Angeles City Council signed off on a $14-billion spending plan for 2025-26 on Thursday, scaling back Mayor Karen Bass' public safety initiatives as they attempted to spare 1,000 city workers from layoffs.
Faced with a nearly $1-billion budget shortfall, the council voted 12 to 3 for a plan that would cut funding for recruitment at the Los Angeles Police Department, leaving the agency with fewer officers than at any point since 1995.
The council provided enough money for the LAPD to hire 240 new officers over the coming year, down from the 480 proposed by Bass last month. That reduction would leave the LAPD with about 8,400 officers in June 2026, down from about 8,700 this year and 10,000 in 2020.
The council also scaled back the number of new hires the mayor proposed for the Los Angeles Fire Department in the wake of the wildfire that ravaged huge stretches of Pacific Palisades.
Bass' budget called for the hiring of 227 additional fire department employees. The council provided funding for the department to expand by an estimated 58 employees.
Three council members — John Lee, Traci Park and Monica Rodriguez — voted against the budget, in large part due to cost-cutting efforts at the two public safety agencies. Park, whose district includes Pacific Palisades, voiced alarm over those and other reductions.
'I just can't in good conscience vote for a budget that makes our city less safe, less physically sound and even less responsive to our constituents,' she said.
Rodriguez offered a similar message, saying the council should have shifted more money out of Inside Safe, Bass' signature program to address homelessness. That program, which received a 10% cut, lacks oversight and has been extraordinarily expensive, said Rodriguez, who represents the northeast San Fernando Valley.
'Inside Safe currently spends upwards of $7,000 a month to house a single individual. That's just room and board and services,' she said. 'That doesn't include all of the other ancillary services that are tapped from our city family in order to make it work, including LAPD overtime, including sanitation services, including the Department of Transportation.'
Councilmember Tim McOsker, who sits on the budget committee, said the fire department would still see an overall increase in funding under the council's budget. Putting more money into the police and fire departments would mean laying off workers who fix streets, curbs and sidewalks, said McOsker, who represents neighborhoods stretching from Watts south to L.A.'s harbor.
McOsker said it's still possible that the city could increase funding for LAPD recruitment if the city's economic picture improves or other savings are identified in the budget. The council authorized the LAPD to ramp up hiring if more money can be found later in the year.
'I would love to put ourselves in a position where we could hire more than 240 officers, and maybe we will. I don't know. But today we can't,' McOsker told his colleagues.
Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, who joined the council in December, also defended the budget plan, saying it would help create 'a more just, equitable and inclusive Los Angeles.'
'This budget doesn't fix everything. It doesn't close every gap. But it does show a willingness to make some structural changes,' she said.
Bass aides did not immediately respond to inquiries about the council's actions. A second budget vote by the council is required next week before the plan can head to the mayor's desk for her consideration.
Bass' spending plan proposed about 1,600 city employee layoffs over the coming year, with deep reductions in agencies that handle trash pickup, streetlight repair and city planning. The decisions made Thursday would reduce the number to around 700, said City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo, who helps prepare the spending plan.
The remaining layoffs could still be avoided if the city's unions offer financial concessions, said Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky, who heads the council's budget committee. For example, she said, civilian city workers could cut costs by taking four to five unpaid furlough days.
'My goal, my fervent goal and hope, is that labor comes to the table and says 'We'll take some furloughs, we'll take some comp time off,'' Yaroslavsky said.
The city entered a full-blown financial crisis earlier this year, driven in large part by rapidly rising legal payouts, weaker than expected tax revenues and scheduled raises for city employees. Those pay increases are expected to consume $250 million over the coming fiscal year.
To bring the city's budget into balance, council members tapped $29 million in the city's budget stabilization fund, which was set up to help the city weather periods of slower economic growth. They took steps to collect an extra $20 million in business tax revenue. And they backed a plan to hike the cost of parking tickets, which could generate another $14 million.
At the same time, the council scaled back an array of cuts proposed in Bass' budget. Over the course of Thursday's six-hour meeting, the council:
* Restored positions at the Department of Cultural Affairs, averting the closure of the historic Hollyhock House in East Hollywood, protecting its status as a UNESCO World Heritage site.
* Provided the funds to continue operating the Climate Emergency Mobilization Office, which had been threatened with elimination.
* Provided $1 million for Represent LA, which pays for legal defense of residents facing deportation, detention or other immigration proceedings. That funding would have been eliminated under Bass' original proposal, Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez said.
* Moved $5 million into the animal services department — a move requested by Bass — to ensure that all of the city's animal shelters remain open.
* Restored funding for streetlight repairs, street resurfacing and removal of 'bulky items,' such as mattresses and couches, from sidewalks and alleys.
Even with those changes, the city is still facing the potential for hundreds of layoffs, around a third of them at the LAPD.
Although the council saved the jobs of an estimated 150 civilian workers in that department — many of them specialists, such as workers who handle DNA rape kits — another 250 are still targeted for layoff.
'We took a horrible budget proposal, and we made it into one that is just very bad,' said Councilmember Bob Blumenfield, who represents part of the west San Fernando Valley. 'It took a lot of work to do that, but it is better and we did save jobs. But the fundamentals are still very bad.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bass wasn't the only one deleting texts during the firestorms. Supervisor Barger did too
Bass wasn't the only one deleting texts during the firestorms. Supervisor Barger did too

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bass wasn't the only one deleting texts during the firestorms. Supervisor Barger did too

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has come under heavy scrutiny for deleting the text messages she sent during the region's disastrous January firestorms. But she wasn't the only elected official expunging her correspondence during those history-making days. L.A. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger, who represents the area devastated by the Eaton fire, also routinely deletes her text messages, her spokesperson said. "Supervisor Barger's iPhone auto-delete setting is set to 30 days. She also manually deletes her texts sometimes," Barger spokesperson Helen Chavez Garcia said last month. The Times filed a public records request for Barger's communications with Bass from Jan. 7 through late February. Barger's office provided no written communications in response, despite Barger having publicly said that she was texting with Bass late into the night on Jan. 7, while Bass was in transit back to the city after a diplomatic trip to Ghana. The other four supervisors — Lindsey Horvath, Hilda Solis, Holly Mitchell and Janice Hahn — do not use the auto-delete function on their phones, according to their spokespeople. Chavez Garcia said in an email that there is "no pre-determined method that the Supervisor applies when selecting which messages to manually delete." Constance Farrell, a spokesperson for Horvath, said her understanding was that county officials were supposed to retain their text messages for two years to comply with the county's record retention policy. Horvath's office released some of her text messages in February after a Times public records request. The messages showed the supervisor sparring with Bass during the fires. The county record retention guidelines make no mention of text messages but say that routine "administrative records" are supposed to be kept for two years. The board's executive office said the public record act applies to text messages, though some may be exempt from disclosure. "Whether a supervisor's text is a public record depends on whether it is a text regarding the conduct of the peoples' business," Steven Hernandez, the chief deputy for the executive office, said in a statement. According to county policy, employees must sign an agreement every year acknowledging that all electronic communications, such as emails or instant messages, sent on county devices are the property of the county. Bass previously kept her phone on a 30-day auto-delete setting, far shorter than the two-year retention period outlined in the city's administrative code. However, after being pressed by The Times, which had filed public records requests for the mayor's correspondence during the Palisades fire, Bass' office said it was able to recover the deleted messages using 'specialized technology.' Read more: L.A. mayor's text messages provide vivid window into early fire response (The Times sued the city in March over the mayor's texts. Even though city officials ultimately provided some texts, The Times is contesting the city's argument that releasing them was not required under state law.) It also remains unclear whether Los Angeles City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, who was filling in as acting mayor in Bass' stead when the fires broke out, deleted his text messages from that time period. After The Times filed a public records request seeking correspondence that Harris-Dawson sent to Bass or received from her between Jan. 6 and Jan. 16, Harris-Dawson's office said it had "no responsive records." Harris-Dawson's office did not respond to repeated questions over the course of several months about why there was no correspondence and whether it had been deleted. "It's very disappointing to see that that practice has spilled over up the street [to the County]. I was hoping it was just L.A. City Hall shenanigans and the absurdities of our two big leaders," said Unrig LA founder Rob Quan, referring to Bass and Harris-Dawson. Quan, who leads a transparency-focused good-government advocacy group, said he believed proper recordkeeping from January was all the more important given the historic importance of the fires. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Bass wasn't the only one deleting texts during the firestorms. Supervisor Barger did too
Bass wasn't the only one deleting texts during the firestorms. Supervisor Barger did too

Los Angeles Times

time10 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Bass wasn't the only one deleting texts during the firestorms. Supervisor Barger did too

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has come under heavy scrutiny for deleting the text messages she sent during the region's disastrous January firestorms. But she wasn't the only elected official expunging her correspondence during those history-making days. L.A. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger, who represents the area devastated by the Eaton fire, also routinely deletes her text messages, her spokesperson said. 'Supervisor Barger's iPhone auto-delete setting is set to 30 days. She also manually deletes her texts sometimes,' Barger spokesperson Helen Chavez Garcia said last month. The Times filed a public records request for Barger's communications with Bass from Jan. 7 through late February. Barger's office provided no written communications in response, despite Barger having publicly said that she was texting with Bass late into the night on Jan. 7, while Bass was in transit back to the city after a diplomatic trip to Ghana. The other four supervisors — Lindsey Horvath, Hilda Solis, Holly Mitchell and Janice Hahn — do not use the auto-delete function on their phones, according to their spokespeople. Chavez Garcia said in an email that there is 'no pre-determined method that the Supervisor applies when selecting which messages to manually delete.' Constance Farrell, a spokesperson for Horvath, said her understanding was that county officials were supposed to retain their text messages for two years to comply with the county's record retention policy. Horvath's office released some of her text messages in February after a Times public records request. The messages showed the supervisor sparring with Bass during the fires. The county record retention guidelines make no mention of text messages but say that routine 'administrative records' are supposed to be kept for two years. The board's executive office said the public record act applies to text messages, though some may be exempt from disclosure. 'Whether a supervisor's text is a public record depends on whether it is a text regarding the conduct of the peoples' business,' Steven Hernandez, the chief deputy for the executive office, said in a statement. According to county policy, employees must sign an agreement every year acknowledging that all electronic communications, such as emails or instant messages, sent on county devices are the property of the county. Bass previously kept her phone on a 30-day auto-delete setting, far shorter than the two-year retention period outlined in the city's administrative code. However, after being pressed by The Times, which had filed public records requests for the mayor's correspondence during the Palisades fire, Bass' office said it was able to recover the deleted messages using 'specialized technology.' (The Times sued the city in March over the mayor's texts. Even though city officials ultimately provided some texts, The Times is contesting the city's argument that releasing them was not required under state law.) It also remains unclear whether Los Angeles City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, who was filling in as acting mayor in Bass' stead when the fires broke out, deleted his text messages from that time period. After The Times filed a public records request seeking correspondence that Harris-Dawson sent to Bass or received from her between Jan. 6 and Jan. 16, Harris-Dawson's office said it had 'no responsive records.' Harris-Dawson's office did not respond to repeated questions over the course of several months about why there was no correspondence and whether it had been deleted. 'It's very disappointing to see that that practice has spilled over up the street [to the County]. I was hoping it was just L.A. City Hall shenanigans and the absurdities of our two big leaders,' said Unrig LA founder Rob Quan, referring to Bass and Harris-Dawson. Quan, who leads a transparency-focused good-government advocacy group, said he believed proper recordkeeping from January was all the more important given the historic importance of the fires.

The 'Olympic Wage' Debate Could Return to the Ballots in 2026
The 'Olympic Wage' Debate Could Return to the Ballots in 2026

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The 'Olympic Wage' Debate Could Return to the Ballots in 2026

The 'Olympic Wage' Debate Could Return to the Ballots in 2026 originally appeared on L.A. Mag. Thousands of cooks, room attendants, dishwashers and airport employees across Los Angeles were set to make more than any other minimum-wage worker in the country, but the pushback from business owners and industry giants like United Airlines, Delta, Hilton and Marriott proves they won't go down without a a move to try and halt the rollout, which Mayor Bass signed into law last Tuesday, the defense campaign has until June 30 to secure 93,000 signatures from registered L.A. voters to qualify the measure so it reappears on next year's ballot.'We're the industry. We need to make sure what we fought so hard for is defended,' said Maria Torres, who would've been eligible for the pay increase — but now her time in the state of California is in who speaks only Spanish, said this extra money would be incredibly helpful in supporting her and her husband, whose rent just went up by $300 this month. Originally from Honduras, she often sends whatever she can spare back to family in her home country, but she said she barely has enough to live on herself right now. She and her husband are planning on moving to Louisiana if nothing extra money could go to her housing and healthcare will instead go to their second yacht, she said. 'People can't afford to live in Los Angeles,' says Kurt Petersen, president of Unite Here Local 11, an organization that represents over 30,000 hospitality workers, including Torres. 'Restaurants are struggling…because not enough people eat at them because not enough people have enough money.'Petersen says the larger corporations argue that this will cost the tourism industry millions, and will imperil the L.A. economy. But this ballot initiative, he says, will cost United, Delta and its hotel partners millions — and those millions could go towards paying their workers instead of arguing.'Every dollar that hotel workers, airport workers have in their pocket is one dollar they spend in the community,' he said. 'That's the beauty of this law. Workers spend their paychecks in local restaurants, local businesses, and that's the kind of economy we want.'One major selling point to sign is the threats made by at least eight hotels to pull out of a deal struck to accommodate personnel needed for 2028's Summer Olympic Games, to be held in Los Angeles. Jessica Durrum, the director of Tourism Workers Rising, calls this move 'another greedy tactic' by hotel chains, whose contractual obligations to the Olympics are due in part by the public subsidies given to them to build their lodging in big names in hospitality is no picnic for Tourism Workers Rising. The leaders of these companies always claim tourism is in jeopardy — that 'the sky is falling,' Durrum with the Super Bowl, World Cup and the Olympics, she assures, the sky will never fall.'It's so upsetting for workers…They thought they had this,' Petersen said. 'I mean, it's like grand theft larceny by the modern day robber.' This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Jun 4, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store