Israel set to wage methodical destruction of Iran's nuclear facilities
The Middle East can expect days of Israeli attacks on Iran as it conducts a 'brutal and methodical' assault to ensure it sets back the nuclear programme by many years, military experts have told The National.
Iranians can't afford to wait a week to respond because they're going to be attrited now at a very high rate
Frank Ledwidge
After Iran's military leadership has been largely decapitated in surgical air strikes it currently appears toothless in its ability to respond to the unprecedented attack on the six-decade-old theocracy.
But if it is to retaliate it needs to do so almost immediately as its military infrastructure was 'being [eliminated] at such rate that there will soon be little left,' said former British military intelligence officer, Frank Ledwidge.
A defence source added that the Israelis were going through 'an enormous bank of targets that they've started with the highest level' and would now 'go through them in an orderly fashion'.
It is also becoming evident that Iran's apparently strong air defences have proven ineffective and could very soon be wiped out by Israeli attacks.
'We are taking out their aerial defence system so we can operate more freely against their nuclear programme and against their military targets,' the Israeli military official added. 'Dozens of radars and surface to air missile launchers have been destroyed.'
Nuclear dark ages
The key focus of attack will be Iran's nuclear facilities with Israeli intelligence stating that Tehran now had enough enriched uranium to rapidly make 15 nuclear bombs.
While Israel does not have America's GBU-57 13,600kg bunker buster bombs it does possess large but smaller GBU-28 1,800kg bombs thought to have been used in the assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in September.
With his command bunker buried deep below a Beirut apartment block, Israel deployed a number of the large bombs creating geometric patterns to penetrate deep.
Without US bombers, that could be the tactic Israel uses against Iran's key nuclear sites such as Natanz and Fordow in order to eradicate its nuclear bomb making capability.
That will be the bombing campaign's priority, said Richard Pater, director of the Anglo-Israeli Bicom think tank.
'The key question is that now embarked on this campaign, how many years are you going to be set be setting back Iran's nuclear programme back as it had better be a long time,' he said.
'Everyone understands that the Iranian desire for revenge is going to be peaked so Israel had better do this thoroughly.'
Israel remains silent about whether its action will result in regime change but it is likely that it will want to remove the leadership that has sacrificed so much in search of its nuclear goal.
Retaliation options
Following Israel's 18 months of fighting since October 7 attacks, Iran's biggest deterrent against a backlash, Hezbollah, has been severely depleted and on Friday was only able to issue a benign statement that made no reference to military action.
Other proxies are unlikely to mount serious attacks, although there are concerns that that Houthis in Yemen might be able to up their near daily rocket attack with ballistic missiles, one of which came close to hitting Ben Gurion airport last month.
It now will take a few days for Iran to re-establish command and control over its armed forces after senior commanders were killed and once achieved, they may well have a limited revenge arsenal.
While 100 drones were fired towards Israel soon after Friday's operation began, it appears that few made the eight or nine hour journey to their destination with most shot down.
That is because Israel now has a triple-layered air defence system that can take out drones, cruise as well as ballistic missiles.
Iran's massed missile and drone attack last October only managed to kill a single Palestinian and damage an airfield.
That leaves the regime's only other option of asymmetric warfare of using specialist teams such as Unit 840 to conduct terror attacks at Israeli establishments overseas.
But that will require direction and planning from the top, and Iran's leadership appears under the unprecedented stress of having many of its generals removed from the battlefield.
Ineffectual Iran?
Defence analysts believe the air campaign could continue for a week, perhaps two to 'degrade every aspect of the Iranian military command, control and executive function,' said Mr Ledwidge. 'Today is just a start.'
'But the Iranians can't afford to wait a week to respond because they're going to be attrited now at a very high rate,' he added.
Subsequently Iran's internal communications have been seriously disrupted with the deaths the equivalent of Britain's PJHQ (permanent joint headquarters), Ministry of Defence and head of military all being wiped out on one day, he said.
'Our mission is very clear, to remove an existential threat,' an Israeli military official told The National.
With Iran possessing a considerable stock of ballistic missiles – although their effectiveness is in question – Israel has made a point of attacking its launchers, including inserting a Mossad team, that was potentially local recruited, into Iran for direct strikes.
'We know they have hundreds of ballistic missiles ready to fire towards Israel,' the military official said. 'We were able to in our actions this morning to weaken their chain of command, and carry out pre-emptive strikes against ballistic missiles.'
Ultimately the bombing campaign could see a 'new Middle East' in the long term, said Dr Efrat Sopher, an Iranian foreign policy analyst.
'The immediate future is very worrying with the Iranian regime causing so much instability with all its tentacles but now removing the head of the octopus I believe will bring about a more a more stable international system and peace through prosperity,' she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
29 minutes ago
- The National
Hezbollah assured Lebanese officials it won't join Iran's retaliation, security sources say
Lebanese officials have urged Hezbollah not to join Iran 's response to Israeli attacks and the group has assured them it will not take part, security sources told The National on Saturday. 'Officials moved quickly to urge Hezbollah not to drag Lebanon into another war, and the group has given reassurances that it has no intention of doing so,' one of the Lebanese sources said. Israel's deadly strike on Iran on Friday wiped out much of Tehran's military and nuclear leadership. A broader regional offensive by Israel over the past two years has severely weakened Iranian proxies across the region, leaving Hezbollah unable to come to its sponsor's aid. Still, there is concern within security circles in Lebanon over one specific factor: Hezbollah's arsenal of strategic, long-range precision missiles. 'We know those important missiles can only be launched on orders from Iran,' the source said. 'The problem is, we don't know whether they still exist or if they were destroyed by Israel. And if they do still exist, there's a worry they could eventually be used and lead to a new devastating war with Israel.' A second security source confirmed that the state had formally requested Hezbollah not to interfere, and the group responded positively. 'Many people have fled southern Lebanon and Hezbollah-controlled areas in Beirut out of fear of Israeli strikes and a wider escalation despite the assurances,' the source added. Israel's offensive against Hezbollah, which escalated in September 2024, took out most of the group's leaders and destroyed most of its arsenal. By Israeli and US intelligence estimates, around 70 per cent of Hezbollah's military capabilities have been destroyed. Even if Hezbollah were in a position to attack, its main supply route by land through Syria was cut when its ally, Bashar Al Assad, was deposed last December by rebels who Hezbollah itself had spent years fighting. This means the group would have difficulty replenishing the limited stores that remain. Lebanese leaders and western diplomats are aware that Lebanon's relative stability is hanging in the balance. The US and France scrambled to reach a shaky, if uneven, ceasefire in Lebanon. But the ceasefire, and Hezbollah's defeat, has led to a de facto political reality: Israel can strike at will in Lebanon, but Hezbollah – and Lebanon – would be severely punished for attacking or retaliating.
The National
29 minutes ago
- The National
Tel Aviv residents wake up to scenes of destruction following Iranian strikes that killed three
Residents of Tel Aviv woke up on Saturday to scenes of destruction in parts of the city as Israel and Iran exchanged strikes throughout the night. Blasts were heard in the Israeli capital and Jerusalem in the early morning, with at least three people killed and more than 64 injured by Iranian strikes, Israeli authorities said. Videos circulating on social media showed the moment a missile struck a building in the Kirya area of Tel Aviv that is home to a military headquarters and the ministry of defence. Footage shows a large plume of smoke following an explosion on impact. A heavily destroyed apartment building is shown in the aftermath. Explosions have been reported throughout the night across Tel Aviv, where people were seen running out into the streets, carrying their children to safety. The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said on Saturday morning that he had gone to shelters five times during the night following Iran 's missile strikes. 'Been rough nite in Israel. Had to head to shelter 5 times during the nite,' Mr Huckabee wrote on X. 'It's now Shabbat here. Should be quiet. Probably won't be. Entire nation under orders to stay near shelter.' The Iranian missile attacks hit homes in Rishon Lezion, south of Tel Aviv, and in the city of Ramat Gan, east of the capital, according to authorities. Search teams were looking for any residents trapped under the rubble in Rishon Lezion on Saturday morning, the police said. Another video, filmed by Reuters news agency, shows a missile streaking towards the ground before striking the Kirya area at approximately 1.35am local time. The Israeli military said it identified more Iranian drones heading toward Israel early on Saturday. 'A short while ago, sirens sounded in several areas across Israel following the identification of UAVs launched from Iran toward the State of Israel,' the military said in a statement. Iran's strikes come in response to Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear and military targets that started early on Friday. In Iran, more than 64 people were killed and 320 injured, mostly civilians, said authorities as the attacks targeted the country's senior military leaders and nuclear scientists. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said late on Friday that Iran had 'crossed red lines' by firing at civilian population centres.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Disarmament of Palestinian camps in Lebanon likely to be postponed
The disarmament of Lebanon's Palestinian refugee camps is likely to be delayed beyond a mid-June deadline, a Palestinian source told The National. An official within the Fatah movement in Lebanon said the plan will not be put into effect until after a Palestinian delegation headed by Azaam Al Ahmad returns to Beirut to meet representatives of all Palestinian factions. 'The discussion [of disarmament ] has been postponed until after Azaam Al Ahmad arrives in Lebanon,' the source said, adding that Mr Al Ahmad was not expected until 'after June 15'. He is the deputy head of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), second to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who devised the agreement with Lebanese leaders. 'When Azaam al Ahmad was here, he was supposed to also meet with the coalition which includes Hamas, but their leaders were traveling,' the source said. He declined to provide an exact date. Mid-June was given as a start date for the beginning of the disarmament process for Palestinian factions in Lebanon. Lebanese political sources and officials within the Fatah movement, the dominant political party within the PLO, had said the disarmament would begin with Beirut camps Shatila, Burj Al Barajneh, and Mar Elias. Hamas in Lebanon has dismissed the disarmament plan agreed upon by Mr Abbas and Lebanese leaders as 'unilateral', saying they had been left out of the agreement between Palestinian officials and Lebanese leaders. The disarmament plan represents only Hamas's main opponent, the Palestinian Authority, the movement has said. Hamas also said it was never formally informed of a decision to disarm the camps, insisting on a dialogue of representatives from all Palestinian factions – including a coalition of factions that includes Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), and other Islamist groups not under the authority of the PLO. The disarmament decision has also stirred controversy within Palestinian factions in Lebanon that also hold membership in the PLO, which contains representatives of a diverse array of Palestinian factions with varying ideologies. On Friday, a statement by the Lebanese branch of the Popular Struggle Front, a PLO member, was critical of the unilateral nature of the disarmament decision, saying the agreement was never presented to all Palestinian factions in Lebanon. 'It would have been more appropriate for the owner of the vision and ideas to present them' to representatives of the joint factions in Lebanon, said Tamer Aziz Abu Al Abed, a representative of the Struggle Front. He added that the plan had not achieved a majority of Palestinian confidence or approval in Lebanon. 'We hope in the coming days to put all the papers up for discussion with the presidential delegation coming to Lebanon,' he said. The issue of disarming Lebanon's 12 Palestinian refugee camps, which are not under Lebanese state control, has long been contentious. Groups such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, dedicated to armed resistance against Israel and allied with Hezbollah, have frequently used Lebanon as a base to launch rockets at Israel. Disarming the camps comes under a broader initiative by Lebanese leaders to limit and disarm non-state forces. But the memory of Lebanon's 1975–1990 civil war – during which Palestinian militias were among the main participants, alongside a series of Lebanese factions and international proxies – still lingers for many Palestinians, who view weapons as essential for self-defence. Weaponry also holds deep symbolic value for Palestinians in Lebanon, many of whom were expelled from their land in 1948 during the Nakba, which marked the creation of what is now Israel. For them, arms represent not only protection but a continuing struggle to return to their homeland. Lebanon hosts about 222,000 Palestinian refugees, many of whom live in the 12 overcrowded camps, according to the UN agency UNRWA. Most are direct refugees or descendants of Palestinians who were expelled from their land during a violent mass removal that led to the creation of the state of Israel in 1948. They face a variety of legal restrictions in Lebanon, including on employment.
