Applications under Forest Rights Act rejected for Nagarhole encroachers
The Commission highlighted the case of 52 families from the Jenu Kuruba community in Ponnampet taluk, who were reportedly evicted from the NTR earlier. These families have reapplied for land rights under the FRA. The letter also noted that a joint survey was conducted in October 2024, but the report has yet to be submitted. The Commission stated that, if verified, the forced eviction and lack of follow-up could amount to a human rights violation, and called for a thorough investigation and submission of a detailed report.
However, a senior forest department official criticised the Commission's intervention, stating: 'Such actions demoralise our staff. Ground verification and satellite imagery indicate these claimants reside in nearby coffee estates and not within the forest itself. Their rights have already been assessed and rejected. We are actively working on relocating legitimate forest-dwelling families.'
Amid growing concerns over monsoon-related risks, forest officials warned that illegal settlers could begin constructing permanent structures within the reserve. 'This is a critical time. The government must take a firm and swift decision,' an official remarked.
Environment and Forest Minister Eshwar B Khandre confirmed that the issue is under review. 'No one should remain inside protected forests, as it leads to conflict. Families in Bheemgad Wildlife Sanctuary and Kudremukh National Park have voluntarily agreed to relocate, and similar measures should be extended elsewhere,' he said.
The minister also shared broader figures on FRA implementation, noting that 60,032 acres of forest land have so far been diverted under the Act. A total of 14,132 applications covering 16,685 claims have been approved, while around 2.55 lakh applications — nearly 95% — have been rejected.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Justice is not a privilege but right of every child: Odisha HC judge
BHUBANESWAR: Justice is not a privilege but a right of every child, said Justice Savitri Ratho. Addressing a panel discussion on 'Advancing Child-Centred Justice' hosted by the National Law University Odisha (NLUO) and Child Rights and You (CRY) as part of the 5th World Congress on Justice with Children here recently, the Orissa High Court judge underscored the need for trauma-informed processes and regular monitoring under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015, especially for marginalised children. 'Justice is not a privilege to be earned; it is a promise to be kept for every child,' she affirmed. Speaking on the occasion, chairperson of the United Nations' Internal Justice Council and former judge of the Supreme Court of India Justice Madan Lokur emphasised the need for meaningful access to justice for children - as victims, as accused, and as those in need of care and protection, in all their avatars. He highlighted the underreporting of violence against children, alarming backlog in inquiries, and revictimization faced by survivors during the trial due to systemic delays and inadequate support systems. While principal secretary of the Women and Child Development department Shubha Sarma shared the state's commitment through schemes like Subhadra and Ashirbaad, NLUO vice-chancellor Ved Kumari advocated for a broad, child-centred definition of justice. The World Congress on Justice with Children is a global platform that convenes every five years to further the policy, practice and discourse on child-centred justice.
News18
4 hours ago
- News18
'Deeper Military And Political Complicity': Pakistan's FATF Status Under Fresh Scrutiny After Jihadi Rally
Last Updated: While Pakistan exited the FATF grey list in October 2022 after meeting 34 action points across two action plans Pakistan's commitment to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidelines is once again in question following a large-scale Jihadi rally on May 28, 2025. The rally has reignited concerns over the country's approach to combating terror financing and its broader FATF compliance ahead of a critical review in 2026. While Pakistan exited the FATF grey list in October 2022 after meeting 34 action points across two action plans (27+7), experts argue that the compliance remains largely tactical, not institutional. Legislative reforms may exist on paper, but weak enforcement, selective prosecutions, and systemic tolerance for terror-linked groups undermine meaningful progress. The May 28 rally, openly held by banned terror outfits, signals continued state tolerance and hints at deeper military and political complicity. This directly challenges FATF's Immediate Outcomes 8–11, which focus on preventing terror financing and ensuring effective law enforcement responses. Despite FATF's repeated calls, Pakistan has failed to prosecute UN-designated terrorists meaningfully. High-profile figures like Masood Azhar of Jaish-e-Mohammed face only minor charges related to terror financing — not for core terror acts such as the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Convictions remain symbolic, often reversible based on the ISI's strategic needs. Groups like JeM and Lashkar-e-Taiba continue to operate under aliases such as TRF (The Resistance Front) and PAFF (People's Anti-Fascist Front), exploiting loopholes in enforcement. Similarly, Jamaat-ud-Dawa has rebranded as political fronts like the Milli Muslim League, maintaining access to their funding networks. FATF had demanded the prosecution of key terror financiers and the dismantling of infrastructure supporting terrorism. Yet, asset confiscation remains unaddressed, and no mutual legal assistance (MLA) provisions exist for cross-border asset freezing or comprehensive coverage of predicate offences. Pakistan's Mutual Legal Assistance framework continues to lack crucial provisions, including mechanisms for domestic restraint orders and global asset recovery. This gap enables illicit funds to circulate within Pakistan's financial system unimpeded. In high-risk sectors like real estate and jewellery, FATF had emphasized risk-based supervision under the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Act. While laws exist, oversight of Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs) remains weak. Madrassas and hawala networks, central to terror financing, continue to resist FATF-mandated registration. Top intelligence sources note that Pakistani banks inconsistently monitor high-risk accounts. Internal compliance focuses more on form than substance, failing to detect suspicious transactions. Meanwhile, law enforcement agencies lack essential forensic and cyber investigation tools, severely hampering complex terror-financing probes. The FATF's 2022 onsite report already flagged low effectiveness in 10 out of 11 Immediate Outcomes, including limited use of financial intelligence and poor supervision of vulnerable sectors. With strategic deficiencies unresolved and public displays of extremist activity continuing, Pakistan risks being relisted by FATF by 2026 unless genuine, institutional reforms replace symbolic gestures.
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
Licence for quarry operations in Sivakalai suspended: State to HC
1 2 3 Madurai: The state informed the Madras high court that a licence granted for quarrying operations in Sivakalai village in Tuticorin district has been suspended since the area was notified as the Sivakalai archaeological site. The court was hearing a public interest litigation filed by D Muthuramalingam. The petitioner stated that the authorities granted permission to establish a stone quarry in a patta land situated in Sivakalai village in Nov 2024. The quarry is located near the Sivakalai archaeological site. Following protests, the authorities stopped the quarrying operations temporarily. He stated that using explosives in the quarry would affect the site. Hence, the petitioner moved court seeking a direction to the authorities to cancel the permission granted for the stone quarry and also sought not to grant permissions for quarries near the site. The additional govt pleader submitted that the assistant director of geology and mines, Tuticorin, suspended the licence granted for quarry operations in favour of a person by taking note of the fact that the area was notified as an archaeological site. He submitted that as of now, no mining operations are being carried out. Taking into account the submissions, a division bench of justice S M Subramaniam and justice A D Maria Clete observed that if the person who was granted the licence is aggrieved by the order passed by the authorities, the person is at liberty to approach the competent appellate authority in the manner contemplated under the Act and Rules. The judges made it clear that until a final decision is taken by the competent authorities or appellate authority, no mining operation shall be permitted, and the authorities are directed to ensure that the subject land is protected from any mining activities. Rejecting the request by the counsel appearing for the person who was granted the licence to fix an outer time for disposal of appeal by the authorities, the judges observed that the fact remains that no appeal is pending before the district collector as of today. That apart, the high court, in the exercise of its powers of judicial review, need not direct the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal by fixing an outer time limit. The workload of the competent authority must be taken into consideration. If such a blanket direction is issued, the authorities may not be in a position to dispose of the same within the stipulated time. Therefore, the high court, without ascertaining the workload of the subordinate courts, original authority, or appellate authority, cannot issue a direction fixing a timeline for the disposal of the matters, the judges observed and disposed of the petition.
