logo
Nebraska lawmakers again punt final choice between permanent daylight, standard time

Nebraska lawmakers again punt final choice between permanent daylight, standard time

Yahoo11-03-2025

A series of bills in Nebraska are aiming to change how the state handles changing clocks twice a year in 2025. (Getty Images)
LINCOLN — State lawmakers again punted Tuesday on making a final decision on how to end Nebraska's twice-a-year changing of the clocks back and forth, leaving it up to one more debate.
Lawmakers again advanced Legislative Bill 34, from State Sen. Megan Hunt of Omaha for permanent daylight saving time (the current position of the clocks as of this past Sunday through early November), and LB 302, from State Sen. Dave Murman of Glenvil for permanent standard time (in the winter months between November and early March), this time to the third and final round of debate.
Unlike the first round of debate three weeks ago, more lawmakers picked only one of the options:
14 senators supported only permanent standard time.
14 senators supported only permanent daylight saving time.
13 senators supported both bills.
5 senators voted against both bills.
2 senators did not take a position on either bill.
State Sen. Merv Riepe of Ralston voted against permanent daylight saving time (LB 34) and was 'present, not voting' on permanent standard time (LB 302). He confirmed to the Nebraska Examiner that he supports permanent standard time.
Speaker John Arch of La Vista is in charge of scheduling and told the Examiner that, should both bills pass during the final round of debate, the decision goes to Gov. Jim Pillen.
If Pillen also signs both bills, the final bill he signs would become law.
A spokesperson for Pillen did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the bills.
Both bills would require surrounding states to adopt similar laws before taking effect:
For Hunt's bill, three adjacent states to Nebraska would need to adopt a single year-round time.
For Murman's bill, Iowa, Kansas, South Dakota and Wyoming would all need to adopt legislation for year-round standard time. Multiple senators have said the list should include Colorado, to prevent a 'southwest Nebraska time-zone island.'
Hunt has advocated for year-round daylight time to have the sun later in the evening, particularly in summer months, to help businesses and economic development.
Murman has received support from the Nebraska Medical Association and other major medical organizations for year-round standard time, for purported health benefits better aligned with natural circadian rhythms.
Year-round daylight saving time, from Hunt, would require federal approval, either through Congress or a rule change from the U.S. secretary of transportation. The United States briefly had year-round daylight saving time between Jan. 6, 1974, and April 27, 1975, in response to the 1973 oil crisis.
States can choose to adopt year-round standard time, which Hawaii and Arizona (excluding the Navajo Nation) observe.
Advance BOTH permanent daylight saving AND standard time (13): Christy Armendariz, John Cavanaugh, Stan Clouse, Danielle Conrad, George Dungan, Jana Hughes, Teresa Ibach, Margo Juarez, Jane Raybould, Victor Rountree, Rita Sanders, Ashlei Spivey, Paul Strommen
OPPOSE both bills (5): John Arch, Carolyn Bosn, Rob Clements, Rob Dover, Rick Holdcroft
Advance ONLY permanent DAYLIGHT SAVING time (14): Bob Andersen, Eliot Bostar, Machaela Cavanaugh, Wendy DeBoer, Myron Dorn, John Fredrickson, Dunixi Guereca, Bob Hallstrom, Megan Hunt, Terrelll McKinney, Jason Prokop, Dan Quick, Tony Sorrentino, Brad von Gillern
Advance ONLY permanent STANDARD time (14*): Tom Brandt, Barry DeKay, Ben Hansen, Mike Jacobson, Kathleen Kauth, Loren Lippincott, Dan Lonowski, Dan McKeon, Glen Meyer, Mike Moser, Dave Murman, Tanya Storer, Jared Storm, Woody Wordekemper
DID NOT VOTE on both bills (2): Beau Ballard, Brian Hardin
*State Sen. Merv Riepe opposed daylight saving time and was 'present, not voting' on standard time. He confirmed he supports permanent standard time after the votes.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's Fueling Oil Prices? Geopolitics, Not Growth
What's Fueling Oil Prices? Geopolitics, Not Growth

Forbes

time32 minutes ago

  • Forbes

What's Fueling Oil Prices? Geopolitics, Not Growth

EDMONTON, CANADA, MAY 24: Close-up of a replica oil with words 'oil Country' well painted in ... More Edmonton Oilers colors, displayed outdoors in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, on May 24, 2025. (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images) Oil prices are climbing once more. Although fundamentals such as supply and demand continue to be significant, the latest spike is largely unrelated to seasonal trends or economic expansion. Rather, it is geopolitical factors—specifically, escalating tensions in the Middle East—that are unsettling markets and pushing prices higher. Israel's recent military strikes against Iran, aimed at critical nuclear sites, have shaken the global energy landscape. This escalation has created shockwaves in the oil markets, with Brent crude experiencing a surge of up to 13%, hitting $78.50 per barrel before plateauing around $75. In a similar fashion, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude jumped over 9%, reaching a peak of $77.62 and concluding near $74. This represents the largest single-day price increase in oil since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The offensive was initiated shortly before expected U.S.–Iran nuclear negotiations and was justified by Israel as a crucial measure to prevent Iran from nearing nuclear weapon capabilities. Central to the current instability is the Strait of Hormuz, a slender waterway linking the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea. While it measures only 21 miles at its narrowest point, its strategic significance is immense: approximately one-third of the world's seaborne oil transits through this crucial channel each day. Presently, this essential route is under increased observation. Although Israeli attacks have upheld Iran's oil infrastructure for the moment, the threat of retaliation looms large. Iran has persistently warned it might close the Strait—a move that would instantly disrupt global energy supplies. The mere potential for such disruption is sufficient to elevate prices as traders prepare for volatility. OPEC+ Output Rises: On May 31, 2025, OPEC+ revealed its third consecutive monthly production increase, adding 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) in July. This action, motivated by Saudi Arabia's ambition for market share, occurs amid internal tensions, particularly with Russia, and follows the reinstatement of 1.37 million bpd of a planned 2.2 million bpd increase by the end of 2026. While indicating a strategic change, the group emphasized that future increases are contingent upon market conditions, with the next policy decision scheduled for July 6. A Market in Surplus: As of May, the global oil market already exhibits a surplus of approximately 0.5 million bpd. In the meantime, non-OPEC producers like the U.S. and Brazil are continuing to elevate their output, contributing to a more substantial global supply situation than was previously expected. This increasing surplus coincides with the OECD's recent downgrade of its global GDP growth forecast for 2025, from 3.1% to 2.9%—indicating softer demand on the horizon. Although summer travel and a slight resurgence in emerging markets are currently sustaining demand, any additional economic downturn could tip the scales. Demand Uncertainty: Optimism regarding a rebound in China's oil demand is tempered by escalating trade tensions and tariffs, which may hinder global growth. Slower economic activity could suppress demand, while disrupted supply chains may also limit output, creating a complex, conflicting impact on oil prices that defies straightforward forecasting. The confluence of increasing supply, uncertain demand, and macroeconomic challenges places the oil market in a delicate state. On one side, prices could soar towards $80 per barrel if tensions in the Middle East intensify and supply risks materialize, particularly if the Strait of Hormuz comes under threat. Conversely, OPEC+ production increases and economic softness could restrain price gains and revive oversupply worries as autumn approaches. The recent increase in oil prices is not merely an economic occurrence—it reflects escalating global anxiety. As long as the Strait of Hormuz remains a focal point of geopolitical tension, markets will remain on edge. Investors, consumers, and policymakers should brace for ongoing price fluctuations, driven more by geopolitical factors than by supply. If history serves as a lesson, geopolitical risk premiums can dissipate rapidly—but they can also increase sharply. As oil prices escalate, upstream oil companies such as Halliburton (NYSE: HAL) and SLB (NYSE: SLB) typically tend to benefit in such conditions. For investors seeking growth with reduced volatility, the Trefis High Quality Portfolio has outperformed the S&P 500 with 91% returns since its inception, offering a steadier experience amid turbulence.

NYPD ramps up security at Jewish sites in NYC after Israel's strike on Iran
NYPD ramps up security at Jewish sites in NYC after Israel's strike on Iran

New York Post

time42 minutes ago

  • New York Post

NYPD ramps up security at Jewish sites in NYC after Israel's strike on Iran

The New York City Police Department is ramping up security to Jewish sites throughout the Big Apple in response to Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear sites. 'The NYPD is tracking the situation in the Middle East. Out of an abundance of caution, we're deploying additional resources to Jewish, Israeli & other sites throughout NYC,' the department said in a statement posted on X. NYPD officers standing guard outside a synagogue in Brooklyn on June 2, 2025. Getty Images 'We're coordinating with our federal partners & we'll continue to monitor for any potential impact to NYC,' NYPD added. Israel launched an unprecedented wave of airstrikes across Iran on Friday targeting its nuclear program facilities and other military sites — claiming Iran was fast-tracking the development of nuclear weapons. NYPD officers outside a Jewish religious site on June 2, 2025. Getty Images The attacks, which are expected to significantly escalate conflict between the two bitter rivals, took out several of Iran's top military leaders and nuclear scientists. Israeli officials said they are anticipating a heavy retaliatory response from its Middle Eastern adversary. Mayor Eric Adams has also been briefed on the situation and said NYPD's Counterterrorism Unit is 'closely monitoring the situation.' 'I am praying for peace,' the Mayor said.

Trump Issues Grave Warning to Iran After Israeli Strikes
Trump Issues Grave Warning to Iran After Israeli Strikes

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Issues Grave Warning to Iran After Israeli Strikes

President Donald Trump delivers remarks at the White House on June 12, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Credit - Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning to Iran, urging the country to accept a nuclear deal to avoid further 'planned attacks,' citing that 'there has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter… come to an end.' Trump spoke out via his social media platform, Truth Social, on Friday morning, reacting to the news that Israel had launched an overnight attack on Iran, targeting multiple nuclear and military sites. Referencing the ongoing negotiations over Iran's nuclear program, Trump said that he had given Iran a chance to make a deal. 'I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done,' Trump said. 'Certain Iranian hardliners spoke bravely, but they didn't know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse." Trump added that Iran was told how 'the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come. And they know how to use it.' 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.' Trump warned. Read More: Iran Vows 'Painful' Response After Israeli Attack: What to Know The U.S. was decidedly not involved in the overnight military action, as confirmed by a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in which he urged Iran not to target the U.S. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense,' said Marco, in a statement shared by the White House shortly after the initial strikes. 'President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' A number of senior military officials and nuclear scientists have been killed by the Israeli strikes on Iran, with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowing retaliation, saying that Israel 'should anticipate a severe punishment' and 'has prepared for itself a bitter, painful fate, which it will definitely see.' The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) announced the 'preemptive, precise offensive' in a statement in the early hours of Friday morning, local time. 'Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Weapons of mass destruction in the hands of the Iranian regime are an existential threat to the State of Israel and to the wider world,' the statement read. 'The State of Israel has no choice but to fulfill the obligation to act in defense of its citizens.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the strikes, part of Operation Rising Lion, 'will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat.' Read More: Here Are the Top Iranian Generals and Scientists Targeted and Killed by Israeli Strikes Iran has since responded with around 100 drone strikes on Israel, with Jordan confirming that drones also entered its airspace. Prior to this, talks between the U.S. and Israel had appeared to be heading in a more positive direction after Ali Shamkhani—senior adviser to Ayatollah Khamenei—said in May that Iran was willing to accept a deal subject to conditions. Talks were still ongoing as of early June. Iran rejected a U.S. proposal and offered a counter-offer on June 9. The following day, Iranian lawmakers accused the U.S. of turning negotiation talks into a trap. "The U.S. is not serious in negotiations at all. It has set the goal of talks as imposing its demands and has adopted offensive positions that are diametrically opposed to Iranians' inalienable rights," Iranian lawmakers said in a statement. Contact us at letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store