
UK to buy fighter jets capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons
FILE PHOTO: A Lockheed Martin F-35A fighter jet performs during an exhibition flight at the 55th International Paris Airshow at Le Bourget Airport near Paris, France, June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo
THE HAGUE (Reuters) -Britain said it would buy a dozen F-35A fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons in what it described as the biggest expansion of its nuclear deterrent in a generation.
The purchase of the Lockheed Martin jets would allow Britain's air force to carry nuclear weapons for the first time since the end of the Cold War, Downing Street said.
"In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted," Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement.
Britain's nuclear deterrent is currently limited to the continuous deployment of at least one nuclear-armed submarine patrolling at sea.
Starmer's government is increasing defence spending and upgrading its military forces, including its submarine fleet, as it faces increasing hostility from Russia and as the United States retrenches from its traditional role as a defender of Europe.
The announcement by Britain on expanding its nuclear deterrence was made at a NATO summit in The Hague where European members are set to agree an ambitious new target to spend 5% of national income on defence and security.
The U.S. will supply B61 tactical nuclear weapons for use on the planes as part of a plan for Britain to take on more responsibility for European security, said a British official who declined to be named.
Britain said the purchase of the jets would allow it to contribute so-called dual-capable aircraft to NATO to carry nuclear weapons in the event of a conflict.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said "this is yet another robust British contribution to NATO".
NEW CAPABILITY
The cost of each F-35A jet is about 80 million pounds ($109 million), putting the total bill for the 12 planes at just under 1 billion pounds, according to another British official, who asked not to be named.
Britain's nuclear deterrent currently rests solely on the Trident submarine-based system, which misfired during a test last year, the second successive test failure after one veered off course in 2016.
The last time Britain possessed an independent air-launched nuclear capability was in 1998 when the WE-177 free fall bomb was withdrawn from service, according to Britain's parliament.
Tactical nuclear weapons are intended for battlefield use, as opposed to strategic weapons designed to be fired across vast distances.
By purchasing the F-35A fighter jets, Britain would be able to diversify its military options and align more closely with NATO allies such as France, and the United States, which maintains land, sea, and air-based nuclear capabilities.
The United States withdrew its last nuclear weapons from Britain in 2008, in a sign at that time that the threat of conflict following the end of the Cold War was receding.
Downing Street said buying the new jets would support about 20,000 jobs in Britain and underline its commitment to NATO.
The government has pledged to boost overall defence and security spending to 5% of economic output by 2035 to meet a NATO target and said on Tuesday it must "actively prepare" for war at home for the first time in years.
($1 = 0.7342 pounds)
(Reporting by Andrew MacAskill; Editing by Hugh Lawson and Andrew Heavens)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump whirlwind tests NATO summit unity
THE HAGUE: Will he play nice? That was the question for NATO leaders nervously waiting to see if a carefully choreographed show to please US President Donald Trump would pay dividends as the alliance summit began on Wednesday. Every precaution is in place to avoid a Trump blow-up at the Hague gathering, from giving him credit for a historic spending deal to keeping the meeting short and sweet. But that did not stop the volatile US leader launching a pre-summit grenade as he crossed the Atlantic on Air Force One, casting doubt on the very foundation of the 32-member alliance. He refused to state his commitment to NATO's Article Five clause, the basic agreement that says an attack on one member is an attack on all. 'Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five,' Trump told journalists in comments sure to rattle the European allies he dined with upon arrival on Tuesday night. 'I'm committed to being their friend,' he said. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte played down the comments as the summit opened on Wednesday, saying he believed Trump and the United States were still 'totally committed' to Article Five. In an earlier message, probably not designed for public consumption, Rutte heaped flattery on Trump, praising him for bringing everyone on board for the spending hike. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' Rutte wrote in a gushing, caps-filled missive to Trump, who promptly posted it on social media. 'You are flying into another big success in The Hague,' wrote Rutte. NATO allies are set on Wednesday to rubber stamp a pledge to allocate 3.5 percent of GDP to core defence spending, plus another 1.5 percent to broader security-related areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. Rutte said that the spending boost by Europeans nations and Canada would make sure 'that we not only are able to defend ourselves against the Russians and others, but also to equalise.' 'And this is fair, that we spend the same as the US is spending,' Rutte said. Rutte said that Trump was in an 'excellent mood' after dining in royal splendour with the Dutch king and queen on Tuesday night and spending the night in their palace. 'This is incredible' Trump has long groused that European countries pay too little for their own security, upended by Russia's war in Ukraine. The spending hike is designed to keep him engaged with the alliance, after his return to power sparked fears that he could blow up the seven-decade-old organisation. Spain was the main hold-out on the five-percent target, complaining that spending that amount on defence was 'unreasonable' -- and drawing Trump's ire in the process. Trump took fresh aim at Madrid en route to The Hague, calling its stance 'very unfair' and posting a graphic entitled 'Spain threatens to derail NATO summit' showing the relative outlay of alliance members. One of the lowest-spending NATO countries on defence in relative terms, Spain is only set to hit the current NATO target of two percent this year after a 10-billion-euro injection. Rutte stressed that the spending hike -- billed as 'historic' -- is needed to keep Russia in check, but even here Trump threatens to spoil NATO unity. The US leader has turned Western policy on Ukraine on its head, reaching out to Russian President Vladimir Putin and maintaining a volatile relationship with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump and Zelensky are slated to have a tete-a-tete in The Hague -- with officials hoping to avoid a bust-up like their infamous Oval Office shouting match. Unlike previous summits, Zelensky has not been invited to the main working session of the leaders -- cut to two and a half hours, reportedly due to Trump's dislike of lengthy talks. Rutte said that allies would send the message that support for Kyiv was 'unwavering and will persist'. But despite his insistence that Ukraine's bid for membership remains 'irreversible', NATO will avoid any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Trump ruled it out. One European diplomat put it succinctly. 'We have a completely unpredictable US president.' 'We are hoping there won't be an ill-timed comment that is all anyone remembers. Everything has been done to reduce this risk,' the official said.


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
US offer of support seen as liability by Le Pen's far-right French party
A US State Department delegation met with senior officials from France's National Rally (RN) in late May, but their offer to publicly support figurehead Marine Le Pen after a court barred her from office was rebuffed by the far-right party, two sources said. Le Pen, one of the most prominent figures of the European far right, was a frontrunner for the 2027 French presidential election before a court in March banned her from the contest after she was convicted of embezzling EU funds. US President Donald Trump and other right-wing leaders were quick to rally behind her, alleging political censorship. The US delegation that visited Paris was led by Samuel Samson, an official at the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour (DRL). He is part of an influx of young conservatives rising up the ranks of Trump's administration. Samson met with senior RN officials but Le Pen and her popular No. 2, party president Jordan Bardella, were not present, the two sources said. The aim, one of the sources said, was to discuss ways the Trump administration could offer public support to Le Pen, who wants to overturn her conviction. However, the offer was declined, the two sources said. The RN officials said an endorsement from Trump's State Department could hurt the party's hopes of winning the 2027 election, one of the sources said. The RN officials also told Samson there was no need to support Le Pen as Bardella stands a good chance of winning if she cannot run, the source said. A longtime pariah for many in France, Le Pen has worked hard to clean up the image of her eurosceptic nationalist party, pitching it more broadly as a defender of family incomes, jobs and French identity. A senior State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed the meeting took place, but disputed the characterisation that an offer for help was rebuffed. The official said RN representatives "indicated the fact that they need to act in their own interest as independent parties." The RN welcomed Washington's engagement, the official added. The RN's response is an illustration of how despite areas of ideological proximity, Trump's support is seen as a liability by some European nationalists. A source close to Le Pen confirmed the meeting, saying "support for our party from a foreign administration isn't exactly something we're accustomed to." The RN did not respond to a request for comment. Samson's meeting with RN officials and their rejection of US support have not been reported. Earlier this month, the DRL said on X that its officials "met with French officials, political parties, and other stakeholders to reaffirm a shared commitment to free speech, democratic choice, and religious freedom ... Echoing (Trump) we are concerned by those in Europe 'using lawfare to silence free speech and censor their political opponent.'" Polls show a majority of French people did not take issue with her ban. The day before the RN meeting, writing on the State Department's Substack, Samson cited Le Pen's case as evidence that "Europe has devolved into a hotbed of digital censorship, mass migration, restrictions on religious freedom, and numerous other assaults on democratic self-governance." The State Department official rejected criticism from Trump's opponents that his administration was only concerned about the "censorship" and human rights of far-right figures. "The unfortunate reality of the current human rights discourse is that it is politicized and it does cherry pick," the official said, adding that the Trump administration was simply trying to "fix" that. Samson has been the driving force behind a push to support UK anti-abortion protesters, one of the sources said. In March, the DRL wrote on X, he met with anti-abortion activist Livia Tossici-Bolt. She was found guilty in April of breaching an order which banned protest outside a clinic in southern England. His stated concerns about a European attack on free speech echo those made by US Vice President JD Vance during a bombshell speech in Munich earlier this year.


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump insists Iran strike damage 'severe' despite inconclusive intel
THE HAGUE: US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the damage to Iranian nuclear sites from missile strikes over the weekend was severe, though he also acknowledged that the available intelligence on the matter was inconclusive. His comments followed reports by Reuters and other media outlets on Tuesday revealing that the US Defence Intelligence Agency had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months, despite administration officials saying the program had been obliterated. "The intelligence was very inconclusive," Trump told reporters before joining a Nato summit in The Hague. "The intelligence says we don't know. It could've been very severe. That's what the intelligence suggests." Later, during the same round of comments, Trump argued that Iran's nuclear deal had been set back "basically decades, because I don't think they'll ever do it again." Trump was sitting alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, who both also cast doubt on the reliability of the DIA assessment. Rubio said the US was opening an investigation into the leak of the DIA report. He also suggested the report's contents had been misrepresented in the media.--REUTERS