Fears over Russia being used to make ‘insincere' argument against triple lock, Opposition group says
The Government is using fears about
Russia
to make an 'insincere' argument against the triple lock, according to an alliance of Opposition politicians.
Left-wing and Independent politicians have claimed that a number of Government TDs and Senators are uncomfortable with plans to relax the legal barriers that can stop Irish troops from being deployed overseas.
Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire
of Sinn Féin,
Paul Murphy
of People Before Profit,
Duncan Smith
of Labour, Patricia Stephenson of the Social Democrats, and Independent Senator Alice Mary Higgins held a joint press conference today along with a number of civil society groups calling for the retention of the lock.
The triple lock is the mechanism under which Ireland can deploy more than 12 troops on missions abroad. Such deployments require the approval of the Government, Dáil Éireann and the
UN Security Council
.
READ MORE
The Government has consistently argued that this gives countries like Russia or China, who enjoy permanent membership of the UN Security Council, the power to veto Ireland's participation in international missions. The UN has not agreed a new peacekeeping mission since 2014.
Last month, the
Government approved plans brought forward by Tánaiste and Minister for Defence Simon Harris to unravel the triple lock
. Mr Harris has said he wants to make progress with the controversial legislation before the Dáil summer recess.
Labour's Mr Smith said the Government's discomfort with Russia's place on the council 'seems to be quite recent' and that the issue was not about the status of the UN Security Council.
'I would say they are being insincere in that,' Mr Smith said.
He said he believed some Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael backbench TDs and Senators were against their own Government's plans to scrap the triple lock.
[
Government wants progress on scrapping triple lock before Dáil break
Opens in new window
]
'I do believe there are people in Government that share our position, and we need to reach out to them and try to get them to change the minds of what's going on in Cabinet at the moment, and the public are on our side.
'This is just stuff that you pick up on the margins of meetings or corridor chats and all the rest. They will be getting heat on this from people that don't want to see Irish troops being deployed, which is the majority of people ... it is a headache that backbenchers don't want.'
Ms Higgins said she believed Government politicians who want to keep the triple lock 'have a deeper understanding than maybe some of the Ministers seem to have'.
'Because we're getting a very, very narrow description of neutrality as being this entirely technical matter of, 'Are we fully paid up members of Nato?' rather than, 'Are we a country that fulfils that principle under Article 29 of the Constitution?' – which is the peaceful settlement of international disputes,' she added.
Save Our Neutrality, a cross-party campaign to keep the triple lock, will be holding a demonstration this Saturday against Government plans to relax the legal barriers for sending Defence Forces overseas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Q&A: What is the pension payment error all about and can the money be recouped?
Unions and representatives of retired civil servants say they are awaiting detail of the errors made in relation to the pensions of their current or former members . However, there is concern that some of the issues could require legislation and that senior politicians could be impacted by any changes to the law. What has happened? On Tuesday the Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said 'serious and systemic operational issues' had been identified at the National Shared Services Office (NSSO), which employs about 850 people and handles payroll administration for all government departments. The belief is these errors have resulted in some retired civil servants being underpaid in their pensions; incorrect pension contributions having been deducted from current and previous ministers; and the wrong amount of tax being deducted from the lump sums paid to about 30 senior civil servants upon retirement. With a review of 13,000 retirees' positions under way, however, and an external audit of the NSSO to be undertaken, it is uncertain how the situation will develop. READ MORE What will happen in respect of people who owe or are owed money? Mr Chambers said he was committed to ensuring 'all monies owed to the State are fully recouped and monies owed to individuals are refunded'. The former is likely to create issues, however, especially in relation to the larger amounts, with one retiree said to owe €280,000. With Mr Chambers suggesting some ministers may be asked to repay more than €30,000, the tax issue could be considerable. Details of the time frame have not been clarified, but Ciaran Rohan of the Association of Higher Civil and Public Servants says recouping overpayments stretching back more than four years could leave retirees, or potentially some politicians, substantially out of pocket. This is because current legislation would only allow the reclaiming of the extra tax paid as a result of receiving the extra money for the past four years, even if the overpayments stretched further back. Could that be changed? Only by legislation, says employment lawyer Barry Kenny, who says the issue means 'the original error has financial implications beyond a simple repayment issue'. It also has the potential to make it a political one. How could the money be recouped? A government circular in 2018 sets out the various ways in which overpayments can be reclaimed but there is no provision for anything like a liability of €280,000. The intention should be to recoup all the money and ideally within a year, it suggests, usually by deductions from pay or pensions of up to 8 per cent of the gross amount the person is receiving. But these people can afford to repay, no? The largest figures relate to people who had pension funds on retirement worth more than €2 million. That would certainly suggest they are well off but coming up with the funds to repay a six-figure sum is likely to be regarded as an issue. Cloda Ryan of the Retired Civil and Public Servants Association (RCPSA), which has some 7,000 members, says the vast majority of amounts involved are likely to be far smaller but still have the potential to cause problems for the pensioners concerned. 'Contrary to public perception, the majority of Civil Service pensioners have moderate pensions, in many cases lower than they would receive under the social welfare State pension for which, in general, civil servants recruited before April 6th, 1995 do not qualify.' The organisation is seeking assurances 'that no recovery of pension overpayments would take place without consultation and agreement with each pensioner affected'. And if an agreement can't be reached? 'Any civil servant faced with a request to refund money, large or small, should take legal advice to clarify the legal basis for the demand to repay and whether the figures are accurate,' says Mr Kenny. He says where the validity is established, 'reasonable' deductions or instalments would need to be agreed.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on AI and Ireland: the future will not wait
Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept confined to Silicon Valley or science fiction. It is here, now, reshaping economies, transforming industries and prompting governments to rethink everything from education and employment to ethics and regulation. The question Ireland must urgently confront is whether it is truly prepared for the scale and speed of change AI is set to unleash. There are reasons both for cautious optimism and concern. Ireland has long positioned itself as a European technology hub, hosting the headquarters of many of the world's leading tech firms. Government agencies are actively courting AI investment. Research centres in Irish universities are leaders in developing cutting-edge AI applications. The recent launch of an AI Skills programme by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment signals a growing recognition of the need to upskill the workforce. But the evidence of the last decade also suggests that Irish regulators struggle to come to terms with the challenges posed by US tech companies which are not slow to wield their considerable political influence. The establishment of an Oireachtas Committee on Artificial Intelligence, which met for the first time this week, marks a step in deepening political and legislative engagement with the issue. The committee has the potential to initiate a broader public and legislative debate on AI policy that balances innovation with the safeguarding of democratic values and public interest. But for this to succeed, it will need to act in constructive coordination with education, enterprise and civil society. Because readiness is about more than strategy documents, it must reach into the heart of how we educate, train, and govern. Schools, for example, are already grappling with how to prepare students for a new world in which traditional educational metrics are no longer credible. The reformed Leaving Certificate, with its increased emphasis on project work, now faces an unexpected challenge: how to assess students fairly in a world where generative AI can produce plausible essays and design projects at the click of a button. READ MORE Equally urgent are the labour market implications. AI is set to displace roles in sectors ranging from transport and customer support to software development and legal services. Without a serious, joined-up national response, Ireland could face widening inequality, social dislocation and a growing digital divide. Nimble policymaking and innovative thinking are imperative. But this moment also requires political will and public investment. AI is not just a technological leap. It is a societal transformation. If Ireland is to thrive in this new age, it must act with speed, coherence and purpose. The future will not wait.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Casement Park redevelopment: British government offers £50m to back scheme
Uncertainty over the British government's commitment to rebuilding Casement Park in west Belfast ended at lunchtime on Wednesday. After weeks of speculation, a £50 million (€59 million) investment was offered by the treasury to Stormont to 'support the redevelopment' of the stadium as part of the British government's spending review. This sets out the government's spending plans over the coming years, subject to 'sufficient finance' being raised elsewhere. And therein lies the rub, given that there is a £90 million shortfall remaining of the estimated £260 million cost to transform the dilapidated site. [ Government 'absolutely committed' to pursuing redevelopment of Casement Park for Euro 2028 Opens in new window ] But for the GAA and those who have long campaigned for a redeveloped Casement Park, the government's funding commitment gives fresh impetus to a project mired in controversy for more than a decade. READ MORE 'This needs to be the beginning of the end of the saga,' said former Antrim County Board member Brendan Mulgrew. 'Funding is place by the British government. Some very hard conversations need to take place very quickly around what's the maximum that can be given by other bodies ... today is an opportunity to inject urgency into this project.' To date, Stormont, the Irish Government and the GAA havejointly contributed £120 million towards Casement. And for many campaigners, its fate now rests with them. Legal challenges, political disputes and spiralling costs have delayed progress on plans to build the proposed 34,500-capacity venue. The stadium, the home ground of Antrim GAA, closed in 2013. [ 'People said it will never happen but I was firm believer it would' Opens in new window ] Preparatory work at the Andersonstown Road site began last February when it was chosen as a venue for the Uefa Euro 2028 soccer tournament. The plan was pulled when the British government said seven months later it could not bridge the gap in time for the games. 'Stormont Ministers, the Irish Government and the GAA need to get round a table and decide how they are going to get this over the line,' said Mulgrew. Within 20 minutes of British chancellor of the exchequer Rachel Reeves confirming details of her government's spending plans, Tánaiste Simon Harris welcomed its investment and said he 'will now engage' with the GAA, British and Northern Ireland authorities 'to deliver a redeveloped stadium'. Up to €50 million was offered through the Irish Government's Shared Island fund last February. The GAA recently confirmed it will also increase its contribution from an original £15 million. However, the Stormont contribution could prove to be a stumbling block as Casement has become an increasingly politicised issue. Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill has welcomed a commitment of €50 million from the Irish Government towards the rebuild of Casement Park. Stormont Ministers committed £62.5 million to Casement in 2011, as part of a strategy to revamp it along with Windsor Park and the rugby ground at Ravenhill. While the two other Belfast-based projects proceeded, the GAA scheme stalled. As recently as Monday, DUP Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly said that no 'special case' should be created to fund one particular organisation or sport in Northern Ireland, when asked about her support for Casement ahead of Wednesday's announcement. With Sinn Féin First Minister Michelle O'Neill calling for Casement to be built in the wake of the British funding commitment, the onus will now be on her Executive team to deliver. The project is an Executive 'flagship project' and 'more than just a sporting venue', she said on Wednesday.
