Single passenger survives horrifying Air India plane crash
One passenger survived the devastating Air India plane crash that killed hundreds.
Air India Flight 172 departed Ahmedabad to fly to London Gatwick Airport, crashing 10 seconds after takeoff.
Air India confirmed that 241 of the 242 passengers and crew were killed in this devastating crash.
50 people were killed on the ground, which included residents inside the BJ Medical College and Hospital.
Vishwash Kumar Ramash was the sole survivor and is a British-Indian national who sat in seat 11A.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
34 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Flickering green and white': Inside the cabin seconds before the Air India crash
In his final message to air traffic controllers, the plane's pilot said the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner had 'no thrust', was 'losing power' and was 'unable to lift'. The Dreamliner is designed to be able to climb and fly safely in the event of having only one engine operational. Speculation has been rife over what may have caused the crash, including the possibility of pilot error, faulty flaps, electrical problems or engine failure. A bird strike is a prominent hypothesis, and could have caused a catastrophic engine failure leading to such a situation, but there has been no evidence of flocks in the area at the time of the crash. 'More than one thing went wrong here. The thing that might have started it, and I think probably did, was a loss of power,' Learmount said 'Whether it was loss of power on one engine or both engines is not clear. But the failure of a single engine should not cause a crew to lose control of a modern airliner, even in the critical early climb phase. Loading 'At the same time, simultaneous engine failures for unconnected reasons simply do not happen, based on the entire history of aviation. So if there was a failure of both, the question is what could have caused it.' The two engines on the plane are made by General Electric aviation and have a good safety history. On Friday, the Indian aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation, issued a notice to Air India to conduct more inspections of all of its 787-8 and 787-9 fleet with GE engines. This includes an inspection of the fuel monitoring systems, a test of the electronic engine control, a check of the hydraulics and a review of take-off parameters. 'Power assurance checks' are also to be done on each plane within two weeks. Dr Akhil Bhardwaj, a senior lecturer in aviation safety at the University of Bath, said he believed the DGCA was acting with an 'understandable abundance of caution'. Last year, a United Airlines 787 jet, which has the same GEnx-1B engines as the doomed AI 171 flight, suffered an 'uncontained left engine failure shortly after take-off' while flying from Singapore to San Francisco last year, according to a National Transportation Safety Board report. The engine ceased working at cruise altitude and set alight, according to the report, with the pilots managing to circle back and land the plane in Singapore using just one engine. A GE Aerospace spokesman said: 'Safety is our top priority, and we support the action being taken by the Indian Directorate General of Civil Aviation for enhanced safety inspections of the Air India 787-8/9 fleet. 'We continue to work closely with the appropriate regulatory and investigative agencies, and we are committed to providing all technical support necessary to understand the cause of this accident.' Loading Experts have suggested that the Dreamliner, which until Thursday had an unblemished safety record, also deployed its Ram Air Turbine (RAT) during the ill-fated 60 seconds between take-off and the crash. The RAT is a propeller-like device that sits in the fuselage between the wings and is only deployed in the most dangerous situations, to provide emergency power to vital electrical systems. Sambulo Matema, a lecturer in aviation management at University College Birmingham, said: 'There is credence to this theory. In a complete power‑loss scenario, the aircraft transitions from engine‑supplied power to RAT power, and lighting anomalies can occur.' Loading 'This behaviour aligns with established emergency procedures and the expected performance of aircraft electrical systems under severe duress. 'After total power loss, the RAT deploys as a fallback power source. During this transition, green emergency lighting activates, and white lights may flash while onboard systems reboot and stabilise.' Learmount, who flew Hercules military transport planes around the Middle East during his RAF career, said the RAT would have sent power to the cockpit. The plane's batteries would also have supported vital systems. However, neither could have done anything to keep the plane aloft in the event of its turbines spooling down. Loading All this suggests the fault lay in the engines. However, what could have caused them to shut down remains unclear. One theory is contaminated fuel. In 2010, a Cathay Pacific flight to Hong Kong almost ended in disaster when the pilot was unable to control engine thrust, leading it to land at twice the usual speed. It later emerged that fuel pumped into the plane had been contaminated with saltwater, damaging its engines over time. However, such problems are rare. Learmount said: 'If you go looking for a potential cause of multiple engine failure, fuel contamination could do it. But again, history is against that potential cause in observed reality.'
The Age
39 minutes ago
- The Age
‘Flickering green and white': Inside the cabin seconds before the Air India crash
In his final message to air traffic controllers, the plane's pilot said the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner had 'no thrust', was 'losing power' and was 'unable to lift'. The Dreamliner is designed to be able to climb and fly safely in the event of having only one engine operational. Speculation has been rife over what may have caused the crash, including the possibility of pilot error, faulty flaps, electrical problems or engine failure. A bird strike is a prominent hypothesis, and could have caused a catastrophic engine failure leading to such a situation, but there has been no evidence of flocks in the area at the time of the crash. 'More than one thing went wrong here. The thing that might have started it, and I think probably did, was a loss of power,' Learmount said 'Whether it was loss of power on one engine or both engines is not clear. But the failure of a single engine should not cause a crew to lose control of a modern airliner, even in the critical early climb phase. Loading 'At the same time, simultaneous engine failures for unconnected reasons simply do not happen, based on the entire history of aviation. So if there was a failure of both, the question is what could have caused it.' The two engines on the plane are made by General Electric aviation and have a good safety history. On Friday, the Indian aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation, issued a notice to Air India to conduct more inspections of all of its 787-8 and 787-9 fleet with GE engines. This includes an inspection of the fuel monitoring systems, a test of the electronic engine control, a check of the hydraulics and a review of take-off parameters. 'Power assurance checks' are also to be done on each plane within two weeks. Dr Akhil Bhardwaj, a senior lecturer in aviation safety at the University of Bath, said he believed the DGCA was acting with an 'understandable abundance of caution'. Last year, a United Airlines 787 jet, which has the same GEnx-1B engines as the doomed AI 171 flight, suffered an 'uncontained left engine failure shortly after take-off' while flying from Singapore to San Francisco last year, according to a National Transportation Safety Board report. The engine ceased working at cruise altitude and set alight, according to the report, with the pilots managing to circle back and land the plane in Singapore using just one engine. A GE Aerospace spokesman said: 'Safety is our top priority, and we support the action being taken by the Indian Directorate General of Civil Aviation for enhanced safety inspections of the Air India 787-8/9 fleet. 'We continue to work closely with the appropriate regulatory and investigative agencies, and we are committed to providing all technical support necessary to understand the cause of this accident.' Loading Experts have suggested that the Dreamliner, which until Thursday had an unblemished safety record, also deployed its Ram Air Turbine (RAT) during the ill-fated 60 seconds between take-off and the crash. The RAT is a propeller-like device that sits in the fuselage between the wings and is only deployed in the most dangerous situations, to provide emergency power to vital electrical systems. Sambulo Matema, a lecturer in aviation management at University College Birmingham, said: 'There is credence to this theory. In a complete power‑loss scenario, the aircraft transitions from engine‑supplied power to RAT power, and lighting anomalies can occur.' Loading 'This behaviour aligns with established emergency procedures and the expected performance of aircraft electrical systems under severe duress. 'After total power loss, the RAT deploys as a fallback power source. During this transition, green emergency lighting activates, and white lights may flash while onboard systems reboot and stabilise.' Learmount, who flew Hercules military transport planes around the Middle East during his RAF career, said the RAT would have sent power to the cockpit. The plane's batteries would also have supported vital systems. However, neither could have done anything to keep the plane aloft in the event of its turbines spooling down. Loading All this suggests the fault lay in the engines. However, what could have caused them to shut down remains unclear. One theory is contaminated fuel. In 2010, a Cathay Pacific flight to Hong Kong almost ended in disaster when the pilot was unable to control engine thrust, leading it to land at twice the usual speed. It later emerged that fuel pumped into the plane had been contaminated with saltwater, damaging its engines over time. However, such problems are rare. Learmount said: 'If you go looking for a potential cause of multiple engine failure, fuel contamination could do it. But again, history is against that potential cause in observed reality.'
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Only surviving Air India passenger Vishwash Kumar Ramesh says plane felt 'stuck' as he reveals how he escaped burning wreckage
The only survivor of the Air India crash has described how the plane felt "stuck" seconds after takeoff before it struck a medical college hostel and exploded in a fireball. Speaking from his hospital bed hours after one of worst aviation disasters claimed at least 290 lives, including his brother's, British national Vishwash Kumar Ramesh said they had been in the air for five to ten seconds when something did not feel right. "It felt like the plane was stuck. It felt like something had happened," he told local Indian media, adding a green and white light then turned on in the cabin. "The pilot was trying to give it a bit of a push it forward but it was struggling." Mr Ramesh's survival has been labelled a miracle. He was one of 242 passengers and crew who boarded the plane in Ahmedabad bound for London. But he would be the only one to climb out of the wreckage alive. "Everything happened in front of my eyes. I still can't believe myself how I came out alive. For a little while I thought I was going to die," the 40-year-old father said. "But when I opened my eyes I realised I was alive. So I tried to escape. I pulled out the belt from under my seat and tried to escape (but couldn't). Then I managed to do it. "I saw others and the air hostess in front of me who couldn't escape." Mr Ramesh was seated in 11A, according to his boarding ticket, an emergency exit row behind business class, which is towards the front of the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. According to local police, he survived by jumping from the plane. It was not clear on Friday if Mr Ramesh managed to jump out before the plane made impact. But the British national elaborated further about his escape, saying his side of the plane had crash landed on the ground floor of the medical hostel. "I don't know about the other side but it was open on this side," Mr Ramesh recalled. "As soon as the door broke, I could see that it was open for me and I had a chance to get out. Then I managed to get out. But the opposite side (of the plane), the wall of the building would have blocked people and nobody would have been able to get out. "It was really only on my side where there was space to get out." Mr Ramesh suffered burns to his hands and bruising to other parts of his body. A local doctor said he is "out of danger". He could be discharged from hospital in coming days. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Mr Ramesh at hospital where the pair discussed what had happened and the survivor's health. The leader was also taken to the crash site in the state of Gujarat to survey the damage. The plane's black box containing the flight data recorded has been recovered. But the other one, which records the cockpit conversations, has not been located. Both black boxes will be crucial for investigators to determine what happened. In the meantime, Air India has been ordered by the country's aviation regulator to carry out further "maintenance actions" across its fleet of Boeing 787-8/9s after the crash. The United States' National Transportation Safety Board has sent a team to help India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau.
