&w=3840&q=100)
HC rules in favour of Karan Johar, bars release of film using his name
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday upheld a March 7, 2025 judgment that refused to lift the stay on the release of the film 'Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar'. The film's release had been halted since June 2024 after the court found that it likely infringed on the personality rights of filmmaker Karan Johar, reported Live Law.
A division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Makarand Karnik dismissed the appeal filed by the filmmakers against the earlier ruling by Justice Riyaz Chagla, who had passed the original interim stay on June 13, 2024. That interim stay was later confirmed and made absolute in a detailed ruling on March 7, 2025.
A copy of the latest judgment is yet to be made available.
In his previous order, Justice Chagla observed that a 'strong prima facie' case had been made by Johar to protect his personality rights, noting his celebrity status based on several blockbuster films he has directed and produced. The court also found that the use of his name in the title of the film appeared to be unauthorised and intended to unfairly profit from Johar's established brand.
'There is no manner of doubt that the plaintiff [Johar] has played a role in transforming the Bollywood film industry and launched careers of several successful actors. I have no doubt that prima facie the subject film is a direct reference to the plaintiff and makes unauthorised use of plaintiff's name,' Justice Chagla noted in his interim ruling.
Also Read
In his final judgment on March 7, Justice Chagla ruled that the filmmakers had prima facie violated Johar's personality rights, publicity rights, and right to privacy by using his name and associated attributes in the film title.
'The plaintiff [Karan Johar] has been able to establish that by using his brand name the defendants are attempting to ride upon the goodwill and reputation of the plaintiff to earn unjust profits for itself,' the court said while making the interim stay order permanent.
The judge also noted that the characters in the film, named 'Karan' and 'Johar', are aspiring film directors in Bollywood — a clear reference to Johar's real-life profession. The use of the term 'director' alongside the name was viewed as a deliberate attempt to create an association with the real-life celebrity.
The court found that this kind of portrayal could lead to commercial exploitation of Johar's name, which carries independent economic value. The judge emphasised that Johar alone has the right to commercially benefit from the use of his brand and identity.
Background of the case
Johar had filed a lawsuit claiming that he had no connection to the film and that the makers were unlawfully using his name in the title. The film is co-produced by IndiaPride Advisory Pvt Ltd and Sanjay Singh, and directed by Bablu Singh.
In the lawsuit, Johar alleged that the film infringed upon his personality rights, right to publicity, and right to privacy. His legal team argued that the title Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar directly referred to his name and brand, without any authorisation.
They added that Johar's name has gained a distinct identity and secondary meaning due to his widespread recognition in the entertainment industry. As a public figure, he has the legal right to prevent misuse of his identity under intellectual property laws.
Johar's team also claimed that promotional material and trailers were causing irreparable harm to his reputation and goodwill, which he has built over decades in the film industry.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Madras HC closes Vetri Maaran's plea after CBFC provides detailed note on edits in Andrea Jeremiah-starrer 'Manushi'
The Madras High Court has formally concluded a petition filed by Kollywood filmmaker Vetri Maaran concerning the certification of his latest production, Manushi. The court disposed of his plea following fresh submissions from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) during a recent hearing on June 17. About Madras HC's recent order According to Live Law, Justice N. Anand Venkatesh took note of the CBFC's updated response, in which the board, through central government counsel A. Kumaraguru, clarified that specific edits had been proposed for the film. As a result, the court declared the current plea closed. Vetri Maaran had previously approached the court, contending that the CBFC had summarily denied certification to 'Manushi' without offering clear reasons for its decision. Ilaiyaraaja composes for Vetri Maaran's film with Soori & Vijay Sethupathi Vetri Maaran's plea In an earlier hearing on June 4, the High Court directed the CBFC to ensure greater transparency by pinpointing the exact scenes, dialogues, or sequences it found objectionable, rather than issuing a broad rejection. Responding to the court's direction, the board conducted a fresh review and presented a list of proposed cuts. Vetri Maaran's counsel informed the court that the filmmaker disagreed with several of the CBFC's objections. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo However, Justice Venkatesh clarified that the current writ petition could not be extended to challenge those individual objections and that a new legal petition would need to be filed for further review. About Manushi 'Manushi', featuring Andrea Jeremiah and helmed by director Gopi Nainar, is a hard-hitting social drama produced under Vetri Maaran's production house. The project has faced significant hurdles, with both the examining and revising panels of the CBFC reportedly refusing certification back in September 2024. The board cited concerns over content it believed undermined governmental policies, threatened national unity, and accentuated regional divisions, particularly between northern and southern India.


Scroll.in
2 days ago
- Scroll.in
‘Can't let mobs take over': SC tells Karnataka to ensure release of Kamal Haasan's ‘Thug Life'
The Supreme Court on Tuesday criticised the Karnataka government for the ' extra-judicial ban ' on the screening of the film Thug Life, starring actor and politician Kamal Haasan, reported Live Law. 'We cannot allow mobs and vigilante groups to take over the streets,' said a bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan. 'Rule of law must prevail.' On June 3, Haasan's production house told the Karnataka High Court that it will not seek to release the film in the state amid a row over his remark that the Kannada language 'was born out of Tamil'. Haasan made the remarks on May 24 at the audio launch for Thug Life in Chennai, after which pro-Kannada organisations held protests demanding that he should apologise for them. In the wake of the protests and demands to block the film, Raajkamal Films International had moved the High Court seeking directions to ensure its release. Asking Haasan to apologise for his remark, the High Court on June 3 said that the actor's statements had caused 'unrest and disharmony' in Karnataka. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court said that a person's statement should be countered 'with a statement'. The bench said that it was the state government's responsibility to ensure the screening of any film with a certificate from the Central Board of Film Certification. 'It cannot be that at the fear of burning down the cinemas, that the film cannot be shown,' the bench added. People may not watch the film. That is a different matter. We are not passing any order that people must watch the film. But the film must be released.' The court was hearing a public interest litigation seeking the film's release in Karnataka. The petitioner told the Supreme Court that the Karnataka government had not filed any complaint against the groups issuing threats against the film's release, reported Live Law. The state's counsel told the court that Haasan had decided not to release the film until he resolved the concern with the Karnataka Film Chamber. However, the Supreme Court expressed disapproval of the High Court's directive asking Haasan to apologise for his statements. 'It is none of the business of the High Court,' said Justice Bhuyan. On June 3, the actor had refused to apologise, saying he had 'no malice' behind his remarks. The bench also took strong exception to the threats issued against the actor in Karnataka for his comments. 'All the enlightened people of Bengaluru can issue a statement that he is wrong,' said the court. 'Why should there be a resort to threats?' Haasan's remarks At the audio launch in Chennai on May 24, Haasan described his bond with the Tamil language with the words: ' Uyire Urave Tamizhe [My life and my family is Tamil].' He addressed Kannada actor Shivarajkumar, who was at the event, and said: 'Actor Shivarajkumar is my family living in another state… Your language was born out of Tamil. So, you are included in that line.' The actor's remarks sparked a furore in Karnataka, with pro-Kannada group Karnataka Rakshana Vedike threatening to boycott his film. Members of the group tore posters of the film Thug Life in Bengaluru to protest the actor-politician's remarks. Other pro-Kannada organisations also staged protests in Bengaluru, Belagavi, Hubballi and Mysuru, demanding an apology from the actor. On May 28, Haasan sought to clarify his remarks and said: 'I think what I said was said with a lot of love. Historians have taught me the language's history… I didn't mean anything.' The film is directed by Mani Ratnam. Among its producers is Red Giant Movies, a company owned by Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam leader Udhayanidhi Stalin. The film has been dubbed in several languages, including Kannada.


Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
‘None of its business': Supreme Court pulls up Karnataka high court for Kamal Haasan apology remark
The Supreme Court on Tuesday disapproved of the Karnataka high court's observation asking Kamal Haasan to apologise for his 'Kannada-Tamil' remark, saying it wasn't the court's business to seek an apology. The apex court made the critical remark during a hearing for the release of Haasan's film, Thug Life, in Karnataka. "It is none of the business of the high court," the court observed. The Supreme Court came down heavily on the state government over the blocking of the Kamal Haasan film in Karnataka, observing that mobs and vigilantes cannot be allowed to take to the streets. A bench of Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and Manmohan said the rule of law has to be established, and guns cannot be put to people's heads to stop them from watching the movie. "We can't allow mobs and vigilante groups to take over the streets. The rule of law must prevail. We can't allow this to happen. If somebody has made a statement, counter it with a statement. Somebody has made some writing, counter it with some writing," the bench said, reported Live Law. Also read: 'You may be Kamal Haasan...': How Karnataka high court admonished actor-politician over Kannada-Tamil remark Giving one day to the state government to inform it about the release of the movie, the apex court observed that once a film has obtained the Central Board of Film Certification clearance, it has to be released in all states. "Rule of law demands that any film which has a CBFC certificate must be released, and the State has to ensure its screening. It can't be that, for the fear of burning down the cinemas, the film can't be shown. People may not watch the film. That is a different matter. We are not passing any order that people must watch the film. But the film must be released," Justice Manmohan added. Kamal Haasan had triggered the row with his remark that Tamil was the source from which Kannada evolved. The Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) later announced that the film would not be screened in the state unless Haasan apologised. Earlier this month, the Karnataka high court, hearing a plea seeking the smooth release of the film in the state, admonished Haasan, asking if he had made the statement in his capacity as a historian or a linguist. It also said that the row would have died down had the actor apologised. "The division of this country is on linguistic lines. A public figure cannot make such a statement... The people of Karnataka only asked for an apology. Now you come here seeking protection," the high court had said. With inputs from PTI