'I'll shove it up their...': Trump says nobody gonna mention that he got Olympics and Fifa World Cup
At the White House gathering, US President
Donald Trump
shared what motivated him to run again in 2024 presidential elections, repeating his claim that the 2020 US election, which Democrats won, was 'rigged.' He was speaking at a Kennedy Center board meeting at the White House on Monday night. He boasted about securing both 2028 Olympics and 2026 Fifa World Cup in the United States.
What motivated Trump for 2024?
'We got the Olympics and then we got through Gianni, he's the boss, he's a friend of mine, we got the World Cup. I got them both and I said, 'Man, I won't be president. I got the Olympics and the World Cup and I won't be president and they're gonna forget that I got them, nobody's gonna mention it because, you know, a little bit, that's the way life is. And then they rigged the election," he said.
ALSO READ:
White House study raises alarm: 9 million Americans could lose health insurance in 'major' recession if...
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In Dhaka - Watch What Happens
Happy in Shape
Undo
"And then I said, you know what I'll do? I'll run again and I'll shove it up their a**. And that's what I did. And all of a sudden, I then realized, I said, you know what? I got the Olympics, I got the World cup, and I got the 250th. Look at the way this works out. So if they would have left us alone and wouldn't have cheated on the election and wouldn't have rigged it, I would have been retired right now. I would have been happily doing something else. And instead, they have me for four more years. Can you believe it? So it has rigged," he added.
"So if they would have left us alone and wouldn't have cheated on the election and wouldn't have rigged it, I would have been retired right now," Trump said. 'ok'' "I would have been happily doing something else, and instead, they have me for four more years,' Trump added.
Live Events
— alx (@alx)
Donald Trump criticized the previous leadership of the Kennedy Center, claiming that its period of "rampant political propaganda" ended with his recent involvement. Speaking to the center's new board members at a White House event, Trump remarked, "When I said I'd do this, I hadn't even been there." He joked about typically avoiding commitments without prior inspection and criticized the venue's condition, despite what he described as significant funding over the past decade.
ALSO READ:
FBI chief Kash Patel, accused of spending more time at nightclubs than office, makes big announcement
After returning to office in January, Trump dismissed several long-serving board members. In February, newly appointed members voted to make him chairman, prompting the resignation of high-profile figures like TV producer Shonda Rhimes and musician Ben Folds. While the Kennedy Center has historically enjoyed bipartisan support, no US president has previously led it.
Trump claimed the facility was deteriorating and criticized its programming, which he said had become overly political, focused on DEI initiatives, and included content he deemed inappropriate—particularly LGBTQ-related shows.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump, Xi likely to speak soon on minerals trade dispute, Treasury's Bessent says
US Treasury Secretary Bessent said he believes President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will speak soon to iron out trade issues including a dispute over critical minerals. President Donald Trump on Friday accused China of violating an agreement with the US to mutually roll back tariffs and trade restrictions for critical minerals. 'What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe. And that is not what a reliable partner does,' Bessent said in an interview on Sunday with CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'I am confident that when President Trump and Party Chairman Xi have a call, that this will be ironed out. But the fact that they are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement – maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the President speaks with the party chairman.' Trump said on Friday he was sure that he would speak to Xi. China said in April that the two leaders had not had a conversation recently. Asked if a talk with Xi was on Trump's schedule, Bessent said, 'I believe we'll see something very soon.'
Hans India
31 minutes ago
- Hans India
The challenges behind producing iPhones in the U.S. – and why it's unlikely
In 2011, President Barack Obama asked Apple cofounder Steve Jobs what it would take to shift iPhone assembly back to the United States. Fast-forward 14 years: former President Donald Trump is resurrecting that same question with Apple's current CEO, Tim Cook. Trump has threatened a 25 percent tariff on Apple—and other smartphone makers—unless they build every iPhone sold in the U.S. domestically. 'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'If that is not the case, a tariff of at least 25 percent must be paid by Apple to the U.S.' Earlier this month, Cook confirmed that most iPhones bound for American customers will ship from India. That response underscores a tough reality: reassembling the iPhone's global supply chain on U.S. soil would dramatically upend how Apple produces its most profitable device. A Well-Oiled Overseas Manufacturing Ecosystem Currently, Apple relies heavily on factories in China and—more recently—India, where a specialized workforce has been honed to assemble millions of iPhones every year. Foxconn, Apple's long-standing manufacturing partner, employs up to 900,000 people at peak production. Their vast campuses, complete with dormitories and on-site support services, allow Foxconn to rapidly adjust output to match Apple's exacting timelines. 'China already has sprawling facilities designed specifically for electronics assembly,' notes Dipanjan Chatterjee, vice president and principal analyst at Forrester. In these plants, teams of workers focus on narrow, highly skilled tasks—often programming industrial robots or performing precision component installation. That level of specialization and scale cannot simply be duplicated overnight in the U.S. David Marcotte, senior vice president at Kantar, adds: 'Each step of the iPhone's assembly requires expertise developed over many years. Replicating that on American soil would be an immense challenge.' Labor and Skills Gap Manufacturing in the United States today looks very different than it did in the latter half of the 20th century. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only 8 percent of American workers were employed in manufacturing as of early 2025—down from roughly 26 percent in 1970. Moreover, modern factories increasingly rely on a blend of robotics, data analytics, and coding skills—areas where China and India currently hold an edge when it comes to electronics production. Carolyn Lee, executive director of the Manufacturing Institute, explains that 'the job has very much changed. Workers today need training in programming, data analysis, and advanced machine operations.' Apple CEO Tim Cook has echoed that point: at a 2017 Fortune event, he said that China offered a rare combination of 'craftsmanship, sophisticated robotics, and software talent.' He warned that meeting Apple's exacting standards without that unique mix would be nearly impossible. President Trump's Onshoring Push One of Trump's central economic objectives has been to bring manufacturing back to the United States. Within the first months of his second term, he levied tariffs on broad categories of imported goods, hoping to incentivize companies to build products domestically. Trump's threat of a 25 percent tariff on smartphones sold in the U.S. would, if enforced, make iPhones significantly more expensive for American consumers—or cut deeply into Apple's profit margins. Cook reportedly met with Trump last week to discuss these proposals. Trump, for his part, hailed Apple's February commitment to invest $500 billion in U.S. operations over the next four years—money earmarked for R&D, data-center facilities, and a Detroit 'Academy' to teach small and mid-sized businesses about advanced manufacturing and AI tools. Taiwan's TSMC has similarly pledged $100 billion to build or expand American chip-making plants, which Trump called a 'political win' onshoring U.S. tech production. Yet Apple's February announcement does not include training a workforce capable of iPhone-scale assembly. Instead, the Detroit academy will focus on helping other businesses adopt 'smart manufacturing' practices—not on building the trained, highly specialized labor pool that Foxconn has cultivated over decades in Asia. What It Would Take to Build in America Several analysts believe that Apple could shift at least part of its iPhone assembly to the U.S. within five years—but only by fundamentally changing the way each device is put together. Patrick Moorhead, founder and CEO of Moor Insights & Strategy, says Apple would need to introduce far more automation to offset the higher labor costs and skill gaps. That could mean redesigning certain elements—glue application, component placement, or precision machining—to be driven by robotic arms rather than hand-assembly. Ultrahuman, a smart health ring startup, offers a real-world example. CEO Mohit Kumar told CNN that when Ultrahuman moved production of its wearable from India to Texas last November, it leaned heavily on automation and cross-training workers to perform multiple tasks like casting and polishing. Even so, Ultrahuman accepts that mass-producing millions of units at the level Apple requires is a far bigger undertaking. Many core iPhone components—chips, camera modules, displays—still originate with suppliers based in China, Taiwan, South Korea, and elsewhere in Asia. Shifting assembly alone would break the synergy of having suppliers clustered near one another, intensifying logistical hurdles and rising freight costs. Dan Ives, global head of technology research at Wedbush Securities, estimates that 90 percent of iPhone production currently takes place in China; as recently as last year, that figure dipped to about 40 percent only after Apple began ramping up in India. Ives warns that assembling the iPhone in the U.S. might triple the device's price. Even if Apple were willing to redesign the iPhone for greater automation, recruit and retrain thousands of American factory workers, and reorganize its supplier network, the company would face significant political pressure from both sides. Trump's tariffs risk imposing punishing costs on Apple, but CEOs and shareholders alike may balk at the price increases or margin squeeze such a move would entail. A Tightrope Walk Forrester's Chatterjee sums up Apple's quandary: 'You cannot realistically, from an economic standpoint, bring iPhone production to the U.S., and you also can't simply refuse to do it.' Apple must carefully navigate between appeasing political demands to onshore manufacturing and preserving the cost efficiencies that keep iPhone prices competitive. At this point, the consensus among analysts is clear: Apple will continue to expand production in India and maintain its China base. Until there's a seismic shift in labor availability, automation technology, or supply-chain structure, making iPhones in America remains more aspiration than reality.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Hungarians silently protest bill 'muzzling' NGOs, media
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban (AP) BUDAPEST: Thousands marched in silence, many with their mouths taped shut, in central Budapest Sunday to protest a planned law that would allow the government to sanction "foreign-funded" NGOs and media. Critics consider the bill "on transparency in public life" as the latest attempt by nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban to muzzle dissenting voices since returning to power in 2010. The legislation would empower the government to blacklist organisations that "threaten the sovereignty of Hungary by using foreign funding to influence public life". The government argues these measures are necessary to defend against "foreign interference". "I believe it is important to have an independent press, and not to judge a publication based on where it gets its money from," one of the protesters, 49-year-old Zsolt Solyom, a retired soldier, told AFP. "What I see is that the government wants to silence any media outlet that does not speak or write according to its liking," he added. An AFP photographer estimated that a few thousand people marched through Liberty Bridge in central Budapest in complete silence. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo "Donation today, evidence of crime tomorrow?" read one of the banners. The crowd later erupted in boos and chants denouncing the ruling party as an organiser read the names of all 115 lawmakers co-sponsoring the bill. According to the draft law blacklisted organisation, would need permission to receive foreign funding. They would also be barred from receiving donations through Hungary's annual one-percent income tax contribution scheme, an important source of revenue for non-profits. The proposed legislation has been condemned by the opposition, which has accused the government of copying Russia's authoritarian evolution. Last week, lead representatives of over 80 media outlets from 22 countries -- including Britain's The Guardian and France's Liberation -- urged their governments and the European Union to do everything in their power to prevent its enactment. The European Commission has called on Hungary to withdraw the draft, vowing to take the "necessary action" if it is adopted. Lawmakers are scheduled to vote on the legislation in mid-June. It is expected to pass, as Orban's tightly disciplined governing coalition has a supermajority in parliament.
