EDITORIAL: Shootings a tragic consequence of anti-Semitism
The two Israeli embassy staffers killed by a gunman in Washington DC had the right to expect to be safe.
They weren't in a war zone. They were at a museum in America's heart of democracy.
The victims, a young couple who planned to get engaged next week on a trip to Israel, were there to attend an event for young diplomats. Speakers at the event included those devoted to humanitarian aid missions across the Middle East and North Africa.
Their killer, Elias Rodriguez, is a 30-year-old from Chicago who has had never been in trouble with the law before, authorities say.
He approached the couple as they left the event with two friends, and opened fire.
After killing the pair, he walked into the museum where he was detained by security.
According to DC police chief Pamela Smith, once in custody, he chanted 'Free, free Palestine'.
What drives a person to murder two strangers? To take the lives of people entirely unknown to him, who had done nothing to him?
Details of Rodriguez' background are scant at this early stage.
But there could be little doubt about his motivations.
US President Donald Trump called the act a 'depraved act of anti-Semitic terrorism'.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin described the deaths as 'horrific anti-Semitic murder'.
'We are witnessing the terrible price of anti-Semitism and wild incitement against the State of Israel,' he said.
'The blood libels against Israel are rising in blood and must be fought to the bitter end.'
These murders will deeply affect the Jewish community — including in Australia.
Australia's Jewish community understands what it's like to have their sense of safety stolen away from them.
Every act of anti-Semitism that has occurred in this country and others since the atrocities of October 7, 2023 have chipped away at it.
These murders will erode it even further.
There are clear differences between Australia and the US. But the frightening reality is that something like this is possible here.
The 'wild incitement' Mr Netanyahu spoke about exist here too and they are destroying our social cohesion and sowing the seeds of violent anti-Semitic hatred.
As Anti-Defamation Commission chairman Dvir Abramovich writes in The Nightly today, radicalisation starts with words 'repeated, unchallenged, and unleashed into public life'.
'Before bullets are fired, words are sharpened. And when speech loses its guardrails, when empathy drains out of our discourse, the slide from disagreement to danger becomes disturbingly short.'
We cannot allow ourselves to be pulled further down this path towards hatred and violence.
Jewish Australians' trust in the Government has been tested in the 19 months since the October 7 massacre.
They have watched their Prime Minister and senior ministers urge 'restraint' by Israel in its fight to defend itself and its people against terrorism.
They have watched acts of hatred at home be met with weak platitudes.
Many no longer feel safe in their own communities. Today, they will mourn the deaths of these two young people, and that sense of safety will slip further away.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Toxic cocktail of narcissism': Douglas Murray blasts ‘privileged' Harvard protesters
Author Douglas Murray discusses the 'toxic mix' and 'narcissism' of Harvard University graduation speeches which highlight the 'real bigotry and real hatred' towards Jews. "You're one of the luckiest kids in the one of the luckiest generations of all time, and you seem to be under the impression that the war in the Middle East that Hamas started is somehow being directed from Harvard University,' Mr Murray told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'Neither Hamas nor the Israeli government take any direction from Harvard University or any other privileged Ivy League campus. 'There's a world beyond the end of your own nose, and these students haven't been taught that ... they certainly haven't taught any humility. 'They think that the world is going to be run on their terms. 'They'll just continue this toxic cocktail of advocacy, endless prejudice against people they feel able to be prejudiced against, and wild, wild narcissism.'
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
London gold executive says Perth Mint 'well regarded', two years after damaging reports
A high-ranking executive from the London-based World Gold Council says the Perth Mint remains "well regarded" internationally, two years after its reputation as a refiner was questioned over the "doping" of gold bars. An investigation by the ABC's Four Corners revealed the mint sold gold to China that met broader industry standards of 99.99 per cent pure gold, but not stricter standards for silver content at the Shanghai Gold Exchange. It also uncovered governance failures by the WA government-owned Gold Corporation relating to anti-money laundering laws, which prompted a federal parliamentary inquiry of the 126-year-old mint, resulting in 10 recommendations last year. Perth Mint chairman Sam Walsh took responsibility for "historical shortcomings" when the mint's annual report was tabled in state parliament in September, noting 60,000 customer records had been remediated as part of a $34 million government program to improve anti-money laundering processes. In light of the mint's recent history, the ABC asked the World Gold Council's chief strategy officer, Terry Heymann, who visited Kalgoorlie and Perth this week for the premiere of a new documentary about WA gold mining, if its international reputation had been damaged. "I'm not going to comment specifically on the details, but the Perth Mint is very well regarded, as indeed is ABC Refinery (in Sydney)," he said. "Australia has two leading refineries and that really gives confidence to the market that the gold coming out of those refineries is to the expected standard, both in terms of the quality, the purity of the gold and responsible sourcing." Mr Heymann said the responsible sourcing of gold remained a focus of the World Gold Council, adding that "there is always room for continuous improvement". The Perth Mint's reputation was restored somewhat in March when it was appointed by the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) as a refinery referee — one of just seven across the globe responsible for quality control of the world's precious metals. The accreditation process took several years and will make the mint responsible for assessing the standards of third-party refiners. "It speaks to the quality of our products," Perth Mint CEO Paul Graham told the ABC in March. "It's something we're very proud of and it places us among the most trusted refiners globally. "We're the only ones in the southern hemisphere who have achieved the referee appointment." Mr Graham replaced Jason Waters in November 2023 after his predecessor acknowledged issues around the diluted gold it supplied to China were "damaging and unacceptable". But Mr Graham denied gold bars had intentionally been diluted or "doped", claiming the media had "misrepresented what the Perth Mint has been doing historically". "The bars are never 100 per cent pure," he said. "I think what was reported around doping, which is a very unfortunate term, isn't necessarily correct." Mr Graham said it was common practice to top up bars with silver or base metals, such as copper. "What we try and do at the Perth Mint is get as close as we can to that 100 per cent," he said. "We believe today that our bars are as pure as any, if not the purest in the market, where we're currently getting bars out at to the tune of 99.996 purity. "The bars that were in question previously were around the 99.992 or 99.993 mark, so we have improved through technology and our focus, but we never believed we were intentionally doping the bars under the standards." Meanwhile, the Perth Mint has reported strong demand for its product as the Australian dollar gold price continues to trade at record highs. It soared above $5,000 an ounce for the first time in April — the same week US President Donald Trump announced his "Liberation Day" tariffs. The Perth Mint sold 43,714 ounces of gold and 723,641oz of silver in April, up from 40,537oz of gold and 713,306oz of silver in March. Demand softened in May when the mint sold 28,244oz of gold and 496,707oz of silver. The mint's depository held 308,899oz of gold at the end of May — equivalent to 9.61 tonnes — worth more than $1.5 billion at current prices. Mr Heymann described gold as an "economic safe harbour", saying the metal had "proven security and resilience". He said US economic policies were only one factor in a perfect storm that also included conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East. "You look at the sustained demand that there is for gold, so much of that being underpinned by central banks around the world, who have had unprecedented levels of buying," he said. "Why are they buying gold? It gives them confidence in helping to manage the financial security of the countries they're responsible for. "Of course, government policies, including the US, play into that but there's no one specific indicator that drives the gold price. "It is a reflection of what's going on around the world."
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
Judge blocks Trump's Harvard international students ban
A federal judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump from barring US entry of foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in exchange programs at Harvard University. Under a two-page temporary restraining order granted to Harvard, US District Judge Allison Burroughs on Thirsday enjoined Trump's proclamation from taking effect pending further litigation of the matter amid an escalating dispute between the Ivy League school and Republican president. The judge ruled Trump's directive prohibiting foreign nationals from entering the United States to study at Harvard for the next six months would cause "immediate and irreparable injury" before the courts have a chance to review the case. Burroughs in May had blocked Trump from implementing a separate order prohibiting Harvard from enrolling international students, who make up more than a quarter of its student body. Harvard on Thursday amended its lawsuit to challenge the new directive, claiming Trump is violating Burroughs' decision. "The Proclamation denies thousands of Harvard's students the right to come to this country to pursue their education and follow their dreams, and it denies Harvard the right to teach them. Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard," the school said in the filing. Burroughs' order on Thursday also continued a separate temporary restraining order she issued on May 23 against the administration's restriction on international student enrolment at Harvard. Earlier on Thursday, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson called Harvard "a hotbed of anti-American, anti-Semitic, pro-terrorist agitators," claims that the school has previously denied. "Harvard's behaviour has jeopardised the integrity of the entire US student and exchange visitor visa system and risks compromising national security. Now it must face the consequences of its actions," Jackson said in a statement. Trump cited national security concerns as justification for barring international students from entering the US to pursue studies at the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university. Under Trump's proclamation, the suspension would initially be for six months but could be extended. Trump's order also directed the US State Department to consider revoking academic or exchange visas of any current Harvard students who meet his proclamation's criteria. In Thursday's court filing, Harvard said Trump had violated federal law by failing to back up his claims about national security. "The Proclamation does not deem the entry of an alien or class of aliens to be detrimental to the interests of the United States, because non-citizens who are impacted by the Proclamation can enter the United States — just so long as they go somewhere other than Harvard," the school said. The Trump administration has launched a multi-front attack on the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, freezing billions of dollars in grants and other funding and proposing to end its tax-exempt status, prompting a series of legal challenges. Harvard argues the administration is retaliating against it for refusing to accede to demands to control the school's governance, curriculum and the ideology of its faculty and students.
