logo
Sony WH-1000XM6 vs AirPods Max: How do Sony's latest cans compare to Apple's premium headphones?

Sony WH-1000XM6 vs AirPods Max: How do Sony's latest cans compare to Apple's premium headphones?

Tom's Guide21-05-2025

Sony's newest flagship cans bring a suite of updates to the table, including a thicker headband and improved ANC. They're more expensive than the M6's predecessor, the WH-1000XM5, but they're still not as expensive as the AirPods Max.
The AirPods Max aren't as new as the M6, but there are still plenty of reasons to pick them up: Stunning build quality, excellent sound, and the best support for Apple devices makes them a great option for those already invested in Apple devices.
Despite being released a few years ago, the AirPods Max are still some of the best wireless headphones. They're weighty, made out of stainless steel, and boast excellent sound quality with good support for Apple's Spatial Audio standard. They're getting a bit long in the tooth, but they're a solid pick for anyone in need of new headphones.
Complicating matters, however is Sony's newly launched pair of ANC flagship headphones — the WH-1000XM6. They're looking to unseat the WH-1000XM5 as the king of the headphone kingdom with a spate of updates that might well make them the better buy.
But which are the better headphones overall — Apple's premium cans, or Sony's new jack-of-all-trades? Let's find out.
Sony WH-1000XM6
AirPods Max
Price
$449 / £399 / AU$699
$549 / £499 / AU$899
Colors
Black; Silver; Midnight Blue
Blue; Purple; Midnight; Starlight; Orange
Size
Not specified
Not specified
Weight
8.9 ounces
13.6 ounces
Battery life (rated)
Up to 40 hours
Up to 20 hours
Connectivity
Bluetooth 5.3 with SBC, AAC and LDAC support
Bluetooth 5.0 with SBC, AAC
Special features
Adaptive ANC, Ambient Sound Mode, DSEE Extreme Audio, Bluetooth multipoint, customizable sound, quick charge, passive mode, 360 Reality Audio
ANC, spatial audio, audio sharing, Siri
The Sony WH-1000XM6 have risen in price over their predecessor by $50, up to $449. That makes them one of the more expensive pairs of headphones you can buy today, with an increase over even the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones, the best noise-canceling headphones.
What makes life trickier for the XM6's value proposition is that Sony will keep selling the XM5, the older model. Those can be had for less money during deals events, making them a more compelling deal if you're looking for ways to spend less money.
The XM6 bring enough extra features and upgrades to make them worth the extra, but there's no denying that they're now an expensive pair of headphones.
And yet they're still not as expensive as Apple's flagship cans: The AirPods Max with USB-C will set you back $549, making them $100 more expensive than Sony's latest pair of headphones.
They too have received discounts since their release, however. We've seen the USB-C variant go down as low as $449, the same price as the Sony headphones. If you're willing to forgo wired USB-C lossless listening and the most up-to-date charging standard, you could even grab yourself a pair of the AirPods Max with Lightning for often less than $400.
You won't have problems getting hold of either pair of headphones — both are available from Amazon and other big-box retail stores. As always, wait for deals events like Black Friday or Amazon Prime Day if you want the very best prices.
Given that you'll usually find all versions of the AirPods Max for more money than the WH-1000XM6, we're going to give this to the lower-cost Sony cans.
The Sony WH-1000XM6 are a small update over their predecessor. There are a couple of new elements worth noting, though — we'll start with the new hinged sliders that help the headphones fold into their newly designed carry case.
The hinges mean that the headphones can now become more compact, but our Tom's Guide's Managing Editor of TVs and AV Nick Pino had some concerns over the long-term durability of the hinges. They are an extra point of failure, something that already felt slightly weak on the older model.
The case that they fold into is very good, though. It's sturdy and omits zippers for a magnetic clasp. It's well-sized and very well made to make sure that you won't have any concerns about packing them into a particularly full backpack.
The headband foam across the top is nice and thick, and it makes them super comfortable to wear for long periods of time. They're super light as well, so they don't get fatiguing for longer listening sessions.
They're a bit rattly, though — when you shake them, the hinges tend to have more noise and movement to them than you might hope.
They're not the worst-looking pair of headphones, either, although they are quite plain. Overall, they're a decent-looking, reasonably well-made pair of folding headphones.
The AirPods Max are a very attractive pair of headphones. From their mesh stretchy mesh headband to the aluminum earcups and stainless steel sliding armature, they ooze premium quality and top notch build.
There are no rattles or creaks when you shake them at all, and the sliding hinges are some of the smoothest you'll find on just about any pair of headphones. They feel like they're something that you've paid a lot of money for — which is good considering that they cost over $500 for a pair.
Out of the box, they're very comfortable despite their heavy weight, with well-judged clamping force and good padding. There are some longevity concerns with the headband, though — my original pair of AirPods Max has drooped and sagged to the point it no longer supports them on the top of my head.
There is also a suede-lined elephant in the room — the carrying case that the headphones come with. It's awful. It only really protects the earcups themselves, and leaves the headband out the elements to make sure that it gets damaged by the contents of your backpack. You'll want one of the best AirPods Max cases to compensate.
This section is going to be a draw. While the AirPods Max are a nicer pair of headphones in terms of design, there are too many long-term issues that can ruin them in the long run.
Sony has stuck with touch controls for the WH-1000XM6. They remain vastly unchanged from those you'll find on the XM5, albeit with more accuracy thanks to an updated internal processor.
Swipes and taps control the main functions of the headphones. Swipe up and down to change the volume, left and right to change tracks, and then double tap to play/pause. The most useful control feature is the ability to hold the right earcup to quickly turn off noise cancelation and turn on audio passthrough. It's perfect when you need to order a sandwich or a bagel and you can't be bothered to take your headphones off.
The only physical controls on the headphones are the power and ANC buttons — which are now different shapes to make them easier to tell apart. No more accidental power-offs when you're looking to change the ANC mode and vice versa.
Apple opted for physical controls on the Airpods Max, and they are great. While I'd normally lament the fact that I have to press a button multiple times to change a track, I don't with the AirPods Max given how easy it is to find the buttons.
I also like how you control the volume on the AirPods Max — just turn the digital crown (a-la Apple Watch) and you'll hear a gentle click as the volume raises or lowers.
The controls overall feel great, and I never found myself getting annoyed at them throughout my testing. They're not as flexible as the WH-1000XM6 controls, however, so this section is going to be a tie.
Sony has changed the sound profile of the XM6 and has designed them for greater vocal clarity rather than a wider soundstage or better bass response.
That extra clarity means that the mids are nicer to listen to than before, and they join some top-quality highs for a great audio experience. There had to be a sacrifice, however, and that's in imaging and soundstage.
They're a slightly narrower listen than the XM5 that came before them, and it can be slightly harder to place the instruments in your tracks. They're still a great listen though, with plenty to enjoy in a variety of different genres.
The AirPods Max are the superior-sounding headphones, however, but only by a hair. They still have crystal clear vocals, but it's the super wide soundstage where they really flourish overall. There's more space for the music to breathe, allowing for much better imaging as a result.
They're a more refined experience than the Sony headphones across the frequency range, with more detail up top and better, quicker bass at the bottom. There's also Apple's excellent Spatial Audio on board, which both works and sounds much better than Sony's 360 Audio implementation.
This section goes to the AirPods Max and their better sound.
Both the AirPods Max and XM6 have great feature sets, but Sony always manages to pack in more features overall into its headphones. You'll find them all in the Sony Sound app, which you can download for both Apple devices and Android phones and tablets. This is where you'll find the dizzying array of noise-canceling modes that change depending on where you are. They're very useful, and more fully featured than the modes on the AirPods Max.
There's also EQ adjustment here. You'll find presets for different genres, but you can also dial in your own thanks to the 10-band EQ settings. This is great for tinkerers, giving ample opportunity to get the sound exactly as you want it.
Bluetooth 5.3 powers the connection to your devices, and offers up loads of different codecs (LDAC, SBC, and more) for your music. Expect Bluetooth LE and Auracast, amongst other 5.3 features as well. Spatial Audio is on board, but it's not quite there yet. 360 Reality Audio only works with Amazon Music Unlimited for now, and Sony's own "Spatial Audio Upmix" isn't yet available for us to try out.
The feature set of the AirPods Max is comprehensive, but not as impressive as the Sony headphones. For one, you won't get the full experience if you don't have an iPhone, with the likes of Spatial Audio and other features not working on Android handsets and tablets.
Bluetooth 5.0 makes sure that you won't want them for Android devices, especially when you consider there's only support for AAC and SBC codecs. That's disappointing considering the quality of the audio hardware inside.
Things get better for Apple users. You'll get excellent-sounding streams from Apple Music, along with the Spatial Audio mixes. Dip into the settings menu of your iPhone to find the ANC settings and other options, like head tracking.
Then there's the interoperability with the rest of the Apple ecosystem. Connect them to your iPhone, and they'll immediately also connect with your iPad and Mac — no need to go into settings to change multipoint settings, it just works.
Given the extra features on board the Sony cans and their ability to work with both Android and Apple devices, though, this one is going to the Sony WH-1000XM6.
Sony has packed the WH-1000XM6 with mics this time around, with 12 over the two earcups. That's led to an increase in call quality, but also improved noise canceling thanks to the extra processing power of their new chip.
The increase, however, is less than we were hoping to see. There's a definite increase in noise blocking in the high range, making for a more holistic noise blocking experience. We were hoping for more, however — while better, it's not the big jump from the XM5.
Transparency mode is still very good though, and sounds very natural when you're trying to talk with someone at the train station or the grocery store.
The AirPods Max ANC is, even five years after their initial release, still very good. It's not better than the Sony WH-1000XM6 ANC, instead focusing on different sounds.
Keyboards and ANC systems are noticeably quieter with the AirPods Max, where bus noises and engines are blocked better by the Sony headphones. You get the feeling Apple tuned its headphones for inside, while Sony knows its users will be taking their headphones out and about more often than not.
This round is going to be a tie — both block out loads of noise, focusing on different parts of the frequency range for different ANC results. It'll depend what you want. Wearing them while walking around the city? Choose the Sony option. Want to silence ambient office noise? Get the AirPods Max.
The battery life of the Sony WH-1000XM6 is about what you'd expect from a pair of headphones at this price point: 30 hours of ANC with every full charge.
Turn the ANC off and they rise to 40 hours. Need extra juice quickly? Plug them in for 3 minutes for 3 hours of battery life in a pinch.
The AirPods Max battery life is... bad. 20 hours of staying power just isn't enough, and the 5-minute quick charge for 1.5 hours of use isn't as good as the Sony headphones.
The Sony headphones take this round, and, as a result, win the face-off overall.
So we finish the face-off with more ties than you might expect, but with the new XM6 as the overall winner. For less money than the AirPods Max, the XM6 offer more features, similar ANC, and more battery life. Sony's latest cans look like a good contender for the best headphones as a result.
That's not to say there are no reasons to pick up the Apple cans — they're a stunningly built pair of headphones that sound really good, and have great features for Apple users. The battery life and Android feature compatibility drag them down, however, and the price rubs salt into the wound.
If the XM6 are still too pricey, consider the Sony WH-1000XM5. They're cheaper than both and offer performance that's similar to the XM6. If you're looking to save some money, you might want to look there instead.
Sony WH-1000XM6
AirPods Max
Price and value (5)
3
2
Design (15)
13
13
Controls (10)
7
7
Sound quality (25)
22
24
Active noise cancelation (20)
15
15
Call quality (10)
9
9
Connectivity (5)
5
5
Battery life (10)
8
3
Total Score (100)
82
78

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jeopardy! and Wheel of Fortune are headed to streaming
Jeopardy! and Wheel of Fortune are headed to streaming

The Verge

timean hour ago

  • The Verge

Jeopardy! and Wheel of Fortune are headed to streaming

Jeopardy! and Wheel of Fortune are coming to streaming for the first time. The two game shows will arrive on Hulu and Peacock in September, according to a report from The New York Times. Under the multi-year deal, new episodes of Jeopardy! and Wheel of Fortune will appear on both streaming services one day after they air on linear TV. The agreement will include older episodes of each show, too. For decades, Jeopardy! and Wheel of Fortune have been staples on linear TV, and their expansion to Peacock and Hulu is part of a broader pattern that's bringing key series, like WWE's Monday Night Raw, to streaming. As pointed out by The Hollywood Reporter, this streaming deal isn't directly connected to the legal battle involving Sony — the producer of Wheel of Fortune and Jeopardy! — and its distributor, CBS. Last year, Sony sued CBS over claims it breached their agreement by not doing enough to boost revenue from licensing the shows. A judge granted Sony the rights to distribute Wheel of Fortune and Jeopardy! in April, but an appellate court ruled last week that CBS can keep distributing the shows during the legal battle.

One App to Rule Them All
One App to Rule Them All

Atlantic

timean hour ago

  • Atlantic

One App to Rule Them All

If Google has its way, there will be no search bars, no search terms, no searching (at least not by humans). The very tool that has defined the company—and perhaps the entire internet—for nearly three decades could soon be overtaken by a chatbot. Last month, at its annual software conference, Google launched 'AI Mode,' the most drastic overhaul to its search engine in the company's history. The feature is different from the AI summaries that already show up in Google's search results, which appear above the usual list of links to outside websites. Instead, AI Mode functionally replaces Google Search with something akin to ChatGPT. You ask a question and the AI spits out an answer. Instead of sifting through a list of blue links, you can just ask a follow-up. Google has begun rolling out AI Mode to users in the U.S. as a tab below the search bar (before 'Images,' 'Shopping,' and the like). The company said it will soon introduce a number of more advanced, experimental capabilities to AI Mode, at which point the feature could be able to write a research report in minutes, 'see' through your smartphone's camera to assist with physical tasks such as a DIY crafts project, help book restaurant reservations, make payments. Whether AI Mode can become as advanced and as seamless as Google promises remains far from certain, but the firm appears to be aiming for something like an everything app: a single tool that will be able to do just about everything a person could possibly want to do online. Seemingly every major tech company is after the same goal. OpenAI markets ChatGPT, for instance, as able to write code and summarize documents, help shop, produce graphics, and, naturally, search the web. Elon Musk is notoriously obsessed with the idea of turning X into an everything app. Meta says you can use its AI 'for everything you need'; Amazon calls its new, generative AI–powered Alexa+ 'an assistant available to help any time you want'; Microsoft bills its AI Copilot as a companion 'for all you do'; and Apple has marketed Apple Intelligence and a revamped Siri as tools that will revolutionize how people use their iPhones (which encompass, for many users, everything). Even Airbnb, once focused simply on vacation rentals, is redesigning itself as a place where 'you can sell and do almost anything,' as its CEO, Brian Chesky, recently said. In a sense, everything apps are the logical conclusion of Silicon Valley's race to build artificial 'general' intelligence, or AGI. A bot smart enough to do anything obviously would be used to power a product that can, in effect, do anything. But such apps would also represent the culmination of the tech industry's aim to entrench its products in daily lives. Already, Google has features for shopping, navigation, data storage, work software, payment, travel—plus an array of smartphones, tablets, smart-home gadgets, and more. Apple has a similarly all-encompassing suite of offerings, and Meta's three major apps (Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp) each have billions of users. Perhaps the only thing more powerful than these sprawling tech ecosystems is boiling them all down to a single product. That these tech companies can even realistically have such colossal ambitions to build everything apps is a result of their existing dominance. The industry has spent years collecting information about our relationships, work, hobbies, and interests—all of which is becoming grist for powerful AI tools. A key feature of these everything apps is that they promise to be individually tailored, drawing on extensive personal data to provide, in theory, a more seamless experience. Your past search history, and eventually your emails, can inform AI Mode's responses: When I typed line up into AI Mode, I got the 'line up' for the day's New York Mets game (the Mets are my favorite baseball team). When I typed the same phrase into traditional Google Search, I got a definition. In other words, the rise of AI-powered everything apps is a version of the bargain that tech companies have proposed in the past with social media and other tools: our services for your data. Meta's AI assistant can draw on information from users' Facebook and Instagram accounts. Apple describes its AI as a 'personal intelligence' able to glean from texts, emails, and notes on your device. And ChatGPT has a new 'memory' feature that allows the chatbot to reference all previous conversations. If the technology goes as planned, it leads to a future in which Google, or any other Big Tech company, knows you are moving from Texas to Chicago and, of its own accord, offers to order the winter jacket you don't own to be delivered to your new apartment, already selected from your favorite brand, in your favorite color. Or it could, after reading emails musing about an Italian vacation, suggest an in-budget itinerary for Venice that best fits your preferences. There is, of course, no shortage of reasons to think that AI models will not be capable and reliable enough to power a true everything app. The Mets lineup that Google automatically generated for me wasn't entirely accurate. Chatbots still invent information and mess up basic math; concerns over AI's environmental harms and alleged infringement of intellectual-property rights could substantially slow the technology's development. Only a year ago, Google released AI Overviews, a search feature that told users to eat rocks and use glue to stick cheese to pizza. On the same day that Google released AI Mode, it also introduced an experimental AI shopping tool that can be easily used to make erotic images of teenagers, as I reported with my colleague Lila Shroff. (When we shared our reporting with the company, Google emphasized the protections it has in place and told us it would 'continue to improve the experience.') Maybe AI Mode will order something two sizes too large and ship to the wrong address, or maybe it'll serve you recommendations for Venice Beach. Despite these embarrassments, Google and its major AI competitors show no signs of slowing down. The promised convenience of everything apps is, after all, alluring: The more products of any one company you use, and the better integrated those products are, the more personalized and universal its everything app can be. Google even has a second contender in the race—its Gemini model, which, at the same conference, the company said will become a 'universal AI assistant.' Whether through Search or Gemini the company seems eager to integrate as many of its products and as much of its user data as possible. On the surface, AI and the everything app seem set to dramatically change how people interact with technology—consolidating and streamlining search, social media, officeware, and more into a chatbot. But a bunch of everything apps vying for customers feels less like a race for innovation and more like empires warring over territory. Tech companies are running the same data-hungry playbook with their everything apps as they did in the markets that made them so dominant in the first place. Even OpenAI, which has evolved from a little-known nonprofit to a Silicon Valley behemoth, appears so eager to accumulate user data that it reportedly plans to launch a social-media network. The technology of the future looks awfully reliant on that of the past.

"It's 5GB of pure bloatware": Apple Intelligence unlikely to win over Mac users at WWDC — Here's why
"It's 5GB of pure bloatware": Apple Intelligence unlikely to win over Mac users at WWDC — Here's why

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

"It's 5GB of pure bloatware": Apple Intelligence unlikely to win over Mac users at WWDC — Here's why

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Apple's annual Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) takes place on Monday, June 9, and the company is set to spotlight its biggest software updates of the year — but will any of its new Apple Intelligence features win over frustrated Mac users? Apple Intelligence may have been the star of last year's show, but the platform, pitched as "AI for the rest of us," has mostly failed to capture the awe of Mac, iPhone, or iPad users, with the one update everyone really wants to see is nowhere in sight. There's no doubt that Apple will liberally flaunt the term AI during this year's WWDC, but a claimed lack of any killer AI features to show could highlight how far ahead Apple's competition is. However, to some, that's a good thing. Take a look online and you'll see many Mac users souring on AI, and until Apple is ready to change their minds with something truly groundbreaking, it might be best to keep it out of the limelight a little longer. See also: Best Apple deals in June 2025 With WWDC 2025 now just a week away, we're getting our last, and arguably most exciting, wave of rumors about what to expect. The highlight, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, will be a major rebrand of Apple's operating systems along with the biggest visual overhaul since iOS 7. For Mac users, that means the next OS update will be macOS 26, which will likely feature tweaked app icons and potentially changes to the overall UI, like more transparent elements. Rumors indicate that Apple is taking a lot of inspiration from visionOS for this sweeping visual overhaul across its platforms, giving a rough idea of what to expect. What we're not expecting to see, however, is any major Apple Intelligence developments. Apple is expected to debut an AI battery optimization tool, which sounds useful, and potentially some other minor updates, but the big, large language model (LLM) Siri update we've all been waiting for is unlikely to make an appearance at WWDC. That big Siri update is the AI feature its users really need. While it's disappointing we have to keep waiting for it, a lack of focus on AI in the meantime might actually be a good thing for Apple, judging by a cold response to AI from many Mac users. Apple was undoubtedly late to the game in consumer AI, falling short of the innovations Google, Meta, and OpenAI have been announcing over recent years. OpenAI is even partnering with former Apple design chief Jony Ive to develop its own in-house AI device. Considering all that, one might think Apple is in hot water, dropping the ball on AI like it has. However, that's assuming Apple users actually want a boatload of AI features on their devices, which might not be the case. For instance, a user in one Reddit thread referred to Apple Intelligence as "5GB of pure bloatware," complaining that trying to disable or remove the feature can lead to bugs. A user in another thread expressed frustration about not being able to completely remove Apple Intelligence, commenting, "Some of us don't like a service shoved down our throats we never asked for, and don't need. Sure, it can be turned off, but it should be optional to be installed to begin with. I'd like to use those few gigs of storage." One user even described Apple's AI as "all hype, no value." Comment from r/MacOS Even users who don't outright dislike Apple Intelligence see little use in it, like one commenter who said: "I pretty much never use writing tools, even before they were integrated, so that's been barely used. Sucks that what the majority of Apple AI is." Another user pointed out the core of the issue: "Siri still seems dumb as a rock." All of this effectively amounts to a lack of enthusiasm for AI in general, at least among Mac users. It makes me wonder, would Apple be better off differentiating itself by backing off on AI, at least until the new-and-improved Siri is ready? So far, Apple Intelligence seems to be mimicking competitors' AI offerings, only with fewer features and years behind. That strategy clearly isn't winning over Mac users, though, who seem to be really looking for practical AI tools and a Siri update, not gimmicks like AI-generated emojis. Instead of trying to convince us it's an AI brand now, maybe Apple could woo fans by showing it's focusing on launching AI tools that prioritize genuine usefulness and user privacy. WWDC 2025 preview: A gloomy prediction for Apple Intelligence, "Solarium," and macOS "Tahoe" iPhone 17 Air leak shows impossibly sturdy frame, but don't put your "bendgate" fears to bed just yet App Store rule change takes the headache out of buying books on iOS Kindle app

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store