SpaceX says debris recovery attempts hindered after Starship explosion
(Reuters) -SpaceX said on Thursday its debris recovery efforts after last week's Starship explosion have been hindered and it has sought cooperation from Mexico, whose president has raised the possibility of legal action against the company.
A massive Starship spacecraft by SpaceX exploded into a dramatic fireball during testing in Texas last week, which Elon Musk's space firm attributed to a "major anomaly."
The Starship rocket appeared to have experienced at least two explosions in rapid succession, lighting up the night sky and sending debris flying, according to video capturing the moment it exploded.
"Despite SpaceX's attempts to recover the anomaly related debris, which is and remains the tangible property of SpaceX, these attempts have been hindered by unauthorized parties trespassing on private property," the company said in a post on social media platform X.
"We have requested local and federal assistance from the government of Mexico in the recovery," it said, adding that it also has offered resources and assistance in the clean-up.
President Claudia Sheinbaum said on Wednesday that her administration is investigating the security and environmental impact of the launch of rockets, particularly for the Mexican state of Tamaulipas.
A general review is being conducted to determine what international laws are being violated. "From there, we'll start a process, because there is indeed contamination," Sheinbaum had said during a morning press conference.
A Starship spacecraft exploded in space minutes after lifting off from Texas in March, prompting the FAA to halt air traffic in parts of Florida, in a setback for Musk's Mars rocket program.
In January, a Starship rocket broke up in space minutes after launching from Texas, raining debris over Caribbean islands and causing minor damage to a car in the Turks and Caicos Islands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The clock's ticking on codifying DOGE cuts into law
Congress has until July 18 to pass a $9.4 billion DOGE cuts package. That includes cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting. It's running into resistance from GOP senators. With just over three weeks to go before a critical deadline, the push to codify DOGE cuts is hitting resistance on Capitol Hill. Several GOP senators sound skeptical about the $9.4 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding that the Trump administration is asking Congress to approve, raising the prospect of a high-profile setback for the DOGE project just weeks after Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's public feud. The House narrowly approved the cuts, in part identified by Musk and the White House DOGE Office, earlier this month. The administration's troubles were evident at a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Wednesday. Lawmakers in both parties highlighted the potential negative impacts of clawing back the funding as they heard testimony from Russell Vought, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget. "We have Native American radio stations in South Dakota. They get their funding through NPR, 90-some percent of what they use," Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota said at the hearing. "They will not continue to exist if we don't find a way to take care of their needs." Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the committee chair, also raised concerns about the $1.1 billion in public broadcasting cuts. Another moderate Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, has previously said that she's opposed to the cuts because rural Alaskan communities depend on the funding. Several GOP lawmakers are also concerned about the $8.3 billion in foreign aid cuts. Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the former Senate GOP leader, broadly criticized DOGE efforts to cut wasteful foreign aid spending during his remarks at the hearing. "There's plenty of absolute nonsense masquerading as American aid that shouldn't receive another bit of taxpayer funding," McConnell said. "But the administration's attempt to root it out has been unnecessarily chaotic." Several of them have raised concerns in particular about cuts to PEPFAR, a global program to combat and treat HIV/AIDS, though the administration has insisted that life-saving programs will continue to receive funding. Democratic senators are expected to unanimously oppose the cuts, just as their counterparts did in the House. With the Senate divided 53-47, that means Republicans can only afford to lose three votes. The administration is using a process known as "rescission" to pursue the cuts, which allows the White House to ask Congress to claw back money it has already approved. The process has not been successfully used in over two decades, and the Senate rejected a rescission request in 2018, during Trump's first term. Lawmakers must approve the cuts within 45 days of the request — July 18 — or Trump is required by law to spend the money. The administration has said that this could be the first of several rescission requests. Democrats have argued that the prospect of constant rescissions threatens to undermine the bipartisan government funding process, where both parties agree to provisions in funding bills that they may not support in order to get enough votes to clear the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate. Rescissions only require 51 votes in the Senate, raising the prospect that Republicans, led by the White House, could unilaterally strip out Democratic priorities after funding bills are passed. At least one Republican senator appeared to be listening to those arguments on Thursday. "My biggest concern is that the appropriations process work, and that Republicans and Democrats agree that the process will end up in a negotiated settlement," Rounds said. "If we get to the point where the Democrats look at this and say, 'We can put it in the bill, but they're not going to fund it, or they're not going to use it,' then there's no reason for them to work with us to get to 60 votes." Rounds said that he would "try to negotiate" with the administration about preserving public broadcasting funding, while Collins told reporters after the hearing that she wanted to see "fundamental changes" to the bill and was working on an amended version. If the Senate passes an amended version of the bill, the House would have to pass the measure again before the July 18 deadline. Read the original article on Business Insider
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Former Supreme Court Justice Warns Freedom and Democracy 'At Risk'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Amid an uptick in threats to judges, former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy warned that the current hostility in America's political discourse imperils freedom and democracy. Why It Matters Rhetoric by President Donald Trump, including calls on social media for the impeachment of judges who have ruled against his policies, has triggered urgent warnings from current and former members of the Supreme Court about the stability of the country's legal systems. These attacks, which have included labeling judges as "troublemakers" and "monsters" in public posts, have raised concerns about undermining the independence of the judiciary, an institution considered essential to protecting American democracy. Current Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, a Republican appointee, also referenced the public attacks on judges in a rare statement, saying, "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose." What To Know In a virtual forum on Thursday for the event "Speak Up for Justice," with other judges from around the world, Kennedy said that "We should be concerned in this country about, as I've already indicated, the tone of our political discourse," according to Reuters. The Ronald Reagan appointee continued: "Identity politics are used so that a person is characterized by his or her partisan affiliation. That's not what democracy and civil discourse is about." Kennedy noted that the rest of the world seems to monitor how things operate in the United States "to see what democracy ought to be." "And if they see a hostile, fractious discourse, if they see a discourse that uses identity politics rather than to talk about issues, democracy is at risk," the retired justice said. "Freedom is at risk." He urged for judges and their families to have protection, and said they are best protected "when the public and our nation realize how central they are to our discourse." Kennedy did not mention Trump by name during the event, Reuters reports. Former U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy speaks at the World Law Congress at U.N. headquarters in New York City on July 21, 2023. (Photo by YUKI IWAMURA/AFP via Getty Images) Former U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy speaks at the World Law Congress at U.N. headquarters in New York City on July 21, 2023. (Photo by YUKI IWAMURA/AFP via Getty Images) Trump has sharply criticized jurists who have ruled against his administration's key policies—most notably U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg—whom he described as a "troublemaker and agitator" while calling for his impeachment after the judge blocked usage of the Alien Enemies Act for deportation flights. According to Politico, U.S. District Judge Esther Salas, whose family was targeted in a fatal attack in 2020, noted during the same virtual event that the U.S. Marshals Service has recorded over 400 threats against federal judges so far this year. Salas attributed the rise to disinformation and inflammatory rhetoric "from the top down." What People Are Saying Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in May on threats to judges, in part: "The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law." Trump, during his 100th day in office speech in Michigan, in part: "We cannot allow a handful of communist radical left judges to obstruct the enforcement of our laws and assume the duties that belong solely to the president of the United States. Judges are trying to take away the power given to the president to keep our country safe ... it's not a good thing." Former Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg, to Newsweek when asked if Kennedy's comments were a poke at Trump: "It's clearly a poke at the President, especially because Justice Kennedy's exit from the Court allowed Trump to shift it to the right with the appointment of Justice [Brett] Kavanaugh." What Happens Next As threats continue to be tracked by law enforcement, congressional debate and judicial responses are expected to intensify as the Supreme Court approaches the conclusion of its current term.
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Tesla robotaxis spark mixed reactions in Austin
Tesla's much-publicized robotaxi service recently began — but only in one neighborhood in Austin, Texas, only for a select group of the company's fans and only with a Tesla employee in the front passenger seat.
