&w=3840&q=100)
Mexicans elect judges in historic polls engulfed by the shadow of crime, corruption
The government and its supporters said the reform making Mexico the world's only nation to select all of its judges and magistrates by popular vote was needed to clean up a rotten justice system read more
A man votes at a polling station during the world-first Mexican elections for all judges and magistrates in Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua state, Mexico on June 1, 2025. AFP
Mexicans chose their judges Sunday in unprecedented elections that sharply divided opinion in a country plagued by rampant crime, corruption and impunity.
The government and its supporters said the reform making Mexico the world's only nation to select all of its judges and magistrates by popular vote was needed to clean up a rotten justice system.
Arturo Giesemann, a 57-year-old retiree, said his main motivation for voting was 'the disgust I have with the current judiciary because of its corruption.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Turnout appeared to be low as many voters struggled to choose from hundreds of largely unknown candidates.
'We are not very prepared,' said Lucia Calderon, a 63-year-old university teacher. 'I think we need more information.'
In the western state of Jalisco, 63-year-old housewife Maria Estrada said she used her 'intuition' as she did not know the candidates.
Experts were concerned that the elections would politicize the justice system and make it easier for criminals to influence the courts with threats and bribery.
While corruption already exists, 'there is reason to believe that elections may be more easily infiltrated by organized crime than other methods of judicial selection,' Margaret Satterthwaite, the United Nations special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, told AFP.
Hundreds of opponents of the reforms marched through Mexico City waving flags and banners with slogans including: 'Hands off our democracy' and 'No to electoral fraud.'
The elections send the judiciary 'to its grave,' said Ismael Novela, a 58-year-old company worker.
'It was the last counterweight we had against the totalitarianism of the executive branch.'
'Regime of corruption'
President Claudia Sheinbaum hit back at her critics on the eve of the vote.
'Those who want the regime of corruption and privileges in the judiciary to continue say this election is rigged. Or they also say it's so a political party can take over the Supreme Court,' she said in a video message.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Nothing could be further from the truth,' she insisted.
The run-up to the vote was not accompanied by the kind of violence that often targets politicians in Mexico.
But 'it is logical that organized criminal groups would have approached judges and candidates who are important to them,' said consultant Luis Carlos Ugalde, a former head of Mexico's electoral commission.
Rights group Defensorxs has identified around 20 candidates it considers 'high risk,' including Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Joaquin 'El Chapo' Guzman.
Another aspiring judge, in Durango state, spent almost six years in prison in the United States for drug crimes.
'Good reputation'
Voters were tasked with choosing around 880 federal judges – including Supreme Court justices – as well as hundreds of local judges and magistrates. Another election for the remainder will be held in 2027.
Candidates are supposed to have a law degree, experience in legal affairs and what is termed 'a good reputation,' as well as no criminal record.
To do a good job, voters 'would have to spend hours and hours researching the track record and the profiles of each of the hundreds of candidates,' said David Shirk, a professor at the University of San Diego.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He believes that most of the corruption in Mexico's judicial system is in law enforcement agencies and public prosecutor offices.
'If you can avoid being prosecuted, you don't have to worry about the judge,' said Shirk, who heads the Justice in Mexico research project.
The judicial reforms were championed by Sheinbaum's predecessor and mentor Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who frequently clashed with the courts before stepping down last year.
The main reason for the elections seems to be 'because Lopez Obrador had a grudge against the judges,' Shirk said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
13 minutes ago
- News18
Zimbabwe To Cull Dozens Of Elephants, Distribute Meat To Locals
Elephant meat is rarely eaten but those who have tried it say it tastes like gamey beef. Zimbabwe, the southern African country home to the second-biggest elephant population in the world after Botswana, will cull dozens of elephants and distribute the meat to its people to ease the sudden boom in the population of the pachyderms. Wildlife authorities in Zimbabwe made the announcement on Tuesday, news agency AFP said in a report. Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Authority (ZimParks) said in a statement that the culling will occur at a vast private game reserve in the southeast and would initially target 50 elephants. 'Elephant meat from the management exercise will be distributed to local communities while ivory will be state property that will be handed over to the ZimParks for safekeeping," it said. Elephant meat is rarely consumed globally due to legal and ethical concerns, but in regions where it's eaten, it has been described as tasting similar to beef or pork, with a gamey flavor and slightly sweet undertones. The meat is typically dense and fibrous, often requiring slow cooking methods like stewing or braising to tenderize it, according to Chef's Resource and The Trellis. Nutritionally, elephant meat is lean, low in cholesterol and rich in protein, iron, and B-vitamins, attributed to the animal's herbivorous diet of grasses, fruits and bark, according to Eat Delights. There was no clarity over how many of the animals would be killed in total or over what period. An aerial survey in 2024 showed the reserve, the Save Valley Conservancy, had 2,550 elephants, more than triple its carrying capacity of 800, ZimParks said. At least 200 have been translocated to other parks over the past five years. Zimbabwe is unable to sell its stockpile of tusks due to a global ban on ivory trading. Tuesday's announcement came a day after four people were arrested in the capital Harare with more than 230 kilogrammes (500 pounds) of ivory for which they were allegedly seeking a buyer. In 2024, Zimbabwe culled 200 elephants as it faced an unprecedented drought that led to food shortages. It was the first major cull since 1988. The move to hunt the elephants for food has drawn sharp criticism, particularly as the animals are a major tourism draw. About the Author Shankhyaneel Sarkar First Published: June 03, 2025, 21:35 IST
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Delhi Public Works Department Posts Pictures Of Workers Entering Drain. Then Deletes
Armed with just a shovel, a group of labourers, with no protective gear of gloves, entered the sewers in Delhi's Rohini, in violation of the Supreme Court order. The images were posted on X by the Public Works Department (PWD), saying desilting work is underway. A backlash followed. Soon after, the post was deleted. Ahead of the monsoon, the PWD is clearing drains and removing obstructions from roads across Delhi to prevent waterlogging. The disturbing images, of labourers surrounded by filth, allowed the opposition to target the government. Despite Supreme Court directives and existing laws, manual scavenging continues in various parts of the country. The court has repeatedly stressed the importance of ensuring worker safety and prohibiting manual handling of waste. "The BJP government has always exploited Dalits and the poor. Look at how manual scavenging is being carried out. Legal action should be taken against this," Delhi AAP president Saurabh Bharadwaj posted. Soon after, the PWD deleted the post. When NDTV questioned Chief Minister Rekha Gupta as to why manual scavenging was still taking place in Delhi despite Supreme Court directives, she said, "The government is preparing for the monsoon. In some areas, it's not possible to use machines, so labourers have been deployed. However, the Delhi government is working in accordance with court orders." A worker recently died while cleaning a drain linked to the Delhi Jal Board. According to Government of India data, 377 people died during drain cleaning between 2019 and 2023. In Delhi alone, 72 deaths occurred during cleaning activities between 2013 and 2024, as per the National Commission for Safai Karamchari. What was the Supreme Court's ruling? In a landmark 2014 ruling, the Supreme Court issued a series of directives to stop manual cleaning of waste and sewage. The court declared that no labourer should be made to clean dangerous sewers. Workers should not be sent into sewer lines without proper safety equipment, it said. The law provides for strict punishment against violators. The court instructed all states and union territories to implement the 2013 law aimed at ending the practice of manual scavenging and ensuring rehabilitation for the victims. While the case was pending in the Supreme Court, the central government enacted the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. The petitioners demanded protection of their right to life and equality.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
No contempt if Parliament, legislatures simply make laws: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has said any law made by Parliament or a State legislature cannot be held to contempt of court. A Bench comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma made the observation while disposing of a 2012 contempt plea filed by sociologist and former Delhi University professor Nandini Sundar and others. The contempt plea alleged failure of the Chhattisgarh government to comply with its 2011 directions to stop support to vigilante groups such as Salwa Judum and arming tribals in the name of special police officers (SPO) in the fight against Maoists. The petition contended that there has been contempt of the order of the apex court as the Chhattisgarh government has legislated the Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act, 2011 which authorised an auxiliary armed force to assist security forces in dealing with Maoist/Naxal violence and legalising existing SPOs by inducting them as members. Besides accusing the Chhattisgarh government of not acknowledging the directions on Salwa Judum, the petitioners said instead of "desisting" from using SPOs and disarming them, the State government passed the "Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act, 2011" regularising all SPOs with effect from the date of the top court order on July 5, 2011. They alleged that the State government has also not vacated all school buildings and ashrams from the occupation of the security forces nor has it compensated the victims of Salwa Judum and SPOs. The top court on May 15 said the passing of an enactment subsequent to the order passed by the top court by Chhattisgarh cannot be an act of contempt. Delicate balance The top court said in order to ensure that rule of law permeates to fulfil constitutional objectives of establishing an egalitarian social order, the balance between the respective sovereign functionaries must always be delicately maintained. "Every State Legislature has plenary powers to pass an enactment and so long as the said enactment has not been declared to be ultra vires the Constitution or, in any way, null and void by a constitutional court, the said enactment would have the force of law." The Bench added, "However, if any party wishes that the said Act be struck down for being unconstitutional, then legal remedies in that regard would have to be resorted to before the competent court of law." Considering the situation prevailing in Chhattisgarh over decades, the Bench outlined the need for "specific steps" to bring peace and rehabilitation in the affected areas through coordinated measures of the State and the Central government. "It is the duty of the State of Chhattisgarh as well as the Union of India, having regard to Article 315 of the Constitution, to take adequate steps for bringing about peace and rehabilitation to the residents of State of Chhattisgarh who have been affected by the violence from whatever quarter it may have arisen," the court said. Judiciary is vested under the Constitution with the power to resolve interpretive doubts and disputes about the validity or otherwise of an enacted law by Parliament or any state legislature, the Bench added. "However, the interpretative power of a constitutional court does not contemplate a situation of declaring exercise of legislative functions and passing of an enactment as an instance of a contempt of a court," it noted. The verdict pointed out that central to the legislative function was the power of the legislative organ to enact and amend laws. "Any law made by the Parliament or a State legislature cannot be held to be an act of contempt of a court, including this court, for simply making the law," the Bench said. The top court underlined the legislature's powers to pass a law; to remove the basis of a judgment or in the alternative, validate a law which has been struck down by a constitutional court by amending or varying it so as to give effect to the judgment of a constitutional court which has struck down a portion of an enactment or for that matter the entire enactment. "This is the core of the doctrine of separation of powers and must always be acknowledged in a constitutional democracy such as ours. This doctrine also emphasises on the principle of checks and balances under our Constitution which is a healthy aspect of distribution of powers, particularly legislative powers." The order went on, "Any piece of legislation enacted by a legislature can be assailed within the manner known to law and that is by mounting a challenge against its validity on the twin prongs of legislative competence or constitutional validity."
