New sponge species discovered in Kaneohe Bay
HONOLULU (KHON2) — Researchers at the University of Hawaii at Manoa's Hawaii Institute for Marine Biology (HIMB) have uncovered 10 new species of marine sponges in Kaneohe Bay.The groundbreaking studies, published in PeerJ and Zootaxa, showcase the use of a novel method that combines genetic analysis with structural characteristics to identify these species.
Despite being among the oldest life forms on Earth, marine sponges have long been understudied.
1 in 3 Americans say debt is causing health problems: How it's impacting Hawaiʻi
This discovery not only sheds light on sponge biodiversity in the Hawaiian Islands but also adds to our understanding of marine life throughout the Pacific region.
'We used ARMS to collect sponges from within the reef,' said Rachel Nunley, a Scientists in Parks intern at Kaloko-Honokōhau National Historical Park and lead author of the study in PeerJ. 'After collecting the sponges, we conducted DNA analysis to identify the species. We found that these species in Kaneohe Bay are new to science and haven't been seen anywhere else in the world.'
Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news
Kaneohe Bay is also home to HIMB and is rich with small, isolated patch reefs that are not only filled with undiscovered sponge species but also host non-native species introduced from the Caribbean and Indo-Pacific regions.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
21 minutes ago
- CNET
Your Apple Watch Might Not Be as Accurate as You Think, New Study Finds
The first thing that always crosses my mind when testing fitness wearables is how accurate the data is. Smartwatches and fitness trackers aren't cheap, and if you're using them to monitor something as crucial as your health, then accuracy matters. Everyone and their brother wear some sort of fitness tracker, whether it be an Apple Watch, Google Pixel Watch, Oura Ring or Whoop. It's estimated that one in three Americans uses a wearable device for health and fitness tracking features. That brings me back to whether these things can be trusted. If they're not accurate… What's the point? Should we all go back to analog? Researchers from the University of Mississippi conducted a meta-analysis of 56 studies that compared the Apple Watch with reference tools when measuring factors like heart rate, step count and energy burned. While there's always some expected error, we have a more definitive answer for how much stock you should put in the numbers you see on your watch. Apple Watches are good at measuring steps and heart rate The meta-analysis findings show that the Apple Watch accurately measures your heart rate and step count. We know this based on the mean absolute percentage error measurement (the standard way to measure accuracy) reported for each health metric. Heart rate had a percentage error of 4.43%, while step count had an error of 8.17%. Anything below 10% is considered excellent, so you should feel pretty confident in what your Apple Watch says your heart rate and step count are for the day. However, you shouldn't rely on the energy expenditure metric The same can't be said for energy expenditure or calories burned. The percentage error for this metric was 27.96%. That's a significant jump in inaccuracy. Researchers found energy expenditure inaccurate across all activities tested, including walking, running, mixed-intensity workouts and cycling. This isn't a new problem. Several studies have found that smartwatches and trackers don't do a great job of calculating calorie burn. They can be off by 40% to 80%. A different study revealed that the Apple Watch Series 9 can vary in energy expenditure and heart rate measures across skin pigmentation. While this study was specific to Apple Watches, I expect similar trends across other devices because they often measure similarly. One study found that the Fitbit Surge had a mean error of 27% when measuring calories burned. Smartwatches calculate how many calories you burn throughout the day, using factors such as your movements, heart rate and data from the sensors inside the watch. Other factors, such as your age, weight and gender, are also included in this calculation. None of them will be 100% accurate. Where does this leave you and your data? This news doesn't scare me as a smartwatch wearer who uses my daily data to track my workouts and sleep. I still think the data smartwatches give us is a great way to stay motivated. I've used the Google Pixel 3 watch to monitor my heart health thanks to the cardio load metric. When it comes to sleep, I've noticed some inaccuracy when it comes to when I fall asleep and wake up, though it's not a huge difference. Most trackers use your heart rate and movement to track your sleep, so it's unsurprising to see some degree of error. There's always some error, and for my use, that's OK. I use my data for trends of my progress, rather than extremely granular data. Though if you're a serious athlete who tracks down to the calorie, it's essential not to rely on your smartwatch for this number. Your smartwatch is a tool to guide you through your wellness journey. Use it to build habits and make meaningful changes, not diagnose medical conditions. That said, I wouldn't count out smartwatch features like Apple's Vital app, fall detection or the loss-of-pulse detection feature that Google Pixel watches are getting. Apple and other brands continuously release updates to improve their tech over time. And if you're wondering which smartwatch you should get for the best accuracy, it's hard to say. They all have their own tracking methods, even if they often overlap. None of them are perfect, so it's best to choose which one fits your budget and vibe best.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bugsee Expands Mobile Observability With Native Crash Reporting for Android
Bugsee's latest Android SDK update gives developers complete visibility from Java to C/C++ for faster, smarter debugging. San Jose, CA , June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bugsee, a recognized leader in mobile app diagnostics and real-time crash reporting, is excited to announce a major upgrade to its Android SDK: full support for NDK (Native Development Kit) crash reporting. This update helps developers gain unprecedented visibility into application crashes originating from native C/C++ code—a notoriously difficult area for traditional monitoring tools to address effectively. Modern apps increasingly rely on native code to deliver the speed and efficiency users expect. From games and media platforms to fintech applications and advanced communications tools, many developers use native modules to optimize performance. However, crashes at this layer have often been out of reach for most crash reporting solutions, leaving developers with an incomplete picture of what went wrong. Bugsee's new support for native crash reporting on Android changes that dynamic, offering true end-to-end observability from Java to JNI and all the way into native C/C++ code. Bugsee 'This is a game-changer for mobile teams working on complex or performance-critical apps,' said a representative from Bugsee. 'With native crash support, Bugsee now gives developers the complete picture—from Java to JNI to native code—so they can move faster, fix smarter, and deliver flawless mobile experiences.' The addition of NDK crash reporting brings a new level of diagnostic completeness to Bugsee's mobile observability platform. By seamlessly capturing crashes that occur within native libraries, the updated SDK empowers teams to diagnose and resolve even the most elusive bugs that were previously hidden behind layers of abstraction. Developers now get access to detailed crash data across every layer of their Android app, making troubleshooting more efficient and effective than ever. For teams striving to build stable, high-performance applications, the benefits are immediate. Native crash visibility reduces the guesswork in debugging, significantly shortening time-to-resolution. Instead of scouring logs or manually reproducing issues, developers receive comprehensive crash reports with actionable data when a problem occurs. This translates to faster fixes, improved stability, and a better experience for end users—all critical factors in a competitive mobile market. The new crash reporting capability is particularly relevant for teams working on advanced apps where performance is paramount. Bugsee's platform is already a go-to choice for mobile developers, thanks to its innovative combination of screen recording, console logs, network traffic, and session analytics. With the addition of native crash reporting, Bugsee strengthens its position as a leading mobile observability solution trusted by developers who demand real-time, production-grade visibility into their apps' behavior. Bugsee's Android SDK version 5.7.1, which includes the new NDK crash reporting feature, is available today. Existing Bugsee users can enable native crash tracking through a simple configuration update. This release reflects Bugsee's continued commitment to providing developers with the tools they need to deliver robust, stable, and user-friendly mobile applications. Bugsee invites new and existing users to explore the benefits of native crash reporting. Whether managing a large Android app or developing a new one, developers can rely on Bugsee's tools and insights to quickly resolve issues and launch confidently. To learn more about the platform and start a free trial, visit About Bugsee Bugsee is a mobile-first observability platform that provides real-time bug, crash, and performance insights for iOS, Android, and web apps. It captures video, logs, network traffic, and now native crashes to provide full visibility into every issue and help teams ship better apps, faster. With its powerful crash reporting capabilities, Bugsee remains a trusted partner for mobile teams worldwide. ### Media Contact Bugsee (408) 314-8465 newsroom: in to access your portfolio
Politico
5 hours ago
- Politico
A plan to preserve U.S. science leadership
PROBLEM SOLVERS National Academy of Sciences President Marcia McNutt made a plea to the nation's science research community during her second annual State of the Science address in Washington on Tuesday: Course-correct or lose to China. We're in the midst of a 'radical new experiment,' McNutt explained, in which the U.S., by pursuing budget cuts, canceling grants and adopting restrictive research policies, serves as the treatment group, while China is the control. Unforced errors made during the pandemic eroded many Americans' trust in science. But there's still at least one point of agreement: 'Everyone, whether it's scientists or nonscientists alike, wants U.S. science to be the world leader.' To remain a world leader in science innovation, McNutt laid out a plan. Among her key suggestions: — Build on a culture of innovation. McNutt worries that budget cuts will fuel overly conservative project selection and lead to less funding for high-risk, high-reward research. To course-correct, the U.S. should do a data-informed analysis of various peer-review approaches to ensure 'truly innovative' proposals succeed. — Create a national research strategy. 'No sensible business person would attempt to run a multibillion-dollar enterprise without a strategy, and yet that is exactly what we are doing with our research enterprise,' she said. In McNutt's view, relying on Congress to tinker with budgets isn't a strategy. Countries like China, Germany, Japan and Norway maximize research and development investment through strategic planning, primarily with apolitical non-government organizations, McNutt added. — Improve science education. The U.S. is already failing to produce enough STEM students to fill available jobs in science. The Trump administration's clampdown on visas will make it even more difficult for immigrants to fill those jobs. Beyond filling jobs, having science-literate lawyers, politicians and workers in manufacturing and transportation strengthens the nation's scientific enterprise. — Don't retreat from international collaboration. Some cutting-edge research facilities require resources from more than one nation. And when international students return home, their U.S. connections drive further international collaboration. 'We squander opportunities by not taking advantage of the fact that international colleagues want to work with us, and we only disadvantage ourselves,' McNutt said. — Cut red tape. Regulations divert time and money away from science, McNutt argues. And since the Trump administration has prioritized reducing regulations, McNutt hopes that push extends to research regulations. Still, in the Department of Government Efficiency era, that's not a given. 'I worry that the emphasis right now on waste, fraud and abuse only leads to more regulations, as everyone is assumed guilty until proven innocent.' The elephant in the room: The National Academy of Sciences is 'preparing for a fairly radical downsizing' amid the Trump administration's science cuts, McNutt told Stat News last month. A budget shortfall of roughly $40 million resulting from terminated contracts means the organization might have to lay off 250 employees in addition to the 50 members of the 1,000-person staff who have already been let go. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. Pope Leo XIV wants to stop artificial intelligence from playing God. Like his namesake, Pope Leo XIII, who promoted workers' rights during the industrial revolution, the new pope is positioning himself as a guardian in the face of unchecked modern technology, POLITICO's Hannah Roberts reports. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@ Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. WORLDVIEW England's National Health Service has launched an internal review into an artificial intelligence model being trained on data from 57 million patients in England, our POLITICO colleagues across the pond scooped. Called Foresight, the generative AI model was touted as a 'world-first pilot project' to pinpoint high-risk patient groups and facilitate early interventions. Foresight was trained on de-identified data from millions of people in England, including a large-scale dataset called the General Practice Extraction Service Data for Pandemic Planning and Research. But doctors have serious misgivings about the model being trained on their patient records without proper authorization. What the docs say: Last month, representatives from the British Medical Association and Royal College of General Practitioners wrote to Ming Tang, chief data and analytics officer at NHS England, expressing 'serious concerns about the lawfulness of the data use and the apparent absence of strict governance arrangements,' according to an email seen by POLITICO. The bone of contention is whether NHSE took patient data solely intended for Covid-19 research and incorporated it into an all-purpose AI model. NHSE's guidelines state that applications for accessing patient data must undergo additional review by its Professional Advisory Group. The advisory group approved the British Heart Foundation consortium's use of the primary care data specifically for Covid-related research during the pandemic but was never consulted about large language model training. The official line: An NHSE spokesperson said: 'Maintaining patient privacy is central to this project, and we are grateful to the Joint GP IT Committee for raising its concerns and meeting with us to discuss the strict governance and controls in place to ensure patients' data remains secure.' What's next: The Joint GP IT Committee, which advises on IT matters related to general practice medicine, plans to write to the Information Commissioner directly, a person familiar with the situation told POLITICO. In addition to demanding that the British Medical Association be called as a witness to the Information Commissioner, the joint commission wants 'explicit governance' over future uses of AI and an undertaking that any future emergency measures permitting the use of general practitioners' data contain a sunset clause if doctors haven't been consulted, the person said.
