Europeans intend to travel more by train than by any other form of transport in the next five years
Train travel is enjoying a booming renaissance, and Europeans are all for it, according to new research.
A survey of 11,000 people commissioned by rail manufacturer Hitachi Rail found that almost half of the respondents intend to travel more by train and less by plane in the next five years.
Globally, over seven in ten said they would use public transport more if it were better connected, and over half would use it even if it cost more.
The new research found that citizens in countries around Europe and in North America anticipate train travel to soar in the coming years at the expense of flying.
Rail travel already accounts for around one-third (29 per cent) of long-distance journeys - those which are 2.5 hours or more.
One-third of people surveyed also expect to travel more by train in the next 12 months. For rail travel in the next five years, that increases to 40 per cent across countries and 49 per cent across cities.
In contrast, plane travel is set to stagnate, with only around 2 per cent expecting to fly more in the same time period.
Respondents said they anticipate their car travel growing, but by 50 per cent less than rail.
The eagerness for more train travel in the future is also complemented by a clear majority (62 per cent) backing legislation to ban short-haul flights where high-speed rail alternatives exist.
In Europe, where there are an increasing number of high-speed rail routes, support rises to 67 per cent.
Such legislation has already been introduced in France, and has been proposed in Spain too.
In both countries, more than twice as many respondents are in favour of the ban as opposed to it, the research found. Those surveyed in both countries said they would even support stronger additional legislation (63 per cent in Spain and 56 per cent in France).
Across every place surveyed, more people backed funding new rail infrastructure with increased air or road taxes than those opposed to it.
The research also explored how to grow public transport usage, with passengers identifying crowding, affordability and convenience as the biggest challenges.
Related
Taking the train can be almost twice as fast as flying for some journeys in France
Journey through the rainforest in luxury on Malaysia's last remaining sleeper train
Across all countries included in the survey, over seven in ten said they would use public transport more if it were better connected, and this remained at over half even if it cost more.
'Those surveyed expect to increase their rail usage more than any other form of transport in the next five years, and they support government action to enable this,' said Edoardo La Ficara, group chief markets officer at Hitachi Rail.
'We, as an industry, have a crucial opportunity to meet this public demand by delivering a great sustainable mobility transition.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
EU open to lowering tariffs on US fertilisers in trade talks
By Kate Abnett BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union is open to lowering tariffs on U.S. fertiliser imports as an offer in trade talks with the Trump administration, but will not weaken its food safety standards in pursuit of a deal, EU agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen told Reuters. "That is definitely an option," Hansen said, of reducing U.S. fertiliser tariffs. "That will be on the table. And I think that would be a huge way forward, and an offer as well to the U.S.," he said in an interview with Reuters on Thursday, adding that whether that would mean zero tariffs, or a reduction of current rates, would need to be negotiated. U.S. exports face the EU's standard tariffs of 5.5% on imports of ammonia, and 6.5% on nitrogen fertilisers, as well as an extra 29.48 euro-per-tonne anti-dumping duty on U.S. urea ammonium nitrate (UAN). UAN comprised around three quarters of EU imports of U.S. fertilisers last year, EU trade data shows. Reducing tariffs could boost Europe's purchases of U.S. fertiliser, to fill a gap as the EU cuts supplies from Russia. Around 24% of the EU's nitrogen fertiliser imports came from Russia in 2023, while the U.S. accounted for 8%, EU data shows. "I believe most of the Europeans would prefer buying fertilizers from the U.S. than from Russia," Hansen said. The EU will hit nitrogen-based fertilisers from Russia with tariffs rising to 100% over three years, a level that would effectively halt annual trade flows currently worth 1.3 billion euros ($1.5 billion). Hansen said the EU was also open to discussing increasing its purchases of hormone-free beef from the U.S., and a deal to have zero-for-zero tariffs on EU and U.S. wines. But he said the bloc would not compromise on its stringent food safety standards as it seeks a deal. "I don't see room for manoeuvre to roll back our high quality standards. But of course, on other points, on other products, we are very open to negotiations," Hansen said.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Britons don't want to come to Tenerife anymore – they don't feel wanted'
British holidaymakers and the Canary Islands have been in love with one another since the 1960s when the first package deals attracted sun-starved northern Europeans at affordable prices. However, recent headlines suggest the romance is waning, with an acrimonious split said to be on the cards. Sensational stories of hotel guests hiding in their rooms from riotous anti-tourist demonstrations, British restaurant patrons being spat at by furious locals, and plane loads of UK arrivals suffocating in inhumane conditions in two-hour queues at Tenerife South's arrivals hall have left many questioning whether their loyalty – and their holiday euros – would be more appreciated elsewhere. A proposed tourist tax could make things even more expensive in the near future, too. But does this narrative hold up, or is it just a case of holiday hysteria whipped up by clickbait headlines? It's hard to ignore the protests that have been going on in the Canary Islands since April 2024, when tens of thousands peacefully demonstrated under the banner of 'Canarias tiene un limite' ('the Canaries have a limit'). But despite what some of the headlines seek to portray, protesters insist their gripe isn't against sun-seeking Britons, but principally about what they see as an unchecked tourism model that is progressively pricing locals out of their own communities, overwhelming the islands' infrastructure, and destroying ecosystems and environments both on land and in the ocean. As Brian Harrison, from the Salvar la Tejita protest group, says: 'At no point was the protest aimed at tourists or tourism. Every one of the [17] organisations that took part values sustainable tourism as positive for the economy. The protest was clearly aimed at the unsustainable mass-tourism crisis which the Canarian government, island council and certain town halls are responsible for.' Over 104,000 homes in the Canaries are owned by companies and large-scale property speculators. Meanwhile, during the past five years wages have dropped by nearly 7 per cent and rents have increased by 40 per cent, an unsustainable position for local workers, and the reason why hospitality workers are threatening further strike action this summer. Nevertheless, it's clear that some British holidaymakers are taking the ongoing grievances personally. One local, employed by says she's aware of a definite shift in mood: 'My family back in the UK are saying a lot of people they know don't want to come to Tenerife anymore because of the protests. They say they don't feel wanted.' And she's not alone. Tenerife estate agent Martin Astley says: 'We do get people contacting us asking if it's safe to come to Tenerife now because of what they're seen in the news. We always explain that the media are blowing things out of proportion, using dramatic, false headlines when the reality is nothing like what they're trying to portray.' Major UK travel providers aren't panicking; far from it. Tui has actually increased its Canary Islands capacity this summer, adding 40,000 extra seats from UK airports, while easyJet has launched new routes to Tenerife from London Southend. In other words, despite the headlines, tour operators clearly still have faith in the destination. The next big round of protests is taking place on June 15, but these marches are planned for mainland Spain and the Balearics, not currently the Canary Islands. Néstor Marrero, secretary of Tenerife's Friends of Nature Association, says that for now, the archipelago's protest groups have decided to change tack. Instead, they're focusing on occupying local landmarks, starting with Teide National Park on June 7. So, while Barcelona and Mallorca may see crowds chanting for change, Tenerife and the other seven islands should remain peaceful on June 15. Having said that, if media headlines fail to make this distinction, there's bound to be a few more holidaymakers who get the wrong end of the stick and look at alternative summer holiday destinations like Turkey, Tunisia and Albania. Santiago Sesé, president of Tenerife's Chamber of Commerce, recently reported an 8 per cent drop in UK summer bookings compared with last year. And Pedro Alfonso from the region's Spanish Confederation of Employers' Organisations admitted that there had been 'a notable slump' in reservations for the forthcoming season. However, other sources suggest 2025 could be a record year for tourism to the archipelago. According to Spain's National Statistics Institute, the Canary Islands welcomed over 4.36 million international visitors in the first quarter of this year – a new record, up more than 2 per cent year on year. Of those, over 40 per cent came from the UK, with Tenerife taking the lion's share. The British love affair with the Canaries may have cooled, but for now the planes are arriving full, and the hotels are still reporting high occupancy levels. Indeed, local business owners are sympathetic over the calls for change. What they're more worried about is the damage to the island's image due to misreporting. As local entrepreneur John Parkes says: 'I'm supportive of the protests. My concern is that the demonstrations are misinterpreted by the public and the media. The aims of the protests are to make the tourist model fairer for the people who live here.' The reality is that the destination is just as warm and welcoming as it's ever been, and visitors are unlikely to even notice the unrest amongst the islanders who understandably want the government to prioritise their needs over the demands of an ever-expanding tourism industry. What's happening in the Canaries isn't a British retreat, it's an island reckoning, and if it does lead to a fairer, more sustainable tourism model, that should be something worth raising a glass of sangria to. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Trump urges Europe to reform unfair tax policies
The Trump administration's announcement last month that it was hiking tariffs on Europe is a wakeup call. For years, European governments have been treating U.S. tech companies as an ATM. Europe needs to come to the table on its discriminatory treatment of American businesses before the July 9 tariff deadline. To hear Europe's leaders howl over the latest tariff threat from President Trump, one might think that after putting the squeeze on the Old World, greedy Uncle Sam is coming back for more. The truth is that Eurozone bureaucrats have turned the targeting of U.S. companies into an art form. Consider the Eurozone's digital services taxes. Services such as content streaming, digital advertising and digital data provided by foreign companies working in Europe are taxed in addition to the tax they pay to their home countries. Naturally, as the global leader in tech innovation, it is American countries that disproportionately bear the burden. Brussels bureaucrats further hone the targeting by applying these taxes exclusively to companies above an arbitrary revenue threshold, ensuring that only large American tech competitors are hit. Six of the seven 'gatekeepers' subject to strict regulatory rules under the EU's Digital Markets Act are American. Likewise, the overwhelming majority of the companies that are subject to the most strident provisions of the EU's Digital Services Act are U.S. firms. Since 2018, U.S. companies have accounted for 83 percent of all EU data privacy fines. While U.S. regulators are satisfied with regulating domestic companies, Europeans are not shy about their extraterritorial shakedowns. French officials regularly call their digital service tax a GAFA or GAFAM tax, a the acronym being a reference to 'Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft.' Similarly, Europe's special levy on streaming services has been dubbed the 'Lex Netflix' after the American entertainment giant. Taxes and red tape might be economically-moribund Europe's only growth export industry. In a Truth Social post last month, Trump torched Europe's 'ridiculous corporate penalties' and 'unfair and unjustified lawsuits against American companies.' America's largest companies are singing the same tune. When EU regulators hit Apple and Meta with $800 million in fines last month, a Meta spokesperson called out the European money grab for what it is — 'a multi-billion-dollar tariff' on American companies. These fines do not take into account the enormous day-to-day compliance costs that U.S. firms must pay for the privilege of doing business in the Eurozone. Staying on top of EU digital rules runs Alphabet, Apple, Meta, Amazon and Microsoft $2.2 billion annually. American companies are forecasted to forgo more than $2 trillion of revenue due to Europe's massive regulatory burden. Apple and Meta recently chose to delay the launch of new features on their products in Europe rather than run afoul of the Eurozone's strict AI rules. To those watching Trump closely over the last decade, last week's escalation against Europe should have come as no surprise. In his first term, Trump initiated investigations into digital service taxes in Austria, France and Italy, issuing several reports on the findings. Since returning to office, Trump has complained that EU treats the U.S. worse than China. What's new is the convergence between the White House and Silicon Valley on Europe. Leading American tech executives have become increasingly outspoken on the regulatory hostility coming from Brussels. Meta's Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan recently criticized the European Commission for trying to 'handicap successful American businesses while allowing Chinese and European companies to operate under different standards.' These concerns appear to be getting through to Team Trump. At last Friday's press conference, Trump cited the $14.4 billion European court judgement against Apple that has been a major thorn in the tech giant's side. The Trump administration's tariffs come at a near-term cost to American consumers. But it is equally clear that U.S. companies are getting the short end of the stick in Europe. The outcome of the trade negotiations between the U.S. and EU will tell whether the tariff bet pays off. A deal with Europe that's limited to industrial goods isn't good enough. The EU must end its discriminatory taxes and call a ceasefire on its lawfare against American innovation. Michael Toth is a practicing lawyer and a research fellow at the Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
