Iran defies US on enrichment ahead of nuclear talks
TEHRAN: Iran on Thursday (Jun 12) vowed to "significantly" increase its output of enriched uranium in defiance of US demands ahead of a new round of nuclear talks, and amid reports of an imminent Israeli attack.
The announcement came after a UN nuclear watchdog resolution accused Iran of "non-compliance" with its obligations, prompting Israel to say the world must respond "decisively".
The United States, Israel and other Western countries have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, an accusation Tehran has categorically denied.
Uranium enrichment has emerged as the key point of contention in nuclear talks with the United States, with the next round due on Sunday in Oman.
"The necessary orders have been issued by the head of the Atomic Energy Organisation to launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location," said a joint statement from the organisation and the foreign ministry.
Iran will also be "replacing all of these first-generation machines with sixth-generation advanced machines" at the Fordow uranium enrichment plant south of Tehran, the organisation's spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said.
This means "our production of enriched material will increase significantly", he told state TV.
THREATS TO US BASES
The United States and Iran have held five rounds of talks since April to hammer out a new nuclear deal, replacing a 2015 accord that President Donald Trump abandoned during his first term in office.
Iran has threatened to target US military bases in the region in the event that the talks fail and conflict erupts.
Trump appeared to shift his previously optimistic tone this week, saying he was "less confident" a deal could be reached, and on Wednesday ordered US personnel to be moved from the potentially "dangerous" Middle East.
On Thursday, the US embassy in Jerusalem restricted staff movements over security concerns, citing "increased regional tensions".
Oman's Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi has nonetheless confirmed in a post on X on Thursday that the "6th round of Iran US talks will be held in Muscat this Sunday".
"SUFFER MORE LOSSES"
Israel has repeatedly warned that it could attack Iranian nuclear sites, vowing to stop its arch foe from acquiring an atomic bomb.
Iran has warned it would respond to any attack.
"All its (US) bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Iran's Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in response to US threats of military action if the talks fail.
"God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict.
A US official had earlier said that staff levels at the embassy in Iraq were being reduced over security concerns, while there were reports that personnel were also being moved from Kuwait and Bahrain.
An Iraqi security official said it was "not complete evacuation" and the US was taking precautionary measures in case of the failure of talks.
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the US embassy in Manama said the mission "has not changed its staffing posture and remains fully operational".
"STRATEGIC MISTAKE"
The latest developments come amid a diplomatic standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment, which Tehran has defended as a "non-negotiable" right while Washington has called it a "red line".
Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 per cent, far above the 3.67 per cent limit set in the 2015 deal and close, though still short of the 90 per cent needed for a nuclear warhead.
Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final say in major state policies, has recently said enrichment is "key" to Iran's nuclear programme and that the United States "cannot have a say" on the issue.
On May 31, after the fifth round of talks, Iran said it had received "elements" of a US proposal for a nuclear deal, with Araghchi later saying the text contained "ambiguities".
Iran has said it will present a counter-proposal to the latest draft from Washington, which it had criticised for failing to offer relief from sanctions - a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years.
On Thursday, the International Atomic Energy Agency's board of governors adopted a resolution condemning Iran's "non-compliance" with its nuclear obligations, carried by 19 votes in favour, out of 35 in total, diplomats said.
The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke the "snapback" mechanism under the 2015 nuclear deal, reinstating UN sanctions in response to Iranian non-compliance - an option that expires in October.
On Wednesday, Iran's permanent UN representative Amir Saeid Iravani, said Tehran would consider "proportionate responses" if the snapback mechanism is triggered - including "starting the process of withdrawal" from the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
37 minutes ago
- CNA
Israel-Iran tensions escalate: How proxies, nuclear ambitions are fuelling crisis
The conflict between Israel and Iran has shaped the Middle East for decades. It was largely on a low boil as the two sides attacked each other - mostly quietly and in Iran's case often by proxy - while avoiding a full-blown war. The hostilities stepped up a gear following the outbreak of war between Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas, which is backed by Iran, in October 2023. Since then, the countries have exchanged fire on each other's homelands in isolated incidents using missiles and drones. Then, in a major escalation, Israel on Jun 13 launched airstrikes against Iran's military targets and nuclear programme, as well as targeting scientists and generals. Explosions were seen and heard in the capital city, Tehran. The head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hossein Salami, was killed in the strikes, according to Iranian state television. Due to its 'pre-emptive strike', Israel declared a state of emergency. An escalation to open warfare could be a real possibility amid renewed focus on Iran's nuclear capabilities. Israel, which is widely believed to have nuclear weapons of its own, has long considered Iran's potential to build atomic weapons a threat to its existence. Why are Israel and Iran enemies? Israel and Iran were allies starting in the 1950s during the reign of Iran's last monarch, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, but the friendship abruptly ended with the Islamic revolution in Iran in 1979. Iran's new leaders called for the destruction of Israel, decrying the Jewish state as an imperialist power in the Middle East. Iran has supported groups that regularly fight Israel, notably Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthi rebels, all of which the US considers terrorist organisations. Israel regards the possibility of a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential risk. Israeli officials have repeatedly implied that if Iran were to reach the brink of weapons capability, Israeli forces would attack its nuclear programme using air power, as they did when they struck a reactor in Iraq in 1981 and an alleged Syrian nuclear site in 2007. Have Israel and Iran attacked each other previously? Prior to Israel's Jun 13 attack on Iran, the two countries exchanged direct blows for the first time in April 2024 when Iran launched a massive missile and drone attack on Israel. This was precipitated by an airstrike two weeks earlier on Iran's diplomatic buildings in the Syrian capital Damascus. The airstrike was widely attributed to, but not acknowledged by, Israel. While Iran's attack caused minimal damage and provoked a more limited return assault by Israel, the head-to-head fighting moved the conflict between the two countries to a more dangerous phase, creating a precedent for overt, direct fighting. Israel assassinated Hamas's political leader, Ismail Haniyeh, in the heart of the Iranian capital in July that same year. Another bout of missile attacks and airstrikes was exchanged by the two sides in October.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Snap Insight: Three responses to watch after Israel's strikes on Iran
SINGAPORE: Israel's attacks on Iran early Friday (Jun 13) morning should not come as a surprise: With proxy forces Hamas and Hezbollah neutered by events in the past year, Iran's position in the region has been severely undermined. When Israel and Iran exchanged strikes in April 2024, the first time both sides had directly targeted each other, Tehran absorbed a body blow: Israel knocked out key installations, including air defence ones, but the Iranian response was ineffective. Most of its missiles and drones were either intercepted or caused minor damage. Then, when Syrian dictator Bashar Al-Assad was deposed in December 2024, Tehran found itself in an even worse position: The land route through which arms made their way to Lebanon was effectively closed. Since then, Israel has been champing at the bit, recognising that there might never be a better time to set back Iran's nuclear programme. Based on what has been reported, it appears clear that only the United States, which was pursuing a nuclear deal with Iran, kept Israel at bay. President Donald Trump himself apparently waved off a planned strike in May, preferring to pursue diplomacy instead. The Israelis nevertheless went ahead with their plans on Friday morning, though it is unclear if Washington gave the green light or merely stood aside. With events still developing, there are more questions than answers, but there are three key areas to focus attention on in the coming days and weeks. IRAN RETALIATION WITH 'A FORCEFUL SLAP' The first is how Iran will react. The scope of the Israeli attack was much wider than anticipated. The Israel Defense Forces did not just go after Iran's nuclear facilities, it also targeted missile defence installations and laboratories. Perhaps most significantly, it has reportedly wiped out much of the command structure of the Islamic Republic's armed forces. Iran has confirmed the death of its military chief, who was the second-highest commander after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Given this, Tehran can be expected to pull no punches. The question is whether there is any heft left in its punches. Perhaps the statement by a spokesman of the country's armed forces is telling: Israel and the US would receive a 'forceful slap', he said – not exactly a term designed to inspire fear of forceful retribution. At the time of writing, it has reportedly launched 100 drones in response, much fewer than Russia has thrown at Ukraine on an almost daily basis. HOW MIDDLE EAST COUNTRIES WILL RESPOND The next key element is how the region will respond. Oman, where talks between the US and Iran were to have taken place this weekend, called Israel's actions reckless. Others have been predictable in calling out Tel Aviv. A few years ago, such a strike would likely have been greeted with barely restrained glee – behind closed doors, of course – in Arab capitals, particularly in the Gulf. But over the past few years, many of those same leaders have sought rapprochement with Iran, deeming their economic transformation programmes existential efforts that must plough ahead, and that regional tensions were an unnecessary obstacle. Make no mistake – there is no love lost between both sides, but they have set aside rivalry in the interest of what they deem the greater good. This is a setback to the Arab states not just in terms of their economic priorities, but also their geopolitical ones. An Israel acting like a regional hegemon is definitely not in their interests, and it remains to be seen how they will react. A BLACK EYE FOR DONALD TRUMP Finally, the attacks are a black eye for Mr Trump and the US. Mr Trump can now add the ashes of a nuclear agreement with Iran to the litany of his 'art of the deal' failures: The 'Riviera of the Middle East' in Gaza, an end to the Ukraine war on 'day one', among others. Perhaps much worse, his admirable aversion to allowing the US to be sucked into a foreign war will now be tested. Whether or not America had any part to play in the Iran strikes, it will inevitably be blamed, and will definitely come into the crosshairs. If, as is likely, it helps Israel thwart the inevitable counterstrikes from Iran, it will make for a bigger target. Yet, if it does not, a sense of panic will take hold from Taiwan to the Gulf, to Europe. At the end of the day, while Israel's strikes appear to have been largely successful, they will bring the world back to square one. There are more than even odds that a chastised Iran will decide that only a nuclear deterrent will keep its enemy at bay, that negotiating with the West is futile, and thus decide that redoubling its efforts to get one is the only way forward.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Israel strikes kill top Iran military leaders, hit nuclear sites
TEHRAN: Israel unleashed a wave of strikes on Iran on Friday (Jun 13), hitting about 100 targets including nuclear facilities and military command centres, and killing senior figures, among them the armed forces chief and top nuclear scientists. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned Israel it faced a "bitter and painful" fate over the attacks, while the Iranian military said there were "no limits" to its response. The Israeli military said later Iran launched around 100 drones in retaliation, with air defences intercepting them outside Israeli territory. Neighbouring Jordan said it intercepted drones and missiles that violated its airspace, as air raid sirens sounded in Amman. US President Donald Trump told Fox News he had prior knowledge of the Israeli strikes, which Israel said involved 200 fighter jets. Trump also stressed that Tehran "cannot have a nuclear bomb". The United States underlined that it was not involved in the Israeli action and warned Iran not to attack its personnel or interests. But Tehran said Washington would be "responsible for consequences" as Israel's operation "cannot have been carried out without the coordination and permission of the United States". Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel struck at the "heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme", taking aim at the atomic facility in Natanz and nuclear scientists. The strikes would "continue as many days as it takes", the Israeli leader said, while the military said intelligence showed Iran was approaching the "point of no return" on its nuclear programme. The strikes killed Iran's highest-ranking military officer, armed forces chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri, and the head of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hossein Salami, Iranian media reported. "The precise targeting of senior commanders of the Revolutionary Guards, the Iranian military, and nuclear scientists - all of whom were involved in advancing the plan to destroy Israel - sends a strong and clear message: those who work toward Israel's destruction will be eliminated," Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said. AFP images showed a gaping hole in the side of a Tehran high-rise residential building that appeared to have sustained a targeted and localised strike. State media said civilians, including women and children, were killed. Tasnim news agency said six nuclear scientists were killed. Flights suspended Tehran's streets were deserted except for queues at petrol stations, a familiar sight in times of crisis. Air traffic was halted at Tehran's main gateway, Imam Khomeini International Airport, while Iraq and Jordan also closed their airspace and suspended flights. Gulf airlines cancelled flights to and from Iran, as well as Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. Israel declared a state of emergency and closed its airspace, with Defence Minister Israel Katz saying Israel was braced for Iran's expected retaliation. Hours later, the Jordanian military said its aircraft and air defence systems intercepted "a number of missiles and drones that entered Jordanian airspace". There are "no limits in responding to this crime", Iran's armed forces said, accusing Israel of crossing "all red lines". Oil prices surged while stocks sank on the Israeli strikes, which came after Trump's warning of a "massive conflict" in the region. Trump had also said the US was drawing down staff in the Middle East, after Iran had threatened to target US military bases in the region if conflict broke out. Prior to the strikes, Trump said he believed a deal on Iran's nuclear programme was "fairly close", cautioning, however, that an Israeli attack on its arch foe could wreck the chances of an agreement. The US leader did not disclose the details of a conversation on Monday with Netanyahu, but said: "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it." Trump quickly added: "Might help it actually, but it also could blow it." "Within reach" US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned Iran not to respond to Israeli strikes by hitting US bases, saying Washington was not involved. Ahead of Friday's attack, Iran had threatened to hit US bases in the Middle East if conflict were to erupt. With the violence raising questions on whether a sixth round of talks planned between the US and Iran will still take place on Sunday in Oman, Trump said Washington is still "hoping to get back to the negotiating table". Confirming Natanz among targets, the UN's nuclear watchdog said it was "closely monitoring" the situation. "The agency is in contact with Iranian authorities regarding radiation levels. We are also in contact with our inspectors in the country," said Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). "Extremist" Israel, which counts on US military and diplomatic support, sees Iran as an existential threat. Netanyahu has vowed less restraint since the unprecedented Oct 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Tehran-backed Hamas, which triggered the massive Israeli offensive in Gaza. Since the Hamas attack, Iran and Israel have traded direct attacks for the first time. Aside from Hamas, Israel is also battling Iranian proxies Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. The US and other Western countries, along with Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it has repeatedly denied. Israel again called for global action after the IAEA accused Iran on Wednesday of non-compliance with its obligations. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, slammed the resolution as "extremist", while Tehran said it would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 per cent, far above the 3.67 per cent limit set in the 2015 deal and close, though still short, of the 90 per cent needed for a nuclear warhead.
