So who WILL take migrants, Keir? No10 refuses to say which countries it is talking to about return hubs after Albania snub
Downing Street is refusing to reveal which countries it is talking to about taking Britain's unwanted asylum seekers
No10 refused to 'get ahead' of discussions with countries it hopes will host its migrant return hubs scheme, after Albania became the first country to rule itself out.
In a surprise move, the Prime Minister used a visit to Tirana yesterday to unveil plans to create Rwanda-style centres abroad to house failed asylum seekers from the UK.
But the initiative imploded on live TV just an hour later when his host, Albanian PM Edi Rama, ruled out ever taking part in the scheme.
At the same time, Labour 's hardline new approach to legal migration, designed to tackle the surge in reform votes, has not helped Sir Keir's personal popularity.
A poll by YouGov today showed the PM's personal rating is down five points in a month to a new record low of -46 .
At the same time, the popularity of Nigel Farage has risen by 11 points to -29, following the by-election win in Runcorn and Helsby, and gains in local elections.
But perhaps most worryingly for Sir Keir, he is down a stunning 34 points with those who voted Labour last year, in a poll carried out after he said Brits were becoming 'strangers in their own land'.
Half of those who put him into power last year now have an unfavourable opnion of him.
Asked when a list of participating countries for the return hub scheme might be available, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'We've set out what return hubs would focus on, we've set out that they would address the current intolerable situation where asylum seekers who have exhausted all legal routes to remain in the UK attempt various stalling tactics to frustrate their removal, so we've set out what it would deliver.
'We've said that we're entering those discussions with countries. Obviously we can't get ahead of those discussions, so it's not possible to say now when … but we will obviously provide an update depending on how those discussions progress.'
Asked why the scheme was announced in Albania, a country which is not taking part, he said Albania was 'one of our closest allies when it comes to tackling illegal migration'.
He said the Prime Minister had been in the country to upgrade a bilateral 'strategic partnership' on how to tackle irregular migration.
A minister earlier denied that Albania's public refusal to host the UK's migrant return hub scheme was embarrassing for the Prime Minister.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson told Times Radio: 'I think that's a bit of a reach. This was never intended to be part of our discussions with Albania.'
Asked which other countries had said they were open to the scheme, she said she was 'not in a position to name individual countries or set out how that's going to work', but that there would be 'further discussions' with a number of nations.
Towering over Sir Keir at a press conference in the capital Tirana, 6ft 7in Mr Rama said his country had no interest in expanding a similar deal it had struck with Italy.
Leaving Sir Keir squirming, Mr Rama said: 'I have been very clear since day one when we started this process with Italy that this was a one-off with Italy because of our very close relationship but also because of the geographical situation which makes a lot of sense.'
He added: 'We have been asked by several countries if we were open to it and we said no, because we are loyal to the marriage with Italy and the rest is just love.'
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp was highly critical of the diplomatic setback.
'This trip is an embarrassment,' he said.
'Starmer jetted off and now the Albanian prime minister has made clear that there will be no UK return hubs in Albania. So, what was the point of this entire visit?'
He added: 'One of the first acts of this Labour Government was to scrap the Rwanda scheme. Now, with 2025 so far the worst year in history for illegal immigrants crossing the Channel, the Prime Minister is scrambling to stitch together a weak imitation.
'Starmer has never cared about stopping illegal migration... now he's in full panic mode, cobbling together half-baked policies to cover up his chaos.'
The blow for Sir Keir comes as he looks to talk tough on immigration to combat the rising threat from Reform UK – despite years of saying the opposite.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Copy Reform and you'll get eaten, Kinnock tells Starmer
Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader who now sits in the House of Lords, said the Prime Minister had been 'not well advised' on how to tackle the rise of Nigel Farage's party. He suggested that attempts to ape Reform's language were 'mortally stupid', and advised the party that 'achievement' in Government was the best way to counter the Reform threat. Lord Kinnock told Prospect Magazine: 'Appeasers get eaten. It's very important to remember that if people are offered two versions of a particular political brand, they will always choose the genuine one.' He added: 'If a progressive party is trying to use the vocabulary of isolationism or segregation or division, it's the same. It is silly to do that. It isn't evil, but it is very, very silly – maybe mortally stupid.' The former Labour leader's intervention is the latest development in growing tensions within the Labour Party about how to tackle the rising tide of Reform support. His remarks came after the Prime Minister announced measures to tackle immigration and a tightening of the system, warning that without such a move the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers'. The speech followed Labour 's drubbing in the local elections last month, where Reform won hundreds of council seats and seized the parliamentary seat of Runcorn and Helsby. The comments were supported by some figures in Red Wall seats, which are under greater threat from the surge in Reform support, but denounced by many Left-wing Labour MPs. Lord Kinnock said: 'I think there are elements in and around the Labour party encouraging that as a way of responding to Reform, and they are fundamentally, 100 per cent, 22-carat wrong.' He added: 'I don't fear Reform, but I do think we ought to fight them rather harder and with more purpose.' The peer told the magazine: 'The playbook is familiar to anybody who studied the 1930s in Europe and or indeed in the United States of America. 'I'm not saying we are in any sense slipping towards some kind of fascist system… But those factors and the way in which they generate division and envy and isolationism – they're unhealthy features of any democracy.' On how to beat Reform, he said: 'Nothing replaces achievement in government, [concentrating on] what people regard to be the primary issues on the agenda, which is to say: health, decent jobs, affordable costs and wages that can meet those costs.' Lord Kinnock led the Labour Party before famously losing the 1992 election to Sir John Major despite the polls being in his favour, leading to another five years of Conservative rule. The pro-Europe politician said that decisions to use phrases such as 'island of strangers' and not to scrap the two-child benefit cap were based on post-Brexit preconceptions of the electorate. He said: 'Certainly there were elements among the advisory team who had an overreaction to the reason for, and the consequence of, the Brexit referendum vote. I think that overreaction has lasted through till now. 'I don't think that they are reactionary individuals. I don't think they're frightened individuals. I think they have overreacted to a misinterpretation of what happened in 2016.' The former leader went on to suggest that Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, should consider a wealth tax, citing as an example a two per cent levy on assets above £10 million. 'Property taxation in our country, asset taxation, is outdated,' he added, as he urged the party's senior figures to be bolder. 'There's a degree of steadiness from Keir which, on a good day, is very, very reassuring. However, that can translate into a paralytic caution. That means that this government, much as I love them – and they know I do – has got a kind of audacity deficit.' Lord Kinnock appeared at Sir Keir's victory speech on the morning of July 5, when the Prime Minister led the party to a landslide win.
The Sun
23 minutes ago
- The Sun
£4million a DAY migrant hotel bill will continue to spiral unless Labour does three things
Trip advisors THE woke brigade in the Home Office who spent years revolting against Tory efforts to curb illegal migration finally have an incentive to drop their opposition. Sensibly, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said she will spare deep cuts in the department — and potential job losses — IF it saves money on the spiralling hotel bill for migrants. 1 And the faster Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's army of leftie civil servants meet these new targets, the more cash she can keep for other projects. Skint Britain forks out £4million every day to house people who largely have no right to be here. The problem is that the number of new arrivals isn't slowing down. Unless Labour ends the golden ticket to the El Dorado paradise of benefits, free housing and illegal work, that hotel bill will continue to rise. Reform act He has Labour pedalling leftwards over welfare and the Tories rightwards on immigration. The Reform leader's ear is well-tuned to discontent with the Government. A desire for real change has delivered control of local councils to his fledgling party for the first time. His problem now is how to show Reform can actually govern — without falling into mini-meltdowns like the ones caused by the exits of chairman Zia Yusuf and MP Rupert Lowe. Reform's surge has been stunning. But being a one-showman band will only get Farage so far. Court out COULD the days of the European Court of Human Rights ruling over our borders finally be numbered? Even the head of the European Council, which oversees the unelected court, is starting to accept it will have to adapt to the public's concerns. Leaders across Europe are waking up to the problems caused by mass migration and want urgent legal reform. And Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is ready to quit the court — as is Reform. Roll with it Apparently, it all kicked off in Tokyo after tourists saw a waxwork of Greggs' pastry snack at Madame Tussauds. No word yet on whether it tasted better than a vegan sausage roll.
Sky News
28 minutes ago
- Sky News
Scotland's Labour weren't the only winners in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election
In the centre of Hamilton, stands the now derelict Bairds department store - a reminder of the past and a sign of the political present. Outside, people speak of a time when the high street was busy and the area buzzing. As in other areas of the country, the blame for this sense of decline is placed at the door of the established parties. "The SNP have done nothing for Hamilton… we need someone to do something and I'm not sure Labour will do it", said one woman stopping for a chat outside Belles Tearoom. Apathy once again prevails. But just over seven thousand people came up with a solution unusual for Scottish politics on Thursday. Nigel Farage. This by-election signals the arrival of Reform as an electoral force north of the border. From a standing start and with little in the way of campaigning infrastructure, the party finished just three percentage points behind the SNP. As he's become accustomed to in England, Nigel Farage ate up Tory votes here. But that does not account for the party's surge. "We took votes off all the parties… there's a huge surge of young people from the SNP, particularly young men, coming to us," said Thomas Kerr, a local Reform councillor and campaigner. For the party, this is explained by independence becoming less of a determinant of electoral support - and domestic issues like the cost of living and the NHS taking priority instead. It's just one factor that's causing traditional political axioms to be scrambled, chief among them - the assumption that Scots will never vote for Nigel Farage. His party can now be confident of picking up their first MSPs in next May's parliamentary elections. So for the established parties, this may all mean a strategic rethink. What is the politically expedient position on immigration in Scotland now? What of the socially liberal identity issues previously championed by the SNP? But there's a more fundamental tension, too. 2:57 Both the SNP and Labour ran campaigns casting this by-election as a two-horse race between them and Reform. The result clearly shows a three-way splintering. That could get messy in the world of coalitions that often comes from the proportionate voting system in Holyrood. For now though, Labour will take the win and try to use it to turn round their flagging ratings. This is no definite inflection point, though. Labour sources say the sophistication of their digital campaign in this race played a big role, with others pointing to the pull of a popular local candidate. But it's also worth remembering that before the SNP surge of 2015, this section of West Central Scotland would have been regarded as a Labour stronghold. It was painted red again last year, with convincing wins in the general election. So on paper, this could have been a tidying-up exercise for Labour. It speaks volumes about the party's wider standing that the win was so unexpected. SNP leader John Swinney may have a point when he says the close result shows his party making progress after the pummelling they took here just 11 months ago. There aren't any runner-up prizes in politics, though. Six hundred votes have denied the SNP a much-needed political shot in the arm and taught them they cannot just cruise to victory on the back of disdain for Sir Keir Starmer. Back in Hamilton, and Bairds is not the only monument of the past here. For the SNP, the town stands as an emblem of the electoral successes of yesteryear. A shock victory by Winnie Ewing in a 1967 by-election signalled the party's entry on to the political stage and triggered a rethink among their establishment rivals. It's an irony likely not lost on many in Scottish politics that Reform has used this slice of the central belt to do exactly the same thing.
