Germany's Max Planck society emerges as magnet for US researchers amid Trump-era turmoil
Germany's Max Planck Society has recorded a dramatic threefold increase in applications from the United States, reflecting growing unease among American scientists over the future of research under President Donald Trump's administration.
The spring 2025 recruitment round saw 81 applications from early-career women scientists in the US, compared to just 25 in the previous year as reported by Reuters.
'Applications from other parts of the world have remained constant. The surge is distinctly American,' confirmed Max Planck president Patrick Cramer.
Top US institutions at the center of the exodus
Almost half of the new US applicants are affiliated with just five institutions—Harvard University, Stanford University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the University of California.
The Max Planck Society, a German state-funded research network with 84 institutes, a €2 billion annual budget, and 39 Nobel laureates, is now considering hiring 20 candidates, up from the originally planned 12, if the quality threshold is met.
Research crackdown and the Harvard controversy
The migration of talent follows the Trump administration's revocation of Harvard University's certification to host international students, a move currently blocked by a federal court.
The policy mandates that foreign students either transfer to compliant institutions or lose their legal status in the US. The White House has indicated intentions to broaden the restrictions to additional universities.
These developments have sent shockwaves through the global academic community, especially as prominent scholars, such as Yale historian Timothy Snyder, have already resigned in protest and relocated to institutions abroad.
Europe seeks to absorb displaced talent
Cramer, recently returned from discussions in the US, revealed to Reuters that international research leaders are increasingly focused on safeguarding academic talent. 'Our main concern is that a whole generation of scientists may be lost to global science,' he said. 'Europe must become a safe haven and help bridge the years ahead.'
The German government is preparing a national initiative, tentatively titled the '1,000 Brains' programme, to expand research infrastructure in anticipation of an influx of international academics fleeing US policy disruptions.
Germany's call to action: A wounded scientific benchmark
Petra Olschowski, the research minister of Baden-Württemberg—home to four of Germany's 11 top-tier universities—warned that the global research ecosystem could suffer if American institutions continue to lose credibility. He said in an interaction with Reuters,
'Harvard and other major US universities are our benchmarks,' she said. 'That very standard is now under threat.'
Global science at a crossroads
Despite European enthusiasm to accommodate affected scholars, budgetary constraints remain a concern. Still, research organisations across the continent are aligning their efforts to counterbalance the instability in the US.
As Trump's education policies grow increasingly nationalistic, Europe is positioning itself not just as an academic alternative, but as a sanctuary for scientific inquiry in peril.
Ready to empower your child for the AI era? Join our program now! Hurry, only a few seats left.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
In Canada lake, robot learns to mine without disrupting marine life
Three robotic arms extended under the water in a Canadian lake, delicately selecting pebbles from the bed, before storing them back inside the machine. The exercise was part of a series of tests the robot was undergoing before planned deployment in the ocean, where its operators hope the machine can transform the search for the world's most sought-after metals. The robot was made by Impossible Metals, a company founded in California in 2020, which says it is trying to develop technology that allows the seabed to be harvested with limited ecological disruption. Conventional underwater harvesting involves scooping up huge amounts of material in search of potato-sized things called poly-metallic nodules. These nodules contain nickel, copper, cobalt, or other metals needed for electric vehicle batteries, among other key products. Impossible Metals' co-founder Jason Gillham told AFP his company's robot looks for the nodules "in a selective way." The prototype, being tested in the province of Ontario, remains stationary in the water, hovering over the lake bottom. In a lab, company staff monitor the yellow robot on screens, using what looks like a video game console to direct its movements. Using lights, cameras and artificial intelligence, the robot tries to identify the sought-after nodules while leaving aquatic life such as octopuses' eggs, coral, or sponges undisturbed. In a first for the nascent sector, Impossible Metals has requested a permit from US President Donald Trump to use its robot in American waters around Samoa, in the Pacific. The company is hoping that its promise of limited ecological disruption will give it added appeal. Competitors, like The Metals Company, use giant machines that roll along the seabed and suck up the nodules, a highly controversial technique. Douglas McCauley, a marine biologist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, told AFP this method scoops up ocean floor using collectors or excavators, "a bit like bulldozers," he explained. Everything is then brought up to ships, where the nodules are separated from waste, which is tossed back into the ocean. This creates large plumes of sediment and toxins with a multitude of potential impacts, he said. A less invasive approach, like that advocated by Impossible Metals, would reduce the risk of environmental damage, McCauley explained. But he noted lighter-touch harvesting is not without risk. The nodules themselves also harbor living organisms, and removing them even with a selective technique, involves destroying the habitat, he said. Impossible Metals admits its technology cannot detect microscopic life, but the company claims to have a policy of leaving 60 percent of the nodules untouched. McCauley is unconvinced, explaining "ecosystems in the deep ocean are especially fragile and sensitive." "Life down there moves very slowly, so they reproduce very slowly, they grow very slowly." Duncan Currie of the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition said it was impossible to assess the impact of any deep sea harvesting. "We don't know enough yet either in terms of the biodiversity and the ecosystem down there," he told AFP. According to the international scientific initiative Ocean Census, only 250,000 species are known, out of the two million that are estimated to populate the oceans. Mining is "always going to have some impact," said Impossible Metals chief executive and co-founder Oliver Gunasekara, who has spent most of his career in the semiconductor field. But, he added, "we need a lot more critical minerals, as we want to electrify everything." Illustrating the global rush toward underwater mining, Impossible Metals has raised US$15 million from investors to build and test a first series of its Eureka 3 robot in 2026. The commercial version will be the size of a shipping container and will expand from three to 16 arms, and its battery will grow from 14 to nearly 200 kilowatt-hours. The robot will be fully autonomous and self-propel, without cables or tethers to the surface, and be equipped with sensors. While awaiting the US green light, the company hopes to finalize its technology within two to three years, conduct ocean tests, build a fleet, and operate through partnerships elsewhere in the world. amp/ico/tib/amc/bs/dw
NDTV
25 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Expect US-India Trade Deal In Not Too Distant Future": Top Trump Aide
Washington: The trade deal between New Delhi and Washington could be finalised soon, according to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who said that India and the United States have "found a place that really works for both countries." The remarks came ahead of the final round of India-US face-to-face negotiations, which are expected to take place in New Delhi this week. "You should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not too distant future because I think we found a place that really works for both countries," Lutnick said in his keynote address at the eighth edition of the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) here on Sunday. "When they put the right person in India, put the right person on the other side of the table, and we've managed (that), I think," he added. Lutnick also said India may get more favourable terms from being one of the first pacts agreed. "Earlier countries get a better deal, that's the way it is. So those who come in July 4th to July 9th, there's just going to be a pile," Lutnick said, adding that India is trying to come in earlier than that. India Also Optimistic Meanwhile, India also said it is working actively to finalise the proposed bilateral agreement aimed at significantly expanding trade and offering preferential market access to each other's businesses. Speaking to the media in France on Monday, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said, "Both countries are committed to work together, and both desire to give preferential access to each other's businesses. We are working towards the bilateral trade agreement." India-US Trade Deal The India-US trade agreement was announced in February by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump. The proposed pact is envisioned as a multi-sector deal with the first phase expected to be finalised by September-October 2025. Its goal is to more than double the bilateral trade volume from the current USD 191 billion to USD 500 billion by 2030. A delegation from Washington is currently in New Delhi to advance discussions on an interim agreement, expected to be finalised by the end of June. New Delhi is pushing for a complete exemption from the 26 per cent reciprocal tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on Indian goods exported to US.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Shashi Tharoor on Donald Trump's repeated ceasefire claims: ‘India didn't need persuasion'
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Tuesday, while wrapping up his all-party delegation's Brazil visit, said on Monday that if at all any American persuasion took place in the process of stopping the conflict between New Delhi and Islamabad, it would be in Pakistan because India needed no persuasion to stop. About US President Donald Trump's repeated claims of having brokered the ceasefire understanding between India and Pakistan, Tharoor said, "No one needed to persuade us to stop. We had already said to stop. If there was any persuasion by the American president or his senior officials, it would have been persuasion of the Pakistanis. They would have had to be persuaded. We don't need to be persuaded because we don't want war." Speaking to news agency ANI, the Congress MP noted that while India has enormous respect for the American presidency and it will speak with that in mind, it is also a truth that "our understanding is a bit different". Tharoor affirmed that India does not want conflict, it wants peace, to focus on development, "that's the basic message". The Congress leader further clarified that from the very day of Operation Sindoor, i.e., May 7, India has sternly stated that it is not interested in prolonging the conflict. "This is not the opening salvo in some sort of war. All it is retribution against the terrorists, period. If Pakistan had not reacted, we wouldn't have reacted," he added. Trump has repeatedly taken credit for the ceasefire understanding between India and Pakistan, saying that he offered to increase trade with both nations in exchange for a stoppage to the conflict. He has claimed to have stopped a big nuclear crisis from happening. Meanwhile, Tharoor said that while the American media space is very crowded, it's hard to grasp people's attention. "Therefore, our story may not be at the top of their minds. But if we can get the attention of those who care about South Asia, those who care about India, those who care about terrorism, we can get our message across very, very easily," he added. The Congress leader noted that the interesting facts about his delegation's visit to the United States will be that the Pakistan delegation will also be there. "Tomorrow almost they will be in Washington, while we are in Washington on the same date. So there's going to be perhaps an increase in interest because of the fact that there are two duelling delegations in the same city," he added. Tharoor highlighted India-US ties and said that it is because the Security Council is a small part of India's relationship with the US. "Whether it comes to trade, whether it comes to defence, whether it comes to intelligence sharing, whether it comes to our participation in the QUAD in the G-20, there are just so many avenues in which we cooperate with the US," he told news agency ANI. Referring to the delegation sent by Pakistan, Tharoor said that it is not by accident. But he also noted that Islamabad's delegation is not going to as many countries as the Indian groups. "They're focusing on what they consider a few key capitals, namely. Washington, Brussels. London. That seems to be the thrust of the Pakistani effort. We have gone to all those capitals and more," he added. Shashi Tharoor detailed his delegation's schedule during its trip to Washington. He said that a series of meetings have been set up with the entire range of public opinion in Washington, government officials, legislators, senators and congressmen, various committees in the House and the Senate, think tanks, media and some public addresses, etc. The Tharoor-led delegation includes Tejasvi Surya (BJP), Shashank Mani Tripathi (BJP), Bhubaneswar Kalita (BJP), Sarfaraz Ahmad (JMM), Gants Harish Madhur Balayogi (TDP), Milind Deora (Shiv Sena), and India's former Ambassador to the US, Taranjit Sandhu. The team has so far visited Guyana, Panama, Colombia, and Brazil so far. Tensions between India and Pakistan heightened in light of the April 22 terror attack that took place in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, killing 26 persons, mostly civilians. A day after the attack, India decided to impose punitive actions on Pakistan, including the suspension of Indus Waters Treaty and cancellation of visas issued to all Pakistani nationals. Two weeks later, on May 7, the Indian armed forces launched Operation Sindoor and carried out targeted strikes on nine terrorist infrastructures, linked to the likes of Jaish-e-Mohammad, Lashkar-e-Taiba, among others, inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). In this operation, more than 100 terrorists were killed, the Indian government had said. Following Operation Sindoor, Pakistan tried to launch a retaliatory military action against India, using cross-border shelling, drones, and unarmed aerial vehicles. However, all their bids were thwarted by the armed forces and the Indian air defence systems. For four days, intense cross-border fighting continued to take place between India and Pakistan. But on May 10, in a surprise announcement, a ceasefire understanding between the nuclear-armed neighbours was reached, wherein they agreed to stop all military actions against each other on land, sea, and air. The announcement was first made by Trump on his Truth Social network, wherein he claimed to have brokered the understanding following long nights of talks. However, India has clarified that the understanding came to be after the director general of military operations (DGMO) of Pakistan reached out to his Indian government Lieutenant General Rajiv Ghai over the hotline, requesting the cessation of military actions against each other. The understanding continues to hold till now. As many as seven all-party delegations, including members cutting across party lines, were formed to take charge of India's global outreach program on Operation Sindoor. The delegations' aim is to present India's stance on terrorism, and its strong message of unity and brotherhood, as well as its collective resolve to wipe out terrorism. The initiative, coordinated by the union government, brought together leaders from both the ruling NDA and opposition parties, showcasing a rare bipartisan consensus on a matter of national security.
