Pahalgam Attack: Pakistan's Desperate Attempt To Disrupt Peace In Kashmir
Last Updated:
After this despicable attack, the message is unmistakable: this is war. India will not cower, nor will it let the blood of innocents stain its soil without retribution.
The horrific terror attack on tourists, the first in years to shatter Kashmir's fragile peace, turned Pahalgam's serene Baisaran meadows into a scene of carnage on April 22, 2025, claiming at least 26 lives, including a newlywed Navy officer. These Lashkar-e-Taiba-linked attackers, dressed in military gear and recording their brutality with body cameras, slipped out of the forests to gun down innocent people—men, women, elderly—who had come to soak in the valley's beauty.
Survivors describe a living nightmare: a gunman demanding victims' names and religions before shooting a man in the head, his wife's cries drowned by gunfire; bodies scattered across the grass, some still holding snacks, others lying beside loved ones pleading for help. The Resistance Front, an offshoot of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed this slaughter, citing 'demographic changes" while leaving behind broken families and a death toll that may rise as the wounded cling to life.
The gall of this massacre in a place known as 'mini-Switzerland" sparks raw fury. These killers didn't just strike—they hunted, firing at close range to ensure no one escaped. A 26-year-old Navy lieutenant, married just six days, saw his future erased, leaving his bride to mourn a love destroyed. An 83-year-old from Tamil Nadu and a 65-year-old woman from Odisha were among the injured, their joyful trip twisted into a blood-stained tragedy. The images sear your mind: locals rushing the wounded on ponies down rocky paths, helicopters circling a valley now drenched in grief. This wasn't just an attack—it was a deliberate blow to hope, a cruel wound to a Kashmir striving for peace, orchestrated by those who thrive on chaos and division.
Kashmir, for years a cauldron of unrest, has been clawing its way toward normalcy, a transformation that Pakistan's terror machinery cannot stomach. The abrogation of Article 370 in 2019 marked a turning point, dismantling the legal barriers that fuelled separatist dreams and opening the region to integration with India. Tourism, a barometer of stability, has soared: in 2024 alone, 3.5 million visitors, including 43,000 foreigners, flocked to the valley, a stark contrast to the numbers in 2018 before the revocation.
The first quarter of 2025 saw 500,000 tourists, a 30-year high, drawn to Pahalgam's meadows and Srinagar's tulip gardens. Cinemas, shuttered for decades, are flickering back to life—Srinagar's INOX multiplex welcomed 250,000 moviegoers in 2024. Malls and shopping complexes, like the gleaming Sara City Centre in Srinagar, buzz with locals and visitors, while homestays in remote villages thrive, signalling economic revival. Life is being celebrated again—weddings, festivals, and markets pulse with joy, a defiant rejection of the fear that once gripped the region.
Local Kashmiri Muslims, long caught in the crossfire of competing narratives, are increasingly seeing their future tethered to India's stability, not the crumbling mirage of Pakistan's promises. Pakistan, a nation buckling under economic ruin and internal strife—its GDP growth limping at 2.4 per cent in 2024, inflation soaring to 12 per cent—offers nothing but chaos. The 2024 Jammu and Kashmir elections, with a 63 per cent voter turnout, the highest in decades, reflect a shift: Kashmiris are voting for development, jobs, and peace, not for a failed state that fuels rebellion from afar.
This awakening terrifies Pakistan, whose decades-long strategy of bleeding India through proxy terror is losing its grip. The separatist narrative, once a rallying cry, now rings hollow against the backdrop of a resurgent Kashmir, where locals welcome tourists with warmth, not suspicion. Pakistan's desperation is palpable—it cannot bear the sight of a Kashmir slipping from its grasp, embracing a future aligned with India's pluralistic promise.
This attack, meticulously planned, is Pakistan's venomous retort to Kashmir's revival. The Baisaran meadow, accessible only by foot or horseback, is no random target—its remoteness demands weeks of reconnaissance, local intelligence, and cold-blooded precision. Intelligence agencies point to LeT/TRF commander Saifullah Kasuri and two Rawalkot-based Lashkar operatives as the masterminds, with six terrorists, backed by a local sleeper cell, executing the strike after detailed scouting.
The timing is no coincidence: US Vice President JD Vance's visit to India, alongside Prime Minister Narendra Modi's trip to Saudi Arabia, placed global eyes on India, amplifying the attack's impact. Pakistan's aim is clear—to scream to the world that Kashmir remains a tinderbox, to choke its tourism-driven economy, and to derail the narrative of normalcy. By targeting tourists, a soft and symbolic target, Pakistan seeks to instil fear, disrupt the Amarnath Yatra pilgrimage looming weeks away, and tarnish India's image as a stable destination.
After this despicable attack, the message is unmistakable: this is war. India will not cower, nor will it let the blood of innocents—tourists, a young Navy officer, elderly travellers—stain its soil without retribution. The perpetrators, skulking under the shadow of Pakistan's terror machinery, will face a reckoning. Pakistan, a nation that speaks only the language of violence, will be answered in kind. The audacity in orchestrating such a slaughter in Pahalgam, a meticulously planned strike to maximise fear, demands a response that leaves no doubt about India's resolve. The Lashkar-e-Taiba and its venomous spawn, The Resistance Front, backed by Pakistan's ISI, have overplayed their hand, and the cost of their barbarity should be steep.
Simultaneously, a subtler but no less vicious war rages—the battle for narrative, waged in newsrooms, social media, and literature festivals. Pakistan peddles an insidious lie: that India and Pakistan share equal blame for Kashmir's turmoil, a false equivalence that whitewashes decades of Pakistani aggression. The truth is stark—India has been the victim, its cities scarred by Pakistan's terror campaign. From the 2001 Parliament attack to the 2008 Mumbai massacre, where 166 lives were snuffed out by ISI-backed Lashkar-e-Taiba, to the 2016 Pathankot airbase assault, Pakistan's fingerprints mark every wound.
Just days before the Pahalgam attack, Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir spewed divisive bile, invoking the two-nation theory to declare Muslims and Hindus irreconcilable. His words were a prelude to this bloodbath, a calculated signal to his proxies to target Hindu civilians. Worse, Pakistan's propaganda subtly prods India's Muslim communities, sowing discord with dog-whistle messages that fall flat but reveal its communal agenda. The ideological thread is unmistakable—Pakistan's terror and its rhetoric are two sides of the same coin.
India will not let this narrative war be hijacked. The myth of moral parity must be shattered, for Pakistan is no equal; it is the aggressor, its hands dripping with the blood of thousands. While Pakistan's economy crumbles—its debt-to-GDP ratio at 70 per cent in 2024, its streets roiled by protests—India stands tall, a rising power hosting global events and conferences like the G20.
Kashmir's revival, with its booming tourism and vibrant local support for integration, is a story Pakistan seeks to drown in fear. But India will fight on both fronts. On the battlefield, it will hunt down those who planned and executed this horror, ensuring justice for the fallen. In the war of ideas, India will expose Pakistan's duplicity, countering its lies with the truth of a Kashmir embracing peace and progress. This is not just a fight for territory—it is a battle for the soul of a region, and India will prevail, undaunted by the shadows Pakistan casts.
The writer takes special interest in history, culture and geopolitics. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
Kashmir terror Lashkar-e-Taiba Pahalgam attack
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
April 25, 2025, 15:27 IST
News opinion Opinion | Pahalgam Attack: Pakistan's Desperate Attempt To Disrupt Peace In Kashmir
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Unblocked! After legal feud, US Supreme Court allows Elon Musk's DOGE broad access to Social Security data
The US Supreme Court on Friday granted billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency access to personal information on millions of Americans amid an extended legal battle. DOGE plays a very important role in the Trump administration's aim to slash the federal workforce. According to Reuters, the justices put on hold Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander's order that blocked DOGE's access to the personal information of Americans. Judge Hollander's order blocked DOGE's access to the Social Security data systems that contained the medical and financial records of millions of Americans. It was cited in the order that granting such access could violate federal privacy laws in the country. According to NBC, the conservative-majority court granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration. The application requested the justices to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland. This comes at a time when Donald Trump and Elon Musk are caught in the middle of a major feud, with the latter taking to X to criticize the reigning US President. The Social Security data request was made by the Elon Musk-led DOGE before the fallout between the billionaire and the President. At the time, DOGE wanted to modernize the existing systems and detect waste and fraud at different levels. Their request revolved around Social Security numbers, medical records, and crucial financial information of Americans. 'These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government's records to much-needed scrutiny,' Solicitor General D. John Sauer was quoted as writing in the court documents. Meanwhile, the challengers' lawyers wrote, "The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure — and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it," according to the court documents.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
US Supreme Court allows DOGE access to Social Security data
The US Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Department of Government Efficiency, billionaire Elon Musk's former department, broad access to the Social Security Administration's data systems. This will allow the DOGE to access personal information of millions of Americans logged under the SSA, news agency Reuters reported. Justices put on hold the order of Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander, who had largely blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" in data such as medical and financial records while litigation proceeded in a lower court. This move came at the Justice Department's request. The court, which had a 6-3 conservative majority, did not provide a rationale for siding with the DOGE. Two labor unions and an advocacy group sued to stop DOGE from accessing sensitive data at the SSA. The plaintiffs of the lawsuit argued that SSA had been "ransacked" and that DOGE members had been installed at the agency without proper vetting or training and demanded access to some of its sensitive data systems. Earlier in February, DOGE's move to seek access to SSA data prompted the acting commissioner, Michelle King, to step down against the backdrop of the Musk-security system issues. King chose to resign after over 30 years of service as she refused to provide the requested information to the DOGE staffers at the SSA. A day later, the White House had said that the Trump administration put an "anti-fraud expert" temporarily in charge at the SSA. At the time, Trump also directed Musk and DOGE to identify fraud at the agency, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying that several dead people have been receiving fraudulent Social Security payments. "They haven't dug into the books yet, but they suspect that there are tens of millions of deceased people who are receiving fraudulent Social Security payments and so their goal in going into the Social Security Administration is to identify three things: Number one, to identify duplicate payments and to end them, Number two, to identify payments that are going to deceased people who are no longer living and should no longer be receiving that money and number three, to protect the integrity of the system for hardworking Americans who have been paying into it their entire lives,' Leavitt had told Fox News. Nancy Altman, president of the Social Security Works, an advocacy group for the preservation of Social Security benefits, said that there is no way to overstate "how serious a breach this (DOGE seeks SSA data) is". "And my understanding is that it has already occurred. The information collected and held securely by the Social Security Administration is highly sensitive," she had added. SSA has the data of everyone with a Social Security number, Medicare, and every low-income American who has applied for Social Security's means-tested companion program, Supplemental Security Income. In addition, Social Security payments account for around $1.5 trillion, or a fifth, of the annual federal spending in the US. An audit from last year, a NYT report cited. The agency is a major provider of government benefits, sending checks each month to more than 70 million recipients including retirees and disabled Americans.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Paul Weiss Loses Ex-US Attorney Williams After Trump Deal
A former federal prosecutor who joined Paul Weiss in the month leading up to President Trump's second term left for Jenner & Block. New York-based partner Damian Williams will co-chair Jenner's litigation department and investigations, compliance and defense practice, according to the firm's announcement on Friday. He leaves a firm that struck a controversial deal with the Trump administration to avoid punitive sanctions to a firm that sued Trump to block a similar attack. Williams' departure comes only months after he re-joined Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison. Paul Weiss announced Williams' arrival in January, and said he began his legal career as a Paul Weiss associate in 2009. 'Damian led the Southern District with excellence and integrity, and we are excited to welcome him to Jenner as part of our firm's long tradition of hiring former public servants who are zealous and effective advocates,' said Jenner's chair Tom Perrelli, former Associate US Attorney General. A representative for Paul Weiss thanked Williams for his contributions to the firm and wished him well. Paul Weiss roused controversy within the legal community as the first of nine firms to pledge a collective $940 million in free legal services to Trump-approved causes in exchange for avoiding punitive White House sanctions. The firm drew Trump's anger as the former professional home to Mark Pomerantz, who left the firm in 2021 to assist with the Manhattan District Attorney's investigation into Trump's finances. Along with other Trump-targeted firms Perkins Coie, WilmerHale and Susman Godfrey, Jenner sued the Trump administration to reclaim security clearances and access to federal buildings that were threatened by a Trump executive order. Williams served as the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York from 2021 to 2024, when he left to join Paul Weiss. He oversaw the high-profile prosecutions of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried and US Senator Bob Menendez. He was the first Black US Attorney in the history of the New York Southern District. Jenner's announcement said Williams will be a 'driving force' in the firm's litigation and white-collar work. 'Jenner & Block fearlessly advocates for its clients and provides outstanding strategic counsel through their most difficult challenges,' Williams said. 'I've seen firsthand how this firm expertly tackles the toughest cases and lives its values. I'm excited to join a team with an extraordinary depth of legal talent that doesn't shy away from hard fights—and delivers results that matter.' Paul Weiss has sustained a string of partner exits in the wake of the announcement of its deal with the Trump administration. Litigation department co-chair Karen Dunn, an outside counsel to Google and former campaign adviser to Kamala Harris, left with three partners last month to start a new litigation boutique. Dunn and colleagues have represented Apple Inc. and Facebook. Their exits followed Jeh Johnson, Homeland Security Secretary under President Barack Obama, and Steve Banks, who oversaw the firm's pro bono practice. Trump issued an executive order against the firm March 14, which he rescinded within a week when firm chairman Brad Karp said the firm would devote $40 million in free legal services to mutually-agreed upon causes during Trump's presidency. Karp's pledge was expanded upon by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom's March 28 deal with the president, which saw the firm promise $100 million in free legal services. Within a month, seven other firms, including Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins, made similar pledges, some as high as $125 million. The firms, as part of their deals, also promised not to engage in 'illegal DEI' activities and commit to 'merit-based' hiring. Skadden also faced departures in the wake of its deal with Trump, one being Kathleen Rubenstein, executive director of the Skadden Foundation, resigning from the public interest law group. To contact the reporter on this story: Justin Henry in Washington DC at jhenry@ To contact the editors responsible for this story: Chris Opfer at copfer@ John Hughes at jhughes@ Alessandra Rafferty at arafferty@ This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
