
Wisconsin Supreme Court election results: Susan Crawford defeats Brad Schimel in most expensive judicial race in US history
Liberal Dane County Judge Susan Crawford scored an unexpectedly easy victory in the high-stakes race for a crucial seat on the state Supreme Court in the most expensive judicial race in U.S. history.
Crawford, 60, had received 55% of the vote to conservative Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel's 45% with 82% of the vote in, according to unofficial results. Decision Desk HQ called the race less than an hour after polls closed at 8 p.m.
At Crawford's election night party in Madison, supporters cheered in response to calls that she had won the race early in the night. Groups in justice's robes and cow-printed cowboy hats flooded the party to celebrate, while others dressed in America-themed outfits broke out in dance.
When Crawford took the stage, she called the campaign an "incredible, life-altering experience."
"As a little girl growing up in Chippewa Falls, I never could have imagined that I'd be taking on the richest man in the world for justice in Wisconsin. And we won!" she said to cheers, referring to the $20 million-plus billionaire Elon Musk in an attempt to defeat her.
Schimel took the stage about 9:20 p.m. to say he had called Crawford to concede. Some of his supporters were crying and hugging each other as the race was called.
"You gotta accept the results," he said, adding that the numbers were not going to turn in his favor.
Crawford will replace outgoing liberal Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, who did not run for re-election. She takes office Aug. 1.
Her victory gives liberals control of the state's high court for the next three years, when it is considering such issues as abortion, union rights and more.
In rejecting Schimel, the state's voters spurned Republican President Donald Trump, who endorsed him, and Musk in a race widely seen as a referendum on the president's first two months in the White House.
Schimel welcomed their support and made a point of highlighting his ties to Trump in an effort to turn out the voters who supported the Republican president in November.
At stake in the race was not solely a seat on the state's seven-member high court but also its ideological control. Crawford's victory effectively locks out conservatives from retaking the majority until at least 2028.
Those high stakes contributed to the bitterness — and record spending — that defined the race.
Race featured heavy spending by wealthy donors, with Elon Musk leading the way
The battle saw spending eclipse $100 million, according to WisPolitics, with more than 100,000 donations from all 50 states flowing into Wisconsin. The old record was $56 million, the amount spent in the state's 2023 Supreme Court election.
As of Monday, the two campaigns together had raised a combined $43 million.
Crawford's campaign had raised just under $28 million, a record for a judicial candidate. Schimel's campaign contributions stood at $15.1 million.
The rest of the money has been raised and spent by third-party groups.
Musk's more than $20 million in spending coupled with his advocacy on Schimel's behalf, including a Sunday town hall in Green Bay, transformed him into a lightning rod in the campaign. Liberals highlighted his involvement in the race as conservatives embraced him, even as they sought to divert attention to liberal megadonors like billionaire George Soros.
In a statement, Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chair Ben Wikler said Democracy in Wisconsin was "alive and roaring."
"Susan Crawford's victory over Brad Schimel, Elon Musk, and Donald Trump is a resounding message from voters that Wisconsin believes in freedom, democracy, and the rule of law, that they have had enough of MAGA extremism, and that Wisconsin is not for sale," he said.
Long, bitter campaign ends in quick victory
Tuesday night's quick victory belied a bitter campaign.
Schimel and Crawford both launched attack ads that heavily featured criminal cases overseen by their opponent, who they argued was putting law-abiding citizens in danger by going easy on felons.
And while both candidates pledged to be "impartial," the legally nonpartisan race featured issues that fall largely along partisan lines, including abortion.
Crawford attacked Schimel over his ties to Musk, his personal opposition to abortion, and his handling of sexual assault evidence known as rape kits when he was the Republican state attorney general.
Meanwhile, Schimel pummeled Crawford for the financial backing she received from Soros and Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker in addition to the lawsuits she was part of as a private attorney to try to overturn Act 10 and block voter ID, which she previously likened to a poll tax and labeled "draconian." Soros contributed $2 million and Pritzker $1.5 million to the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, which funneled the cash to Crawford's campaign.
Conservatives also said her election to the court would allow liberals to redraw congressional districts in a way that is more favorable to Democrats, a contention that Democratic U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries confirmed last week.
But Crawford has said she has never discussed the issue of congressional redistricting either publicly or privately.
(This story has been updated to add new information.)
Alison Dirr can be reached at adirr@jrn.com.
Contact Daniel Bice at (414) 313-6684 or dbice@jrn.com. Follow him on X at @DanielBice or on Facebook at fb.me/daniel.bice.
Laura Schulte can be reached at leschulte@jrn.com and on X @SchulteLaura.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Keep it real and show the receipts': California Congresswoman on how to fight Trump's agenda
Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, who represents parts of Los Angeles and sits on the House Judiciary Committee, says Trump has 'created and manufactured violence in Los Angeles to distract from the Republican budget.' She joins the Weeknight to break down Trump's escalating use of force on protesters – and what the tactics are really about.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Challenge to Tampa Bay Senate seat revisits how it was created in 2022
The federal courthouse in Tampa on June 11, 2025. (Photo by Mitch Perry/Florida Phoenix) Day Three of the federal lawsuit alleging that a Tampa Bay area state Senate district was racially gerrymandered focused in part on how that district was created in 2022. The suit, filed by the ACLU of Florida and the Civil Rights & Racial Justice Clinic at New York University on behalf of three residents of Tampa and St. Petersburg, alleges the Legislature packed Black voters into District 16 to reduce their influence in nearby District 18, in violation of their equal-protection rights. Democrat Darryl Rouson serves in SD 16, while Republican Nick DiCeglie is the incumbent in SD 18. The defendants are Senate President Ben Albritton and Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd, and their attorneys began their defense on Wednesday, bringing Jay Ferrin back to the witness stand in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa. Ferrin is now a senior adviser to the Florida Senate, but he served as staff director of the Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment in the fall of 2021, when the districts lines were created. He discussed how he and his staff went about drawing up the Senate districts that year and the guidelines they followed. The reapportionment process beginning that fall was taking place under the guidance of Ray Rodrigues, who chaired the Senate Reapportionment Committee. Defense attorneys aired several Florida Channel video excerpts on Wednesday showing Rodrigues explaining how 'hard lessons were learned' following the Florida Supreme Court's decision in 2015 to throw out the GOP-controlled Legislature's maps after deeming them unlawful under the Fair Districts constitutional amendments adopted by voters in 2010. Rodrigues was insistent that he wanted the 2022 Legislature to conduct itself in such a fashion that the courts would not reject the maps lawmakers would produce. 'This map will withstand a court challenge,' Rodrigues declared on the floor of the Senate. That's what the trial taking place this week will ultimately determine. Ferrin testified that, after his staff created other Senate districts in the Tampa Bay area, there remained about 100,000 residents in Pinellas County who would have to be inserted into another Senate district. (With the population of Florida in 2021 at 21.5 million people, Ferrin said, his staff were tasked to draw approximately 538,438 voters into each of the 40 Senate districts). The resultant SD 16, which encompasses parts of St. Petersburg and Hillsborough County, is similar to the 'benchmark' map created in 2015 that was then known as Senate District 19. Ferrin denied that he was instructed to maintain that same configuration. He also said that under the rules promulgated by Rodrigues, he and his fellow staffers could speak about any new maps only with either the Senate's general counsel or other Senate members — and not the general public. He was not supposed to review public submissions. Florida senators were allowed to propose amendments during the reapportionment process, to add their own maps. Rodrigues and Democratic Sen. Audrey Gibson had filed such amendments, Ferrin said, but no senator had asked him to directly to create any Senate maps. ACLU attorney Nicholas Warren said at the beginning of the morning that he had sought to depose Rodrigues and fellow Republican and committee member Danny Burgess before the trial, but both had asserted legislative privilege, which shields them having to testify in certain lawsuits. In the afternoon, the defense called two expert witnesses who criticized the expert witness testimony and voting analysis that came from the plaintiffs on Tuesday. Steven Voss is a political science professor at the University of Kentucky. When asked to break down the political partisanship of the Tampa Bay area, he included four counties that make up the Tampa Bay metropolitan statistical area — Hillsborough, Pinellas, Polk and Hernando. Based on population, he said, five Senate districts could be folded into the area, and that three historically were reliably Republican while two would favor Democrats. Currently, that breakdown is four Republican districts and one Democratic — with Senate District 14, which Voss said historically favored Democrats, going to the GOP in 2022. Voss took aim at the alternative voting maps produced for the ACLU by Penn State University professor of statistics Cory McCartan. Those maps showed that a district could have been fairly drawn up exclusively in Hillsborough County while still protecting Tier-1 standards there and in Pinellas County. (That involves the Florida Constitution's Fair District Amendment, which says that districts shall not be drawn with the intent or result of denying or abridging the equal opportunity of racial or language minorities to participate in the political process or diminish their ability to elect representatives of their choice). Voss said that the result of McCartan's work was that he was 'cracking and packing' voters in his maps to ultimately help Democrats at the voting booth. Sean Trende, senior elections analyst for RealClearPolitics, also testified for the defense. He praised the composition of the Senate maps passed by the Legislature in 2022, saying it was 'pretty incompetent racial gerrymandering, if that's what's going on.' The trial is expected to conclude on Thursday. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Virginia governor candidates vow to end 'car tax'
PORTSMOUTH, Va. (WAVY) — Virginia's car tax is widely considered the most-hated tax in the state, and it could be coming to an end soon. Both candidates for the Virginia governor's race have expressed their desire to eliminate the state's car tax. Republican Lt. Gov Winsome Earle-Sears recently announced her 'Axe the Tax' initiative, which would end the state's car tax as well as income taxes on tipped wages. A campaign spokesperson for Democrat Abigail Spanberger said, 'Abigail will work with both Democrats and Republicans to put Virginia on a real path towards eliminating the car tax once and for all.' However, the state estimates an elimination of the state's car tax would cost localities around 2.5 to 3 billion a year, a price some state lawmakers are concerned about. 'You got to wrestle through a way to deal with that. That doesn't leave the localities holding the bag because it's localities who pick up most of the cost. For example, your local police department or your local school divisions,' said Sen. Mark Warner. In a statement sent to 10 On Your side, Sen Tim Kaine said, 'This is a complicated issue that requires delicate balancing, and it's ultimately up to the General Assembly to make changes to the state tax code.' Despite the hefty price, some residents in the Hampton Roads area are still in favor of eliminating the tax. 'I most certainly am in favor of whichever candidate wins to stop, to eliminate, to get rid of the personal property taxes on our cars. There's other avenues, where a city can bring in that extra money so, I would say let's end it and go from there,' said Portsmouth resident Michael Crowell. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.