Nearly 5,000 votes 'a waste' as NDP didn't notify Elections Ontario of southwest candidate's withdrawal
Social Sharing
Elections Ontario says the NDP failed to notify election officials that one of its candidates had withdrawn, resulting in over 4,700 votes going to someone who was no longer in the race.
The riding of Elgin-Middlesex-London, covering a large swath of rural southwestern Ontario, including St. Thomas and part of London, saw 51,465 votes cast. Of those, 4,738 went to Amanda Zavitz, who withdrew a week before Thursday's election.
"Shame on them," said Kelly Elgie, referring to the New Democrats.
Elgie told CBC News that when she voted in Thorndale, she noticed a concerning lack of information disclosing Zavitz's withdrawal.
"I think they owe our constituents and our area an apology. We collected almost 5,000 votes in our area for their party. It's a waste."
Progressive Conservative incumbent Rob Flack won the riding with 28,719 votes, followed by the Liberals' Doug Mactavish with 12,578.
CBC News sent requests for comment to Zavitz and the Ontario NDP, but hadn't heard back by time of publication.
Zavitz announced on Feb. 20 she was withdrawing from the race, a day after apologizing for comments she made during her presentation in New York last March that were captured in a YouTube video. In the comments by Zavitz, who's white, she expressed a secret desire "to be a Black woman." The controversy began after Progressive Conservatives highlighted the video during the election campaign.
According to an Elections Ontario spokesperson, the NDP failed to follow through on Zavitz's withdrawal.
"We have yet to receive a notification of withdrawal from any candidate in Elgin-Middlesex-London," Dave Pearce said in an email to CBC News on election night.
Elections Ontario told CBC there's a formal process for withdrawing a candidate — it includes a one-page form that asks for the individual's name, riding and party, as well as a signature from both the candidate and a witness.
"Generally speaking, when a candidate withdraws after the close of nominations, their name remains on the ballot and notices are posted at polling locations to make voters aware that the candidate has withdrawn," Pearce wrote.
Since Elections Ontario says it has no record of the form being filed, when Elgie arrived at the local polling station to cast her ballot, no notice was posted.
"I found it odd. It was like, 'Wow.' This felt like a significant election. There's been a lot of conversation about this vote, and not splitting the vote," said Elgie. "I would love to see that we re-vote in our area, because I think there was an injustice."CBC News heard from other voters who expressed disappointment and and felt the lack of transparency was unfair.
Opponents 'ticked off'
While it's impossible to know which candidates would've received the almost 5,000 votes that were cast for Zavitz had voters been notified she'd withdrawn, it's a concerning misstep for the other parties' campaigns.
"I'm ticked off to hear about it," said Laura Blondeau, spokesperson for Mactavish. "We're very disappointed. It would be an appropriate part of the process to formally notify Elections Ontario."
Blondeau said she's concerned a lack of notification meant voters didn't have the full picture when they cast their ballots. She said because the votes couldn't have flipped the election night result, it's unlikely the Liberals will raise the issue through a formal complaint.
Blondeau also noted Zavitz endorsed Mactavish on social media following her withdrawal announcement.
Green Party candidate Amanda Stark, who finished fourth with 2,933 votes, said she spent the days leading up to election day warning locals that Zavitz had announced her withdrawal following reports that notices weren't posted during advance voting.
"Both of us were representing parties that stand for very similar things," Stark said. "What if her supporters [would have otherwise] voted for me? That's another unfortunate detail, but there's nothing I can do."
The situation, Stark said, shows the importance of clear communication in elections.
"It's disheartening, because there's already a feeling of powerlessness and discouragement because people feel their vote doesn't count," Stark said. "Why are we [as people running for office] shooting ourselves in the foot here?"
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
3 hours ago
More than a dozen Canadian Sikhs face active assassination threats, organization warns
More than a dozen Canadian Sikhs live under active threats on their lives, an advocacy organization is warning. Those threats originate from India, said Balpreet Singh, a lawyer and spokesperson for the World Sikh Organization. The group argues it's unconscionable for the federal government to invite Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to next week's G7 meeting (new window) . Singh called for a series of actions to be taken against India at a news conference on Parliament Hill on Thursday alongside Moninder Singh, a spokesperson for the Sikh Federation (Canada). The father of two said he'd been warned by law enforcement about threats on his life about a half-dozen times in the last few years. Moninder Singh described leaving his home for months at a time, making arrangements with child protection services as well as the RCMP. You move around, constantly looking over your shoulder. You want to make sure that you're not in overly public environments, where other people could be harmed, said Moninder Singh. You can't go to your kid's school, you can't go to their practices, you can't go to family events. You avoid weddings, you avoid any type of family gatherings. WATCH | Modi G7 invite sends message 'our lives simply don't matter': Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Modi G7 invite sends message 'our lives simply don't matter': Sikh organization The World Sikh Organization of Canada is calling on Prime Minister Mark Carney to revoke Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's G7 invite unless three conditions are met. Balpreet Singh, the group's legal counsel, calls the invitation a 'betrayal of Canada's core values.' The two men said the Canadian government should not only rescind Modi's invitation, but also launch a public inquiry specifically targeting Indian foreign interference and transnational repression in Canada, as well as cancel intelligence-sharing agreements between the two countries. Earlier on Thursday, Global News cited confidential sources (new window) in reporting that former NDP leader Jagmeet Singh was targeted by a suspected Indian government agent in 2023, resulting in the leader getting police protection. The report says police no longer believe Singh is in imminent danger. CBC News has not independently confirmed that story. At the news conference, Moninder Singh said ending intelligence-sharing with India could make it harder for the country to surveil the NDP leader and Sikh activists. Balpreet Singh said he's heard the former NDP leader no longer has police protection, something he thinks is a mistake. CBC News sent questions to the federal Public Safety Department as well as the RCMP for details on Sikhs who have been targeted, including Jagmeet Singh. The government department deferred to the Mounties, which have yet to provide a statement. The idea to me that the leader of a Canadian political party could be targeted is such a clear indication of foreign interference, said the NDP's foreign affairs critic, Heather McPherson. To find out that Mr. Singh no longer has any sort of protection, when the threat is very real against him, it's appalling. All Canadians have the right to feel safe, said Conservative MP Andrew Scheer, the interim Opposition leader. Scheer said specific threats against a prominent Canadian who's held public office is something that our security officials should take very seriously. WATCH | Liberal calls Modi invite 'a bad idea': Liberal MP says Modi coming to Canada is 'a bad idea' 2 days agoDuration1:58Speaking to reporters in Ottawa, B.C. Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal said he met with Prime Minister Mark Carney Wednesday morning to express concerns he says his constituents have with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi being invited to the upcoming G7 summit in Alberta. The WSO's Balpreet Singh said other Canadian Sikh politicians are afraid to criticize India out of fear for their and their loved ones' safety. He declined to say which politicians have told him this. Imagine what that means to our democracy, said McPherson. Carney has said it makes sense to have the leader of the world's most populous country around the table when there are big challenges to discuss. Modi has been present at several recent G7 leaders' summits. At last year's event in Italy, he had a brief one-on-one with former prime minister Justin Trudeau. A dozen members of Carney's own caucus met him on Wednesday to raise their concerns about the decision (new window) , though many Liberals have also defended the invite. Liberal MP Charles Sousa said Canadians are concerned about their position on the world stage. India makes sense to be part of a global discussion, he said. Canada-India relations have been on shaky ground since Trudeau and the RCMP alleged Indian agents were involved in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar (new window) , the Canadian Khalistani separatist who was brazenly gunned down outside a Sikh temple in B.C. in 2023. Raffy Boudjikanian (new window) · CBC News
National Observer
8 hours ago
- National Observer
Carney shows his hand on infrastructure and trade bill
Ever since June 6, when Prime Minister Mark Carney declared that he expects Bill C-5 to become law before summer break, one question has loomed over Parliament: How? It normally takes months for a bill to become law. Proposed legislation (which is what a bill is) must go through several readings and committees run by MPs and senators alike, who all call witnesses to weigh in on the pros and cons, which trigger amendments, which then require further deliberation, all before a final vote is cast. If that sounds slow, that's because it is — and it usually takes even longer in a minority government, where Opposition MPs make up a big portion of the committees and so, have ample opportunity to bog the process down. So how did Carney expect to whiz his signature policy through such a quagmire in a mere two or three weeks? But on Thursday, June 12 – one head-scratching week after Carney unveiled the bill – he dropped his cards: a special parliamentary order that would, if Parliament votes for it, condense the entire process into five days. The order's formal name is ' An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act.' Or as NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice calls it, a super-motion. '[It] will, if passed, speed up the debate and study of that bill in an incredible and scandalous way,' Boulerice said in a phone interview soon after the Act to Enact the Act was introduced. Parliament will vote on this super-motion on Friday. It requires a simple majority to pass. If that happens, a parliamentary committee will be formed next week and given just two days to scrutinize Bill C-5, plus make whatever amendments they can squeeze in. The bill will go through the final two readings and hit the floor next Friday, June 20, for a final vote. On that day, according to the terms of the super-motion, '[t]he House shall not adjourn until the proceedings on the bill have been completed.' Meaning, in other words, MPs are stuck in their seats until the bill either becomes law or dies. The procedural mystery behind the prime minister's plan to rush his treasured legislation has been unveiled. Now it's Parliament's play. All of that hinges on the super-motion. If that passes on June 13, Carney will almost certainly get his legislation by next weekend. 'It's really against the rights of parliamentarians,' Boulerice said. 'It's really anti-democratic. It's all the horrible things that a government can do to shut down debate and pass a really controversial project through the throats of the MPs and the general public and First Nations and environmental groups.' Two Acts in one Bill C-5 is really two bills in one, both named in the unwieldy title. The first part is about breaking down interprovincial barriers to trade and labour mobility, and is, in general, less controversial than the bill's second part: the 'Building Canada Act,' which would give cabinet the power to deem certain megaprojects (from pipelines and electricity grids to ports and high-speed rail) in the 'national interest,' which would then put them on a two-year fast track to federal approval. It's the second part that Boulerice, along with many environmental advocacy groups and Indigenous leaders, have deep misgivings about. ''National interest' is so vague that they can put whatever they want [on that list], and after that, guarantee the two years maximum. … Once it's on the list, it cannot be removed. It cannot be blocked or stopped by anybody – provinces, First Nations, citizens, cities. I think it's the dream of Stephen Harper coming true.' Indeed, Conservatives do appear to like the bill – the party's members, not known for their shyness about legislation they dislike, didn't once mention it or the super-motion to accelerate its passage, in Thursday's Question Period. What's less clear is whether they want to hand Carney the political gift of having his signature policy turned into law in such short order against such odds. The Conservative Party did not immediately respond to an inquiry about their plans. It's far from a done deal yet, however. Boulerice is in talks with the Bloc Quebecois, both of whom are busy scouring the 'really big book' of parliamentary procedure for tools that might at least put the brakes on the super-motion. 'We will try some obstruction procedures,' he said. In addition to motions that could slow the day down, Boulerice said they might try splitting Bill C-5 into two parts, allowing the first to rush through, while reserving the second part on 'national interest' projects for proper scrutiny.' In a best-case scenario for Boulerice, the NDP and Bloc will be able to stall voting on the super-motion until Monday. In that case, 'we'll gain some time to raise awareness' with the public, in the hopes of generating enough bad press that the bill becomes too toxic for Parliament to support. But the government is already working on getting its own message out. In a separate briefing about wildfires, several cabinet ministers were asked by reporters to explain the rush embodied by this super-motion. 'We're in a very difficult situation right now,' said Tim Hodgson, minister of energy and natural resources. 'We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadian jobs are at risk, Canadian livelihoods are at risk, and quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk … to deal with this, we need to do things that we have not done in a long time, in time frames we have not done since the end of World War II. What we are doing is allowing for debate – I spent four hours last night in a committee of the whole. There is going to be the same sort of process in the Senate. It is important that we start moving, or we will find ourselves in an increasingly difficult situation.' Asked if the Liberals have spoken with Conservatives for a sense of whether they'll support this push, Hodgson said, 'I don't think it's appropriate to talk about the private conversations that are going on.' Mandy Gull-Masty, the minister of Indigenous services and a former Grand Chief of the Cree Nation government in Quebec, was also at that press conference. Asked if the government had addressed the question of First Nation consultation and support for this legislation, Gull-Masty said that in her view, Bill C-5 is 'not just critical for the Canadian economy, it's also critical for Indigenous people.' She said the prime minister has made himself personally available to Indigenous leaders across the country, and felt that Section 35, which enshrines Indigenous rights in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, along with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, are both embedded in the process. 'I think this is something that is unique to the One Canada Economy Bill, is that we're not just inviting Indigenous partnership to the table, we're actually asking them, 'What is your process of consultation, and how can we work with you in collaboration to carry out those steps?'' For now, it won't be Indigenous groups, or environmental advocates, or anyone but the MPs inside the House of Commons who decide whether Gull Masty's faith in her new party's good faith is warranted. And of those parliamentarians, it is now the Conservatives who hold the future of Carney's prized legislation in their hands. They could choose to gift it to him all at once, delay it until after summer, or withhold it altogether.
Vancouver Sun
9 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
'It's unacceptable': Brother of Jagmeet Singh says Canadians warned about risk to their life deserve protection
OTTAWA — The brother of former federal NDP leader Jagmeet Singh says Canadians who receive a duty to warn about a threat against their life and safety should be provided protection, calling the lack of security 'unacceptable.' Gurratan Singh says the need for protection is 'paramount' and that the current situation results in people being left to 'fend for themselves.' 'It's unacceptable and an immediate step that must be given is security must be provided to those who are facing duty to warns from, especially, foreign governments.' Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'I think any single Canadian who gets a duty to warn deserves that security immediately.' Issues surrounding a duty to warn notification, a practice used by police to alert someone when it believes there to be a credible threat endangering them, have emerged in light of India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi's upcoming visit to attend the G7 in Alberta next week. Sikh activists and community leaders have denounced Prime Minister Mark Carney's invitation to Modi as a betrayal of their community. They have pointed to the RCMP having said it has evidence showing links between violent crimes, such as murders and extortion, to the Indian government. Former prime minister Justin Trudeau also told the House of Commons in September 2023 that it had 'credible allegations' that agents acting on behalf of the Indian government were involved in the killing of prominent Sikh separatist and activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. India has denied the accusation, but had considered Nijjar, who advocated for an independent Sikh state to be created in India's Punjab province, to be a terrorist. Earlier on Thursday, Global News also reported, citing unnamed sources, that former NDP leader Jagmeet Singh had been surveilled by someone with ties to the Indian government, which resulted in the RCMP providing him protection. During the recent federal election campaign, Singh himself revealed that the RCMP warned him about a credible threat against his life in late 2023, which resulted in him and his family being placed under police protection. At the time, Singh's wife was pregnant with their second child, and the former party leader told reporters he was so concerned about the threat that he considered quitting politics. For Gurratan Singh, himself a former provincial member of Ontario's legislature, what happened to his brother underscores the need for Canada to hold India accountable for its targeting of Canadians, which the RCMP has stated has been shown by evidence. 'My brother was the previously democratically elected leader of the NDP, a national federal party in Canada. We now know that there's evidence that he was being surveilled by the Indian government, that his life was at risk by the Indian government and that the risk was so live that his daughter was born under the shadow of that risk in a hospital that had RCMP and security presence,' he said on Thursday. He said the impact of his brother receiving that notification was tough, as was seeing him accompanied by police detail 'It represents that your brother's life is at risk and those around him are at risk as well.' Balpreet Singh, legal counsel and spokesman for the World Sikh Organization, in a news conference on Thursday, called it 'unacceptable' that Jagmeet Singh now lacks this protection and that others who receive similar warnings from police are not provided security and receive minimal information. NDP Edmonton MP Heather McPherson told reporters she believes security should be offered to Singh. Interim NDP Leader Don Davies declined to comment on the matter, saying he was unsure of the specific details. Monninder Singh, spokesman for Sikh Federation Canada, says he has received multiple duty-to-warn notifications, as have 'well over' a dozen other Sikh Canadians and activists. As a father of young children, he said their family had to come up with a plan that included discussions with child and family services. At one point, Singh said he left their home and returned after five months. 'You move around constantly looking over your shoulder,' he said. 'Every aspect of your life changes. You can't go to your kids' school. You can't go to their practices. You can't go to family events. You avoid weddings, you avoid any type of family gatherings, public spaces.' National Post staylor@ Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here .
