Waymo Driverless Cars Head To Tokyo — With Drivers
A Waymo car drives along a street on March 01, 2023 in San Francisco, California. (Photo by Justin ...)
Waymo's driverless cars are headed to Tokyo to chalk up their first kilometers on international roads — but it's all about data collection, rather than driverless trips.
The 25 Jaguar I-PACE electric cars will feature Waymo One technology, but will be driver operated in order to let the Alphabet-owned company map Tokyo and better understand local roads, infrastructure, and driving habits.
"It's important for us to understand the difference in driving environment, what makes the driving here unique," said Nicole Gavel, Waymo's head of business development and strategic partnerships, at an event in Tokyo, according to Reuters.
In a post on X.com, Waymo said the Tokyo trips across seven wards of the city would mark the system's first kilometers on international roads, though the cars will be manually driven with Waymo technology on board — sort of like how the project first started in San Francisco back in 2009.
The international road trip highlights how much work is still needed to make a driverless car trained in one city work in another, a "generalizability" challenge that Waymo is trying to understand by sending vehicles across different US cities this year.
Tokyo, Japan will naturally be a bigger leap from San Francisco than closer-to-home expansions to LA or Austin; Waymo said recently that it was now providing 200,000 autonomous taxi rides each week, without a safety driver present at the wheel.
That said, Waymo hopes that once the mapping phase is complete, the autonomous driving system can take over, though still with a test driver at the wheel. Gavel couldn't say how long the initial phase would last.
"We're just starting with the testing so that's where we're focused," she said. 'Longer term, obviously, we would love to have a business here in Tokyo.'
A Waymo autonomous self-driving Jaguar taxi is stopped at a light while driving along a street on ... More March 14, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. Beginning today, Waymo One is offering robotaxi services in a 63-square mile area of greater Los Angeles including Santa Monica, Venice and downtown with over 50,000 people on the wait list. Waymo is owned by Alphabet, Google's parent company. (Photo by)
She added in a statement that the project would be following the same pattern as American tests, with a "commitment to safety, dedication to earning trust in communities where we operate, and collaboration with local officials and community groups here in Tokyo."
Waymo first announced the Japanese trips late last year, and has been working for months with local taxi firm Nihon Kotsu and mobility app maker Go.
"Our partner, Nihon Kotsu, Tokyo's largest taxi company, will oversee the management and servicing of the Waymo vehicles," Waymo said in a blog post last year. 'The companies are working closely together to train Nihon Kotsu's team on operating vehicles equipped with Waymo's autonomous driving system. Initially, Nihon Kotsu drivers will operate the vehicles manually to map key areas of the Japanese capital, including Minato, Shinjuku, Shibuya, Chiyoda, Chūō, Shinagawa, and Kōtō.'
Beyond private partners, the project has also required working with government and first responders, too.
"We are engaging with Japanese policymakers, regulators, and local safety officials to ensure a responsible and seamless implementation of Waymo's technology to Tokyo's streets," the blog post added.
Earlier this year, Waymo added 10 new cities including San Diego, Las Vegas and Washington DC, to its lineup of locations for driverless car testing, though as with Tokyo they won't be offering commercial services but will be test rides with drivers behind the wheel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
16 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Albertsons, Pavilions, Vons, and Kroger workers set to strike in California
Strikes only happen when companies push workers past the point of no return. No worker wants to give up a paycheck in order to get the raise and benefits they feel they deserve. In many cases, even when management and labor negotiate a favorable deal, the money lost during a strike remains lost forever. Workers, however, have very little leverage with management when it comes to negotiating fair wages. In many cases, bosses consider workers replaceable and don't take worker demands seriously. In many part of American history, workers could not strike without fear of being replaced. Now, with retail jobs plentiful enough that both Walmart and Target pay their workers over $15 per hour, labor has more leverage. Replacing tens of thousands of people in this market won't be easy, so a strike could cripple the business and do long-term damage. Hopefully, reality forces both sides to come to the table before a work stoppage takes place. Nearly 45,000 Albertsons, Pavilions, Vons, and Kroger (Ralphs) workers have voted overwhelmingly in favor of a strike. They have not walked off the job yet, but the threat to their employers has become very real. UFCW Local 324 represents the impacted workers, and the union has a simple description of its goals. "The mission of UFCW Local 324 is to improve the lives of working families and to bring economic justice to the workplace. The UFCW is one union with one voice. We are committed to changing the places where we work and the communities where we live so that all workers have the opportunity to reach the American Dream," it shared on its website. The union traces its history back to 1936. "The United Food and Commercial Workers union stands as the by-product of mergers between many other trades and professions whose members saw value in uniting in solidarity against an increasingly powerful array of corporate retailers," it added. Now, the union is ready to mobilize its workers to strike. It shared an update on its website. "These past two weeks, nearly 45,000 grocery workers across Southern California came together and overwhelmingly voted YES to authorize an Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) Strike against Ralphs, Albertsons, Vons, and Pavilions for breaking the law by surveilling, interrogating, threatening, and retaliating against union members," it shared. "This vote is a powerful message to Kroger and Albertsons: We are fed up with their union-busting tactics and unlawful behavior that disrespects workers, silences our voices, and stalls progress at the bargaining table." While those are serious charges, the core of the dispute between the workers and management is wages and working conditions. "For four months, we've negotiated with Kroger and Albertsons, offering solutions to the staff shortage crisis that hurts store operations, working conditions, and customer service. The companies have dismissed our proposals and claimed that our concerns were 'anecdotal', downplaying the real challenges we and our customers face daily," the union shared in an update to members. UFCW Local 324 believes it has acted in good faith and that management has not. "We're at the breaking point. We are disrespected, overworked, and undervalued by Kroger and Albertsons. We're tired of asking these corporations to invest in their workers and customers, only to see no results. We're tired of asking the companies to respect our labor rights and seeing our co-workers intimidated," it added. Kroger, which owns Ralphs, shared a statement with KTLA. "Our current offer reflects that commitment, including market-leading wage increases for associates over the life of the agreement, and continued investment in industry-leading healthcare and a pension…These are benefits that many non-union competitors do not offer," a portion of the statement reads. The union has not set a strike date. Negotiations are expected to resume on June 25. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Where the Money Goes: Map, Charts Show Migrant Remittance Payments
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. A provision in President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" making its way through the United States Congress would place additional taxes on money immigrants want to send back to their home countries. In 2023, the last full year of data available, over $650 billion was received in remittances by countries worldwide. Roughly a third of that comes from the U.S., with countries with high levels of immigration to American benefitting most from the payments. Republicans in Congress want to recoup some of the money migrant workers in America are sending home, arguing the money should remain circulating within the U.S. economy. Those opposing the move, and some who have studied remittances for years, argue that a remittance tax could drive up immigration to the U.S. rather than hinder it. "Undocumented migrants play a huge role in the U.S. economy, not only as they participate in the labor force, and part of this is that they do send money back home, but a large number of them actually do pay taxes," Rubi Bledsoe, a research associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) told Newsweek. "They also participate in supporting social programs that Americans get access to, without necessarily being able to access them themselves." Bledsoe argued that if remittances aren't being sent back to family and friends, or if the funds are reduced, then those who depend on them may look to come to the U.S. for work as well. Which Countries Benefit From Remittances? A person holds cash in his hand next to Western Union signs at a Florida Check Cashing window inside a convenience store in Miami, Florida, on January 12, 2023. A person holds cash in his hand next to Western Union signs at a Florida Check Cashing window inside a convenience store in Miami, Florida, on January 12, 2023. EVA MARIE UZCATEGUI/AFP via Getty Images Remittances from the U.S. to Mexico in 2023 were around $63.3 billion, or about 3.5 percent of Mexico's total GDP. It's also a similar amount to the total USAID budget for the entire world, CSIS found. Most of that money makes it way to some of the poorest regions of Mexico, Bledsoe said, with research from the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute (MPI) think tank supports. "For families in low- to middle-income countries who receive remittances from the United States, for instance, remittances are a lifeline that allows people to pay for utilities, services, and everyday expenses that they would otherwise not be able to afford," Ariel G Ruiz Soto, a senior policy analyst at MPI, told Newsweek. "Remittances can also be turned into investments that benefit not just individual families but also communities through shared projects, like building hospitals, schools, or buying necessary supplies to improve infrastructure." Among the biggest recipients of all global remittances in 2023 were India ($120 billion), Mexico ($66.2 billion), the Philippines ($39 billion), France ($36.9 billion), China ($29.1 billion), and Pakistan ($26.5 billion), according to the World Bank. The data from the World Bank covers worldwide payments, meaning not all that money came from the U.S. — though in cases like Mexico, remittances from the U.S. make up the vast bulk of the total. Americans living overseas who send back money home also count in the data. The U.S. received around $7.7 billion in remittances in 2023. CSIS estimates Mexican workers are sending $300 a month back home in remittances, on average, meaning most of their paycheck is still being spent within the U.S. That means their money is going towards housing, goods and services in their communities, and often state and federal taxes. There has been a steady rise in the amount of money heading to certain countries in recent years, as migration levels and access to jobs in the U.S. have increased. This has caused concern among some on the right who want to see stricter regulations on remittances. "It is kind of a double-edged sword," Ira Mehlman, media director at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) told Newsweek. FAIR advocates for a more restrictionist immigration policy. "Yes, it does send money back to people in the home countries, but it also becomes a dependency. If you're going to be sending your best workers out of the country to work in another country and then wait for the money to come back, it impedes the development that needs to happen in those countries." Mehlman said FAIR also has concerns that payments are making their way back to cartels and other organized crime groups, while American companies are getting away with employing those without legal status, enabling a cheaper workforce that is detrimental to U.S. citizens as well as immigrants with work authorization. While there is widespread agreement that stopping payments to criminal organizations is necessary, both Bledsoe and Ruiz Soto cautioned against introducing tougher rules on remittance payments. They say this could have an adverse effect on illegal immigration, predicting that, should remittances be cut off from low- and medium-income countries, then more people may look to make the journey to the U.S. "Because the migrant is already here, sending money back, it means that the family of that migrant isn't in the United States," Bledose said. "So it is preventing migration on some level." Ruiz Soto added that "by filling the void of government investment and development, remittances reduce the economic pressures for many people to emigrate irregularly over the long term." Mehlman said Congress could act to introduce stricter measures, as it is looking to do with the tax on remittances, while Ruiz Soto said more security measures to track the funds being sent abroad could be introduced in an attempt to root out abuse.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Finning International's (TSE:FTT) 27% CAGR outpaced the company's earnings growth over the same five-year period
When you buy a stock there is always a possibility that it could drop 100%. But on the bright side, you can make far more than 100% on a really good stock. Long term Finning International Inc. (TSE:FTT) shareholders would be well aware of this, since the stock is up 186% in five years. On top of that, the share price is up 37% in about a quarter. Since it's been a strong week for Finning International shareholders, let's have a look at trend of the longer term fundamentals. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. Over half a decade, Finning International managed to grow its earnings per share at 18% a year. This EPS growth is lower than the 23% average annual increase in the share price. This suggests that market participants hold the company in higher regard, these days. And that's hardly shocking given the track record of growth. You can see how EPS has changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values). We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases in the last year. Even so, future earnings will be far more important to whether current shareholders make money. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of Finning International's earnings, revenue and cash flow. As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Finning International, it has a TSR of 230% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return. We're pleased to report that Finning International shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 42% over one year. That's including the dividend. That's better than the annualised return of 27% over half a decade, implying that the company is doing better recently. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Finning International you should be aware of. If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: most of them are flying under the radar). Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Canadian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos
