VE Day: Party leaders write for Metro on momentous anniversary
As the VE Day celebrations get underway across the country, party leaders are reflecting on what the day means to them.
A week-long series of events kicked off on Monday with a tribute from the King, a military procession, and a fly past to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War Two in Europe.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Leader of the Opposition Kemi Badenoch have written their thoughts on the historic occasion for Metro.
Now, the leaders of the three largest UK-wide parties in the House of Commons – the Liberal Democrats, Reform UK, and the Green Party, write below about the importance of the day, the historical significance, and what VE Day means in 2025.
80 years ago today, huge crowds of people gathered outside Buckingham Palace and on Whitehall, jubilantly waving Union Flags as they came together to celebrate the news that Britain and our allies had defeated the Nazis and secured victory in Europe.
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sign up here.
It was without doubt one of our country's finest hours.
As Winston Churchill told those crowds, this was a victory of the great British nation as a whole. A nation that had bravely stood alone against the Nazis when no one else dared.
Today and always we should be proud of everything they achieved, and remember with gratitude all those who made the ultimate sacrifice in defence of our country and our freedoms – who gave their tomorrows for our todays.
'We were the first, in this ancient island, to draw the sword against tyranny,' Churchill said. 'After a while, we were left all alone against the most tremendous military power that has been seen… The lights went out and the bombs came down. But every man, woman and child in the country had no thought of quitting the struggle.'
What it must've felt like for the people in those crowds – parents who had lost sons on the beaches of Normandy, women who had lost husbands in the skies over England at the Battle of Britain, families who had lost loved ones to German bombs.
Everyone who had weathered the Blitz, the blackouts and the ration books. Who sacrificed so much over so many years of death and destruction.
The joy of that victory, the pain of their grief, the sheer relief that it was all over – so many emotions whirling together on the Mall and all over the country.
Above all, it was a moment when people were starting to hope again, to look to the future with real optimism.
And, after six long years of leading the world in standing up to Hitler and defeating facism, Britain took up the challenge of leadership again – not in war, but in peace. We led the world in building what came next.
We helped to forge new forums to foster peace, uphold human rights and improve trade and economic cooperation – from NATO and the United Nations to the European Convention on Human Rights and the Bretton Woods monetary system.
Amidst the rubble of war, in the shadow of the Holocaust, and with the looming spectre of nuclear weapons, British leadership offered real hope for the world.
And despite all the challenges that have followed – all the trials and tribulations of the past eighty years – there is no doubt that the world has been better for it, as a result of British leadership.
In war and in peace, the United Kingdom has remained a powerful force for good: standing tall in the world, championing our values and working together with others.
That is what the world needed 80 years ago, and it's what the world needs so badly again now.
Ed Davey MP is the leader of the Liberal Democrats
Today is a day not only to reflect on the joint triumph of European and American forces and mourn the millions of lives lost, but also to express gratitude for our shared heritage and pride in our national history.
As we approach one of the final VE Day commemorations with living World War II veterans, it is more important than ever to honour their extraordinary sacrifices and fearless courage.
They represent one of the last generations of Britons who stood firm in defence of democracy and prevailed against tyranny.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Yet now we find ourselves at a time where national pride in our history is declining — down 22% — and record numbers are considering leaving Britain altogether. In this moment of reflection, we must remember not only what was fought for, but why it mattered.
VE Day serves as a powerful reminder of the strength, resilience, and the values that have shaped our nation — and why they are worth preserving.
For me, there are several key factors behind the growing lack of pride in our nation's history: A political class that shows contempt for our heritage and traditions; an education system more focused on ideological indoctrination than genuine learning; and a population explosion rapidly changing the makeup of our country.
VE Day is a good time to reflect on what makes us Proud to be British.
Thanks in large part to our Christian roots, we have long been one of the most accepting countries in the world – welcoming those in genuine need.
We have opened our doors to Protestants from France, Jews fleeing Russia, Asians expelled from Uganda, countless refugees during World War Two, and more recently, Ukrainians escaping the attacks on home soil.
So many of those people have contributed great things to this country and that cannot be overlooked.
But there are undoubtedly those who show no appreciation for being here; those who do pose a threat to others and our British identity.
Increasingly, young people are unaware of the significance of VE day, unaware of the great history of Britain, and unsure they want to remain and build a future here.
For any country to thrive, they must be unified by a common belief or background – regardless of skin color or ethnicity, they must be proud of their commonalities.
For the kind of patriotism and prosperity that we are celebrating today to exist, people must also feel like their ruling class works for them and governs solely in their best interests.
Those failures are what brought me out of retirement to lead Reform UK.
Our mission is not only to revive a struggling economy, fix a broken NHS, and reclaim control of our borders – but to unite the country around what binds us: A deep respect for the British values, culture, and tradition that are being celebrated.
Above all, the government must serve its own people, as our wartime leaders did.
That principle has been lost, and it's what we are determined to restore.
So I hope that people take the time to show respect to our veterans, our history, and our culture on this anniversary of Victory in Europe, and beyond.
Nigel Farage MP is the leader of Reform UK
This week, we commemorate 80 years since the end of World War II in Europe – the deadliest conflict in history, which claimed over 50 million lives, including the murder of six million Jewish people in the Holocaust.
We remember the lives lost, and we give our deepest thanks to the veterans who fought to protect our freedoms.
When we talk about those awful events, we often say 'never again.' But too often, we let those words remain just that – words.
Sometimes the horror of what happened during that dark period of history can blind us to the ways in which the roots of the destruction – totalitarianism, prejudice, and intolerance – might creep into our own societies today.
Today, governments across the world are restricting the freedoms of their citizens, pursuing aggressive territorial expansion, and exploiting social divisions to consolidate their power.
Take Hungary's recent ban on Pride parades and other LGBTQ+ gatherings. Russia's intensifying crackdown on free speech and Putin's illegal invasion of Ukraine.
Or the Trump administration's terrifying wave of deportations that seem to be targeting people who have expressed support for Palestine.
Saying 'never again' comes with a responsibility to keep our eyes open to what is happening in the world around us. To the language used by political leaders to demonise (like Trump calling Mexicans 'drug dealers, criminals and rapists'); to dehumanise (referring to migrants as hordes, or Palestinians as 'vermin'); and to divide (like those pitting 'Judeo-Christian values' against 'alien' cultures). More Trending
And 'never again' comes with a responsibility to actively resist these attempts to undermine our bonds to the people around us, whatever our faith, our country of birth, or the colour of our skin.
That means keeping hold of our empathy. Being willing to listen. Trying our best to understand experiences that are not like ours.
We've learnt that when political leaders pursue power, control, and territory, it's ordinary people who pay – whether that's with our freedoms, our humanity, or our lives.
Carla Denyer is the co-leader of the Green Party of England and Wales
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Ross.Mccafferty@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Kemi Badenoch: Britain risks losing the spirit of Churchill and VE Day
MORE: I'm begging Stacey Solomon to put an end to her reality show
MORE: Hidden references and no trousers – the hits and misses of the Met Gala
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
31 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
SNP calls on Labour to match Scottish Government action on poverty
Almost two million families would be lifted out of poverty if Labour matched Scottish Government action on the issue, the SNP has claimed. Ahead of the UK spending review, the SNP asked the House of Commons Library to produce an independent analysis on the number of British children in poverty and the impact that replicating Scottish Government policies across the UK would have. The research showed 1.83 million families would be lifted out of poverty if policies were matched, including abolishing the two-child benefit cap, scrapping the bedroom tax and raising the child element of Universal Credit to match the Scottish child payment, according to the SNP. Statistics showed a third of British children were anticipated to be living in poverty by 2029-30 unless action was taken. Sir Keir Starmer was urged to act on the figures ahead of the UK spending review on Wednesday amid warnings the number of British children living in poverty is expected to rise to a record 4.6 million by 2029-30. Over the past decade, the number of children living in poverty has risen from 3.7 million (27%) in 2013/14 to 4.5 million (31%) in 2023/24, the SNP said. The SNP said Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling, due to 'bold' policies such as the Scottish child payment of £27.15 per child, per week, paid in addition to other benefits. Replicating it UK-wide, by raising the child element of Universal Credit by the same amount, would lift 732,000 families out of poverty, including a further 38,000 families in Scotland, analysis showed. The SNP said it has also mitigated the bedroom tax and is in the process of ending the two-child benefit cap in Scotland. It said replicating the policies would lift a further 609,000 British families out of poverty, with the combined impact of introducing all three policies lifting 1.83 million families out of poverty, including a further 75,000 in Scotland. The UK Government delayed its child poverty taskforce review to the autumn and last year Labour MPs voted against abolishing the two-child benefit cap, in a motion tabled by the SNP. The Chancellor has previously rejected proposals to abolish the bedroom tax. The SNP said the UK Government's own impact analysis showed planned cuts to disability benefits will push 250,000 more people into poverty, including 50,000 children, with families losing out on £4,500 a year on average as a result of the cuts, branding it 'shameful'. SNP work and pensions spokeswoman Kirsty Blackman MP said: 'The evidence shows Keir Starmer's Labour Government is keeping almost two million families in poverty by failing to match SNP action across the UK. 'It's shameful that UK child poverty is rising to record levels under the Labour Government, which has pushed thousands more children into deprivation by imposing punitive welfare cuts. 'It's vital that the Prime Minister finally listens to families struggling with the soaring cost of living – and takes the long-overdue action needed to end child poverty at the UK spending review this week. 'That means abandoning the devastating austerity cuts to disabled families, matching the Scottish child payment UK-wide, abolishing the bedroom tax and scrapping the two-child limit and benefit cap. 'With 4.5 million children living in poverty in the UK, only bold and immediate action will do. 'The two-child benefit cap and bedroom tax must be abolished immediately, but that alone isn't enough to end child poverty. It's vital the Labour Government matches the Scottish child payment by raising the child element of Universal Credit across the UK. 'Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling – and families receive the best cost-of-living help of anywhere in the UK. 'Westminster must match this action – or it will leave millions more children languishing in poverty.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to bring down child poverty and we have already expanded free breakfast clubs, increased the national minimum wage for those on the lowest incomes, uprated benefits in April and supported 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a fair repayment rate on universal credit deductions. 'We will also publish an ambitious child poverty strategy later this year to ensure we deliver fully funded measures that tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty across the country.'
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Scottish Labour 'naive' to expect widespread gains at 2026 Holyrood election after Hamilton victory
An ex-Labour MP urged Anas Sarwar to distance himself from unpopular policy decisions taken by Keir Starmer if he wants to become the next first minister. Scottish Labour would be "naive" to assume it can make widespread gains at the next Holyrood election on the back of its victory in Hamilton last week, a former MP has said. Anas Sarwar claimed last week it was "game on" for his party ahead of next year's poll after it pulled off a surprise by-election win in South Lanarkshire. The victory gives Labour some badly needed momentum in Scotland after its approval ratings slumped in the wake of Keir Starmer's first year in power at Westminster. But Dennis Canavan, who served as a Labour MP for 25 years, said the party needed to "beware" the rise of Reform UK after it came a close third in the by-election contest. He told the Record: "It was a surprise victory for Labour - but it would be naive to use this result to predict widespread Labour gains at next year's elections to the Scottish Parliament. "To put the result into perspective, Labour won with the support of only 14 per cent of the electorate. If Anas Sarwar really wants to improve his chances of becoming first minister, he should tell Keir Starmer to ditch his disastrous policies on things like the two child benefit cap, the WASPI women's pension rights and cuts to welfare. "Starmer is not an electoral asset, especially in Scotland, and his failure to make a personal appearance in the by-election campaign may have actually helped Davy Russell." Canavan, who quit Labour in 1999 and later served as an independent MSP, said the result was a "bitter disappointment" for the SNP. He added: "Both Labour and the SNP must beware of Reform, who came from nowhere to getting over a quarter of the vote. By next year they will probably be much more organised and may therefore present a bigger threat. "It is pointless pandering to the agenda of Reform. Starmer's recent claim that 'we risk becoming an island of strangers' sounded like the language of Nigel Farage. Responsible politicians must try to lead public opinion instead of apeing right wing extremists. "We need more emphasis on pointing out the evils of racism and positively campaigning for a fairer and more equal society. "The by-election result reveals that the majority of the electorate did not vote at all. That seems to indicate a serious disconnect between the political class and the rest of society and does not bode well for the future of democracy. "All politicians must work harder to enthuse the electorate with a positive vision of a better world." Sarwar said yesterday he had spoken to Keir Starmer following Labour's victory last week. He added that he wants to see the two-child benefit cap removed 'as fast as possible'. The Scottish Labour leader said the UK Government was already working to 'improve growth' and bring mortgage rates and energy bills down to alleviate the cost-of-living crisis. He added: 'There have been four interest rates cuts because of economic stability and those four interest rates cuts have meant that the average mortgage is down by over £1,000. 'We've started to see energy bills come down, but those need to come down much quicker, because people feel a real pressure in the cost-of-living crisis.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
How the UK spending reviews will shape Scotland's finances
The UK Government has already trailed plans to increase defence spending, boost spending in the NHS, and reform social security. But it has said much less, so far, about day-to-day spending on public services. With limited headroom for new funding, any shift in priorities is likely to mean savings elsewhere. Read more: Spending decisions on reserved areas such as the industrial strategy, research and development, and defence procurement will all have an impact here in Scotland. But the Scottish Government's budget will also be impacted too. Even with recent tax devolution, the Barnett Formula remains the most significant contributor to the Scottish Government's budget. The formula ensures that any increase or decrease in Whitehall spending in devolved areas – for example, health or education – triggers a population-based adjustment to Scotland's budget. That means that what is announced in the spending review will not just matter for Whitehall departments, it will directly shape the financial envelope available to Holyrood. The onus then falls on the Scottish Government to set out its own spending priorities. June's medium-term financial strategy will likely give a high-level overview, but for greater detail we will need to wait for our the spending review in Scotland. The Cabinet Secretary for Finance has indicated that a timeline for that review will be published in June. The interaction between UK and Scottish Government fiscal policies does not stop with the Barnett Formula. Just last month, we were reminded of further – often subtle – interactions between developments in the UK and the Scottish budget. Read more: In publishing our updated five-year outlook at the Scottish Fiscal Commission, we highlighted how further fiscal pressures had emerged since the turn of the year. One such factor was the latest information on the Scottish Government's devolved tax and social security data, relative to the rest of the UK. Under Scotland's fiscal framework, the Scottish budget does not always benefit when its tax revenues rise. What matters is whether those revenues are growing faster than their counterparts in the rest of the UK. This is due to a core principle in the fiscal framework that seeks to protect the Scottish budget from shared UK-wide economic risks. But, on the other hand, this means that any divergence in performance between Scotland and the rest of the UK – the so-called net tax position – has a direct consequence on the level of funding available. In recent times, we have seen an improving performance – and outlook – for revenues in the rest of the UK that is not being fully matched in the data for Scotland, leading to knock-on implications for Scotland's budget. This is one of the lesser-known intricacies of our devolved fiscal setup: stronger tax growth in England can mean less money for Holyrood than planned, even if Scotland's own outlook is unchanged. Read more: A similar issue arises in social security. As more benefits are devolved – including disability and carer payments – what matters is not just how much is spent, but how that compares to the funding received. Scottish Ministers have made deliberate policy choices to expand eligibility and increase support, particularly in areas linked to child poverty and disability. Those choices have widened the gap between spending and funding. But the latest forecasts show that planned UK Government reforms to reduce spending in England and Wales – especially through tighter eligibility for benefits related to disability and ill-health – might make that gap larger by lowering the equivalent funding to Scotland. By 2029–30, we project that annual spending on devolved social security will exceed funding by £2 billion. Holyrood may have greater control over tax and spend decisions than in the past, but the budget remains integrated with decisions made in Westminster. Any meaningful strategy for Scotland's public finances – including in future spending reviews – must start with a clear understanding of that interdependence. Graeme Roy is professor of economics at the University of Glasgow's Adam Smith Business School.
