Hakam urges government to extend CJ Tengku Maimun, senior judges' term to uphold judicial reforms
KUALA LUMPUR, May 22 — The National Human Rights Society of Malaysia (Hakam) has called for transparency and equal treatment in the extension of judicial tenures, expressing concern over reports of selective practices in granting extensions to senior Federal Court judges.
In a statement, Hakam highlighted that Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, and Federal Court judge Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan have not received the customary six-month extensions under Article 125(1) of the Federal Constitution despite their upcoming retirements.
'This is in stark contrast to extensions granted to Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli, Chief Judge of Malaya Datuk Seri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim, and Federal Court judges Tan Sri Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal, Datuk Zabariah Mohamad Yusof, and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah,' Hakam said.
The group raised concerns about what it described as a selective and opaque approach to judicial extensions, which it said undermines public confidence in the judiciary and threatens its independence.
'Malaysia's judiciary is at a pivotal juncture with nine Federal Court judges set to retire this year. The leadership of Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun, who has been instrumental in restoring public confidence in the judiciary, is essential during this critical period,' Hakam said.
Tengku Maimun, Malaysia's first female Chief Justice, has been lauded for her commitment to judicial independence and for presiding over landmark cases with integrity during her tenure under four prime ministers. Hakam also praised her efforts in advocating for judicial reforms to reduce executive influence in judicial appointments.
Similarly, Hakam commended Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar and Justice Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan for their exceptional jurisprudence, independence, and adherence to constitutional principles.
The group urged the government to ensure consistency and transparency in judicial extensions, calling for clear criteria based on merit and experience rather than political considerations.
'Hakam calls upon the government to extend the tenures of Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun, Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar, and Justice Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan under Article 125(1) of the Federal Constitution,' the statement read.
It also demanded transparency in the decision-making process for judicial appointments and extensions, emphasising that an independent judiciary is vital for democracy and human rights protection.
'The stability of our judiciary and public confidence in Malaysia's legal system depend on the fair and equal treatment of our most senior judges,' Hakam added.
The society said it would continue monitoring the situation and advocating for judicial independence as a fundamental pillar of Malaysia's constitutional democracy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
12 hours ago
- New York Times
What We Know About the Charges Against Abrego Garcia
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the man who was erroneously deported to a prison in El Salvador earlier this year, was flown back to the United States on Friday to face charges related to transporting undocumented migrants. For months, the Trump administration had resisted court orders instructing officials to bring back Mr. Abrego Garcia, who had been living in Maryland and had a special court order forbidding his deportation to El Salvador. The fight thrust Mr. Abrego Garcia into the national spotlight, and he became the face of the political and legal turmoil surrounding President Trump's crackdown on immigration. Mr. Abrego Garcia appeared in federal court in Nashville on Friday evening. He was detained and is expected to return to court on June 13. Here's what we know. What are the charges? In court papers seeking his pretrial detention, prosecutors said Mr. Abrego Garcia had played 'a significant role' in smuggling immigrants, including unaccompanied minors. A federal indictment unsealed on Friday also accused him of transporting firearms and narcotics purchased in Texas for resale in Maryland. He appeared in Federal District Court in Nashville on Friday wearing a short-sleeved, white, button-down shirt, The Associated Press reported. Through an interpreter, he said he understood the charges. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Washington Post
16 hours ago
- Washington Post
An hour before being blocked, State tells consulates to reject Harvard visas
The State Department on Thursday told consulates around the world to reject visa applications for students planning to attend Harvard University, less than an hour before a judge blocked the Trump administration from enforcing that policy. The directive says that consular officers should not cancel visa appointments for those affected and should assess whether an applicant is otherwise eligible for admittance to the United States, according to a copy viewed by The Washington Post. But those who seek to 'begin a course of study at Harvard University or participate in an exchange visitor program at Harvard University' should be rejected, the directive says. It says that the department will not provide refunds of visa application fees to those affected 'as the applicant is still permitted to interview.' The cable came after the Trump administration's second attempt to block visas for foreign students who plan to study at Harvard. On May 22, the Department of Homeland Security said it would bar Harvard from participating in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, which allows universities to enroll foreign students, alleging that Harvard allowed 'anti-American, pro-terrorist' foreigners 'to harass and physically assault individuals … and obstruct its once-venerable learning environment.' That move was blocked by a federal court. On Wednesday, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation barring admission to the United States for students intending to study at Harvard. In court documents, Harvard called the move a patent end run around the judge's order. Just before 7 p.m. on Thursday, the university asked the court to block Trump's proclamation, filing a motion for a temporary restraining order. It was granted about three hours later, at 9:54 p.m., but not before the State Department sent its directive. The message to consulates was sent at 8:59 p.m. Thursday. The State Department declined to comment, and it was unclear whether the agency planned to modify or rescind its guidance in light of the court's order. As of late afternoon Friday, they had not, according to one State employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation. The memo said that a new code was being created to indicate the reason for rejection: 'HRVD.' The rules apply to those who have already been approved and whose visas have already been printed but not yet passed back to the applicant, the cable says. Officers are to cancel the visa in those cases, it adds. The State employee said that until Trump's changes, the process for obtaining student visa approval was largely straightforward. Applicants who could prove they were accepted to college, could pay the tuition — and also proved they didn't plan to stay or work in the U.S. post-graduation — had a good chance of winning approval in almost all cases. 'Now it's a flat denial to Harvard and only Harvard,' the employee said. The employee also noted that the instructions sent by cable seem to require state staff to accept Harvard admits' interviews and money, and then deny them anyway.
New York Times
19 hours ago
- New York Times
Abrego Garcia Is Being Returned to U.S. From El Salvador
Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man at the center of a legal and political maelstrom after being mistakenly deported to El Salvador, is expected to return to the United States to face charges related to transporting undocumented migrants in the country, according to an indictment unsealed in federal court in Tennessee late Friday. The stunning move, which had quietly been planned for several weeks, could provide a much-needed offramp for the Trump administration, which has bitterly opposed a series of court orders to take steps to release him following his wrongful removal on March 15. The 10-page indictment also represents a potential effort to save face: Bringing Mr. Abrego Garcia back to face criminal charges — rather than complying with the dictates of three federal courts, including the Supreme Court — allows the White House to avoid an increasingly difficult legal confrontation, while enabling the administration to press its claim that he is a dangerous criminal who was worthy of removal in the first place. Since the start of the case, administration officials have sought to depict Mr. Abrego Garcia, a metal worker who has lived illegally in the United States without incident for years, as a member of the violent street gang MS-13. The charges filed against him in Federal District Court in Nashville accused him of belonging to the gang and taking part in a conspiracy to 'transport thousands of undocumented aliens' across the United States. His lawyers said they welcomed their day in court and pointed out that the government's decision to return him to the United States undercut its longstanding efforts to keep him in El Salvador. 'Today's action proves what we've known all along — that the administration had the ability to bring him back and just refused to do so,' said Andrew Rossman, a lawyer for Mr. Abrego Garcia. 'It's now up to our judicial system to see that Mr. Abrego Garcia receives the due process that the constitution guarantees to all persons.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
