
You've minted enough: SC rejects plea on reinstating DND toll
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a review petition filed by the Noida Toll Bridge Company Limited (NTBCL), reaffirming its December 2024 decision that the Delhi-Noida Direct (DND) Flyway must remain toll-free. The court rejected NTBCL's request for reconsideration with a terse observation: 'You have minted enough.'
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan heard the review petition in open court and upheld its earlier finding that NTBCL had recovered its project costs, earned significant profits, and was no longer entitled to collect toll from commuters.
The company had approached the court challenging the December 20, 2024 verdict, which had upheld the Allahabad high court's 2016 ruling directing the cessation of toll collection. The Supreme Court had then made scathing observations against NTBCL and its director, Pradeep Puri, noting that the company had exaggerated project costs and generated excessive profits at the public's expense.
'This case was an eyeopener for us. You have minted enough. Review is dismissed,' the bench said.
The court's 2024 order relied heavily on a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), which found that the company had defrauded the public under the pretext of providing infrastructure. 'An exhaustive reading of the CAG Report highlights the extent to which the public has been defrauded,' the court had said. 'The general public has been forced to part with hundreds of crores by IL&FS and NTBCL… with the collusion of officers from two state governments and NOIDA, who turned a blind eye.'
Senior advocate Aman Hingorani, appearing for NTBCL, argued during the review that the original judgment failed to record CAG findings favourable to the company. The court, however, declined to revisit the findings in a review proceeding.
A separate review plea was filed by Pradeep Puri, a former bureaucrat and NTBCL director, seeking expungement of critical remarks on his role. The court rejected this as well, stating that all findings about his conduct stemmed directly from the CAG report.
In its December ruling, the court had remarked: 'Pradeep Puri, designated as the Director of NTBCL, did not perform any substantive function; nevertheless, all expenses associated with his role, including his hefty remuneration, were incorporated into the total project cost.'
The CAG audit revealed questionable expenditures included legal fees worth ₹11 crore, travel costs of ₹4 crore, and ₹33 crore spent on restructuring deep discount bonds. NTBCL also incurred ₹72.25 lakh on 'corporate gifts,' including gold coins distributed to employees, drivers, and sub-staff.
According to CAG, NTBCL's toll income from 2001 to 2016 stood at ₹892.51 crore. The company made consistent profits, cleared all debts with interest, and paid out ₹243.07 crore in dividends to shareholders. 'NTBCL has thus, by March 31, 2016, recovered the project costs, the maintenance costs, and a significant profit on its initial investment,' the court had observed. 'There is no rhyme or reason for the collection of tolls to continue.'
The DND Flyway was developed through a tripartite agreement between NTBCL, Noida, and Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Limited (IL&FS). Under the Concession Agreement, NTBCL was granted the right to levy tolls. However, the Allahabad high court, after reviewing the agreement, found its provisions legally untenable and ordered NTBCL to stop collecting tolls. The Supreme Court endorsed this, further holding that Noida had overstepped its authority by delegating toll-levying powers to a private entity.
The matter had been brought to court by the Federation of Noida Residents, who challenged NTBCL's continued toll collection. With Friday's ruling, the top court has now shut the door on further toll recovery from commuters on the DND Flyway.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
After nearly 8 years, Ayodhya land circle rates hiked up to 200%
After nearly eight years, the circle rate of land in Ayodhya, where a Ram Temple was inaugurated last year, has been increased up to 200 per cent, depending on the use of land and location. While the order is effective from Saturday, a holiday, the land registry, as per the new circle rates, will begin from Monday. 'We have approved the proposal for a hike in circle rate after considering the objections we had received on our proposal circulated in August last year,' District Magistrate (Ayodhya) Nikhil Funde told The Indian Express on Sunday. On the hike, Funde said: 'The demand from the public was mostly to raise it more than our proposals in several areas. But the decision has been taken based on market rates and a survey conducted by us.' The circle rate is the district administration's assessment of land value in its jurisdiction, based on which stamp duty is fixed on sale or purchase, and based on which the administration acquires property from land owners, including farmers. On July 10 last year, The Indian Express had reported that the circle rates in Ayodhya have not been increased for the past seven years despite a surge in land transactions and the rising market value of land ever since the 2019 ruling of the Supreme Court that paved way for the construction of the Ram Temple in the town. The Uttar Pradesh Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1997, which was amended in 2015, stated that the 'District Collector, as far as possible, in every August month, will determine Rs per square metre minimum value of Agriculture/non-Agriculture land' and other immovable properties considering use of land, irrigation facilities, distance from road, market, bus station, railway station, factories, educational institutions, hospitals and government offices; its location within urban, semi-urban or rural areas; and other possibilities like distance from developed areas. Ayodhya is among 54 districts of Uttar Pradesh where the circle rate was last revised in 2017. In 21 districts, it was revised in 2023. The rates were also revised in districts adjoining Ayodhya such as Barabanki, Ambedkar Nagar, Gonda and Basti and Sultanpur. The steepest hike in the circle rate has been in areas near the Ram Janmabhoomi where the market rate of land has increased manifold since the Supreme Court's Ram Temple verdict. The highest hike of 200 per cent has been in villages like Tihura Manjha where the circle rate for 'agriculture' land since August 2017 ranged from Rs 11 lakh to Rs 23 lakh per hectare. In the latest circle rate, it has gone up to Rs 33 lakh and Rs 69 lakh per hectare. At Tihura Manjha village, the House of Abhinandan Lodha has purchased land and actor Amitabh Bachchan had signed an agreement for two plots last year. For Tihura Uparhar, the circle rate has been increased from Rs 32-71 lakh per hectare to Rs 42-95 lakh per hectare. In Shahnawzpur Majha, the rate has been increased from Rs 75-169 lakh per hectare to Rs 98-221 lakh per hectare. In Barahta Majha, the circle rate has been hiked from Rs 75 lakh- Rs 169 lakh per hectare to Rs 98 lakh- 221 lakh per hectare. At Ganja village, where the airport is located, old rates ranged between Rs 28 lakh to Rs 64 lakh per hectare. The new rates are between Rs 35 and 80 lakh per hectare. The UP Avas Vikas Parishad, which has proposed to build a township spread over nearly 1,800 acres, acquired nearly 600 acres until last March in villages such as Shahnawaz Pur Majha, Barhata Manjha, and Tihura Manjha. However, some of the farmers said the hike is not up to their expectations. 'Rates should have been increased at least 200 per cent in every village surrounding nearly 10 km of Ram Janmabhoomi. Farmers are not benefitting from the developments that are taking place in Ayodhya,' said Durga Yadav, who is fighting a legal case for an increase in circle rates in the Allahabad High Court. In last year's Lok Sabha elections, Samajwadi Party candidate Awadhesh Prasad defeated the sitting BJP MP from Faizabad parliamentary constituency, where Ayodhya is located. The Milkipur (SC) Assembly seat, vacated by Prasad, was won by the BJP later. Shyamlal Yadav is one of the pioneers of the effective use of RTI for investigative reporting. He is a member of the Investigative Team. His reporting on polluted rivers, foreign travel of public servants, MPs appointing relatives as assistants, fake journals, LIC's lapsed policies, Honorary doctorates conferred to politicians and officials, Bank officials putting their own money into Jan Dhan accounts and more has made a huge impact. He is member of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). He has been part of global investigations like Paradise Papers, Fincen Files, Pandora Papers, Uber Files and Hidden Treasures. After his investigation in March 2023 the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York returned 16 antiquities to India. Besides investigative work, he keeps writing on social and political issues. ... Read More


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Citing lack of evidence, Telangana high court acquits three in drugs case
Hyderabad: The Telangana high court quashed a drugs case registered in 2022 at Bolarum against three people, including a BPO employee and his friends. While hearing a petition filed by the trio, the high court observed that they could not be held responsible based solely on the confession of the other accused, especially in the absence of any corroborative evidence. Hence, the continuation of criminal proceedings against the trio is nothing but an abuse of the process of law, the court said while quashing the FIR. Delivering the judgment, Justice K Sujana noted that the police failed to collect any evidence linking the petitioners to the alleged crime apart from the confession of another accused. The police also did not send the seized mobile phones of the three petitioners to the FSL for analysis, nor were their blood samples sent for medical examination to prove that they consumed the alleged drugs, the judge remarked. 'In view of the observations based on the Supreme Court judgments, the trio cannot be held liable for the alleged crime,' said Justice Sujana. The prosecution contended that the accused were transporting hash oil from Visakhapatnam and supplying it to users in the city. The police caught two individuals, and six hash oil tins and Rs 1,500 cash were also seized from them. However, counsel for the petitioners argued that no drugs were found in possession of the petitioners, nor were they involved in sourcing any prohibited narcotic drugs. 'Falsely implicated' 'They were falsely implicated in the case solely based on the confession of one of the accused. Even according to the Supreme Court in the Tofan Singh vs State of Tamil Nadu case, this evidence is not admissible,' the counsel for the petitioner argued.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
INSCO to submit improved resolution plan for Hindusthan National Glass
The Supreme Court approved bidder Independent Sugar Corp ( INSCO ) will submit to lenders an improved resolution plan for Hindusthan National Glass (HNG), the country's largest maker of glass bottles, said people aware of the development. The Africa-based bidder will offer ₹356 crore over and above it offered to pay earlier, they said. EY-backed resolution professional Girish Juneja will invite a committee of creditors (CoC) to vote on the revised INSCO plan after vetting it. As per the Supreme Court's order, only the INSCO plan will be put for voting, said the people. INSCO is owned by the Madhvani Group , a conglomerate based in Uganda. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In Uttar Pradesh - Watch What Happens Happy in Shape Undo Somewhat similar to Bhushan Power and Steel, it is among the rare cases wherein the apex court has rejected a plan after it had been approved by the CoC. At the heart of the matter is a Supreme Court ruling that rejected a CoC approved plan given by AGI Greenpac because it did not adhere to the terms of the request for proposal. AGI Greenpac, which gave a higher offer than rival bidder INSCO, failed to get requisite approval from the Competition Commissioner of India (CCI) before the plan was approved by the CoC. It received a conditional approval from the CCI after lenders had voted on the plan. Live Events While rejecting a review petition filed by AGI Greenpac, the Supreme Court directed INSCO to match the offer given by AGI Greenpac and directed the resolution professional to complete the resolution process involving the approval of the INSCO resolution plan by the CoC, by July 2025.