Wildflowers could be absorbing toxic metals that pass on to bees, study finds
This story was originally published by The Guardian and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.
Wildflowers could be absorbing toxic metals from soil in urban areas and passing toxins on to pollinators, a study has found.
Researchers from the University of Cambridge found that common plants including white clover and bindweed, which are vital forage for pollinators in cities, can accumulate arsenic, cadmium, chromium and lead from contaminated soils.
These metals have been found in previous studies to damage the health of bees and other pollinators, which feed on the contaminated nectar. This leads to reduced population sizes and death. Even low metal levels in nectar can hinder bees' learning and memory, which degrades their foraging abilities.
The contaminated soils tend to be have been leached into the land from buildings and factories that once stood there. The scientists who carried out the study are now recommending that urban areas are tested for contaminants and potentially cleaned before wildflowers are planted.
The study, published in Ecology and Evolution, was carried out in the post-industrial US city of Cleveland, Ohio, which was once a hub for iron and steel production, as well as oil refining and car manufacturing — all industries that potentially contaminate land with trace metals. Now, the city has more than 33,700 vacant lots as people have moved away.
The researchers extracted and tested nectar from a range of self-seeded flowering plants that are popular with pollinators and found growing across the city. Lead was consistently found at the highest concentrations, but different species of plant accumulated different amounts and types of metals.
The plants absorb the toxic metals from contaminated soils where buildings and factories once stood. Pollinators then feed on the contaminated nectar of those plants, leading to reduced population sizes and death.
The bright blue-flowered chicory plant (Cichorium intybus) accumulated the largest total metal concentration, followed by white clover (Trifolium repens), wild carrot (Daucus carota) and bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis).
Cities worldwide face metal contamination in soils and the level of contamination usually increases with the age of the city. Sources include cement dust and mining.
But people should not be discouraged from planting wildflowers for bees, the report authors said.
Dr Sarah Scott, from the University of Cambridge's Department of Zoology and first author of the report, said: 'It's really important to have wildflowers as a food source for the bees, and our results should not discourage people from planting wildflowers in towns and cities.
'We hope this study will raise awareness that soil health is also important for bee health. Before planting wildflowers in urban areas to attract bees and other pollinators, it's important to consider the history of the land and what might be in the soil — and if necessary find out whether there's a local soil testing and cleanup service available first.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
3 days ago
- National Observer
The weird way that penguin poop might be cooling Antarctica
This story was originally published by Grist and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration In December 2022, Matthew Boyer hopped on an Argentine military plane to one of the more remote habitations on Earth: Marambio Station at the tip of the Antarctic Peninsula, where the icy continent stretches toward South America. Months before that, Boyer had to ship expensive, delicate instruments that might get busted by the time he landed. 'When you arrive, you have boxes that have been sometimes sitting outside in Antarctica for a month or two in a cold warehouse,' said Boyer, a Ph.D. student in atmospheric science at the University of Helsinki. 'And we're talking about sensitive instrumentation.' But the effort paid off, because Boyer and his colleagues found something peculiar about penguin guano. In a paper published on Thursday in the journal Communications Earth and Environment, they describe how ammonia wafting off the droppings of 60,000 birds contributed to the formation of clouds that might be insulating Antarctica, helping cool down an otherwise rapidly warming continent. Some penguin populations, however, are under serious threat because of climate change. Losing them and their guano could mean fewer clouds and more heating in an already fragile ecosystem, one so full of ice that it will significantly raise sea levels worldwide as it melts. A better understanding of this dynamic could help scientists hone their models of how Antarctica will transform as the world warms. They can now investigate, for instance, if some penguin species produce more ammonia and, therefore, more of a cooling effect. 'That's the impact of this paper,' said Tamara Russell, a marine ornithologist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, who studies penguins but wasn't involved in the research. 'That will inform the models better, because we know that some species are decreasing, some are increasing, and that's going to change a lot down there in many different ways.' With their expensive instruments, Boyer and his research team measured atmospheric ammonia between January and March 2023, summertime in the southern hemisphere. They found that when the wind was blowing from an Adelie penguin colony 5 miles away from the detectors, concentrations of the gas shot up to 1,000 times higher than the baseline. Even when the penguins had moved out of the colony after breeding, ammonia concentrations remained elevated for at least a month, as the guano continued emitting the gas. That atmospheric ammonia could have been helping cool the area. The researchers further demonstrated that the ammonia kicks off an atmospheric chain reaction. Out at sea, tiny plantlike organisms known as phytoplankton release the gas dimethyl sulfide, which transforms into sulphuric acid in the atmosphere. Because ammonia is a base, it reacts readily with this acid. Ammonia wafting off the droppings of 60,000 birds contributed to the formation of clouds that might be insulating Antarctica, helping cool down an otherwise rapidly warming continent. This coupling results in the rapid formation of aerosol particles. Clouds form when water vapor gloms onto any number of different aerosols, like soot and pollen, floating around in the atmosphere. In populated places, these particles are more abundant, because industries and vehicles emit so many of them as pollutants. Trees and other vegetation spew aerosols, too. But because Antarctica lacks trees and doesn't have much vegetation at all, the aerosols from penguin guano and phytoplankton can make quite an impact. In February 2023, Boyer and the other researchers measured a particularly strong burst of particles associated with guano, sampled a resulting fog a few hours later, and found particles created by the interaction of ammonia from the guano and sulphuric acid from the plankton. 'There is a deep connection between these ecosystem processes, between penguins and phytoplankton at the ocean surface,' Boyer said. 'Their gas is all interacting to form these particles and clouds.' But here's where the climate impacts get a bit trickier. Scientists know that in general, clouds cool Earth's climate by reflecting some of the sun's energy back into space. Although Boyer and his team hypothesize that clouds enhanced with penguin ammonia are probably helping cool this part of Antarctica, they note that they didn't quantify that climate effect, which would require further research. That's a critical bit of information because of the potential for the warming climate to create a feedback loop. As oceans heat up, penguins are losing access to some of their prey, and colonies are shrinking or disappearing as a result. Fewer penguins producing guano means less ammonia and fewer clouds, which means more warming and more disruptions to the animals, and on and on in a self-reinforcing cycle. 'If this paper is correct — and it really seems to be a nice piece of work to me — [there's going to be] a feedback effect, where it's going to accelerate the changes that are already pushing change in the penguins,' said Peter Roopnarine, curator of geology at the California Academy of Sciences. Scientists might now look elsewhere, Roopnarine adds, to find other bird colonies that could also be providing cloud cover. Protecting those species from pollution and hunting would be a natural way to engineer Earth systems to offset some planetary warming. 'We think it's for the sake of the birds,' Roopnarine said. 'Well, obviously it goes well beyond that.'
National Observer
21-05-2025
- National Observer
Feather forensics offers a way to root out poachers
This story was originally published by bioGraphic and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration Every year, the illegal wildlife trade ensnares millions of wild birds in a vast global industry worth up to US $23 billion. Poaching for the black market affects a huge diversity of life, including nearly half of all bird species. Songbirds and parrots are particularly popular targets, with thousands illegally caught and traded every year. Proving that a bird sold as a pet was born in captivity, rather than poached from the wild, is difficult. Tracking a bird's origins, says Katherine Hill, an invasive species biologist at the University of Adelaide in Australia, relies on paperwork, 'which can obviously be forged relatively simply.' Over the past few decades, however, scientists have been developing a technique that can hint at whether an animal hails from the wild or captivity. Known as stable isotope analysis, the approach involves analyzing the abundance of different forms of certain chemical elements in an animal's tissues. Stable isotope analysis works on birds because their feathers lock in identifiable chemical signatures as they grow, creating a snapshot of a period of the bird's life, Hill says. Captive birds, for example, tend to eat corn and sorghum. Wild birds eat more fruits, nuts, and wild plant seeds. This altered diet skews the chemical analysis, giving scientists an accurate way to gauge what kinds of foods a bird has been eating. Scientists have used stable isotope analysis to study bird diets for s everal years. But earlier projects aiming to tease out birds' origins largely focused on a few endangered parrot species with limited diets, small populations, or small ranges. Hill wanted to see if she could apply the technique to parrot species with relatively large geographic ranges that eat a wider variety of foods. In particular, she focused on four common Australian parrots that are popular as pets—galahs (Eolophus roseicapilla), sulphur-crested cockatoos (Cacatua galerita), little corellas (Cacatua sanguinea), and long-billed corellas (Cacatua tenuirostris). Beginning in December 2020, Hill set out around Adelaide, where she scanned the streets for the vibrant white, yellow, or pink shocks of wild parrot feathers. COVID-19-related lockdowns meant it was difficult for Hill and her colleagues to visit zoos or aviaries to collect the feathers of captive parrots. Instead, they created a community-science initiative to collect feathers from the public. Spreading the word through social media, local news organizations, and other places likely to catch the eyes of animal lovers, the scientists harnessed dozens of volunteers from across South Australia who collectively sent in thousands of feathers they found in the wild or gathered from the bottom of their pets' cages. The project became a way for people to connect with nature, Hill says. Pooling the feathers by species, and splitting them by whether they came from wild or captive birds, Hill and her colleagues found that stable isotope analysis can accurately distinguish between wild and captive galahs nearly 90 percent of the time, and the other parrot species 74 percent of the time. The isotope research from those four parrot species will provide data that other scientists can use in future studies as well. The technique offers a potent way to identify poached birds. But it is possible, says Hill, to cheat the test. If a captive bird is fed a diet similar to what a wild one would eat—or if wild birds have particularly diverse diets or access to something similar to pet food—it could muddy the results. But, says Hill, when used with other tools, isotope analysis could tip off law enforcement that a bird might have been poached, giving the authorities reason to investigate further. The value of stable isotope analysis is also constrained by time, Hill says. Because birds regularly grow and molt their feathers, each piece of plumage only reflects the time between molts. For many parrots, that's about a year. This means the technique would be best at identifying birds that were captured from the wild within that time frame. Astrid Andersson, a conservation biologist at the University of Hong Kong, says the effectiveness of stable isotope analysis to distinguish between captive and wild parrots aligns with previous research, including her own work on a Chinese population of yellow-crested cockatoos. 'It's really important to expand the number of species that have this stable isotope data,' says Andersson. Different species need their own stable isotope datasets, she says. 'We need to build up the database that authorities could potentially refer to.' Wildlife authorities don't often use stable isotope analysis in their investigations and, to date, the technique isn't being regularly used in bird-poaching investigations. But analyzing feathers could be a powerful new tool in the anti-poaching toolbox, says Kate Brandis, a wildlife forensics expert at the University of New South Wales in Australia. 'This is still a developing area,' she says. But research like Hill's is 'demonstrating that this does have a place in fighting the illegal wildlife trade.'
National Observer
15-05-2025
- National Observer
‘Astonishing journeys': online tool tracking migratory animals highlights challenge of protecting them
This story was originally published by The Guardian and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration Off the east coast of Florida, female loggerhead turtles swim more than 1,000km north, hugging the edge of the continental shelf to get to feeding grounds. Humpback whales move through Moreton Bay off the Brisbane coast in Australia, on their way to feed around the Balleny Islands more than 4,000km away off the Antarctic coastline, where wandering albatross circle above, travelling 1,000km a day. In the Netherlands, Arctic terns set off from breeding colonies on one of the bird kingdom's longest migrations – a 90,000km round trip, to east Antarctica and back again. It is hard for plodding, land-bound Homo sapiens to fathom the distances covered by these species, or their total disregard for the perils of the high seas, or the country boundaries humans have drawn. But all these journeys, and many hundreds more, have been brought together for the first time in a new online tool that reveals the movements of more than 100 species that migrate across the planet's oceans. 'They're absolutely astonishing journeys and they're far more common than we give them credit for. All sorts of species do this,' says Daniel Dunn, an associate professor and director of the University of Queensland's Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science. 'Some of these birds spend less energy flying than they do standing on the ground. They can sleep while they're flying, somehow putting half their brain to sleep while the other half is paying attention.' Almost half of all species that migrate over or in the ocean are feared to be in decline – and they are presenting conservationists with a unique and confounding challenge. How can a country help save a species that spends its time feeding or breeding in one place, if that same species is put under threat when it leaves? One study, for example, found nine threatened migrating shorebird species that visit Australia each year are being hunted while they travel. Dunn and his colleagues have been working on the problem, reviewing more than 1,000 studies on the movements of migratory species and then loading the best of the data into a public web system known as Mico (Migratory Connectivity in the Ocean). The system, detailed in an article in the scientific journal Nature Communications, is the first attempt to give policymakers a clear idea of where species go, how they are connected and what it will take to save them. Dr Lily Bentley, a marine conservation ecologist specialising in migratory species and lead author of the article, said the Mico system was also useful for seeing what is not known about migratory species. What the system shows, rather than a comprehensive map of all migratory animals, is the first attempt to synthesise all the studies that have tracked species. For example, Mico shows the vast global distribution of blue whales – the places where the biggest animals on Earth are known to live. But the tool also shows there have been practically no tracking studies of the whales anywhere around the entire African continent. Bentley said it was 'very much the first step'. 'If you're at a big international meeting and someone wants to know what species goes where, now we can have an answer.' Conservationists and policymakers are working on two big global agreements that the Mico team hope will benefit from their work. Dunn says one example is the '30 x 30' target – a global plan backed by more than 120 countries to protect 30% of the planet's land and ocean by 2030. 'Part of that target requires that the [protected areas] are well connected, but we are still trying to work out how we determine that. 'We can't wait, because the stresses on the animals are not waiting. We need to provide that initial information.' A second global deal, adopted in 2023 after 20 years of negotiations, is a treaty looking to increase the number of protected areas in the high seas. 'These two things could be amazing for migratory species if we get the areas right,' said Bentley. 'Migratory species move between jurisdictions, so you have to bring more and more people to the table and that's a hard thing to do. '[Mico] takes us a step further to making sure we're telling policymakers which areas of the high seas are important to protect.' Rebecca Hubbard is the global director of the High Seas Alliance, a group of more than 60 non-governmental organisations working on the high seas treaty. Hubbard, who attended a presentation of the Mico system this week, said it would help, 'particularly on the high seas that are half of our planet and two-thirds of the ocean'. 'We're now having to conserve our species on a global scale. We always need more data, but we also need to be able to see patterns in that data. [Mico] is incredibly useful in translating a lot of individual bits of information into a broader signal.'
