logo
Will Canadian PM Carney Maintain His Anti-Trump Messaging Post-Election?

Will Canadian PM Carney Maintain His Anti-Trump Messaging Post-Election?

Epoch Times30-04-2025

News Analysis
Prime Minister Mark Carney was elected after running a campaign heavily focused on saying U.S. President Donald Trump poses an existential threat to Canada, but it remains to be seen whether this messaging will continue now that the election has passed.
The Liberals tapped heavily into rising nationalist sentiment in Canada, caused by Trump's talk of making the country the 51st U.S. state and by the imposition of three different sets of tariffs on its largest trading partner.
Stoking patriotism had not been a major card of the Liberals under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who had started his mandate in 2015 by
More criticism of the country came later with the growing influence of social justice ideology in government. Trudeau accepted the 'genocide' finding of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls in 2019, and vowed to root out 'systemic racism' in Canada after the murder of George Floyd in the United States in 2020.
Trudeau also ordered flags to be flown at half-mast for more than five months in 2021 in response to claims by some First Nations of ground-penetrating radar pointing to the possibility of unmarked graves at former residential schools. So far no excavations have found remains. During this period, statues of Canada's founding father John A. Macdonald were toppled, removed, or hidden. He was also cancelled from
Related Stories
4/30/2025
4/29/2025
This critical perspective on Canada's history and current society was absent as the Liberals focused their campaign on national pride and sovereignty following Trump's 51st state comments.
'A new Liberal government will never cower to President Trump's attacks on Canada. In this kind of crisis, protecting Canada's identity is part of securing Canada,' Carney declared during the campaign.
With the new mandate secured, now comes the daunting task of entering negotiations with the Trump administration on the most pressing issue of trade, but also on security and defence.
It remains to be seen if Trump will continue his comments about making Canada the 51st U.S. state after the election and during the negotiations. He raised it on election day April 28 on his Truth Social platform, but didn't issue a post after the election.
Carney had also maintained his anti-Trump messaging until the very end of campaign, repeating in his victory speech his slogan that 'Trump is trying to break us, so that America can own us.'
Trump congratulated Carney on his election win on April 29. During an April 30 cabinet meeting, Trump called Carney a 'very nice gentleman' and said he would come to the White House 'very shortly, within the next week.'
Referring to Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, Trump added, 'They both hated Trump, and it was the one that hated Trump I think the least that won.'
Is it Over?
A Liberal strategist told The Epoch Times in an interview he expects Carney to change his messaging post-election with negotiations looming.
'I don't believe that particular messaging around the relationship with the United States being 'over' will remain a major theme of the prime minister's communications efforts,' said Charles Bird, principal at Earnscliffe Strategies.
Carney said on the campaign trail and in his victory speech that Canada's 'old relationship with the United States, a relationship based on steadily increasing integration, is over.'
Bird added, however, there is 'more than a bit of truth' to the assertion that the old relationship between Canada and the United States is over and that it's understandable people have concluded that the southern neighbour is 'not a reliable partner.'
'But there's little to be gained on the part of the government in making the point repeatedly that we no longer regard you as the close ally we once did,' said Bird, who added he thinks the emphasis will instead be placed on finding ways the two countries can work together effectively.
This had been the core message of the Liberal government in public and in private after Trump was elected and before the Canadian general election, as it sought to avoid the punitive tariffs.
Stephen LeDrew, former Liberal Party president, also believes there's no incentive for Carney to maintain an adversarial approach to the United States.
'I don't think that Canadians would accept that the relationship is over,' LeDrew told The Epoch Times in an interview. He said Americans he has spoken with also value the relationship with Canada and want to work together.
LeDrew said that in any case, Trump is 'holding all the cards' and there isn't going to be a 'huge policy initiative' from the Liberal government on how to deal with Trump.
'Why would Carney do that? I think Carney is busy making his own government, getting things to run better, and he will deal with Trump when Trump starts to squawk again.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

President Donald Trump on Saturday said that it wasn't his decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, back to the U.S. to face federal charges, saying the 'Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine.' 'That wasn't my decision,' Trump said of Abrego Garcia's return in a phone call with NBC News on Saturday. 'It should be a very easy case' for federal prosecutors, the president added. Trump added that he did not speak with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return, even though the two men spoke about Abrego Garcia during an April meeting in the Oval Office. His remarks came after Abrego Garcia arrived back in the U.S. on Friday and was charged in an indictment alleging he transported people who were not legally in the country. The indictment came amid a protracted legal battle over whether to bring him back from El Salvador that escalated all the way up to the Supreme Court. Abrego Garcia's family and lawyers have called him a family man, while Trump and his administration have alleged that he is a member of the gang MS-13. The case drew national attention amid the Trump administration's broader push for mass deportations. After Abrego Garcia's deportation, lawyers for the Trump administration said he was deported in an 'administrative error,' as Abrego Garcia had previous legal protection from deportation to El Salvador. Still, the Trump administration did not attempt to bring Abrego Garcia back, even as the Supreme Court ruled that it had to 'facilitate' his return to the U.S. Democrats, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., had for weeks said that Abrego Garcia was denied due process when he was detained and deported, arguing that he should have been allowed to defend himself from deportation before he was sent to El Salvador. Trump on Saturday called Van Hollen, who went to visit Abrego Garcia in jail in El Salvador in April, a 'loser' for defending the man's right to due process. 'He's a loser. The guy's a loser. They're going to lose because of that same thing. That's not what people want to hear,' the president said about Van Hollen. 'He's trying to defend a man who's got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular. No, he's a total loser, this guy.' On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia 'was a smuggler of humans and children and women. He made over 100 trips, the grand jury found, smuggling people throughout our country.' In a statement Friday, Abrego Garcia's lawyer called Bondi's move 'an abuse of power, not justice.' This article was originally published on

Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud
Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud

Elon Musk has deleted his X post claiming that President Donald Trump's name is mentioned in the Jeffrey Epstein files Musk's claim came after the two men clashed about a new budget bill backed by the president The tech billionaire's decision to take down the post may be a sign of de-escalation in their highly publicized feudElon Musk has taken down his explosive claim that President Donald Trump's name is in the Jeffrey Epstein files — a move which may be a step toward de-escalation in the public feud between the two men. In the since-deleted post, which Musk shared on X on Thursday, June 5, the tech billionaire claimed that Trump appears in the high-profile case files, writing that it was the 'real reason' the files had not been made public. "Have a nice day, DJT!" he added sarcastically. Trump responded to the claim on Friday, June 6, by reposting a statement on Truth Social that was originally written by Epstein's former lawyer, David Schoen, on X. In the statement, Schoen claimed that his client 'had no information to hurt President Trump.' "I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died,' the statement began. 'He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!" Trump's name has previously been publicly linked with Epstein. His name was mentioned in flight logs released earlier this year by Attorney General Pam Bondi a total of seven times. However, the appearance of Trump's name in the flight logs does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing, as many of the individuals named could have been on Epstein's plane for legitimate reasons. The president was friends with the disgraced financier and pedophile for many years, but the two had a falling out in the mid-2000s, Trump told reporters shortly before Epstein died by suicide in 2019. Musk's deleted claim came on the heels of a number of verbal jabs with the president following the release of a controversial new budget bill. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk posted to X — which he owns — on Tuesday, June 3. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." During an Oval Office press conference on Thursday, June 4, Trump responded to Musk's criticisms. "Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anyone sitting here," Trump told reporters. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the [electric vehicle] mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars." Trump also predicted Musk's attacks would get personal after saying he was "very disappointed in Elon." The war of words also came just days after it was announced Musk would be leaving the Trump administration. Read the original article on People

Bill O'Reilly Bats for Trump to Pardon to 4-Year-Old Immigrant With Serious Illness: ‘Has to Be Exceptions'
Bill O'Reilly Bats for Trump to Pardon to 4-Year-Old Immigrant With Serious Illness: ‘Has to Be Exceptions'

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bill O'Reilly Bats for Trump to Pardon to 4-Year-Old Immigrant With Serious Illness: ‘Has to Be Exceptions'

Even Bill O'Reilly knows when enough is enough. The conservative commentator who has long supported strong border security went to bat this week for President Trump to issue humanitarian pardons to certain undocumented immigrants, using the example of a young child with a serious illness being treated at a Southern California hospital who was granted a pass by Homeland Security. 'I was happy to see this story,' the 'No Spin News' host said Friday. But first, some Biden-bashing: 'Thanks to President Biden, the FBI has spent more than a million manpower hours investigating problems stemming from the open border,' he said. 'Now, on Tuesday of this week alone, 2,200 illegal migrants were taken into custody,' he continued. 'That's a lot for one day. That's a 37% jump from the week prior. So, they're stepping up. ICE is stepping up its raids and … keeping them contained. They're not out on the street anymore. The White House is pleased. Trump wants this. That's why it's happening.' He also noted that since Trump has been president, there have been 67,000 undocumented migrants taken in and about 65,000 deported, but 'there are exceptions, or there should be, and there are.' 'Homeland Security, which controls ICE, has to make exceptions here,' he said. 'One of them is little Sophia Vargas, a four-year-old Mexican girl with a very serious illness. She's being treated in Southern California in a hospital there. Her mother, who took her across the border illegally in 2023, has been detained by ICE. But ICE is now giving the family a humanitarian waiver, which is the right thing to do. All right? We have to save this girl's life. 'Now, I would, if I were President Trump, pardon her. I'd say, 'You can stay on a humanitarian basis.' Nothing wrong with that. Sophia and her mom do not pose any danger to us, and it's a humanitarian thing.' Watch the monologue in the video above. The post Bill O'Reilly Bats for Trump to Pardon to 4-Year-Old Immigrant With Serious Illness: 'Has to Be Exceptions' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store