East Dundee man killed after being hit by cars had BAC nearly 4 times over limit
An East Dundee man killed in February after being struck by three cars on Route 31 had a blood alcohol content nearly four times over the legal intoxication level, records show.
Tom Yucuis, 69, longtime owner of Butcher On The Block meat shop in Lake in the HIlls, was walking in the roadway near Miller Road in Dundee Township about 6 a.m. Feb. 24 when he was hit, according to Kane County sheriff's office reports.
'In speaking with the detective assigned to the investigation, the deceased's toxicology report has come back at an ethanol level of 298,' Undersheriff Amy Johnson said in an email Monday.
When converted to a blood alcohol content, that translates to 0.298, Johnson said. The legal BAC limit to drive in Illinois is 0.08 or less.
Someone with a BAC level of 0.15 to 0.30 could experience confusion, vomiting and drowsiness, according to information on the Cleveland Clinic website. Anything that exceeds that amount could result in loss of consciousness and alcohol poisoning, which can be fatal, the site said.
Toxicology tests are done routinely during autopsies, but it can take several weeks for results to be completed and returned.
Johnson said no tickets or charges will be filed in the case, which is now considered closed.
On the day he died, Yucuis was wearing dark clothing and walking in the southbound lanes of Route 31, the sheriff's office said. The drivers of three vehicles that struck him stopped to help and called 911, reports said.
No other details as to what happened or why Yucuis might have been in the roadway have been released by the sheriff's office, which told The Courier-News that a Freedom of Information request would have to be submitted before they would consider providing more on the case.
Yucuis was born in Chicago but grew up in Sleepy Hollow and graduated from Dundee Community High School in Carpentersville in 1973, his online obituary said. He had been a butcher/meat cutter by profession for 50 years, and he and his wife, Jill, owned their Lake in the Hills butcher shop for 25 years.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I've been caught by Britain's most prolific speed camera – it makes the road no safer
When careful motorist Norman Tate received a letter of intended prosecution for speeding, he could hardly believe it. It told the grandfather, who had had a clean driving licence for more than a quarter of a century before the incident last year, that he'd been caught doing 45mph in a 30mph zone in his Ford Mondeo by a speed camera on a busy junction on the A38 in Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire. 'I'm a straight-up person. My immediate thought was, 'I'm a senior citizen and don't do 45mph in a 30mph area,'' says Tate, now 80. 'I might creep over the limit by a few miles an hour, but not by that much. So I thought I'd investigate.' The chartered civil engineer, with experience of road and bridge design, analysed the signage along that stretch of road. He's concluded that it is 'not fit for purpose' – and argues that motorists should be given better warnings that they are about to enter a 30mph area. It is a view that others who have been caught by that speed camera share – and there are plenty of them. In fact, the little yellow box mounted on a pole is so prolific that it is said to be the 'most lucrative' speed camera in the country, according to a Channel 5 documentary due to be broadcast tonight at 8pm. Speed Cameras: Are They Out to Get You? says that one camera caught 17,498 speeding offences in nine months from when it was installed in August 2023 – at an average rate of 72 per day and potentially costing motorists more than £1.6 million. So, what, you might well ask, is going on with this camera in a Nottinghamshire market town to make it ranked the most prolific – and some claim the sneakiest – in the country? And what happens to all the money it generates? When we visit Sutton-in-Ashfield to meet Tate, from nearby Chesterfield, Derbyshire, he explains how, as you approach the camera from junction 28 of the M1, first there is a 70mph speed limit that suddenly turns to 50mph – with an average-speed camera overhead – then it goes to 30mph about 100 yards from the crossroads where the camera is. There is a 30mph sign as you approach on the dual carriageway and a smaller sign warning of the camera ahead and reminding you it's 30mph. But, Tate says: 'When I started looking into the signage, it became apparent that if there's a high-sided vehicle on the inside lane, there's no way you can see the 30mph sign. There is nothing on the road itself to say it's 30mph. I think there should be. It's too easy to think you're still in the 50mph zone.' Norman Tate | From Speed Cameras: Are They Out to Get You?, courtesy of Lion Television (When we stopped by at a busy 4pm, motorists appeared to be driving carefully, but it was hard to tell whether it was carefully enough – the camera uses infra-red light technology, which means it doesn't flash.) The figures in the documentary come from a survey by Legal Expert, a personal injury, compensation and accident claim solicitor company. To obtain them, the firm made a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to all 43 police forces in England and Wales asking for the number of speeding fines issued in the 12 months to April 5 2024, and the top 20 spots where drivers have been caught speeding. Only 23 replied. If the 17,498 figure for the camera on the A38 in Sutton-in-Ashfield is annualised, it would be 23,331, putting it ahead of the second-placed speed camera, which was on the M25 between junctions 7 and 16 in Surrey (21,989 offences, at a daily average of 60). With speeding offences resulting in a £100 fine and three points on your licence (if they result in a fixed penalty notice and are not contested), that would mean that £2,333,100 worth of fines would have been threatened in a year, using the annualised figure for the A38 camera. A separate FOI request, not mentioned in the documentary, about the A38 speed camera was later made to Nottinghamshire Police by Gary Eyre, a heating engineer from Huthwaite, near Sutton-in-Ashfield. He found the reply 'flabbergasting': it said 41,675 motorists were punished for travelling in excess of the 30mph limit in the camera's first 20 months. 'I go into about 10 houses every day and everybody knows someone who's been done,' he said, explaining what prompted him to make the FOI request. That means at least £4.1 million worth of fines will have been threatened during that period. Nottinghamshire Police has stressed to The Telegraph that 47 per cent of those offences were resolved with speed awareness courses as an alternative to prosecution, so no fines will have been paid for those. 'I don't disagree with having speed cameras,' Tate says, 'and this one is there doing the job it should be doing and is designed to do – if the signage was correct. This is a very dangerous junction and the camera is trying to save people's lives. But if there's 23,000 people a year going through there at the wrong speed, there's something wrong – and that's the signage.' His attempts to argue his case saw him locked in what he called a 'David and Goliath' battle with the authorities. In the end, after first electing to go to trial, he pleaded guilty to his speeding offence, committed at 11.09am on February 1 last year. He did not contest the 45mph recorded by the camera but argued that the advance warning signs from the 50mph to the 30mph zone are 'inadequate' and called for a review of those signs. Magistrates gave him four points, fined him £360, and ordered him to pay a surcharge to victim services of £144 and £150 costs to the Crown Prosecution Service. In the documentary, Tate is featured with his friend Brian Staples, 76, a retired auto electrician from Papplewick, Nottinghamshire, who runs a classic car club. Staples is more dubious of the camera's intent, telling the documentary: 'They're taking those motorists to court and making them look as if they're bad drivers, and they're not. Friends that I know have been caught there are in their 80s – they're not speeding, they've just been caught out.' Staples also claims that some speed cameras are there just to collect money rather than to slow people down. Patrica Harvey, 68, a retired office accounts manager from Pinxton, Derbyshire, told The Telegraph that she has been caught speeding by the Sutton-in-Ashfield camera twice in a year, the second time around a fortnight ago. Both times, she said her speed was in the mid-30s mph. 'I was specifically looking for the sign the second time but didn't see it,' she said. 'I'm really very cautious about my speed. But one minute you're in 50mph, then it's 30mph. There's not enough signs telling you what's happening.' Judy Gascoigne, 66, a PA from Matlock, Derbyshire, was warned by a passenger in her car of the camera ahead and was trying to slow down when she was caught doing 36mph. 'I didn't see the signage,' she said. 'I did a speed awareness course and there were four or five others on it caught at the same camera.' Another motorist said: 'I got caught twice in the same week. When there's tree branches in the way and large vehicles, the signs are difficult to see.' From Speed Cameras: Are They Out to Get You?, courtesy of Lion Television The documentary also raises the question of what happens to the money from speed camera fines, making the point that it is common misconception that it goes to the council. In fact, it goes directly to central government, to the Treasury, and is used towards general spending rather than ring-fenced for specific areas. Motoring journalist and transport campaigner Quentin Willson told the documentary: 'If the public saw that the revenue raised from speeding fines made a visible difference, then perhaps the public would be more behind them.' It is an issue that West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner Simon Foster is campaigning on. He wants the money raised from speeding fines in his region to be spent on road safety schemes there. During a consultation in 2023, 93 per cent of the public agreed that money raised from fixed penalty fines should stay in the region. So far, however, his calls – to both this and the previous government – have not resulted in a change of policy. One argument against allowing the income from speed cameras to be retained locally is that it might incentivise regions to install cameras to make money. Nottinghamshire Police said around 37,000 vehicles go through the junction where the Sutton-in-Ashfield camera is every day, so only a very small percentage are exceeding the speed limit. There had been at least one fatal collision and a number of serious injury collisions in the years before the camera was installed. But there have been no fatal or serious injury collisions since it was installed and the rate of offences have reduced to around 60 a day. The force also said work to cut back foliage to ensure all signage was visible was done before the camera went live, and the 'unusual step' was taken of putting out proactive communication to inform people of the new camera. Insp Simon Allen, of Nottinghamshire Police, said: 'While the 30mph limit around this junction is not set by the police, it is in place for a very good reason – including the very large number of children who use the pedestrian crossings to get to and from school each day. 'Like all safety cameras in the UK, this unit is in place to reduce speed and prevent road traffic collisions – not to catch people speeding.' A Department for Transport spokesman said: 'Fines from speeding offences help fund essential public services including health care, transport and policing in the West Midlands and across the country. 'While we keep the motoring offences and their penalties under review, we don't currently have any plans to change this system.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Coroner IDs 6-year-old girl killed after being hit by car in Harrison Twp
The 6-year-old girl who was killed after being hit by a car in Harrison Township has been identified. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] New Center 7's Mason Fletcher spoke with a neighbor who witnessed the crash. Catch his report on News Center 7 at 5:30 p.m. TRENDING STORIES: Woman unable to walk, sues hospital after surgeon operated on the wrong knee Motorcyclist dies after crashing, falling 25 feet 30-year-old gored by bison while visiting Yellowstone National Park The Montgomery County Coroner's Office identified 6-year-old Ineza Christel on Wednesday. According to a previous News Center 7 report, the crash occurred around 7:45 p.m. Tuesday in the area of Marlay Road and Briar Place in Harrison Township. Christel was transported to a local hospital with serious injuries, where she died, according to the sheriff's office. Witnesses told deputies Christel came from behind a stopped vehicle and ran into the path of another vehicle. We will continue following this story. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Speaker Johnson tries to draw a ‘clear distinction' between Jan. 6 attack and L.A. unrest
Amid unrest in Los Angeles, Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans have largely stuck to specific talking points, each of which is burdened by the same flaw: The president's pardons for Jan. 6 criminals, including convicted felons who violently clashed with law enforcement. Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma, for example, told CNN this past weekend that he has a problem with protesters in California 'attacking law enforcement,' which was a perfectly sensible sentiment. Of course, it naturally led many observers to note that many Jan. 6 rioters went to prison for attacking law enforcement, and the incumbent Republican president gave them all pardons. Around the same time, U.S. Customs and Border Protection used its social media platform to issue a statement that read, 'Let this be clear: Anyone who assaults or impedes a federal law enforcement officer or agent in the performance of their duties will be arrested and swiftly prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Attack a cop, and life long consequences will follow!' FBI Director Kash Patel added in a statement of his own: 'Hit a cop, you're going to jail.' There was nothing wrong with the statements, except for the degree to which they were undercut by Trump's pardons for Jan. 6 rioters. The president himself told reporters this week, 'Nobody's going to spit on our police officers.' Unfortunately for Trump, he put this principle aside while pardoning violent felons who did a lot more than just spit on police officers. It was against this backdrop that House Speaker Mike Johnson was pressed on the obvious contradiction. Newsweek reported: CNN's Manu Raju asked Johnson whether he thinks it's 'hypocritical' for Trump to condemn the anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles for clashing with law enforcement when Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of everyone charged in the deadly Capitol riot, many of whom were convicted of beating or impeding law enforcement. 'Look, no, I think there's a clear distinction between those two,' Johnson said. Pressed on what he sees as the difference, the Louisiana Republican added, 'Everybody wants me to relitigate January 6, I'm not going to do that. There's a very clear distinction between the two. The people who broke the law and destroyed property [on January 6] were met with the proper consequences on that.' Of course, what the House speaker neglected to mention is that after the Jan. 6 criminals 'were met with the proper consequences,' his party's president decided to undo those consequences. The next day, Attorney General Pam Bondi was pressed on the same point, and she struggled, too. Republicans have had several days to come up with some compelling talking points on this. Evidently, they can't think of anything. This article was originally published on
