Georgia to shutter EU and NATO information centre as ties with West fray
FILE PHOTO: Supporters of Georgia's opposition parties walk past a wall painted with the flag of the European Union (with a sign) and the Georgian flag during a protest against the government's decision to suspend talks on joining the European Union in Tbilisi, Georgia December 8, 2024. REUTERS/Irakli Gedenidze/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Supporters of Georgia's opposition parties hold a rally to protest against the result of a recent parliamentary election won by the ruling Georgian Dream party, in Tbilisi, Georgia November 4, 2024. REUTERS/Irakli Gedenidze/File Photo
Georgia to shutter EU and NATO information centre as ties with West fray
TBILISI - The Georgian government is to close its information centre on NATO and the European Union, Georgian media reported on Wednesday, citing the country's foreign ministry, amid souring ties between Tbilisi and the West.
According to its website, the information centre aims "to engage our population in Georgia's European and Euro-Atlantic integration processes and to gain their well-informed support".
The centre, opened in 2005, is based in a large building on Freedom Square in downtown Tbilisi and flies the flags of the EU, the NATO military alliance and Georgia.
Georgia's Interpress news agency reported that the centre is to be merged into the foreign ministry and that some staff have been told they are to be dismissed. The ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Georgia has been an EU candidate member since 2023, while NATO said in 2008 that the mountainous country of 3.6 million would eventually join the alliance.
But though once among the most pro-Western and democratic of the Soviet Union's successor states, Georgia's government has in recent years moved to clamp down on domestic critics, while also rebuilding ties with former imperial overlord, Russia.
Bidzina Ivanishvili, a billionaire ex-prime minister widely seen as Georgia's de facto leader, has said the EU and NATO are controlled by a shadowy "global war party" that seeks to topple the government and drag his country into war with Russia.
Ivanishvili's Georgian Dream party in November 2024 paused EU accession talks until 2028, abruptly halting a popular national goal that is written into the country's constitution.
The EU has said Tbilisi's application has been frozen over laws on "foreign agents" and LGBT rights that Brussels has criticised as restrictive and influenced by Russian policies .
Georgian Dream says it still wants to eventually join the EU and NATO, but that it also wants to keep the peace with its huge northern neighbour, as well as preserve the country's traditional Christian values.
The United States imposed sanctions on Ivanishvili last December, accusing him of dismantling Georgian democracy in the interests of Russia.
Tbilisi and Moscow have had no formal diplomatic ties since 2008, when Russia defeated Georgia in a brief war over two Moscow-backed separatist regions. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
New push in Europe to curb children's social media use
A rising body of evidence has shown the negative effects of social media on children's mental and physical health. PHOTO: AFP New push in Europe to curb children's social media use LUXEMBOURG - From dangerous diet tips to disinformation, cyberbullying to hate speech, the glut of online content harmful to children grows every day. But several European countries have had enough and agree the EU should do more to prevent minors' access to social media. The European Union already has some of the world's most stringent digital rules to rein in Big Tech, with multiple probes ongoing into how platforms protect children – or fail to do so. Backed by France and Spain, Greece spearheaded a proposal for how the EU should limit children's use of online platforms as a rising body of evidence shows the negative effects of social media on children's mental and physical health. They discussed the plan on June 6 with EU counterparts in Luxembourg to push the idea of setting an age of digital adulthood across the 27-country bloc, meaning children would not be able to access social media without parental consent. France, Greece and Denmark believe there should be a ban on social media for under-15s, while Spain has suggested a ban for under-16s. Australia has banned social media for under-16s, taking effect later this year, while New Zealand and Norway are considering a similar prohibition. After the day's talks in Luxembourg, it appeared there was no real appetite at this stage for an EU-wide ban on children under a specific age. But Danish Digital Minister Caroline Stage Olsen indicated there would be no let-up. 'It's going to be something we're pushing for,' she said. Top EU digital official Henna Virkkunen admitted specific age limits would be 'challenging' for multiple reasons, including cultural differences in member states and how it would work in practice. But the European Commission, the EU's digital watchdog, still intends to launch an age-verification app next month, insisting it can be done without disclosing personal details. 'Very big step' The EU in May published non-binding draft guidelines for platforms to protect minors, to be finalised once a public consultation ends this month, including setting children's accounts to private by default, and making it easier to block and mute users. French Digital Minister Clara Chappaz said it would be 'a very big step' if the EU made platforms check the real age of their users, as theoretically required under current regulation. The worry is that children as young as seven or eight can easily create an account on social media platforms despite a minimum age of 13, by giving a false date of birth. 'If we all agree as Europeans to say this needs to stop, there needs to be a proper age verification scheme, then it means that children below 13 won't be able to access the platform,' Ms Chappaz said. France has led the way in cracking down on platforms, passing a 2023 law requiring them to obtain parental consent for users under the age of 15. But the measure has not received the EU green light it needs to come into force. France also gradually introduced requirements this year for all adult websites to have users confirm their age to prevent children accessing porn – with three major platforms going dark this week in anger over the move. TikTok, also under pressure from the French government, on June 1 banned the '#SkinnyTok' hashtag, part of a trend promoting extreme thinness on the platform. In-built age verification France, Greece and Spain expressed concern about the algorithmic design of digital platforms increasing children's exposure to addictive and harmful content – with the risk of worsening anxiety, depression and self-esteem issues. Their proposal – also supported by Cyprus and Slovenia – blames excessive screen time at a young age for hindering the development of minors' critical and relationship skills. They demand 'an EU-wide application that supports parental control mechanisms, allows for proper age verification and limits the use of certain applications by minors'. The goal would be for devices such as smartphones to have in-built age verification. The EU is clamping down in other ways as well. It is currently investigating Meta's Facebook and Instagram, and TikTok under its mammoth content moderation law, the Digital Services Act (DSA), fearing the platforms are failing to do enough to prevent children accessing harmful content. And last week, it launched an investigation into four pornographic platforms over suspicions they are failing to stop children accessing adult content. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Britain faces ‘extraordinary' threat from Russian and Iranian plots, official warns
A police officer stands guard outside the Old Bailey criminal court in London on May 30. PHOTO: AFP LONDON – In a room at the Old Bailey courthouse in London, six men went on trial this week over an arson attack on a business that was shipping satellite equipment to Ukraine. Down the hall, a separate hearing involved an alleged plot to inflict 'serious violence' on Iranian journalists working in Britain. And in May, six Bulgarians were sentenced to prison for being part of a Russian spy ring operating from a guesthouse on England's east coast. These disparate cases underscore how Britain has become the locale for a web of foreign espionage operations. For Britain's top adviser on state threats and terrorism, they offer a stark backdrop to his warning that Russia and Iran are 'exploiting divisions in the West' to recruit agents via social media. The adviser, Jonathan Hall, cannot discuss active criminal cases because of England's strict reporting laws. But in an interview with The New York Times, he said attempts by Russia and Iran to carry out hostile acts on British soil were creating an 'extraordinary' level of threat, albeit one that may be harder for the public to grasp than that from terrorism. 'Terrorism is something that gets public attention,' Hall said, partly because of the 'death and destruction and mayhem' caused by attacks. State threats, he said, were 'much harder to conceptualise' for the public. Mr Hall's warnings, and those of other senior British officials, stand in sharp contrast to the United States, where President Donald Trump has said little about the efforts of Russia and Iran to destabilise American society, preferring instead to focus on diplomatic overtures to the two countries on issues like the war in Ukraine and Tehran's nuclear programme. Mr Trump's approach comes even as US authorities have tracked what they believe to be Iranian plots to assassinate the president – allegations that Iran denies – and former intelligence officials have spoken of Russian agents in Mexico who have tried to encourage illegal migration into the United States. In Britain, as in the United States, some of these cases may reach into high places. On June 6, a judge said that three defendants will stand trial in April over the fires at two properties and a vehicle linked to Prime Minister Keir Starmer. British news media has reported that the security services are investigating whether Russia may have been involved in the fires – an allegation the Russian government denies. Mr Hall acknowledged that some details from recent cases, including that of the six Bulgarians involved in the Russian spy ring operating out of the guesthouse in Great Yarmouth, could appear 'intrinsically funny.' 'But without being a killjoy, I think it risks missing the point about the risk posed by these individuals,' Mr Hall said. 'They were contemplating assassinating people and they clearly were able to get very close to their targets, so there's nothing comic about that.' The Bulgarians had been conducting surveillance on targets that included journalists, Russian dissidents and political figures. The ringleader discussed the possibility of kidnapping and killing an investigative reporter. The group was acting under the orders of Jan Marsalek, an Austrian fugitive and former businessperson whom the prosecution said was working on behalf of Russian intelligence. In another recent case, Daniel Khalife, a young British army soldier who had been spying for Iran, blew his cover by telephoning MI5 and fruitlessly offering his services as a double agent. After escaping from jail by strapping himself to the bottom of a van delivering food, Khalife was apprehended, tried and sentenced to 14 years in prison in February. For hostile states looking to recruit agents, Mr Hall said, 'It doesn't really matter if they have someone who bungles, because volume is enough, and I suppose it's inevitable, if you have a volume approach, that you'll pick up some bunglers and some people who go out to be very capable.' A lawyer and former prosecutor specialising in international crime and security, Mr Hall was appointed by the government in 2019 to review the effectiveness of Britain's terrorism laws, and in 2024, to additionally advise on state threats. In an official review published last month, Mr Hall called for the British government to create new legal powers allowing it to seize passports from suspected foreign agents, issue alerts over activity by foreign intelligence services and prosecute people for targeting victims overseas. He is not the only official sounding the alarm. In its most recent annual threat assessment, Britain's domestic intelligence agency, MI5, warned that Russia, Iran and China represented the biggest state threats to national security and were outsourcing espionage and sabotage operations designed to disrupt and destabilise Britain. Mr Ken McCallum, the director-general of MI5, said in October that Russian intelligence agents were on a mission 'to generate mayhem on British and European streets,' while Mr Richard Moore, the head of the British Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, said that Russian intelligence services had 'gone a bit feral.' The embassies of Russia and Iran in London did not respond to a request for comment on these recent cases. One of the most brazen recent foreign acts on British soil was a nerve-agent attack on a former Russian double agent, Sergei Skripal, in Salisbury, south-west of London, in 2018. The fallout prompted the British government to introduce new national security laws in 2023, which made foreign espionage, sabotage and influence criminal offenses. In February, Mr Hall met with officials from the Justice Department in Washington, to examine their handling of the threat from hostile states. He praised 'the US approach of just whatever works,' which uses a broad spectrum of federal and state legislation to disrupt plots. The most striking trend in recent years has been the use of organised crime groups by foreign powers, Mr Hall said. That is the result of waves of diplomatic expulsions that ejected intelligence officers from Britain, he said, which meant that states 'couldn't use intelligence officers under diplomatic cover to recruit and to coordinate plots.' Mr Hall said both Russia and Iran were paying local criminals to carry out acts of violence, espionage and intimidation on British soil. Such efforts have had mixed success, with the prosecution of the Bulgarian spies and others resulting in rare disclosures of spy tradecraft because of lapses in operational security. Russia and Iran, he warned, were also using the internet to find, influence and hire politically disaffected people in Britain and the United States, both of which suffer from degrees of polarisation. He noted that this was 'increasingly hard to combat' because of deeply targeted and personalised social media feeds: 'Every individual person gets a different feed, and we don't know what other people are seeing.' 'If you're an intelligence officer,' Mr Hall added, 'why would you not exploit divisions in the West and try to find some sort of cultural synergy between you and your target?' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Africa Corps to stay in Mali after Russia's Wagner mercenary group leaves
MOSCOW/DAKAR - The Africa Corps, a Kremlin-controlled paramilitary force, said on Friday it will stay in Mali after Russia's Wagner mercenary group leaves following a 3-1/2 year fight against Islamist militants. Wagner has been in Mali since the army, which seized power in two coups in 2020 and 2021, kicked out French and United Nations troops involved in fighting Islamic insurgents for a decade. The Africa Corps was created with the Russian Defence Ministry's support after Wagner founder Yevgeny Prigozhin and commander Dmitry Utkin led a failed military mutiny against the Russian army leadership and left Russia for Belarus with other mercenaries. About 70-80% of the Africa Corps is made up of former Wagner mercenaries, according to several Telegram chats used by Russian mercenaries seen by Reuters. Wagner posted on social media that it was returning home after its mission in Mali had been successfully completed. It added it had brought all of the country's regional centres back under the control of the Malian military junta, pushing out Islamist forces and killing their commanders. Wagner did not say what its fighters would do back in Russia. The Africa Corps said on its Telegram channel that Wagner's departure would not introduce any changes as the Russian contingent will remain in Mali. "Russia does not lose ground, but on the contrary, continues to support Bamako now at a more fundamental level," it said, referring to the capital city. The Malian defence ministry did not immediately respond to a request for a comment. A spate of attacks erupted in recent weeks, which insurgents said killed more than 100 Malian soldiers and some mercenaries. Jama'a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM), an insurgent group in West Africa's Sahel region, claimed responsibility for the violence in recent days, including a bombing attack on Wednesday against Malian and Russian soldiers near Bamako. Russia has been seeking to replace Wagner with the Africa Corps in Mali, Ulf Laessing, head of the Sahel programme at Germany's Konrad Adenauer Foundation, said in an interview. "The takeover by the Africa Corps means that the Russian military engagement in Mali will continue, but the focus might change more to training and providing equipment and less actual fighting jihadists." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
