Family of deported child recovering from brain cancer accuses CBP of ‘serious abuses'
A family deported to Mexico while seeking brain cancer treatment for their 10-year-old daughter in Texas has requested an investigation into alleged abuses they claim they faced while in U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody last month.
According to a civil rights complaint first obtained by NBC News, the family alleges law enforcement committed 'serious abuses' when it denied medical care to the 10-year-old girl, who is a U.S. citizen. The mixed-status family also alleges they were detained 'in deplorable conditions' before being removed to Mexico, where they say some of their children's lives 'are in peril because of their status as U.S. citizens.'
On Feb. 3, the family was stopped by CBP officials at an immigration checkpoint in Texas while they were traveling to an emergency medical appointment for their 10-year-old daughter. During prior trips, the girl's undocumented parents were allowed through the checkpoint after presenting authorities with letters from their daughter's doctors and lawyers. But this time, the parents were told those letters were insufficient.
Immigration authorities arrested the parents after they were unable to show legal immigration documentation. The family's attorney, Daniel Woodward, said the parents have 'no criminal history' and were in the process of obtaining T visas, a temporary immigration benefit for victims of human trafficking. The girl's mother told NBC News they arrived in the U.S. from Mexico in 2013 and settled in Texas hoping for 'a better life for the family.'
In addition to the couple's 10-year-old daughter, four of their children, ages 15, 13, 8 and 6 — three of whom are U.S. citizens — were with them when they were arrested. Following their arrest, the parents and their five children were taken to a detention facility. They were loaded on a van 24 hours later and dropped on the Mexico side of a bridge.
The Texas Civil Rights Project, a legal advocacy and litigation organization representing the family, filed the complaint Monday with the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.
The 10-year-old isn't the only member of the family who is being treated for a medical condition. The couple's 15-year-old son and 13-year-old daughter both have a serious medical condition, a heart disorder, known as Long QT syndrome, that causes irregular heartbeats and can be life-threatening without proper treatment.
In the complaint, the family alleges CBP's medical team knew it had custody of 'three children with complex medical needs, one of whom was complaining of urgent and serious symptoms.' Despite that, authorities failed to transfer the children to a medical facility 'to obtain pediatric medical review.' The complaint alleges this was in violation of the Flores Settlement Agreement, which regulates how minors must be treated in federal immigration custody.
'Twelve hours earlier, [the 10-year-old girl's] parents were so worried about her that they rushed the family towards Houston for emergency care. Instead of granting her that care, CBP forced a child who was still recovering from brain surgery to sleep in a hot, dirty, brightly lit cell,' the complaint reads.
The document alleges the children were inappropriately searched during their detention: 'Officers searched each member of the family, including the pat downs of sensitive parts of their bodies. [The] six-year-old … a U.S. citizen, later asked his mom why they touched him 'down there.''
The complaint also alleges that authorities denied the family adequate access to their attorney and threatened them with permanent separation unless the parents signed the deportation order. 'One officer threatened that the government would take away her children and she would never speak to them again,' the complaint alleges.
In a statement, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson called reports of the family's situation 'inaccurate,' because when 'someone is given expedited removal orders and chooses to disregard them, they will face the consequences.'
According to the 10-year-old girl's mother, since the family was deported last month, her daughter has been unable to access the follow-up care she needs. The girl still suffers from swelling in her brain and difficulties with speech and mobility on the right side of her body.
The mother also told NBC News that all of her children are unable to sleep due to concerns about their safety, having been deported to an area of Mexico where U.S. citizens are often kidnapped.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump faces criticism of his broad mass deportation push from two different angles
The sister of a woman allegedly murdered by six noncitizens said President Donald Trump's administration is targeting the wrong people for deportation and is not doing enough to get the worst of the worst off U.S. streets, even as authorities embark on a massive deportation effort. Tiffany Thompson, whose sister Larisha Sharrell Thompson was shot and killed in South Carolina last month, said she was angered that while deportations have played a central role in Trump's administration, more hadn't been done to target those who were charged in the killing — particularly the alleged ringleader, who faced a previous charge before her sister was killed. 'It's frustrating that they're illegal and they committed this crime. They should have been deported, maybe this wouldn't have happened,' Thompson told NBC News in an interview. She added: 'I don't know where Trump is right now.' The notion that a family member of someone allegedly killed by an undocumented immigrant would call Trump to action over his signature issue comes amid broader questions about how the president is executing his mass deportation policy. Though from a different point of view, Tiffany Thompson's anger mirrors the anxiety rippling through Los Angeles over Trump's deportation efforts there, culminating in protests and some violent clashes and driven by the belief that the administration is indiscriminately removing noncitizens instead of targeting removal of criminals in an attempt to laud a high number of arrests. Polling shows immigration remains Trump's strongest issue, though the most recent CBS News/YouGov poll conducted last week illustrated a gap: A 55% majority said they like the goals of Trump's deportation program, while 44% said they like how 'he is going about it.' Americans narrowly said they believe Trump is prioritizing dangerous criminals (53%) versus prioritizing nondangerous people (47%) for deportation. And to the extent there is sharp division over Trump's immigration policy, it's not over efforts to deport convicted criminals. More than 80% of Americans support deporting those who have committed violent crimes, according to the Pew Research Center data from late February and early March. 'What this administration is doing is going after low-hanging fruit: collateral arrests, stripping protections,' said Beatriz Lopez, co-executive director of Immigration Hub, a national immigration policy group. Lopez derided Trump administration tactics, including stripping Temporary Protected Status from Venezuelans and agents making arrests outside immigration courthouse hearings. 'They are creating the chaos,' she added. 'They aren't going after violent criminals. They are creating undocumented people.' Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, pushed back on that characterization on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' on Monday, saying that the enforcement actions in Los Angeles last week stemmed from a criminal investigation targeting specific people as part of a larger alleged conspiracy. They were not, Homan said, a random immigration raid. 'I said from day one, Jan. 20, we will prioritize public safety threats and national security threats. However, we will enforce law, particularly — I may prioritize my family life over my work, doesn't mean I ignore my work,' Homan said. 'We're going to enforce immigration law. We've been honest about that from day one, especially in sanctuary cities. When we can't get the bad guy in the safety and security of a jail, they release them to the street. Well, we got to go to the street and find them.' Data shows that violent crimes committed by immigrants are rare when compared with the general population. 'We often will hear about a very high-profile event, and not to reduce the tragedy of it — obviously, a crime is still a crime, and it's incredibly painful when you know when people are affected by those sorts of things — but looking at numbers and statistically speaking, it's not as though a higher presence of immigrants creates a higher presence of crime,' said Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh, associate policy analyst with the Migration Policy Institute, an immigration policy think tank. 'That's been pretty proven through various studies over the years.' But as the Trump administration has pointed to arrestees as 'rapists' and 'killers,' competing narratives have stacked up with examples like a child suffering from cancer ordered to self-deport, university students targeted for removal and advocacy groups sounding alarms over violations of human rights and due process. Some Trump supporters have spoken out about the impact of a dragnet detaining those here legally. An Argentinian couple from North Carolina, who said they had backed Trump, were apoplectic after their 31-year-old son, a green-card holder in the country since he was a toddler, was arrested and detained in Georgia. 'He didn't say he was going to do this, that he was going to go after people who have been here for a long time,' the mother, Debora Rey, said of Trump in an interview with The Atlanta Journal Constitution. 'He said he was going to go after all the criminals who came illegally. ... We feel betrayed, tricked.' At the same time, noncitizens charged with violent crimes are still making headlines. Under President Joe Biden, Trump attacked such crimes as evidence of a broken system that required his election to fix. Now, he and Republicans hold up those incidents — including the recent attack in Boulder, Colorado — as evidence that deportations should be more widespread. Authorities announced they elevated their deportation efforts and lauded a record-breaking day of arrests last week. 'President Trump is working at record speed to clean up Joe Biden's Open Border Disaster that let countless unvetted illegal aliens pour into the United States and threaten the safety of American citizens,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a written statement. 'The President has closed the border and now he's deporting illegal aliens, especially violent criminals. The recent attack in Boulder just underscores why the President's work is so important. 'We're grateful the media is now admitting that illegal aliens pose a risk to the safety of the American people and look forward to the stories about why Joe Biden let so many violent criminals into the country in the first place,' Jackson continued. In the Larisha Thompson case, six people who do not have legal status, according to the Department of Homeland Security, were charged. They include 21-year-old Asael Aminadas Torres-Chirinos, who faces three firearms charges and, according to DHS, had previously been arrested on a domestic violence allegation. Lancaster County lawyer Doug Barfield said Chirinos' 2022 charge was still pending. He added that immigration authorities had placed detainers on all six people, which would prevent them from going free even if they posted bond. Tiffany Thompson said she 'wished they would have seen that,' referencing Chirinos' previous arrest and the fact that he was still in the country. She didn't specifically cast blame on any administration but remained angry that the suspects — including teens who were 13, 14 and 15 years old — were attempting to be released on bond. 'Would I like for Trump to get ahead of this? Yes,' she added. The pace of deportations has bothered the White House, and NBC News reported top Trump aide Stephen Miller berated and threatened to fire senior Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials in May if they did not begin detaining 3,000 migrants a day. Miller also threatened to fire leaders of field offices posting the bottom 10% of arrest numbers monthly, NBC News reported. Yet, that's exactly the tactic that immigration experts say will do little to protect against national security. 'There's really no incentive for ICE to spend a bunch of resources investigating and tracking down people in the field. It's about convenience primarily, and public safety is a distant second,' said David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian-aligned public policy think tank. 'The Laken Riley Act specifically says you should be prioritizing resources to go after people who have been arrested on violent or property offenses. So they supported that bill,' Bier said, referencing the law Trump signed in January, which requires Immigration and Customs Enforcement to detain undocumented immigrants who are arrested or face charges, or who have been convicted of 'burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting.' After signing the law, Trump said, 'That's why I'm here instead of somebody else. Actually, it's the biggest reason.' Bier said the argument after signing the law was, 'They said: 'This is going to prevent more Laken Rileys.' And then they have done nothing to implement it.' The administration and allies reject that assertion, saying they are arresting criminal noncitizens and are moving as quickly as possible to reverse the impacts of lax border policies under Biden. In March, DHS touted its success in deporting convicted criminals and those who had pending criminal charges. 'He is dealing with what Biden and Kamala Harris facilitated. ... He keeps going as fast as he can, trying to fix a million different issues,' said Nicole Kiprilov, the executive director of The American Border Story, a group that elevates 'the human stories of American citizens impacted by the border crisis.' 'These people now who are committing crimes under the Trump administration are people who were brought in by Biden,' Kiprilov said. 'They were not brought in by Trump.' Kiprilov noted that Trump has turned off the flow of illegal immigration by shutting down the southern border. In a written statement, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said: 'Under Secretary Noem, we are delivering on President Trump's and the American people's mandate to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens to make America safe. In the first 100 days, 75% of ICE arrests were criminal illegal aliens with convictions or pending charges. The shocking story here is that instead of deporting many heinous criminals, the Biden Administration chose to RELEASE these known public safety threats into our communities instead of deporting them.' Currently, 56% of those in ICE detention have either been convicted of a crime or have pending criminal charges, according to ICE data. The remainder do not have criminal histories. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dog attacks on USPS workers have reached a seven-year high. And one region is leading the way
The cliché that dogs and postal workers are sworn enemies has been proven by USPS data showing dog attacks on its employees have reached a seven-year high, with the Midwest leading the way. Last year more than 6,000 dog attacks on mail carriers were reported to the Postal Service, the USPS announced last month, ahead of its National Dog Bite Awareness Campaign. The rate of dog attacks hasn't been this high since 2017, NBC News reported, citing USPS data. Attacks have increased 5 percent since 2023 and 15 percent from 2022. In 2024, there were an average of about five dog attacks per 100,000 households in the Midwest. The states with the highest rate of dog attacks were Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and Ohio. There are bound to be clashes between postal workers and pets, with 49 million American households owning dogs, according to Census Bureau data from 2021. There are more than 326,000 mail carriers in the U.S., according to 2022 Bureau of Labor Statistics data. In 2022, a Florida postal worker Pamela Jane Rock, 61, died after being attacked by five dogs, according to local officials. "One neighbor brought his firearm along and fired several shots in the air in an attempt to disrupt the attack," Joseph Wells with the Putnam County Sheriff's Office said at the time, according to NBC News. But Wells said that tactic was 'unsuccessful,' and Rock ended up dying at a hospital a day later. On Monday, a 48-year-old mail carrier in Connecticut was hospitalized after being attacked by a dog, the Hartford Courant reported, citing local police. Middletown Police Chief Erik Costa said the postal worker was bitten on his left thigh, left wrist, right forearm, lower abdomen and the back of his head. USPS spokesperson David Coleman called the rise in dog attacks a 'real problem,' in a statement to NBC News. 'Dogs are animals, they act instinctively and can bite for any number of reasons. All it takes is just one wrong interaction/movement for our carriers to be injured,' he said. Coleman advised dog owners to be responsible with their pets: 'Teach your dog appropriate behavior and commands and don't allow a dog to roam freely.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial recap: Ex-girlfriend ‘Jane' faces cross-examination from the defense after harrowing testimony about ‘hotel nights'
The trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs continued Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, with 'Jane' — a pseudonym for an alleged victim and ex-girlfriend of Combs — returning to the witness stand to face cross-examination from the defense in the high-profile sex trafficking case. Federal prosecutors say that for decades, Combs abused, threatened and coerced women to participate in drug-fueled marathon sexual encounters called "freak offs" and used his business empire, along with guns, kidnapping and arson, to conceal his crimes. Testifying for a fourth straight day, Jane said that she still loves Combs despite her allegations of abuse, and that she endured the 'freak offs,' or what she called 'hotel nights,' because 'he was my baby.' Over three days of direct testimony, she tearfully recounted the harrowing sexual encounters — telling the court that she felt obligated to 'perform' sex acts for Combs with other men because he was paying her rent. She also testified about a brutal assault she endured before Combs ordered her to cover up her injuries and take ecstasy for an impromptu 'hotel night.' The 55-year-old hip-hop mogul is facing five criminal counts: one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs has pleaded not guilty. If convicted, he could face life in prison. Here are some key takeaways from Wednesday's testimony culled from various reporters and news organizations in the courtroom, including CNN, NBC News, and the Washington Post. Under cross-examination, Jane acknowledged that despite the alleged abuse, she still loves Combs. She told the court that she endured the 'freak offs' or 'hotel nights' — and having sex with multiple strange men in front of Combs — because she often thought it was the only way she could spend time with him. 'He was my baby,' she said. She said that after a typical 'hotel night,' she'd give him foot massages, feed and bathe him and put on his favorite show, NBC's 'Dateline,' until he fell asleep. When asked by defense attorney Teny Geragos if she still loved Combs, Jane said that she does. Geragos pressed Jane on the financial support she has received from Combs. During her direct testimony, Jane told the court that Combs paid and still pays her $10,000-per-month rent — part of the 'love contract' she entered into with him — and that he is currently paying her attorney fees for appearing as a government witness at his trial. Over the course of their three-plus-year relationship, Geragos estimated that Combs wired Jane $150,000. Jane said that she was not sure of the exact figure but that the number seemed accurate. But Jane also testified that she lived under constant threat of Combs not paying her rent, which she said he used 'as a little tool.' Big picture: The defense sought to underscore the consistent financial support Combs has given Jane — an arrangement that could undercut her allegations of abuse in the minds of the jury. Jane testified that early in their relationship, she became concerned about Combs's drug use. She recalled that on a trip to Turks and Caicos, the music mogul's hands were shaking and that the coloring of his eyes and gums seemed off. 'I could tell he wasn't taking very good care of himself,' she said, adding that she urged him to seek treatment. When Geragos suggested that Jane knew Combs was a drug addict, she said, 'In the beginning I didn't really know how to label it. I encountered somebody that was overdoing the partying.' 'As our relationship continued I noticed a very strong pattern, and I still didn't really even label [him] as a drug addict," she said. "I think now I would say that, but then I just would say that he was a really big party guy.' Describing the details of some of their 'hotel nights' under cross-examination, Jane testified that when they were with a male escort named Paul, they likened themselves to NBA greats. They called themselves 'the trifecta,' a label coined by Combs, she said. In this scenario, Jane was Kobe Bryant, Paul was Shaquille O'Neal and Combs was Michael Jordan. "I was Kobe Bryant and Paul was Shaq," she told the court. "Sean was Michael Jordan." As the frequency of their "hotel nights" increased, Jane said that she sought to understand Combs's desire to see her have sex with other men. She told the court that she began researching and came across the word "cuck," which is derived from "cuckhold," a man whose wife or girlfriend is unfaithful. She said she understood a "cuck" to mean a man who is turned on by watching his woman have sex with another man. (In recent years, the word has been co-opted by right-wing conservatives as a derogatory term for a man who has politically progressive or moderate views.) Jane said she also believed Combs could have been exploring bisexuality. 'Cucks could also have a bi-curiosity that they are too ashamed to experience themselves,' she explained. 'So they use the woman to venture out in this curiosity without actually doing the act itself.' Big picture: The defense has argued that Combs was engaged in a "swinger" lifestyle and not a criminal enterprise as prosecutors allege. Having the jury hear Jane say that she believes Combs was exploring his sexuality through the "freak offs" could help make that case. At one point during Tuesday's cross-examination, Jane and defense lawyer Geragos got into a pointed exchange over designer handbags. Geragos suggested that Jane was accepting designer handbags from Combs in exchange for having sex with strange men. "No, I got trauma," the witness said. When Geragos asked Jane if she knew what a Bottega handbag is, she responded: "I'm sure you have one." Then, when Geragos asked how much a Bottega bag costs, Jane shot back: "How much does my body cost?" Before testimony got underway, Judge Arun Subramanian denied a motion for a mistrial submitted over the weekend by Combs's legal team. The motion was centered around the testimony of government witness Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Combs's ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, who testified that Combs dangled her from the 17th-floor balcony of Ventura's apartment in Los Angeles on Sept. 26, 2016. The defense submitted evidence showing Combs wasn't in Los Angeles on that date. Bongolan said she estimated the date based on photos of her injuries. Combs's team alleged mistrial prosecutorial misconduct, claiming that the government knew or should have known that the witness's assertion of the date the alleged attack occurred was "demonstrably false.' But the judge disagreed. 'This is not fodder for a mistrial; this is the adversarial process at work,' Subramanian said, while calling defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland's cross-examination of Bongolan a 'real Perry Mason moment.' No interference happened, Subramanian said, and the defense was fully able to undermine Bongolan's testimony.
