logo
This Elephant Uses a Hose to Give Herself a Shower Every Day

This Elephant Uses a Hose to Give Herself a Shower Every Day

Observer27-11-2024

To stay cool, and protect their skin, elephants wallow in mud, bathe in dust and use their trunks to spray themselves with water. Now, an Asian elephant named Mary, who lives at the Berlin Zoo, has developed a more advanced technique, using a large hose to give herself a shower.
Mary's hose-wielding appears to be the latest example of tool use by animals, researchers say in a paper that was published in the journal Current Biology. 'Mary is so superb at showering,' said Michael Brecht, a neuroscientist at Humboldt University of Berlin and an author of the paper.
Another elephant also proved handy with a hose. A youngster named Anchali developed two techniques for interrupting the flow of water through the hose — and thus, Mary's showers.
The observation raises a provocative possibility: By disabling the tool Mary was using, Brecht thinks, Anchali was engaged in a 'kind of a sabotage behavior.' The study provides more evidence that elephants can use manipulate objects in sophisticated ways. Other studies showed them peeling bananas and using branches to swat flies away.
Lena Kaufmann, a doctoral student in Brecht's lab and an author of the paper, said that an elephant might have 'a somewhat intuitive understanding for a hose, because it's super similar to the trunk.' Kaufmann initially noticed Mary's showering skills while watching the zookeepers make their rounds, using a hose to rinse off each elephant. But when they got to Mary, they simply handed her the hose. — EMILY ANTHES / NYT

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This Dinosaur Had Feathers and Probably Flew Like a Chicken
This Dinosaur Had Feathers and Probably Flew Like a Chicken

Observer

time3 days ago

  • Observer

This Dinosaur Had Feathers and Probably Flew Like a Chicken

In 1861, scientists discovered Archaeopteryx, a dinosaur with feathers, in 150 million-year-old limestones in Solnhofen, Germany. They didn't know it at the time, but that fossilized skeleton — and the several that followed — provided a key piece of evidence for the theory of evolution, as well as for the fact that birds were actually dinosaurs. Since then, researchers have pored over every detail of available specimens, trying to puzzle out how birds came to fly. So you might expect that such a well-studied fossil species wouldn't be capable of surprises. But in a new paper, a team led by Jingmai O'Connor, a paleontologist at the Field Museum in Chicago, revealed previously unrecorded soft tissues and skeletal details from a new specimen, known as the Chicago Archaeopteryx. What they found also helps explain why some feathered dinosaurs got off the ground, if only for short-haul flights. Many Archaeopteryx specimens are too flattened by geology to discern important skeletal details. The latest specimen, acquired by the Field Museum in 2022, let O'Connor's team address some of the anatomical uncertainties. Unlike other specimens, the bones of the Chicago Archaeopteryx were preserved in three dimensions, allowing the researchers to better evaluate the skull's palate. That showed the earliest signs of an evolutionary trajectory toward the skulls of modern birds. In another accident of fossilization, the carcass's wings were separated from the body, leaving them 'pristinely preserved.' The team confirmed that rather than having two layers of wing feathers, Archaeopteryx actually had three. In modern birds, that third layer helps link the shorter forearm to the body to create a continuous lift surface, which allows for sustained flight. — ASHER ELBEIN / NYT

A Roman Gladiator and a Lion Met in Combat. Only One Walked Away.
A Roman Gladiator and a Lion Met in Combat. Only One Walked Away.

Observer

time05-05-2025

  • Observer

A Roman Gladiator and a Lion Met in Combat. Only One Walked Away.

Gladiators battled lions and other wild animals in the arenas of the Roman Empire. But for all the tales of combat depicted in ancient texts, marble reliefs and mosaics, and then retold in movies and other modern media, archaeologists have never found direct physical evidence, such as skeletons of gladiators bearing animal-induced wounds. At last, proof of classical combat between man and beast has been found in the form of a skeleton from a Roman settlement in Britain. The skeleton was discovered 20 years ago, in an excavation spurred by a couple hoping to renovate the yard of their home in the English city of York. An initial survey turned up evidence of an ancient cemetery, halting the construction plans. 'Britain is rich with Roman archaeology,' said Tim Thompson, an anthropologist at Maynooth University in Ireland and an author of a paper that describes the discovery in the journal PLOS One. 'You pretty much can't shove a spade in the ground without hitting something ancient and archaeological.' The larger site contained the buried remains of more than 80 individuals, and many of their bodies showed signs of trauma. The demographics of the deceased, the types of injuries in their bones and the manner in which they were interred suggested that they had fought as gladiators about 1,800 years ago, when what is now York was an outpost of the Roman Empire. One skeleton in particular, identified by researchers as 6DT19, had unusual wounds: small indentations in the hip bones. Other researchers had noted that these notches looked like bite marks from a large animal, perhaps a lion. To determine if the indentations of 6DT19's hip really were bite marks, Thompson and his colleagues first had to collect data on what the bite marks of large mammals look like. For that, they made a somewhat unusual request of several British zoos: a chance to examine their lions' leftovers. By shining a grid of light on the bones gnawed on by zoo animals, the researchers created a map of the dimensions and depth of the animals' bites. They then created a map of 6DT19's hip bones and compared the bite marks left by the different animals with the indentations on the skeleton. Sure enough, the Roman combatant's injuries were best explained by a lion's bite. However, the hip bite probably isn't what killed 6DT19. 'We think the individual was incapacitated in some way, and then the animal came along, bit and dragged the body away,' Thompson said. — KATE GOLEMBIEWSKI /NYT

This Tree Wants to Be Struck by Lightning
This Tree Wants to Be Struck by Lightning

Observer

time04-05-2025

  • Observer

This Tree Wants to Be Struck by Lightning

When lightning strikes a tree in the tropics, the whole forest explodes. 'At their most extreme, it kind of looks like a bomb went off,' said Evan Gora, a forest ecologist at the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in Millbrook, New York. Dozens of trees around the one that was struck are electrocuted. Within months, a sizable circle of forest can wither away. Somehow, a single survivor stands, seemingly healthier than ever. A new study by Gora, published in the journal New Phytologist, reveals that some of the biggest trees in a rainforest don't just survive lightning strikes. They thrive. Gora set out to study whether individual trees in the rainforest in Panama's Barro Colorado Nature Monument benefit from being struck by lightning. And if they did, does that help the population of the species survive at a larger scale? Members of Gora's team developed a method for monitoring lightning strikes and triangulating their electromagnetic signals. From 2014-19, their system captured 94 lightning strikes on trees. The researchers discovered that 85 species had been struck and seven survived, but one stood out literally and figuratively: Dipteryx oleifera, a towering species that had been struck nine times, including one tree that had been hit twice and seemed more vigorous. Dipteryx oleifera stands 30% taller than the rest of the trees and has a crown 50% larger than others, as if it is an arboreal lightning rod. All the struck Dipteryx oleifera trees survived lightning strikes, but 64% of other species died within two years. Trees surrounding Dipteryx oleifera were 48% more likely to die after a lightning strike than those around other species. In one die-off, a single strike killed 57 trees around Dipteryx oleifera 'while the central tree is just happy and healthy,' Gora said. The clearing of neighboring trees and choking vines meant struck Dipteryx oleifera trees had less competition for light, making it easier to grow and produce more seeds. Researchers estimated getting struck multiple times could extend a Dipteryx oleifera tree's life by almost 300 years. — REBECCA DZOMBAK / NYT

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store