logo
Teens accused of gunning down homeless man near Albuquerque arroyo

Teens accused of gunning down homeless man near Albuquerque arroyo

Yahoo19 hours ago

Jun. 5—When officers responded to gunfire along an Albuquerque ditch last month, a man living in a tent said he told off two teenagers firing guns in the area. Two hours later, two gunshots were detected near the tent and the homeless man was found shot to death the next morning.
Now, Joshua Curtis, 18, and Adrian Brown, 17, are behind bars in his death.
Curtis and Brown, both of Albuquerque, are each charged with an open count of murder, conspiracy, negligent use of a deadly weapon and unlawful carrying of a handgun in the May 1 death of Christopher Sturluson, 23. Brown is also charged with shooting at a dwelling or occupied building.
Curtis was arrested May 28 and booked into the Metropolitan Detention Center, Albuquerque Police Department spokesperson Gilbert Gallegos said in a news release. Brown was already behind bars at the Bernalillo County juvenile detention center when the charges were filed against him Tuesday.
It is unclear what Brown was already booked into jail for, but he was on juvenile probation at the time of the killing, 2nd Judicial District Attorney's Office spokesperson Nancy Laflin said.
Two years ago, he was arrested for bringing a firearm to Sandia High School. A year later, Brown was arrested for another gun-related crime, District Attorney Sam Bregman said. It is unclear what that crime was or the outcome of the case.
"He received little to no consequences for his multiple juvenile arrests involving firearms," Bregman said in a statement Thursday, without elaborating on the specifics. "... He didn't learn anything except that he could get away with carrying a gun as he pleased. Now, a 23-year-old man is dead, and two teens are charged with murder."
Curtis and Brown were identified as the suspects through video surveillance and photographs, Gallegos said.
At 9:43 a.m. on May 1, APD responded to a call of a homicide in the 4600 block of Carlisle NE, north of Montgomery, near Interstate 25, according to a criminal complaint filed in Metropolitan Court. Arriving officers found Sturluson dead with blood on his face and neck, police said.
Officers had been in the area around 9:30 p.m. after gunfire was detected in the area, the complaint states. Sturluson told police he was in his tent when he heard shots and told two teens — later identified as Curtis and Brown — "to get the (expletive) out of here."
At 11:49 p.m., the ShotSpotter system detected two shots near the tent, the complaint states. A neighbor told police they saw two males run through an apartment parking lot, one carrying a gun, while the other picked up bullet casings.
The neighbor took photos of the males and uploaded them to evidence.com, where the public can share evidence of a crime, according to the complaint. One of the photos showed a man — later identified as Curtis — firing a gun minutes before the fatal shooting.
At an apartment complex near the crime scene, police spoke to two girls who said they saw Brown, Curtis and their girlfriends near the arroyo, according to the complaint. One girl said she heard Brown say, "That was me, I was shooting at the ditch with these idiots."
Police questioned Brown, who lived at the complex, but he denied shooting Sturluson and said the boys walked away after he yelled at them, the complaint states. Apartment surveillance cameras showed Brown and Curtis walking east of the tent about a minute before shots were fired, police said.
Police linked the casings from behind Sturluson's tent to casings found from the shooting hours earlier, according to the complaint. Detectives found that, after the incident, Brown sent Curtis a social media message, saying, "I didn't snitch you better not either."
Twenty minutes after the shooting, Curtis sent a woman a text, saying, "I'm not perfect or the best looking but I'll always defend you there's the proof I'll kill someone for you," police said.
Prosecutors filed a pretrial motion to keep Curtis behind bars, saying Curtis and Brown "showed a complete disregard for human life because they knew that Sturluson was camped where they were shooting."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legal Experts: How U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling on ‘Reverse Discrimination' Will Make Things Worse For Black Americans
Legal Experts: How U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling on ‘Reverse Discrimination' Will Make Things Worse For Black Americans

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Legal Experts: How U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling on ‘Reverse Discrimination' Will Make Things Worse For Black Americans

After the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a 'reverse discrimination' claim, Black Americans are left wondering how this new precedent will impact them. The court's decision came down on Thursday (June 5), adding to the growing list of the judges' past controversial decisions on civil and social liberties. A woman named Marlean Ames is suing her employer in Ohio after she alleged she was passed up on a promotion because she is a straight woman, according to BBC. Instead, her gay boss hired another gay employee for the job, which Ames claims was a clear act of gender discrimination. Several lower level courts didn't agree with her. That's when she took things to the highest court in the land, who ultimately ruled with an unanimous vote. The Root spoke to Marc Brown, founding attorney at Marc Brown law Firm, who said 'the floodgates have been let open' for discrimination cases of all kinds. In a country where anti-DEI legislation and other attacks to Black history and education has become the norm, the court's ruling is a 'rolling back of some protections that the Supreme Court previously made available for minorities– people that have been subjected to centuries of discrimination,' Brown said. 'But it doesn't mean that she [Ames] wins.' The Supreme Court ruled on the principle of the Constitution, not Ames' case itself. She still must present her case in a lower level court. Regardless, it's not lost on Brown the future implications of such a decision. 'There will likely be a heavy increase of these reverse discrimination lawsuits,' Brown continued. For him, this ruling emphasizes a trend started by majority groups. 'I've noticed over the years, whenever the majority feels threatened or upset, new terms are created.' The term 'reverse discrimination' was in direct retaliation to the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. 'When you look at the historical systemic inequalities over the years or centuries, you know there is no way that minorities are in the power to really discriminate against these individuals,' Brown added. For anyone paying attention to the conservative-led Supreme Court recent history, Ames decision is one of the many giving legs to right-wing agendas. Whether it's reversing Roe v. Wade or Affirmative action in schools back in 2023, the Justices — three of whom were hand picked by President Donald Trump — have made their position clear. But according to Stacey Marques, ESQ, Black Americans shouldn't panic. 'What I tell my sons is the same thing I tell myself: Make sure you bring your A-game to everything that you have the opportunity to work on,' she said. The mother of two also knows the challenges of being Black in America, and she warned Black folks to get prepared. 'With this anti-DEI climate that we're in — also this climate that is encouraging reverse discrimination lawsuits, it's gonna require the younger generation to adopt the ideals as well as the work ethic of the older generation in order to not only survive but to excel,' she added. Marques has been practicing for 25 years, and she said the ruling only adds more to the already full plates of lawyers nationwide. 'Lawyers are so busy now because there's so many things happening,' she said referring to Trump's blitz of pending lawsuits and court decisions. 'We are in a constitutional crisis.' continued to 11 years 'Anytime the Supreme Court speaks, everyone listens.' '

Sheena Scarbrough told Sade Robinson, 'Baby, Mommy's got this,' the night before trial verdict
Sheena Scarbrough told Sade Robinson, 'Baby, Mommy's got this,' the night before trial verdict

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Sheena Scarbrough told Sade Robinson, 'Baby, Mommy's got this,' the night before trial verdict

Sade Robinson's mother barely slept the night before the verdict was rendered in the trial of Maxwell Anderson in Robinson's death. During the night, Sheena Scarbrough spoke to her slain daughter. "I told her, 'Baby, Mommy's got this,'" she said. Surrounded by family, Scarbrough talked to the media June 6 after a jury in Milwaukee County Circuit Court found Anderson guilty of all four charges — first-degree intentional homicide, mutilation of a corpse, hiding a corpse and arson — in the April 2024 death of Robinson, 19, after they went on a date in Milwaukee. After initially hesitating to speak, Scarbrough talked about Robinson's smile and her aura. They video-called one another in the days before her disappearance and murder, she said. "She will be forever remembered as an angel," Scarbrough said. "She is our hero." She addressed her outburst directed at Anderson at the end of the trial's first week May 31, calling him a "devil." Robinson's uncle, David Scarbrough II, interjected, saying "he is a devil." The family also addressed the decision by defense attorney Anthony Cotton to disclose that meth pills were found in a safe in Robinson's home. David called him a "clout chaser." "Dragging my daughter's name in her demise. He was wrong from that one," Sheena said. She urged people to support missing Black and Brown women, and advocated for a state taskforce to be made. More: Wisconsin lawmakers tried to create a task force for missing and murdered Black women. Will this year be different? Verona E. Swanigan, Scarbrough's attorney, noted that Scarbrough's health needs have been put on hold until the trial could be completed. That resulted in her missing a day of the trial due to sleep, Swanigan said. Scarbrough acknowledged that when she spoke. "I haven't really had a day to grieve since April of last year," she said. Swanigan thanked the jury, the judge and the community. "It has been a long year," she said. "It has been a mountain of grief no parent should have to bear." Swanigan noted that Robinson's family intends to fight for legislation to combat sex-trafficking and kidnapping of women. She acknowledged State Rep. Sheila Stubbs, who stood alongside Robinson's family on the day of the verdict, calling Stubbs "instrumental" in advocating for such policies. Robinson's family will continue to pursue their civil case against Anderson, Swanigan said. The family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Anderson in June 2024, and sued the two bars Robinson attended with Anderson on the night of her death in April 2025. Swanigan added that the family hopes to force Anderson to participate in a deposition so that many of their outstanding questions about Robinson's death might be answered. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Sade Robinson is 'our hero,' mother Sheena Scarbrough says after trial

Maxwell Anderson found guilty on all counts in murder of Sade Robinson. What to know about verdict
Maxwell Anderson found guilty on all counts in murder of Sade Robinson. What to know about verdict

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Maxwell Anderson found guilty on all counts in murder of Sade Robinson. What to know about verdict

(This story was updated to add more information.) A Milwaukee County jury on June 6 convicted 34-year-old Maxwell Anderson of killing and mutilating 19-year-old Sade Robinson last April. Jurors listened to eight days of witness testimony and delivered the verdict after less than an hour of deliberation. Here's what to know: Yes, jurors found Anderson guilty of first-degree intentional homicide, mutilation of a corpse, hiding a corpse and arson. Jurors took about 45 minutes total to deliberate and find Anderson guilty of all charges. They deliberated for about 15 minutes starting at 4:40 p.m. on June 5, and for about 30 minutes between 8:30 and 9:00 a.m. June 6. Anderson remained largely still as the verdicts were read out, appearing to swallow and blink a few times. Scarbrough spoke to the media after the verdict, saying of her daughter: "She will be forever remembered as an angel. She is a hero." Scarbrough later urged support for missing Black and Brown women, and advocated for the creation of a state taskforce. More: Wisconsin lawmakers tried to create a task force for missing and murdered Black women. Will this year be different? Swanigan said the Robinson family will continue to pursue its civil case against Anderson. She added that Robinson's family hopes to force Anderson to participate in a deposition, so outstanding questions about her death might be answered. The family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Anderson in June 2024, and sued the two bars Robinson attended with Anderson on the night of her death in April 2025. Later, the attorney chastised some media outlets' decision to publish graphic images during the proceedings. Vance-Curzan said the state was 'feeling confident' throughout the trial, going on to say authorities spent "countless hours" investigating. 'When a case is investigated the way this one was investigated, the evidence just spoke for itself,' he said. The prosecutor also said he was thinking of Robinson's family. 'While we are satisfied with this verdict, our hearts go out to the family of Sade Robinson,' he said. 'This is a tragedy, and I'm just hopeful this verdict will be a step towards healing.' Cotton told WISN-12 News he wasn't surprised by the jury's quick deliberation. 'We respect the jury's verdict,' Cotton said. 'We understand they had a very difficult job to do. They obviously thought about it overnight.' He also said there was a "sense of relief" with the end of the trial. Cotton reportedly received personal threats. 'My heart goes out to Sade's family,' he added. 'I can't imagine what they're going through." Anderson will be sentenced at 10 a.m. Aug. 15. A conviction for first-degree intentional homicide carries a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment in Wisconsin. It's possible that Anderson could serve part of the sentence in prison and then be eligible for extended supervision, but it will be decided by a judge. No, Wisconsin doesn't have the death penalty. Chris Ramirez, David Clarey, Maia Pandey, Sophie Carson and Ariela Lopez contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Maxwell Anderson trial in Milwaukee: What to know about the guilty verdicts

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store