logo
South-East Asia risks becoming cyber fraud hub, Azam Baki warns

South-East Asia risks becoming cyber fraud hub, Azam Baki warns

The Star14 hours ago

KOTA KINABALU: South-East Asia is fast becoming a hub for cyber-enabled fraud with cross-border criminal syndicates exploiting digital platforms and weak governance to perpetrate large-scale financial scams, says Tan Sri Azam Baki.
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner said recent investigations, both domestic and international, pointed to disturbing activity of transnational digital crime networks in the region.
'Digital platforms have become the preferred medium for fraud syndicates. These groups are sophisticated, well-funded, and take advantage of gaps in regulation and enforcement across jurisdictions,' he said at the International Conference on Technology, Management and Sustainability (ICTMS 2025) here on Wednesday (June 18).
ALSO READ: Online fraud cases see big jump in early 2025
Addressing the growing global challenge of digital crime and corruption, he said Malaysia had taken steps to disrupt these criminal networks by working with partners such as Interpol.
He cited the wide-ranging Ops Tropicana probe of investment scams and digital fraud operations as an example.
'Ops Tropicana uncovered large-scale investment fraud involving the use of online platforms, digital wallets and cross-border fund transfers.
"These syndicates often enlist professional enablers, including accountants, company secretaries, and legal advisers, to legitimise their operations.
'These are not simple scams. They are well-structured operations... (that are) much harder to detect and prosecute,' he said.
ALSO READ: Quantum leap in cybersecurity and fighting fraud
MACC intelligence found that digital fraud syndicates have evolved from petty online scams into highly organised ecosystems, often operating call centres and shell companies across the region to mask their activities, he noted.
'These criminal networks are agile. They move operations across borders, target regulatory grey zones, and adapt rapidly to enforcement tactics,' Azam said, stressing the need for international cooperation to fight this threat.
Azam also called for stronger legal frameworks governing technology, more robust oversight of digital finance and fintech (financial technology) platforms, and tightening company formation procedures, which are often exploited to hide ownership and the flow of illicit funds.
'Digitalisation has unlocked tremendous opportunities, but it has also created new risks. It is time for regulators, businesses, and governments to work together in preventing digital platforms from becoming safe havens for crime,' he said.
He also told conference participants in his keynote address that digitalisation without ethical oversight is a recipe for disaster.
ALSO READ: Scam calls hit record in Thailand before cyber fraud crackdown
He said that while digital tools such as artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain offer vast potential, they must be accompanied by strong governance frameworks.
'Without proper oversight, automation can be abused. Without proper controls, these innovations become vulnerabilities, not solutions.
'Technology is not the enemy. Poor governance is.
"Corrupt individuals exploited system loopholes, not because the technology failed, but because the human controls around it were weak.
"In the rush to digitalise, many forget that machines do not make ethical decisions, people do. We cannot rely on technology alone to prevent abuse. We need oversight, we need regulation, and above all, we need integrity,' he stressed.
To mitigate risks, Azam proposed a modern anti-corruption strategy grounded in digital integrity.
ALSO READ: Trapped in cycle of scams
This includes the use of blockchain forensics, AI (artificial intelligence)-driven auditing, real-time surveillance systems, and stronger collaboration between regulators, academia and enforcement agencies.
'Digital systems must not just be smart … they must be governed smartly. It is time we reform not just our tools, but our thinking,' he said.
He added that good technology must be matched with capable leadership.
'When management neglects controls, digital platforms can be hijacked. Whether it's social aid being redirected to ghost recipients or ESG (environmental, social and governance) claims manipulated with falsified data, the result is the same: fraud thrives where governance fails," he said.
He encouraged participants, who included academics, researchers and industry professionals, to be active in promoting responsible digital development.
'Let this conference spark new collaborations to advance not only technology, but the values that guide it,' he said.
ICTMS 2025, organised by Universiti Teknology Mara's (UiTM) Accounting Research Institute (ARI), focuses on the intersection of technology, ethics and sustainability.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No whistleblower protection for Sabah case informant– MACC
No whistleblower protection for Sabah case informant– MACC

New Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

No whistleblower protection for Sabah case informant– MACC

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has confirmed that the person set to be charged alongside two Sabah assemblymen in connection with a corruption case involving mineral mining licences is not protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. Its Legal and Prosecution senior director, Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, said Section 11(1) of the Act clearly states that anyone involved in the offence they report is not eligible for protection. "If a person is involved in the wrongdoing, they are not protected under the Act and therefore cannot be considered a whistleblower," he told Bernama today. He said to qualify for protection, a report must be made in good faith to a recognised enforcement agency such as the MACC, the police, or other authorised government bodies. "Reports made with malicious intent, such as to seek revenge or defame others, do not meet the criteria for protection," he added. Wan Shaharuddin also stressed that a key requirement under Section 11(1) is that the whistleblower must not be complicit in the wrongdoing being reported. If found otherwise, any protection granted may be revoked. "This is to preserve the integrity of the whistleblower framework and prevent it from being misused as a 'shield' by those trying to escape accountability," he said. Earlier, the individual's lawyer claimed his client was a whistleblower who had cooperated with authorities, but was later informed he would be charged in court on June 30. Recently, several video clips allegedly featuring conversations involving certain individuals and Sabah elected representatives discussing corrupt practices linked to mineral mining activities went viral on social media. Previously, MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki confirmed that two Sabah assemblymen and another individual are expected to be charged in court this month in connection with the scandal. – BERNAMA

Individual In Sabah Mineral Licence Case Not Protected Under Whistleblower Act
Individual In Sabah Mineral Licence Case Not Protected Under Whistleblower Act

Barnama

time5 hours ago

  • Barnama

Individual In Sabah Mineral Licence Case Not Protected Under Whistleblower Act

KUALA LUMPUR, June 18 (Bernama) -- The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has confirmed that the individual set to be charged alongside two Sabah assemblymen in connection with a corruption case involving mineral mining licences is not protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. Its Legal and Prosecution senior director, Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, said Section 11(1) of the Act clearly states that anyone involved in the offence they report is not eligible for protection. 'If a person is involved in the wrongdoing, they are not protected under the Act and therefore cannot be considered a whistleblower,' he told Bernama today. He said to qualify for protection, a report must be made in good faith to a recognised enforcement agency such as the MACC, the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM), or other authorised government bodies. 'Reports made with malicious intent, such as to seek revenge or defame others, do not meet the criteria for protection,' he added. Wan Shaharuddin also stressed that a key requirement under Section 11(1) is that the whistleblower must not be complicit in the wrongdoing being reported. If found otherwise, any protection granted may be revoked. 'This is to preserve the integrity of the whistleblower framework and prevent it from being misused as a 'shield' by those trying to escape accountability,' he said. Earlier, the individual's lawyer claimed his client was a whistleblower who had cooperated with authorities, but was later informed he would be charged in court on June 30. Recently, several video clips allegedly featuring conversations involving certain individuals and Sabah elected representatives discussing corrupt practices linked to mineral mining activities went viral on social media.

'Whistleblower' in Sabah mining scandal not protected because they were part of the wrongdoing, says MACC
'Whistleblower' in Sabah mining scandal not protected because they were part of the wrongdoing, says MACC

The Star

time5 hours ago

  • The Star

'Whistleblower' in Sabah mining scandal not protected because they were part of the wrongdoing, says MACC

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has confirmed that the individual set to be charged alongside two Sabah assemblymen in connection with a corruption case involving mineral mining licences is not protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. Its Legal and Prosecution senior director, Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, said Section 11(1) of the Act clearly states that anyone involved in the offence they report is not eligible for protection. "If a person is involved in the wrongdoing, they are not protected under the Act and therefore cannot be considered a whistleblower,' he told Bernama on Wednesday (June 18). He said to qualify for protection, a report must be made in good faith to a recognised enforcement agency such as the MACC, the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM), or other authorised government bodies. "Reports made with malicious intent, such as to seek revenge or defame others, do not meet the criteria for protection,' he added. Wan Shaharuddin also stressed that a key requirement under Section 11(1) is that the whistleblower must not be complicit in the wrongdoing being reported. If found otherwise, any protection granted may be revoked. "This is to preserve the integrity of the whistleblower framework and prevent it from being misused as a 'shield' by those trying to escape accountability,' he said. Earlier, the individual's lawyer claimed his client was a whistleblower who had cooperated with authorities, but was later informed he would be charged in court on June 30. Recently, several video clips allegedly featuring conversations involving certain individuals and Sabah elected representatives discussing corrupt practices linked to mineral mining activities went viral on social media. Previously, MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki confirmed that two Sabah assemblymen and another individual are expected to be charged in court this month in connection with the scandal.- Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store