
‘The Last of Us' Season 2, Episode 6: The root of Ellie's anger and estrangement
This story contains many spoilers for 'The Last of Us' Season 2, Episode 6.
The infected have learned to stalk and sprint. The Cordyceps fungus is now airborne. And Joel (Pedro Pascal) isn't immortal. The first five episodes of 'The Last of Us' offered up several new threats and at least one major death. Deep into its second season, HBO's series adaptation of the popular video game remains true to its namesake by sending its protagonist Ellie (Bella Ramsey) and her partner Dina (Isabela Merced) on a revenge mission from their fortified compound in Wyoming to the wilds of Seattle. Their aim is to find Joel's killer, Abby (Kaitlyn Dever). But the Pacific Northwest presents challenges beyond cauliflower-headed flesh eaters and deadly mean girls. The brutal conflict between the Washington Liberation Front and the primitive religious cult the Seraphites makes Ellie's mission all the more dangerous and complex — and the show's imagery more gruesome.
Episode 6 brought Joel back from the dead in a series of flashbacks that gave insight into his unique parenting skills, revealed the event that triggered the rift between Joel and Ellie and uncovers what happened to therapist Gail's (Catherine O'Hara's) husband, Eugene (Joe Pantoliano). While on patrol, Eugene was bitten by the infected. Ellie made Joel promise he would not kill Eugene until he had the chance to say goodbye to his wife. But when Ellie leaves for a moment to retrieve their horses, Joel breaks the promise.
Like Episode 3 of Season 1, Sunday's installment of the series was the rare episode that deviated from the game's narrative to tell a deeper story about the characters. Beginning at Ellie's 15th birthday and moving through subsequent ones, the episode chronicled the shifting dynamic in the main characters' father-daughter relationship, from a tight bond between orphan and her adopted protector to near estrangement.
Lorraine Ali, Tracy Brown and Mary McNamara gathered to discuss the latest episode of the spore-filled thriller.
Ali: 'The Last of Us' features flesh-eating zombie-like things and death-worshipping cults, but I love that the true terror at the heart of Season 2 is the prospect of parenting a teen. The theme at the core of Episode 6 was largely centered on the fraught father-daughter dynamic between Joel and Ellie and the dangers of passing down generational trauma. We even get some backstory on Joel's rough childhood, though I wish there had been more on that front.
What we do get a lot more of is Ellie's hostility toward Joel, and it's exhausting in ways that the showrunners probably never intended. Naturally there is plenty of ire in Ellie as she hurtles toward adulthood in a hopeless hellscape with an assassin/guardian who's repeatedly lied to her. But now that she's the lead character of the series, I need more from Ellie than just one or two gears of rage and scorn, especially given the complexity of their relationship.
Joel killed to save her and doomed humanity in the process! A bond forged in such tragedy should inspire a truckload of emotions, even in a defiant teen who's still clumsy at expressing her feelings. But that depth or nuance just wasn't there for me, even when the series cued us up for such moments. The flashbacks to Ellie's birthday celebrations with Joel felt like explainers of how the two grew apart as opposed to emotional snapshots that captured the roots of their estrangement. Maybe I've been spoiled by the surprising depth and beauty of Season 1? I miss the terror and joy of that abandoned mall.
Brown: It's interesting that you mention the abandoned mall, Lorraine, because I think that's what it all comes back to for Ellie. I don't know if it's because I've spent many hours playing as Ellie in 'The Last of Us' games, or because I understand what it's like to be an angsty teenager much more than being a parent, but I thought Episode 6 did help shed some light on Ellie and Joel's behaviors and dynamic.
Back in Episode 4, while trying to explain her immunity to the Cordyceps fungus to Dina, Ellie mentions that there are a lot of the times she wishes she wasn't immune. In this latest episode, we learn that one of the reasons Ellie is angry with Joel is because he lied to her about what happened back in Salt Lake City with the Fireflies. But she's also mad at him because he took away the one thing she thought could give her life and immunity purpose. 'My life would have mattered, but you took that from me,' she says to him on their porch, in what appears to have been their very last conversation.
We know that Joel's been shaped by the guilt of not being able to save his daughter Sarah at the start of the outbreak. For Ellie, I think the loss that's affected her the most is Riley and the guilt of surviving their trip to that abandoned mall. If she wasn't immune, Ellie would have died that day with her best friend and first love. Because she didn't, she needed something to help justify why she's still alive. What greater meaning could someone find for their life in a world ravaged by a pandemic than to be the reason humanity is able to find a cure?
McNamara: I'm grateful for the episode if only because it gave my own teenagers what they wanted most — more Pedro Pascal. (I miss him too but with much less passion.) But as you say, Tracy, survivor's guilt is real and now Ellie is eyeing another emotional burden — Joel was killed for actions he took to save her life.
Revisiting Ellie's birthdays was very touching, bridging the changes in both characters. How the hard-edge Joel from Season 1 became the softly anguished therapy patient of Season 2. Why Ellie was so rude and dismissive toward him. She knew all along that he had lied to her about Salt Lake City, and he suspected she knew — the presents, especially the trip to the science and natural history museum, seemed equally motivated by love and penance.
I also loved their time in the the space portion of the museum because it underlined the vagaries of human history — this is not the first advanced civilization to fall, leaving ruins behind. Joel remembers when humans traveled to the stars (and had the resources to build museums); for Ellie, a journey from Wyoming to Seattle is just as fraught. They were always essentially time-travelers in each others lives.
But most important for me, this episode resolved just how Ellie had left it with Joel before Abby ruined everything. The truth was finally spoken — both Joel's and Ellie's. That she didn't think she could forgive him but she wanted to try. That he was taken from her before she could find her way to forgiveness must certainly drive some of the rage, no?
Ali: OK, I officially feel hard-hearted, especially since we're discussing an episode designed to plumb the characters' and viewers' emotions. I'm glad Season 2 is connecting with you both, and millions more HBO and Max subscribers. Or is it HBO Max? Or plain old HBO? Regardless, this round of the series is not resonating with my adult, parenting self or my inner sullen teen, i.e. the part of my being that guides many of my rash decisions and dictates my slouchy posture. That said, I do love the chemistry between Ellie and Dina. Their love and fierce loyalty toward one another is a high point of Season 2. And it looks like they're now going to be parents.
Brown: As Ellie says, she's going to be a dad! The way Ellie and Dina's relationship developed over the course of the season has been one of my favorite differences between the show and the game. But speaking of the game, the birthday trip to the museum and the porch conversation where Ellie tells Joel she wants to try to forgive him that Mary mentioned are both big flashback moments directly adapted from 'The Last of Us Part II' with some minor changes. In the game, Ellie and Joel spend time checking out a dinosaur exhibit before getting to the space exploration exhibit, which I admit I'm a little sad we did not get to see. And Ellie confronting Joel about the truth of what happened in Salt Lake is a separate moment long before the porch conversation in the game.
One major difference between 'The Last of Us Part II' and the show is the storyline involving Eugene and Gail. The Eugene in the game was a resident of Jackson who lived out his life until he died of natural causes in his 70s, which is something the younger generation can only dream of. Gail, on the other hand, is an original character, and my response to her introduction was mostly 'hooray Catherine O'Hara, hooray therapy.' Catherine O'Hara is always a delight and it's clear everybody living in the world of 'The Last of Us' could use some therapy. But in Episode 6 we see that Eugene and Gail's story also serves as a flashpoint in Joel and Ellie's estrangement.
We already knew Joel had killed Eugene from his therapy session with Gail earlier in the season, but what did you think about that whole sequence, Mary? Did it affect your understanding of Joel or Ellie in any way?
McNamara: Well, I have to say that was an example of bad parenting. The patrol has rules, tough but necessary for the safety of the community. Ellie (who is, hello, freaking immune) wanted to bend them. Classic parent/child face-off. But instead of just saying 'no' to her and 'any last words?' to Eugene before shooting him, Joel allowed her believe she was getting her way, which was just dumb. Of course he was going to shoot Eugene; he had to shoot Eugene. But it honestly did not make sense to lie about it, especially when the lie would be exposed almost instantly. Sometimes a parent just has to be the bad guy, even if it means making Catherine O'Hara really mad at you.
And though I agree with you both about the energy of Ellie and Dina offering love in place of vengeance during their excursion to Seattle, I wish the writers could have figured out a way to bring O'Hara along.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Devin Harjes, 'Boardwalk Empire' star, dead at 41
Devin Lee Harjes, who portrayed Jack Dempsey in "Boardwalk Empire," died Tuesday, May 27, in New York, his representative confirmed to Fox News Digital. He was 41. Harjes died due to complications from cancer at Mount Sinai West Hospital in New York City. He was diagnosed with cancer in the winter. The award-winning actor made his television debut in 2011 with the acclaimed HBO series. He starred alongside Steve Buscemi, Michael Kenneth Williams, Michael Pitt and Richard Harrow. "Desperate Housewives" Star Valerie Mahaffey Dead At 71 "He was an artist of great conviction who never gave less than one hundred percent to any role he undertook," his representative, David Williams, told Fox News Digital. "As a person, he was generous, kind, understanding and devoted to his family and friends, a great horseback rider and had a magic way with all animals. He was at home in the back country of the Rocky Mountains, the plains of west Texas or the middle of Hell's Kitchen. He will be missed." Read On The Fox News App Harjes most recently portrayed Pete Baylor on the television series, "Manifest." Hollywood Stars Who Died In 2025: Photos Born in Lubbock, Texas, Harjes studied acting in college and launched his career in the Dallas-Fort Worth theater before pursuing acting in New York City. With a few short films under his belt, Harjes starred in "The Forest is Red," where he earned best actor at the Tolentino International Film Festival in Italy. Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News He earned acclaim for his role in the 2012 coming-of-age flick, "Boyz of Summer," and then worked on "Blue Bloods" before returning to short films. Harjes appeared in the "Gotham" television series, in addition to "Daredevil" and "Elementary." Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter The actor worked alongside Nicholas Hoult and Kevin Spacey in the 2017 movie, "Rebel in the Rye," which was based on the life of "The Catcher in the Rye" author J.D. Salinger. "Outside of acting, Devin was a dedicated student of martial arts and a regular at the gym — he often joked it was safer than getting kicked in the face by a horse," his obituary said. "Devin is survived by his loving parents, Randy and Rosanne Harjes; his sister Trish Harjes and her husband Justin Kelley; nephews Tristin and Sawyer Kelley; nieces Rory and Charly Kelley; his former wife Shiva Shobitha; his beloved cat, Maude; and countless friends whose lives were brighter … or at least more entertaining … because of him."Original article source: Devin Harjes, 'Boardwalk Empire' star, dead at 41
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘One of the things that made it so special was that it wasn't for everyone': ‘The Leftovers' EPs and cast on the show's legacy
Damon Lindelof is the first to admit that The Leftovers was a bit of a hard sell for mass audiences. The critically acclaimed show, which ran for three seasons from 2014 to 2017 on HBO, attracted a devoted, passionate but relatively small fan base, who were drawn in by the haunting exploration of grief and its aftermath. More from GoldDerby David E. Kelley on the secret of his prolific career: 'Don't ever assume you're smarter than the audience' 'I'm glad I'm still alive': Jon Hamm and John Slattery on 'Mad Men,' 10 years later 'King of the Hill' cast and creators on revival: 'Bobby's got a little bit of fame and a little bit of swagger' Lindelof reunited with executive producers Tom Perrotta (whose novel inspired the series) and Mimi Leder and cast members Carrie Coon (Nora), Amy Brenneman (Laurie), and Ann Dowd (Patti) at the ATX TV Festival in Austin to "reheat" The Leftovers, sharing their first impressions of each other and the series, the most 'terrifying' scene, and the show's lasting legacy. Lindelof revealed he was nervous before his first meeting with Perrotta. 'It was a job interview in a lot of ways, but you just completely and totally put me at ease, and by the end of the meeting, that was the beginning of the next five years of our lives,' said Lindelof. As a fan of Lost, Perrotta said he felt like it was a 'blind date' — 'because what does he think of me?' he recalled wondering. 'And then what I remember feeling was, this guy has the quickest mind that I have encountered and I'm going to have to really be on my toes.' ('Somewhere my wife and son are laughing,' quipped Lindelof.) SEERemembering 'The Leftovers': Why do Emmy voters hate TV's best show so much? Dowd said she wasn't impressed when she first read the script. 'I thought it was ridiculous,' she said. 'And I can tell you I have never loved a character more. I thought, 'Well, what's gonna happen if I'm not talking?' I can't believe the power you have in your room when you're not speaking. Everybody is waiting for you to do what you're going to do. I loved her. It took me a minute but only a minute.' Brenneman said she had 'whiplash' from the transition from her far more glamorous role on Private Practice. 'Damon said, 'Here are the reasons you shouldn't take this job: It shoots in New York, you can't wear any makeup, and you have no lines,' she recalled. laughing. But she said yes because 'I like new things. I don't think I've ever seen this, and you seem to be making it up on the fly.' For Coon, she said it was her first 'real job,' having done mostly theater and some commercials at that point in her career. 'I had no idea what was going to happen and I remember learning several years after the show ended that because I come from the theater and you respect the writer, I was the only actor on the show who wasn't constantly emailing and asking questions,' she said. 'I would just get the script and then I would do it. I still don't do it.' Joked Brenneman, 'That's why you work a lot.' Leder was brought on for the fifth episode, which happened to be the stoning episode. 'How am I going to direct this and not kill the actor?' she worried. (The answer: CGI rocks.) From there, though, she came on board as an executive producer to pursue 'the meaning of life, miracle of life. And I'm still in search of it.' 'You can make a TV show or a movie and it can be really good. But this was making this big beautiful baby that touched everybody's soul,' she said. 'If there's a theme it's that there is so much loss and we continue on. And we live with our loss and our grief we have beautiful lives sometimes.' Lindelof credited Perrotta with the idea of moving the show to Texas for the second season. 'Tom had the initial idea for a town where no one departed in Season 1,' he said. 'And when he pitched the idea, all the writers were like, that idea is so good, we can't burn out the four-week story. So it just sort of sat there in the back of our heads. And when the first season ended, we all sort of really good about this. This was the ending of the novel, we could just end it here. Let's not double down' But then HBO ordered a second season, and the ideas that had been percolating came to the forefront, including Perrotta's pitch for a place that had been protected from the Departure. 'The show ended up dealing with so many different ideas, and it's ultimately, I think, about faith,' said Perrotta. 'But I think for me, it was about randomness and the way people make sense of a random universe. What meaning does Nora derive from what happened to her? What kind of meaning do they derive from their protected status as they perceive it? What does it mean for Nora and her family to show up there?' For her part, Dowd was thrilled about Season 2 — because 'Patti got to talk,' she said. But when she asked Lindelof why, he gave an elliptical answer. 'I think ghosts are more interesting when they're annoyed,' he told her. (Dowd would go on to earn the show's lone Emmy nomination for guest actress in the show's third and final season.) The second season also allowed more joy and warmth and humor to infiltrate the show, recalled Brenneman. 'What I always loved about this premise was something unexplained happens and people have all sorts of responses,' she said. 'Some people go to a faith place, some people go to a nihilistic place, some people crack jokes, some people weep. It gives you a range of things that I feel like we accessed more and more.' Coon recalled her pivotal Season 2 episode, when she went face-to-face with Regina King, administrating the questionnaire. 'I've often said I've only been intimidated two times and that's Holly Hunter and David Thewlis,' she said. 'But that's not true because I was scared of Regina. I was scared of Regina because she's so uniformly excellent. But then you work with her and you realize that the work she has done to get there is in her bones. She's one of the best listeners I've ever worked with.' The scene 'was extraordinary and it was terrifying,' said Coon. 'And it was really a scene that people call back to it a lot when they talk about the show. My makeup artist remembers just the eyelash on my face,' she said. 'But they didn't want to stop the scene.' And the other famous scene that they all debated was Laurie's near-suicide. 'When Laurie went into the water, scuba diving, we as writers were absolutely and totally convinced at the time that we wrote that episode that she was dead,' recalled Lindelof. 'But then everybody was super depressed, and we couldn't generate ideas. 'Finally I walked into Tom's office and I said, 'I think Lori is still alive.' And he was like, 'Thank god, because we've all been talking about it.' That was a case of the show just out and out rejecting something that we were trying to force onto it.' Finally, Lindelof grew emotional talking about the audience's response in the packed Paramount Theater in Austin. 'All I ever wanted to do for a living was tell stories because I was inspired by the stories that were told to me,' he said. 'As proud as I am of the collaborative efforts that remain on other things that I've worked on, this is the one that is the closest to my heart. And one of the things that made it so special was that it wasn't for everyone. So much of the work that we all do and are asked to do is to make it as accessible to as many people as possible. And that isn't to say that we were purposefully trying to exclude people, but what we were after was going to be challenging. The first season in many ways is like, 'Stop f--king watching. You have to lean in. This is going to be a show that's about suffering, and then it's going to be about what people need to do to overcome it or live with it.' And so the idea that there is a theater filled with human beings who understand that and tolerate that and appreciate that, it truly means the world to us.' Best of GoldDerby 'I cried a lot': Rob Delaney on the heart and humor in FX's 'Dying for Sex' — and Neighbor Guy's kick in the 'zone' TV directors roundtable: 'American Primeval,' 'The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power,' 'Paradise' 'Paradise' directors John Requa and Glenn Ficarra on the 'chaos' of crafting 'the world coming to an end' Click here to read the full article.


Time Magazine
7 hours ago
- Time Magazine
The Chilling True Story Behind HBO's The Mortician
HBO's The Mortician, a documentary series premiering June 1, examines the startling true story of a cremator who went to prison for mishandling human remains. In the 1980s, David Sconce ran a cremation business that deliberately mixed up human remains and robbed families of their loved ones' valuables. Sconce, who was in and out of prison after pleading guilty to his crimes in 1989, even speaks in the three-part series. The episodes, premiering weekly, detail the unethical ways that David Sconce increased the cremation business for his family's funeral home, Lamb Funeral Home in Pasadena, California. In the series, Sconce's former employees reveal the terrifying things that they saw while working for him and customers talk about how traumatic it was to receive incorrect remains from Sconce's business. And current morticians weigh in on the correct ways to take care of human remains. Director Joshua Rofé says viewers may be able to relate the cremation scandal to other scandals they see in the news about companies cutting corners in order to make as much profit as possible in exchange for as little work as possible. But in the funeral industry, he says, 'it's pretty damn gruesome.' Here's a look at the most surprising moments in The Mortician. How David Sconce got caught Pasadena-area funeral home directors became suspicious of Sconce when he was completing more cremations than his competitors—and at lower prices. That's because, as former employees explain in the series, Sconce's team would cremate multiple bodies at a time—breaking a collarbone, arm, or leg to squeeze as many bodies into the oven as possible. When his operation moved further out into the California desert, production ramped up, cremating 150-200 bodies at a time. A soldier who liberated Auschwitz happened to live near Sconce's operation in the desert and phoned 911 because he smelled burning flesh, a smell he said he'd never forget after World War II. That's when Sconce got busted. In 1989, Sconce pled guilty to mishandling human remains and mining the corpses' teeth for gold fillings at Lamb Funeral Home. He served a couple of years in prison, and then was sent back in 2013 for violating his lifetime probation by being in possession of a firearm. He was released on parole in 2023. Funeral directors stress in the series that Sconce was a bad apple. They say the Sconce scandal led to more rules and regulations regarding cremations, including laws requiring unannounced inspections of crematories. Taking dental gold or silver is a felony now. How David Sconce carried out the illegal cremation business People who carried out cremations for Sconce recall the red flags they noticed while working for him. Former employees described stripping clothes off of bodies to sell and cutting off body parts to get jewelry to sell. There were running competitions among the employees to see who could fit the most bodies in the oven. Andre Augustine, who worked for Sconce, claims that Sconce's former employees didn't know which remains to put in which box. Clients would get the remains of not only their loved one, but also the remains of other bodies. Sconce's ex-wife Barbara Hunt says her husband was secretive about the cremation business, and claims that she only learned what he was doing from news coverage. But, she recalls, once she saw Sconce sitting on the floor of the garage cracking teeth with a hammer and putting the gold in a styrofoam cup that said 'Au,' the chemical symbol for gold. 'He sold the gold,' Hunt says. 'I just sat there thinking, what world am I in?' Why David Sconce has no regrets Sconce openly talks about cremating multiple bodies at once in the series with no sense of shame. As the series shows, he used to drive a corvette with the license plate 'I BRN 4U.' He argues that because crematories can never clean the ovens of every speck of ash before they put another body into the oven, it justifies what he did. 'Comingling of ash is not a big deal. I don't put any value in anybody after they're gone and dead. They shouldn't when I'm gone and dead. That's not a person anymore.' He said that most families signed up for Sconce to scatter their cremated relatives at sea, with no relatives in attendance, so he doesn't see why anyone would care if the ashes he scattered at sea came from one body or multiple bodies. When asked how he felt about delivering families the cremated remains of multiple people, he said, 'There's no difference in anybody's cremated ash…people just got to be more in control of their emotions. That's not your loved one anymore, and it never has been. Love them when they're here. Period.' Rofé argues that there's more to Sconce's motivation, telling TIME, 'It was about money.' He recalls a moment during the filming when he was alone with Sconce in a motel room and Sconce asked him what Rofé would do if someone gave him so much money to do a documentary that would make Sconce look bad. 'There was a look in his eye unlike any that I'd seen before,' he says. 'It was just scary.' Giving Sconce a voice in the documentary seemed like the right choice to Rofé, who says it's important to not avoid stories about people who have commited crimes. 'If we were to all walk around pretending that everything in this world is hunky dory, we would be doing a great disservice to humanity,' he says. 'But taking a good, hard look at people like this is vital.'