Kāinga Ora to use wool carpet in new state homes
Kāinga Ora has announced it will use wool carpet in new state homes from July, following a directive that government agencies use wool in the construction and refurbishment of their buildings.
The change in procurement rules, to make wool the preferred option in government buildings, was a directive to about 130 agencies in April and takes effect from July.
On Wednesday, the state housing provider announced it would follow suit, with 4500 new state houses expected to be fitted out in the next three years.
The return of wool carpets to state homes was welcomed by Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis and Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson at Fieldays the same day.
"The decision is great news for sheep farmers, and all the New Zealanders whose jobs and incomes are tied to the fortunes of our world-leading wool industry," Willis said.
ADVERTISEMENT
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including passengers stuck on ferry overnight, new flights to Sydney coming, and the weirdest things we leave in Ubers. (Source: 1News)
She said the Government wanted wool producers to have more opportunities to supply woollen products to the construction industry "wherever practical and appropriate".
"Kāinga Ora's new supplier agreement was made possible because the agency chose to re-open an initially nylon-only carpet tender and give wool a chance to compete.
"I'm told woollen carpet manufacturers responded very strongly to that opportunity and that the new carpet supply agreements come with no additional cost."
The new procurement requirements covered government-owned buildings that cost $9 million or more, and refurbishments of more than $100,000.
A spokesperson said the total value of the Kāinga Ora contract was commercially sensitive and couldn't be disclosed.
Nicola Willis speaks to media at Parliament on May 6. (Source: 1News)
ADVERTISEMENT
They said some contracts for carpet in homes had already been let, but under the new supply agreement newly contracted fit-outs would be met through the wool-carpet supply contract.
Where nylon carpet had already been installed in existing homes Kāinga Ora would continue to use nylon carpet for single room or smaller patch repairs.
Willis said the message was clear.
"When wool was put back on the table it more than held its own, delivering value for taxpayers and a win for sheep farmers."
She said the new policy directed government agencies to identify opportunities to use woollen products, and to properly consider a range of factors in procurement including whole-of-life cost, sustainability and health benefits.
"We're leveraging government spending to back the wool industry and the New Zealand economy. I hope private businesses will follow our lead."
A new Kāinga Ora home in Richmond, August 2023. Photo: RNZ / Samantha Gee (Source: rnz.co.nz)
ADVERTISEMENT
She previously said natural qualities allowed wool to dampen sound and absorb pollutants, while woollen fibres contributed to healthier indoor environments by naturally regulating humidity and improving air quality.
Patterson said the move continued to deliver on a New Zealand First and National Party coalition agreement to prefer woollen fibres in government buildings.
"Woollen fibres create safer, healthier and more sustainable living environments for families."
He said the sector contributed $549m to the economy in the financial year ending 2024 from exporting processed and unprocessed wool products.
"The Government is determined to help lift the fortunes of the strong wool sector in supporting our sheep farmers."
rnz.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Business Review
2 hours ago
- National Business Review
RBNZ socks, s*** humans, dunkelflaute, NZME skin
At Fieldays this week, Finance Minister Nicola Willis took the Reserve Bank to task for its handling of Official Information Act requests into the background to Adrian Orr's abrupt departure as the bank's governor. Did we hear that right? Willis was responding to questions after the RBNZ Want to read more? It's easy. Choose your subscription Already have an account? Login Smartphone Only Subscription NZ$29.95 / monthly Monthly Premium Online Subscription NZ$49.95 / monthly Smartphone Only Annual Subscription NZ$299.00 / yearly Yearly Premium Online Subscription NZ$499.00 / yearly Premium Group Membership 10 Users NZ$385 +GST / monthly $38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit Premium Group Membership 20 Users NZ$660 +GST / monthly $33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit Premium Group Membership 50 Users NZ$1375 +GST / monthly $27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit Premium Group Membership 100 Users NZ$2100 +GST / monthly $21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit Yearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace NZ$999.00 / yearly Individual Group membership NBR Marketplace Student Exclusive FREE offer for uni students studying at a New Zealand university (valued at $499). View terms and conditions.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
UN Expert Urges Saudi Arabia To Halt Imminent Execution Of 26 Egyptian Nationals For Drug-Related Offences
Geneva,10 June 2025 The Government of Saudi Arabia must immediately halt the reportedly imminent execution of 26 Egyptian nationals sentenced to death for drug-related offences, in violation of international law, an UN expert said today. 'The Government's claim that applying the death penalty for offences such as smuggling, receiving and distributing narcotic substances under the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act complies with international law is incompatible with its legal obligations under International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,' said Morris Tidball-Binz, the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. 'The right not to be arbitrarily deprived of life is a fundamental tenet of international law, from which no derogation is permitted,' Tidball-Binz said. The 26 Egyptian nationals, currently held on death row in Tabouk prison, have reportedly been informed that their executions will take place shortly after the Eid al-Adha holidays. This follows the execution of two other Egyptians from the same group, carried out on 24 and 25 May respectively, without prior notification to their families. UN experts previously raised these cases with the Government of Saudi Arabia in a formal communication, to which the Government responded. 'The death penalty for drug-related offences fails to meet the threshold of the 'most serious crimes, and lacks conclusive evidence of serving as an effective deterrent,' the expert said. According to court documents reviewed by the expert, some of the Egyptian prisoners were denied legal representation, while others were convicted based on self-incriminating statements which they later retracted in court, claiming that they were made under coercion. 'The right to effective legal representation must be ensured at all stages of criminal proceedings – during interrogations, preliminary hearings, trial, and appeal – and constitutes an effective safeguard against torture and other forms of ill-treatment,' the expert said. 'Violations of fair trial guarantees leading to the imposition of the death penalty render such sentences arbitrary and unlawful,' he added. Since the beginning of 2025, Saudi Arabia has reportedly executed 141 individuals, approximately 68 of whom were foreign nationals. The vast majority were reportedly executed for non-lethal drug offences, in clear violation of international law. Imposing death sentences and carrying out executions for such offences significantly increases the number of people worldwide subjected to punishments fundamentally incompatible with human rights norms, and amounting to arbitrary deprivation of life. 'I urgently call on the Government of Saudi Arabia to halt the planned executions of the 26 Egyptian nationals, to abolish the death penalty for drug-related offences, and to ensure that its drug control policies fully comply with its international human rights obligations, notably the right to life,' the expert said.
NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Auckland's new housing density plans, Wayne Brown's big scheme and more speed limit silliness: Simon Wilson
Remember 2021? That was the year the Labour Government and National Opposition announced a cross-party housing accord. It had a noble goal: to take politics out of the planning for greater density in our big cities. It also had a controversial result: the Medium Density Residential Standards (MDRS), which for many people allowed far too much density, especially when it might be right next to their own villas. Properties could be divided in three, and on each third, a three-storey dwelling could be built. The cross-party accord didn't make it to the next election, with National walking away from it in 2023, but in the way of statutory regulations, the MDRS have lingered on. That's all over now. Bishop and Brown have jointly announced that the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill is back from select committee hearings. A boring name, but this is big. The bill is 'significantly changed' from its original draft and will become law within a month or two. Although the MDRS will be gone, greater density is still coming to Auckland. The ministers call it 'city shaping' and say their aim is to 'fully harness the economic growth benefits of the new City Rail Link'. With more trains and faster journeys, the City Rail Link will make homes and workplaces along all parts of the rail network more attractive, so that's where the Government and council are focusing their density planning. So, instead of allowing three-storey townhouses almost everywhere that wasn't designated 'special character' or 'heritage', the focus will be on transit corridors. Bishop has been working closely on this with Mayor Wayne Brown and his Policy and Planning Committee chair, councillor Richard Hills. The idea driving the minister has always been plain. 'It doesn't make sense that we have single-storey houses on quarter-acre sections a stone's throw away from stations that, in a year or so, will see trains every few minutes,' he said on Wednesday. The Character Coalition, which lobbies to preserve villa suburbs, has responded to this today, saying there are almost no 'quarter-acre' of the kind Bishop describes. Fair point, he exaggerates. But his basic point remains. 'The Government and the [Auckland] Council are investing billions in CRL and have a shared vision for stations that become hubs for public transport, mixed-use development and new housing.' It's not just single-storey houses that could give way to medium-rise development. Low-rise commercial properties are also targeted. Six-storey development will be permitted within walkable distances of train stations and other transit stations such as those on the Northern and Eastern Busways. The revised bill makes specific reference to three railway stations on the Western Line: Maungawhau (Mt Eden), Kingsland and Morningside. 'Successive governments and councils have failed to grasp this opportunity for economic growth in New Zealand's largest city,' Bishop said. 'This is how modern, growing cities all around the world operate, and now it's Auckland's turn.' In my view, Bishop is largely right about all this. The whole process is kind of technical, but bear with me. Since 2022, the council has been working through a long and extremely bureaucratic review called Plan Change 78 (PC78), to identify which parts of the city would be open to the greater density set out in the MDRS. As Bishop says, 'Progress has been slow for many reasons, including the Auckland floods. The intensification plan change process does not allow Auckland to 'downzone' certain areas due to natural hazard risk – only to 'upzone' them – and the council wrote to the Government asking them to fix this problem.' That is, after the 2023 floods it became worrying clear that the planning rules could not prevent development on flood plains. This should now change. The Government will allow the council to withdraw PC78, although not entirely, and not so it can revert to its old ways. Bishop told the council earlier in the year to get its PC78 decision-making done for the central city, and that has now happened. Higher buildings will be permitted, although not everywhere (more on this soon). This aspect of PC78 is not being withdrawn. The precinct around the Morningside train station is top of Minister Bishop's list for more housing density. Photo / Janna Dixon But for the rest of the city, Bishop has instructed Mayor Brown to process a new plan change urgently. They have until October 10 to do it, and the resulting housing capacity must not be less than was going to be permitted under the PC78 and the MDRS. This means that if the council wants to limit density in some areas, like flood plains, it will have to increase the capacity in others. And if the council wants to continue preserving the villa suburbs, it will need to find a way to do that while still allowing medium-rise along the railway lines. And do it inside the next four months. Which, as it happens, is the exact same period in which we will be electing a new council. The last day for voting is October 12. In several parts of the city, this is going to be a very hot election topic. Not least among them, an enormous swathe of suburbia that runs from Kingsland and Sandringham, down through Balmoral and Mt Roskill to Onehunga. This was exempted from planning rules under PC78, pending a decision on the exact route through those suburbs of the Labour Government's ill-fated Auckland Light Rail line to the airport. That exemption will not survive and greater density is likely for these suburbs sooner rather than later. Bishop's intent seems clear: he wants the council to pull finger. 'The government is also considering whether further amendments to the bill to fully maximise development opportunities around other CRL stations are necessary,' he said on Wednesday, 'and I will have more to say in due course.' Anyone for bird bollards? Mayor Brown has instructed Auckland Transport to come up with 'innovative, value for money' ways to create cycleways. Got one! In London, a company has invented Tulip Wands: Tulip bulbs made from recycled plastic that sit atop flexible sticks to warn drivers not to stray into the cycle lane. Tulip cycle wands helping to keep traffic out of a cycleway in London. Cheap and surely guaranteed to bring a smile to your face. But why should London have all the fun? If we did that here, tulips might be a bit odd, and we don't have flowers of our own that could function in a similar way. Kowhai don't really stick up in the same way. Flax caddies would be good, although possibly too complicated. So what about birds? Kiwi, kōtare, kea, kākā, imagine riding along and coming across a kākāpo! Even the ones that don't start with k would work. We could call them Bird Bollards. Or Kiwi Krash Wardens. Or Magic Manu. Hey, Auckland Transport, or Mr Mayor, or absolutely any entrepreneur with an eye for opportunity: you can have this idea for free. What Wayne Brown really wants from this election Why did Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown and his deputy, Desley Simpson, bury the hatchet ahead of the council election in October? They don't get on – even in their joint announcement they said things that annoyed each other. They were going to battle each other for the mayoralty. Simpson explained that when it came down to it, there weren't any big policy differences between the two, which is probably true. But what Brown said pointed to a much stronger purpose for the pair. They're setting up a ticket. Wayne Brown and Desley Simpson announcing they are running together, for mayor and deputy, on a Fix Auckland ticket. Photo / New Zealand Herald Under the name Fix Auckland, which was Brown's slogan in 2022, they are inviting candidates for council to apply to join them. This isn't just to give them a reliable voting bloc, because Brown pretty much has that already. Councillors who might join them, like Greg Sayers in Rodney, Andy Baker in Franklin and Daniel Newman in Manurewa-Papakura, already vote with Brown most of the time. The real value of the ticket is that it will allow Brown to campaign against some of the councillors he believes play obstructive and damaging roles. Top of his list are the two he calls 'the Albanians': Wayne Walker and John Watson, who represent the Albany ward. Both cheered Brown's election in 2022 but they've fallen out badly with him since. The mayor makes no secret of his frustration at their strident opposition to most things he wants to do. That frustration extends to others, most notably Mike Lee from Waitematā and Gulf, who was also a cheerleader for Brown until he wasn't, and Lotu Fuli from Manukau. Lee's seat is highly marginal, but Walker, Watson and Fuli have big majorities and in ordinary circumstances would be unlikely to lose. But if Brown can find credible Fix Auckland candidates to stand against them, it could make quite a difference. The councillors Mayor Brown calls "the Albanians": Albany ward's John Watson, left, and Wayne Walker. He will also want to find credible candidates to replace four other councillors who have often opposed him and are now retiring: Angela Dalton in Manurewa-Papakura, Chris Darby in North Shore, Alf Filipaina in Manukau and Kerrin Leoni in Whau (who is standing for the mayoralty but not the ward). However, talk of political tickets on council should not be overstated. The track record is less than reassuring. For example, there are currently two councillors who were elected in 2022 on the National Party-aligned Communities and Residents (C&R) ticket: Christine Fletcher and Simpson herself. But they have never worked as a team and often don't vote the same way. Simpson left C&R last year in circumstances that remain unexplained. The National Party has other members on council too, including the former cabinet minister Maurice Williamson, but none of them stood as a party candidate and they are not organised as a team. On the Labour side of politics it's much the same. Six councillors belong to the party and four of them (Josephine Bartley, Filipaina, Fuli and Leoni) even stood under the Labour name. But the other two (Shane Henderson and Richard Hills) didn't. The six don't always vote together and they were bitterly split by Brown's proposal to sell the council's airport shares. Similar splits in party allegiances have happened in the Wellington City Council. In short, having a ticket will enhance Brown's chances of getting his chosen candidates elected to council while removing some he doesn't want. But if he wants his ticket to vote consistently as a team, he'll need someone to help him build caucus discipline. And that is something the more people-oriented Desley Simpson is likely to be better at than him. This is the strength of their union. What we don't yet know is what she'll get out of it. Wrangling in the Waitematā The existence of a Fix Auckland ticket may be especially influential in the Waitematā and Gulf ward, which covers the inner city plus Waiheke and Aotea/Great Barrier islands. Incumbent Mike Lee, an independent, will be opposed by Patrick Reynolds, a transport expert and deputy chair of the City Centre Advisory Panel. He's the candidate for City Vision, an umbrella group for Labour, the Greens and progressive independents. At least two members of the local board are also expected to join the race: Sarah Trotman, of C&R, and Genevieve Sage, who was elected on the C&R ticket in 2022 but forced out when she accepted City Vision support to become chair of the board. Sage and Trotman may both be keen on a Fix Auckland endorsement. Meanwhile, the election for the Waitematā local board itself has attracted a couple of extremely notable candidates. One is Anne Batley Burton, who was once one of TV's Real Housewives of Auckland. She calls herself the Champagne Lady, because she imports champagne and is often photographed holding a glass of the stuff. She also calls herself the Pussy Cat Lady, because her 'main passion in life is looking after stray and abandoned cats'. She's on the C&R ticket. Anne Batley Burton, who is running for the Waitematā Local Board. Photo / Supplied The other is Connor Sharp, on the City Vision ticket. Sharp has become one of the leading advocates of 'density done well' in a functional, thriving and less car-dependent city. He writes for the Greater Auckland website, most recently about ways for the Karangahape Rd precinct to fulfil its potential once the City Rail Link opens. Sharp likes to quote the Danish urban planner Jan Gehl: 'A good city is like a good party – people stay longer than really necessary because they are enjoying themselves. If you see a city with many children and many old people using the city's public spaces, it's a sign that it's a good quality place for people.' Sharp says the city centre waterfront is perhaps the best example. 'People flock to Te Komititanga square every day, drawn there not only by the central train station, ferries, express buses, and bike paths, but also attracted by the new shops, seating and trees to sit under, and places to gather, pause, and enjoy the show. 'We do this because it is somewhere we feel safe and comfortable to relax and have fun. Yet only a decade ago Te Komititanga was a road, filled with buses. Now, it is a place to go to, rather than go through. It's emblematic of a general buzz – more people shopping and visiting businesses, boosting the economy while securing jobs and creating opportunities to connect.' Batley Burton, for her part, says she wants to 'take back Auckland's Viaduct' for Super City socialites. That's two very different Aucklands represented right there. The ongoing oddities of the new speed rules As the July 1 deadline for implementing the Government's badly written new Speed Rule draws close, more silliness unfolds. Speed warnings still dominate our billboards - despite the reversal of lowered speed limits on many highway corridors. Photo / Mark Story One example: At Hatfields Beach, on the Hibiscus Coast Highway north of Ōrewa, motorists can now drive at 70km through the area populated by beachgoers and other pedestrians but must then shift down to 60km through open farmland before being allowed to speed up to 80km. Auckland Transport chair Richard Leggat wrote to the Minister of Transport, Chris Bishop, seeking clarification, but an OIA request I made on the correspondence shows the response he received was not heartening. Bishop has confirmed that whatever the anomalies and oddities, the higher speed limits mandated by the new rule will be in place by July 1. Most are already in place. When AT met with the council in early June, speed limits were on the agenda. So was temporary traffic management, better known as the curse of the road cones. Councillor Julie Fairey asked AT's chief executive Dean Kimpton about the relationship between the two. Julie Fairey. Photo / Supplied Everyone wants fewer cones, she pointed out, but once all the higher speed limits are in, won't that mean any new temporary traffic management on those roads will have to be more intense, because the risks are greater? 'Will higher speeds mean more road cones?' she asked. 'It could do,' replied Kimpton, 'it could do.' Unintended consequences, eh. Kimpton also said that now lower speed limits had been removed as a tool to improve road safety, 'we're looking at a system-wide approach'. This led to a peculiar observation. 'One outcome could be that we put in more safety infrastructure,' he said, 'and that makes the roads safer.' He kept a straight face while he said it. In reality, the 'safety infrastructure' he's talking about is more pedestrian crossings and raised crossings on urban roads, more median barriers and wide shoulders on rural roads, and more expensive intersection redesigns. All of which will cost a lot more and not be popular with the drivers the higher speed limits are designed to appease. Unintended consequences, again? It would be if it happened. But it won't, because there's no budget to replace cheap and effective lower speed zones with expensive road redesigns. Auckland Transport's chief executive, Dean Kimpton. Photo / Jason Oxenham In the same meeting, councillor Richard Hills had a question for the AT executives. 'We know raising speeds will increase deaths and serious injuries. It's not a guesstimate, it's data. So who is responsible under the Health and Safety Act for those extra deaths and injuries? Is it just the minister? Is it you? Is it us?' AT's general counsel Gavin Scott replied, 'We're comfortable that we have fulfilled our duties in regard to safety.' Really? AT is designated under statute as the road-controlling authority (RCA) for non-highway roads in Auckland. Precisely because road use is inherently dangerous, RCAs are legally responsible to maintain roads, and the rules for their use, to a standard the public can rely on with a reasonable expectation of safety. But Scott then said, 'People in the public realm are beyond our obligations.' What? To sign up to Simon Wilson's weekly newsletter click here, select Love this City and save your preferences. For a step-by-step guide, click here.
