Trump says Iran and Israel will have peace 'soon'
WASHINGTON: Iran and Israel will have peace "soon", US President Donald Trump said in a social media post on Sunday (Jun 15), adding that there were many unspecified meetings happening and that the two countries should make a deal.
Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on each other overnight into Sunday, killing scores.
"Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal," Trump said on Truth Social, adding that "we will have peace, soon".
Trump did not offer any details about the meetings or evidence of progress toward peace. His assertion contradicted comments by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said on Saturday that Israel's campaign against Iran would intensify.
Trump also told a news network on Sunday it remains possible the United States will become involved in the Iran-Israel conflict and that he would be "open" to Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin being a mediator.
"It's possible we could get involved" in the ongoing battle between the Middle East arch-foes, Trump said in an interview, according to ABC News which said the Republican president stressed that the United States is "not at this moment" involved in the military action.
As for Putin being a potential mediator in the conflict, "he is ready. He called me about it. We had a long talk about it," Trump told an ABC News reporter.
A White House spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on how Trump and the White House were working to de-escalate the situation in the Middle East.
Trump, who portrays himself as a peacemaker and has drawn criticism from his political base for not being able to prevent the Israel-Iran conflict, cited other disputes that he took responsibility for solving, including between India and Pakistan, and lamented not getting more praise for doing so.
"I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's ok, the people understand. Make the middle east great again!" he wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
US senator moves to limit Trump's war powers on Iran, as Mideast conflict escalates
WASHINGTON: A Democratic senator introduced legislation on Monday (Jun 16) to prevent US President Donald Trump from using military force against Iran without Congress's authorisation, as an escalating battle between Israel and Iran raised fears of broader conflict. Tim Kaine of Virginia has tried for years to wrest back Congress's authority to declare war from the White House. During Trump's first term, in 2020, Kaine introduced a similar resolution to rein in Trump's ability to wage war against Iran. That measure passed both the Senate and House of Representatives, winning some Republican support, but did not garner enough votes to survive the Republican president's veto. Kaine said his latest war powers resolution underscores that the US Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the sole power to declare war and requires that any hostility with Iran be explicitly authorised by a declaration of war or specific authorisation for the use of military force. "It is not in our national security interest to get into a war with Iran unless that war is absolutely necessary to defend the United States. I am deeply concerned that the recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict," Kaine said in a statement. Under US law, war powers resolutions are privileged, meaning that the Senate will be required to promptly consider and vote on the matter. Israel's military launched attacks on Iran on Friday with the stated aim of wiping out Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, responded with missile attacks on Israel. Both countries have kept up their attacks, killing and wounding civilians and raising concern among world leaders meeting in Canada this week that the biggest battle between the two old enemies could lead to a broader regional conflict. Trump has lauded Israel's offensive while denying Iranian allegations that the US has taken part and warning Tehran not to widen its retaliation to include US targets. Before leaving for the summit in Canada on Sunday, Trump was asked what he was doing to de-escalate the situation. "I hope there's going to be a deal. I think it's time for a deal," he told reporters. "Sometimes they have to fight it out."
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Will Iran's energy grid, oil reserves be Israel's next targets in its bid for regime change?
An oil storage facility in Tehran burns after being hit by Israeli air strikes on June 15. PHOTO: ARASH KHAMOOSHI/NYTIMES News analysis Will Iran's energy grid, oil reserves be Israel's next targets in its bid for regime change? LONDON – A few days into the military confrontation, any assessment of the war between Israel and Iran is likely to be tentative. Yet, even in this early phase, three broad conclusions are emerging. Iran and Israel are throwing all their arsenals and military capabilities into a fight that both sides consider as crucial to their existence. As a result, the risk of the operation escalating into much broader destruction remains very real. And while the casualty toll is rising fast, both sides are keeping their eyes firmly fixed on the only diplomatic actor that matters in this case: the United States. So, although President Donald Trump continues to resort to meaningless slogans – 'Make the Middle East Great Again', as he put it in his latest public intervention on Truth Social, his favourite social media platform – what the US leader thinks or does remains crucial not only to Israel, but also to Iran. Israel's operation is vast. The first wave of attacks on Iran involved over 200 combat aircraft striking over a hundred targets, including not only nuclear installations, but also the homes of Iran's military leadership, ballistic missile production and storage sites, and air defences. The current Israeli daily operations are much smaller. Still, they regularly involve around 50 jets in each wave; in total, over 300 various Iranian targets have been hit in the first three days of fighting. Still, Israel is far from succeeding in eliminating Iran's nuclear programme, which remains the main objective of its operation. The Natanz nuclear complex sustained severe damage on the first day of strikes. Its above-ground fuel plant, which produced enriched uranium at 60 per cent levels usually required for nuclear weapons, has been destroyed, a fact confirmed by both the International Atomic Energy Agency – the UN nuclear watchdog – and by satellite photographs. However, Iran has two additional known fuel enrichment plants, including the largest one located at Natanz, which is underground. The entrances to these facilities have been struck by Israeli jets and Mossad security agents operating inside Iran. The electrical infrastructure supporting the Natanz site was also destroyed. The sudden loss of power and the vibrations caused by repeated explosions may have damaged the delicate centrifuges required for the enrichment process. But it will take a while for Israel to be certain of this outcome. And Iran's third enrichment facility at Fordow, which plays a critical role in its nuclear programme, is buried underground at depths of around 90 m. That facility can only be destroyed by the American GBU-57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator, a precision-guided monster weighing 13,600 kg that can only be operated by US bombers. Israel may be able to destroy the access to this facility, but unless it renders Fordow inoperable, the chance remains that Iran would be able to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for roughly nine nuclear weapons using its current enriched uranium stockpile. Israel has now achieved complete air control over Iran; not only its jets, but also the various versions of its Heron drones now operating in Iran's skies with impunity. However, the snag for the Israeli government is that it is under pressure to widen its attacks beyond just the nuclear and military installations, to Iran's wider civilian infrastructure. When the war began, Israel warned the Iranians that if they retaliate by hitting at Israeli cities, they should expect the Iranian economy to be struck in return. The Iranians clearly got the message, but they also knew that they stood no chance of persuading Israel to stop its offensive unless they aimed their missiles at the Jewish state's main population centres. So, while Iran's official media was initially careful to claim that the retaliation against Israel was limited to military targets in the first few days of the war, that pretence was soon dropped. State-controlled TV is now broadcasting endless clips of Israeli cities under fire, to the accompaniment of marches popular from the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s. Iran had 'opened gates of hell' on Israel, boasted the June 15 front page of Keyhan, an influential Iranian newspaper. 'We will end the war and Israel simultaneously,' it added. In reality, around 90 per cent of the approximately 500 missiles Iran fired at Israel since the start of the current confrontation were either successfully intercepted, or caused no damage. To date, 13 Israelis have been killed in these attacks and a further 400 have been wounded. By any normal yardstick, this is not a large number for a 9.7 million-strong nation. But for ordinary Israelis, previously accustomed to watching the interception of hostile missiles above their skies as almost a source of entertainment, the casualty tool is already regarded as intolerable. So the pressure is on the government to expand its strikes and destroy Iran's civilian infrastructure. Oil and natural gas wells, as well as Iran's energy export facilities to markets such as China – which go out of Kharg Island and the port of Bandar Abbas – are unlikely to be targeted by Israel at this stage, because this would provoke worldwide mayhem in energy markets and infuriate the US. But Iran's electricity grid as well as strategic oil reserves are sure to be destroyed in the days to come. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long believed that Iran's nuclear quest can only be terminated through regime change – the removal of the country's current rulers. American sources have revealed that soon after the current fighting began, US President Donald Trump rejected a plan by Israel to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. However, Mr Netanyahu may now seek regime change through different means. The Iranian economy is already tottering, weakened by decades of sanctions and gross mismanagement. He may well calculate that if ordinary Iranians are deprived of electricity and fuel, they may well come into the streets and overthrow their current rulers. Asked in a US media interview on June 15 if regime change was part of Israel's military effort, Mr Netanyahu replied: 'That could certainly be the result because the Iranian regime is very weak.' Yet, the record of previous efforts to hasten the overthrow of a government indicates that nobody can predict what triggers revolutions, and their outcomes are seldom those intended. Besides, President Trump still believes that after a bout of fighting, the current Iranian regime will be persuaded to return to the negotiating table and agree to give up its nuclear aspirations. That is just about as unrealistic as Prime Minister Netanyahu's hope for regime change. Still, the fact that the US may be impatient to stop the war dominates the calculations of both Iran and Israel. Israel's current objective is to degrade Iran's military capabilities as much as possible in the shortest period, and perhaps goad Iran into attacking US installations throughout the Middle East, a step that will bring the US into the fray. Meanwhile, Iran's objective is to resist for as long as needed until President Trump starts putting pressure on Israel to stop. Mr Trump certainly relishes his pivotal role in this conflict. Even though none of what is happening now will ever 'Make the Middle East Great Again.' Jonathan Eyal is based in London and Brussels and writes on global political and security matters. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
China reviews impact of US data curbs due to Trump's budget cuts
[BEIJING] China's government is reviewing impacts on the nation's scientific research after US President Donald Trump's moves to withdraw funding from some US agencies and halt publication of certain categories of data. Several Chinese ministries and bodies have in recent weeks started assessing potential disruption to their work, and made efforts to determine the extent to which some activities have become reliant on data published by the US, according to sources familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified to discuss details that are not public. Agencies carrying out reviews include the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Meteorological Administration, Ministry of Natural Resources and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, one of the sources said. One area of work facing potential disruption has been studies of coral bleaching in the South China Sea, according to another source. Chinese researchers had used a US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) product that published coastal water temperatures, which was decommissioned last month, the source said. The move comes as Beijing and Washington have been working to get bilateral relations back on track, with negotiators agreeing on a framework to ease trade tensions and revive the flow of sensitive goods between the world's two largest economies. But details are scarce and many issues remain unresolved, including China's massive trade surplus with the US. Reviews being carried out by the Chinese ministries will examine if domestic sources can replace the use of US data that's now unavailable, the sources said. Investigations are being conducted quietly to avoid giving the US any potential bargaining chip, according to the sources. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Meteorological Administration, Ministry of Natural Resources and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Beijing has sought in recent years to reduce its dependence on foreign sources for critical technology and products. Past US actions have only accelerated China's push for self-reliance, much like how US curbs on chip sales have spurred growth in the country's home-grown semiconductor industry. China views climate science as a geopolitical battleground. President Xi Jinping wants his country to become a weather superpower and have a bigger say in global meteorological governance. Beijing spent nearly 500 per cent more on climate diplomacy from 2013 to 2023, following a familiar strategy of offering financial help to other nations to boost the use of Chinese technology and services. In the US, job losses and funding cuts have impacted the collection and availability of data in fields such as climate, weather and health. Hundreds of employees have been fired at NOAA as part of the Trump administration's broader efforts to shrink the federal government. NOAA declined to comment on whether the removal of data products and websites has impacted cooperation with other countries, including China. The agency said coastal water temperature data remains available in other formats. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. The coastal water temperature guide made data 'easier for scientists or interested lay people to see it and analyse it', said Craig McLean, an ocean researcher who worked at NOAA for decades before retiring in 2022. Without the original presentation, 'it could be a more complicated journey' for anyone trying to use and make sense of the information, he said. Cuts to research and information sharing in the US will also impact partners from Europe to Australia, across fields such as astronomy, physics, public health and weather monitoring, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute said last month. Chinese data It isn't just the US that has pulled back on the amount of data it makes public. China has drawn criticism for tightening its grip on sensitive details, limiting the ability of economists, think tanks, financial analysts and others to access information. Restrictions have included corporate registries, bond market transactions, official biographies of politicians and academic papers. Domestic data firm Wind Information in 2023 stopped providing detailed information on local companies to overseas clients, while the Ministry of State Security repeatedly warned that foreign entities are obtaining sensitive data, including on food production, geography and weather patterns, through software, non-governmental organisations and unwitting Chinese citizens. China has a history of working with America's federal science agencies, including NOAA, and last year renewed a treaty first signed in 1979 covering cooperation in several fields. Researchers have often praised the accuracy and comprehensive coverage of US data – in 2017, the China Meteorological Administration said the US data prediction was among the best in the world. BLOOMBERG
