
Brain dead Georgia woman forced to be kept alive under state's abortion ban
A woman who was declared brain dead nearly three months ago is being kept alive in Georgia to continue her pregnancy due to the state's heartbeat bill.
Adriana Smith, 30, was hospitalized in early February for intense headaches, and doctors found multiple blood clots in her brain, according to her family.
Doctors reportedly attempted surgery to relieve the pressure, but Smith was left brain-dead after the operation.
She's being kept alive through intensive medical intervention so she can carry her pregnancy to term.
Georgia passed the Living Infants Fairness and Equality (LIFE) Act in 2019, and Governor Brian Kemp signed it into law, requiring medical professionals can't perform an abortion if a heartbeat is detected.
The law cited two exceptions in the case of a medical emergency or if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest.
A medical emergency is defined in the law as an event where the abortion was necessary to save a mother's life or 'the substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman.'
Abortions can also be performed if a medical professional believes that the child would be born with a 'chromosomal anomaly' where the baby would die after birth.
Smith's case represents a complicated part of the law because an abortion wouldn't save her life, and a heartbeat was already detected in her unborn baby.
She was nearly nine weeks pregnant when she was admitted to the hospital, and her family says doctors are keeping her alive until the baby can survive outside the womb, which is around 32 weeks.
Her mother, April Newkirk, opened up to local NBC affiliate, WXIA-TV, about the trauma Smith's condition has caused their family.
'She's been breathing through machines for more than 90 days. It's torture for me,' Newkirk said.
'I see my daughter breathing, but she's not there. And her son—I bring him to see her.'
Newkirk said Smith initially went to Northside Hospital in Atlanta, but she was released without a CT scan and was only prescribed medication.
'If they had done that or kept her overnight, they would have caught it. It could have been prevented,' Newkirk told WXIA-TV.
Smith's mother told the outlet that she went back home, and her boyfriend then called 911 when she began struggling to breathe.
In Smith's case, her pregnancy can't be terminated because an abortion wouldn't save her life, and a heartbeat had already been detected
Smith was transferred to Emory University Hospital, where she had worked as a nurse, and was recently moved to a center where she is receiving obstetric care.
Her family has taken her son to visit her and told WXIA that they told him she's just sleeping.
Newkirk is riddled with grief and believes the family should have had the choice to terminate Smith's pregnancy.
'She's pregnant with my grandson. But he may be blind, may not be able to walk, may not survive once he's born,' she told WXIA.
'This decision should've been left to us. Now we're left wondering what kind of life he'll have—and we're going to be the ones raising him.'
Newkirk also said she was worried about paying the mounting hospital bills, telling the outlet, 'Every day that goes by, it's more cost, more trauma, more questions.'
Georgia's heartbeat law caused an uproar when it was passed in 2019, with many pro-choice advocates citing the medical risk it could potentially pose.
Since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, 41 states have issued abortion restrictions, including 12 that have total bans.
Seven states have bans in the first 18 weeks of pregnancy, and 22 have bans after 18 weeks.
An investigative study conducted by ProPublica found last year that many woman lost their lives due to abortion bans across the country.
One of those women was Amber Thurman, a Georgia woman whose death sparked public outrage in 2022 after she suffered a miscarriage and later died when she couldn't receive medical care due to the state's abortion ban.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
EPA says power plant carbon emissions aren't dangerous. We asked 30 scientists: Here's what they say
The Trump administration's Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed a new ruling that heat-trapping carbon gas "emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants do not contribute significantly to dangerous air pollution.'' The Associated Press asked 30 different scientists, experts in climate, health and economics, about the scientific reality behind this proposal. Nineteen of them responded, all saying that the proposal was scientifically wrong and many of them called it disinformation. Here's what eight of them said. 'This is the scientific equivalent to saying that smoking doesn't cause lung cancer,' said climate scientist Zeke Hausfather of the tech firm Stripe and the temperature monitoring group Berkeley Earth. 'The relationship between CO2 emissions and global temperatures has been well established since the late 1800s, and coal burning is the single biggest driver of global CO2 emissions, followed by oil and gas. It is utterly nonsensical to say that carbon emissions from power plants do not contribute significantly to climate change.' "It's about as valid as saying that arsenic is not a dangerous substance to consume," said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann. "The world is round, the sun rises in the east, coal-and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change, and climate change increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms, infectious diseases, and many other health threats. These are indisputable facts," said Dr. Howard Frumkin, former director of the National Center for Environmental Health and a retired public health professor at the University of Washington. Climate economist R. Daniel Bressler of Columbia University, said: 'We can use tools from climate economics, including the mortality cost of carbon and the social cost of carbon, to estimate the climate impacts of these emissions. For instance, in my past work, I found that adding just one year's worth of emissions from an average-sized coal-fired plant in the U.S. causes 904 expected temperature-related deaths and over $1 billion in total climate damages.' University of Arizona climate scientist Kathy Jacobs said: "Their statement is in direct conflict with evidence that has been presented by thousands of scientists from almost 200 countries for decades. 'It's basic chemistry that burning coal and natural gas releases carbon dioxide and it's basic physics that CO2 warms the planet. We've known these simple facts since the mid-19th century,' said Oregon State's Phil Mote. Andrew Weaver, a professor at the University of Victoria and former member of parliament in British Columbia, said: 'President Trump is setting himself up for international court charges against him for crimes against humanity. To proclaim you don't want to deal with climate change is one thing, but denying the basic science can only be taken as a wanton betrayal of future generations for which there should be consequences.' Stanford climate scientist Chris Field, who coordinated an international report linking climate change to increasingly deadly extreme weather, summed it up this way: "It is hard to imagine a decision dumber than putting the short-term interests of oil and gas companies ahead of the long-term inters of our children and grandchildren." ___ Matthew Daly and Michael Phillis contributed from Washington. The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Women's supplements brand O Positiv explores sale, sources say
NEW YORK, June 11 (Reuters) - O Positiv Health is exploring a sale that could value the women's health supplements company at around $1 billion, according to three people familiar with the matter. The founder-owned business is working with investment bank Jefferies on the sale effort, said the sources, who added that O Positiv is projecting $275 million of revenue this year after generating around $225 million in 2024. The sources cautioned that no deal was guaranteed, and spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private information. Jefferies declined to comment. O Positiv did not respond to a comment request. Siblings Bobby and Brianna Bitton launched O Positiv in 2018. The company makes vitamins and probiotics that address a variety of health concerns, from PMS and menopause symptoms to vaginal and gut health. The products are sold on the company's website, as well as through retailers including Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab, Target (TGT.N), opens new tab and Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab. Consumer health companies and private equity firms alike have put more emphasis on investing in the women's health space in recent years, which has created a significant pool of buyers for brands founded by entrepreneurs. Such deals include Pharmavite buying Bonafide in November 2023 and L Catterton, in partnership with actress Naomi Watts, acquiring Stripes Beauty last year.


Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
US CDC restores jobs for 450 laid-off employees
June 11 (Reuters) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is reinstating some 450 employees laid off under the Trump administration's massive reduction of the federal workforce, a government spokesperson said on Wednesday. The employees had worked for the National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention, the National Center for Environmental Health, the Immediate Office of the Director and the Global Health Center (GHC), according to Fox News. A spokesperson for the Health and Human Services (HHS) Department, which oversees the CDC, confirmed the report. Their work includes oversight of lead poisoning prevention, toxic chemical spills, air quality as well as global disease surveillance, according to the CDC's website. Many of the employees were part of the mass layoffs of 10,000 staffers at U.S. health agencies announced in April by President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk to shrink the federal government and slash spending. Some 2,400 CDC jobs were slated for cuts under the plan. Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr later said that some of those roles would be reinstated after an outcry over the potential for increased risks to public health. In an email from Thomas Nagy of HHS seen by Reuters, employees were told that their reduction in force or RIF notices had been revoked and that they should contact their immediate supervisor with questions. Some of the reinstated employees were from the CDC's Lead Poisoning Prevention and Surveillance Branch, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. That program had been scheduled to be included in a new HHS division called the Administration for a Healthy America, or AHA.