Australia ‘confident' Trump won't sink Aukus submarine deal after review
Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Thursday he was confident the
Aukus submarine pact with the US and Britain would proceed, and his government would work closely with the US while the Trump administration conducted a formal review.
Advertisement
Australia in 2023 committed to spend A$368 billion (US$239 billion) over three decades on Aukus, the country's biggest-ever defence project with the United States and Britain, to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines.
A Pentagon official said the administration was
reviewing Aukus to ensure it was 'aligned with the President's America First agenda', on the eve of expected talks between US President Donald Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
In an Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio interview, Marles said Aukus was in the strategic interests of all three countries and the new review of the deal signed in 2021 when Joe Biden was the US president was not a surprise.
'I am very confident this is going to happen,' he said of Aukus, which would give Australia nuclear-powered submarines.
Advertisement
'This is a multi-decade plan. There will be governments that come and go and I think whenever we see a new government, a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken,' Marles told the ABC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
an hour ago
- RTHK
Trump's National Guard deployment illegal, court rules
Trump's National Guard deployment illegal, court rules A judge said Donald Trump must return control of the California National Guard to the state. Photo: Reuters A judge has ordered Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard to the state, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles over Governor Gavin Newsom's objections was "illegal." "His actions were illegal... He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith," US District Judge Charles Breyer wrote of the president in the ruling, seen by AFP. However, he paused the order until 12pm local time on Friday – and the White House almost immediately launched an appeal that could make it all the way to the Supreme Court. "Donald Trump will be relieved of his command at noon tomorrow," Newsom said in televised comments after the ruling was issued. "He is not a monarch, he is not a king, and he should stop acting like one," the 57-year-old Democrat said. Trump's decision to federalise the National Guard – a reserve force – and deploy them in California over the objection of the state governor was one not taken by a US president since 1965. The Republican has argued he did so because protests in Los Angeles against immigration raids ordered by his administration had gotten out of control, and the city was "burning." But Newsom and local law enforcement have stated repeatedly that there was no need for the deployment, and the protests have been mostly peaceful and contained to a few city blocks – albeit tarnished by some spectacular violence, including the torching of several cars. Critics have accused Trump – who also deployed 700 active Marines to the sprawling city – of exaggerating the crisis and exceeding his authority to conduct a power grab. Breyer's 36-page opinion said the violence fell "far short" of the "rebellion" Trump described to justify calling in the guardsmen. There was "no evidence of organised, as apart from sporadic or impromptu, violence" during the protests, which first broke out in Los Angeles on Friday, he said. "Nor is there evidence that any of the violent protesters were attempting to overthrow the government as a whole; the evidence is overwhelming that protesters gathered to protest a single issue – the immigration raids." Breyer also wrote that he was "troubled" by the implication that "protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion." (AFP)
Asia Times
2 hours ago
- Asia Times
Dollar back on the ropes as Trump goes tariff wild
The US dollar slid to three-year lows on Thursday as Donald Trump signaled his White House isn't done with tariffs after all. The US president's claims to have a framework for a detente with China fueled hopes 'Tariff Man' had learned his lesson on imposing crushing import taxes on all major economies. Not so much, it appears, as Trump says he'll set unilateral tariff rates in the next week or two. It's unclear what exactly Trump intends to do, how high he might go or whether it's all bluff. It might not be, as the US leader attempts to change the #TACO narrative that Trump Always Chickens Out. What is clear, though, is that the dollar's days of being collateral damage amid Trump's one-man arms race are far from over. The Japanese yen is now on the cusp of the 140 level to the dollar, as the US currency hits three-year lows versus a basket of top currencies. The worry in Tokyo is that a continued drop would trigger intense yen-selling and the unwinding of the so-called 'yen-carry trade.' Twenty-five years of holding rates at, or near, zero turned Japan into the globe's top creditor nation. For decades, investment funds borrowed cheaply in yen to bet on higher-yielding assets around the globe. As such, sudden yen moves slam markets virtually everywhere. It became one of the globe's most crowded trades, one uniquely prone to correction. This trading strategy has kept aloft everything from Argentine debt to South African commodities to Indian real estate to the New Zealand dollar to derivatives on New York exchanges to cryptocurrencies. That explains why when the yen zigs sharply, markets everywhere can zag in sudden and unpredictable ways. Arif Husain, head of fixed income at T Rowe Price, speaks for many when he calls the yen-carry trade the 'San Andreas fault of finance.' Though the Bank of Japan had been tightening over the last 12 months, getting rates to a 17-year high of 0.5%, the process has gone smoothly. Global markets largely took the rate hikes in stride. Yet the financial chaos around Trump's trade war forced the BOJ to shelve the process. At next week's June 17-18 meeting, Governor Kazuo Ueda might find himself in the same position as Toshihiko Fukui, the last BoJ head to get rates to current levels. Between 2006 to 2008, Fukui's board managed to scrap quantitative easing and hike rates for the first time since the late 1990s. He pushed benchmark rates to 0.5%. Then came the 2008 'Lehman Shock,' and with it, a return to quantitative easing (QE). As the dollar's slide pushes the yen higher, there's growing pressure on Ueda to stop hiking rates. 'Economic data are weak, and Japan-US trade talks have made little progress,' says Stefan Angrick, Japan economist at Moody's Analytics. 'The central bank is staying cautious, for now.' The BOJ, he adds, 'wants to see demand-driven inflation before tightening aggressively, but there's preciously little evidence of that.' Angrick also thinks the BOJ will slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet. Instead of trimming bond purchases by 400 billion yen (US$2.8 billion) per quarter, as it has been doing, we expect a shift to cuts of just 200 billion ($1.4 billion) every three months. Koichi Sugisaki, strategist at Morgan Stanley MUFG, is focused on how Team Ueda evaluates the negative impact from Trump's 25% auto tariff and 'a recent rise in underlying inflation trend.' Japanese inflation is rising at a 3.6% rate, nearly double the BOJ's 2% target. Along with raising inflation expectations, Trump's tariffs are also wreaking havoc with global bond markets. On one level, a rising yen exchange rate could reduce the risk of imported inflation. On another, a plunging dollar would trigger an epic risk-off trade. Paul Tudor Jones, who founded the $16 billion macro hedge fund Tudor Investment Corp, thinks a sharp dollar drop lies ahead as the Federal Reserve slashes interest rates. He thinks the dollar could be 10% lower within the next 12 months. 'You know that we are going to cut short-term rates dramatically in the next year,' Jones tells Bloomberg. 'And you know that the dollar will probably be lower because of it. A lot lower because of it.' Jones thinks Trump will replace Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell with an 'uber dovish' leader who will bow to demands for lower rates. There's speculation that Trump might tap current Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to lead the Fed. Trump managing to name a loyal political appointee as Fed chief could backfire in Asia, the region that holds the largest stockpiles of US Treasury debt. Already, 'there's clearly solid dollar selling,' observes strategist Kit Juckes at Societe Generale. If the US ratcheted up tariffs, market anxiety would increase as global growth prospects wane. Marcello Estevao, economist at the Institute of International Finance, notes that 'global growth is losing momentum.' The IIF now forecasts global growth to slow to 2.7% in 2025 from 3.1% last year 'amid structural policy shifts and fragmented recovery,' Estevao says. Odds are that 'US growth sharply decelerates, with fiscal expansion and tariff uncertainty shaping sentiment,' Estevao says. Consumer confidence indicators continue to deteriorate, while inflation expectations remain elevated. Business sentiment has turned negative as well.' The Euro area, Estevao notes, 'faces its own challenges in pursuing future growth, and Japan is gradually moving away from ultra-accommodative monetary policy. Both face muted growth constrained by divergent fiscal and monetary adjustments.' China's growth, meanwhile, 'remains moderate, meeting its growth targets but with narrowly focused composition, and stays heavily reliant on policy support, limiting global spillovers, growth is resilient overall, but capital allocation is increasingly selective and policy sensitive,' Estevao says. In other words, the global financial system is not in a strong position to withstand Trump's next tariff onslaught. Or if credit rating companies follow the lead of Moody's Investors Service, which revoked Washington's AAA status in mid-May. Moody's said America's ability to control its balance sheet is eroding year after year, forcing yields higher. 'Successive US administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs,' it said. 'We do not believe that material multi-year reductions in mandatory spending and deficits will result from current fiscal proposals under consideration.' Deutsche Bank strategist Jim Reid refers to Moody's being the last top rating company to yank away America's AAA 'death by a thousand cuts' as Congress plays games with the debt ceiling and funding the government. And as Washington's debt burden heads toward the $37 trillion mark. At this point, the only globally approved credit rating outfit still assigning the US a AAA rating is Japan's Rating & Investment Information Inc. For now, at least. Given the balance of political and economic risks, says Brad Setser, economist at the Council on Foreign Relations, there's 'a bit too much mythologizing about the dollar's reserve currency role – and a bit too little attention paid to actual dynamics around dollar reserves.' Setser adds that 'all this matters, of course, for the debate over the right size of the US fiscal deficit going forward. The US shouldn't count on large ongoing flows from reserve managers who basically are compelled to hold a large share of their total assets in dollars.' China, Setser notes, 'has gone to great lengths to avoid adding to its Treasury portfolio over the last 15 years, and it now accounts for the lion's share of the global current account surplus.' Setser says it matters whether the flow into the US has been driven by a search for exceptional returns – or at least higher returns than available in the large savings glut economies of Asia. 'There's no particular reason to expect that the dollar will continue to offer exceptional protection in bad states of the world,' he says. The bottom line, Setser, 'is that risk assets don't usually rally in bad states of the world. That may be relevant if July 9th turns into Judgement Day and Trump decides to unilaterally set a new tariff schedule for all the countries around the world that haven't struck a new Trump II trade deal.' In the interim, as Trump continues to make tariffs great again, trust in the dollar is taking bigger and bigger hits. Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Judge temporarily bars Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles
A US judge on Thursday temporarily barred US President Donald Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, finding that the Guard was unlawfully mobilised by Trump. San Francisco-based US District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity. Breyer's order will take effect at noon on Friday. Breyer said the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion'. Trump justified the deployment of troops by qualifying the protests as a rebellion. 'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' Breyer wrote. The Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order. Trump summoned military troops to Los Angeles to support a civilian police operation over the objection of Newsom, an extraordinary and rarely used measure.
