Karen Read Retrial Wrapping Up As Defense Prepares to Call Final Witness
Karen Read Retrial Wrapping Up As Defense Prepares to Call Final Witness originally appeared on L.A. Mag.
Testimony in the Karen Read retrial - which has made national headlines - continued Tuesday with testimony from a defense expert who says Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe likely smashed his skull during a fall backward, but did not die from hypothermia as a medical examiner previously suggested.After retaking the stand, Elizabeth Laposata, a forensic pathologist and former medical examiner who is now a professor at Brown University, told jurors she believes O'Keefe fell unconscious immediately after hitting his head on a ridged object and was bitten and scratched by an animal, based on an analysis of his injuries."By looking at the body, I could tell that there was no evidence of impact from a vehicle," Laposata told the jury. 'He landed on something that had a ridge on it, to cause the laceration in the scalp. And then with a little bit of movement those vertical scratches were caused by some kind of pebbly-like surface.'
Her testimony directly contradicts the government's assertion that Read, 45, backed into her boyfriend in a blinding snowstorm outside another Boston cop's home in Canton, Massachusetts and left him to die after a night of heavy drinking. Her defense insists that O'Keefe got into an altercation inside the home of now-retired Boston Police Sergeant Brian Albert and was attacked by the Albert's family dog, a German Shepherd named Chloe. The case has raised serious questions about the investigative techniques utilized by Massachusetts State Troopers in the Norfolk County District Attorney's office, where the case against Read was initiated. The lead investigator in the initial probe, Michael Proctor, was fired for misconduct in March, weeks before Read's retrial began, based on text messages he sent about Read in a chain that included his MSP superiors. In one he wrote that she was a "wack job cunt" with "no ass" and reported he had not found any "noodz" on her phone after it was seized. The Norfolk County D.A. Michael Morrissey hired a private defense attorney, Hank Brennan, who was a lawyer for notorious Boston gangster and longtime FBI informant James "Whitey" Bulger, to work as a special prosecutor in the case.Read hired a team of attorneys that includes high-profile Los Angeles defense lawyer Alan Jackson, and his partner Elizabeth Little, along with former Boston prosecutor David Yanetti and white shoe lawyer Robert Alessi from New York City.
Her first trial ended in a hung jury. The defense could call its last witness in the trial, now in its eighth week, with Tuesday marking 30 days of testimony, today or tomorrow.
This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
30 minutes ago
- CBS News
Massachusetts optician harassed for "FRAMED" license plate during Karen Read trial
A Middleboro optician thought her vanity license plate was a cute tongue-in-cheek ode to her job until it became a rallying cry from for Karen Read supporters. Now the owner of the license plate "FRAMED" is getting shouted at and her car vandalized. "I've had people like literally speeding up to me on the highway, to like catch up to my driver side window to give me the thumbs up and stuff," said Lauren Downey. She has had the vanity plate for three years now, but during the Karen Read trial, her supporters have started to have her plate put on banners and wearable merchandise. One man in New Hampshire got the same plate for that state, and he wears it around his neck outside the courthouse. Supporters of Karen Read gather before the murder trial of Karen Read in Norfolk Superior Court, Friday, June 13, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. Mark Stockwell / AP "My husband is over there, and he couldn't believe it," Downey said. "He's seeing the plate in real life. We saw it on t-shirt." The plate has also been all over social media. Car keyed twice The controversy surrounding the trial has carried home with Downey. Twice now, someone has keyed her car because of the plate. She has had people screaming obscenities at her or even run across parking lots to praise her plate. At times, her children are in the car. "People are giving me the middle finger in a parking lot or at an intersection," said Downey. "I would love to think they are that excited over glasses that would be great." Lauren Downey's "FRAMED" license plate. CBS Boston Downey put in for the license plate three years ago. It was supposed to be a play on her job as an optician who helps people find the correct eye glass frames. It also wasn't the only name she submitted. "When you sign up for a vanity plate, you submit for three different options and then the registry chooses which one you receive," said Downey. "I can change my plate, but that may not make sense at this point." The retrial of Karen Read is now in the jury's hands. Downey is waiting until the trial is over before fixing the damage to the car in case something else happens.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Karen Read trial week 8 takeaways: Read's fate in hands of jury
For the first time in weeks, lawyers were able to address jurors directly in the Karen Read retrial on Friday as they delivered their closing arguments. Hank Brennan, the lead prosecutor, and Alan Jackson, Read's lead defense attorney, took differing approaches in their closings, reflective of how each side approached the trial. Jackson spoke first, going nearly 90 minutes as he hammered two key points: that there was no collision between Read's SUV and her boyfriend, Boston Police officer John O'Keefe, and that police failed to properly investigate the case. 'What if it wasn't the house of a Boston cop?' Jackson said. 'We can be certain they would've torn that house apart looking for answers." He also leaned on the testimony of numerous experts, including the commonwealth's medical examiner, all of whom said O'Keefe's injuries weren't consistent with being hit by a car. 'Just look at John's arm,' he said. The prosecution 'couldn't find a medical expert who would say those were inconsistent with a dog bite or a scratch.' Throughout Jackson's speech, index cards flashed on the courtroom TVs, each representing a key point. As he concluded, Jackson told the jury to consider that stack of index cards. Each one represented reasonable doubt, and each one meant Read must be acquitted. Brennan, though, leaned more on raw emotion: he opened and closed on O'Keefe himself. He was a man who tried to help everyone, Brennan said, and on the morning of Jan. 29, 2022, he was the one who needed help. It was only Read, he suggested, who could get O'Keefe help. He also suggested to the jury that the data proved the case beyond a reasonable doubt, even though he admitted the prosecution didn't know exactly how the collision at the center of the case took place. Brennan pointed to the healthcare data from O'Keefe's phone, the plummeting temperature of his cell phone battery and the data from Read's Lexus SUV. 'The data shows John O'Keefe is not moving,' he said. 'The data is the data. You can't change it as much as you want to.' Data is 'not subject to bias,' Brennan emphasized. He closed with a photo of O'Keefe on the screen. 'John O'Keefe was a person, and he was murdered by Karen Read,' he said. 'Whether she meant to hit him or not.' After eight weeks, dozens of witnesses and hundreds of exhibits, 12 jurors finally got the case and began their deliberations. The panel deliberated for only two hours on Friday before they were sent home for the weekend. Here's what else you need to know from the eighth week of the trial. As the retrial entered its final stretch this week, there were visible moments of escalating tension between the lawyers and even with judicial decisions. Norfolk County prosecutors tried to block the defense from questioning one of their final witnesses — a forensic pathologist and former medical examiner — about her opinion that John O'Keefe's injuries were caused by dog bites. The judge ultimately allowed the forensic pathologist, Dr. Elizabeth Laposata, to testify about the wounds coming from an animal, not from a dog specifically. 'I just think it's outrageous,' Alan Jackson, a defense attorney, told the judge, sounding exasperated. There were barbs traded between attorneys throughout the week. Robert Alessi, one of Read's attorneys, moved for a mistrial after a prosecutor mistakenly pointed to cuts in O'Keefe's sweatshirt — made by a state police technician — and implied they could have been caused by road rash. 'The Commonwealth has no case. They have no collision. They are desperate and trying to create evidence of specters of collision where the evidence doesn't support it,' Alessi said. Jackson spent a good deal of time questioning a defense expert witness, Daniel Wolfe, about a test involving a crash dummy's right arm being struck at 29 mph. Wolfe is an accident reconstructionist with the company ARCCA and he described a series of holes on the dummy's sweatshirt caused by road rash. There were also visible signs of road rash to the face and torso. Wolfe said the damage to the dummy was inconsistent with the damage to O'Keefe. He also noted that the dummy's shoes stayed on his feet after impact. One of O'Keefe's shoes was found at the scene of 34 Fairview Road, the other stayed on his foot. Jackson also projected a photograph from the SUV with a shattered back window after the dummy test. Wolfe stated it was 'inconsistent' with the damage to Read's SUV. Read's lawyers pushed for a mistrial on Monday — the second time in a week. Defense attorney Robert Alessi told Judge Beverly Cannone that the motion for a mistrial with prejudice was based on 'intentional misconduct' by the prosecution. Alessi accused a prosecutor of misleading jurors while questioning an accident reconstructionist about O'Keefe's sweatshirt. Special prosecutor Hank Brennan questioned the defense's expert witness, Wolfe, about punctures to the back of O'Keefe's sweatshirt. Brennan pulled out the sweatshirt encased in a transparent display to ask Wolfe about damage to the back of the sweatshirt. Alessi said the questions were misleading because Brennan knew the holes in question were made by a Massachusetts State Police criminalist, and could not have happened as a result of a collision. The holes on the back were 'clearly, unequivocally, without doubt' caused by the cutting of a criminalist. 'Those holes in the back of the sweatshirt [have] nothing to do with any type of event on or about Jan. 29, 2022.' 'What could be more egregious?' Alessi asked. 'They picked the most opportune, sensitive time to pull this stunt. This is intentional, this is irremediable, this is on the key issue of this case, whether there was a collision at all.' Brennan admitted to having made a mistake, but the judge denied the mistrial motion. She instead gave jurors an instruction telling them the holes in the sweatshirt came from a criminalist and 'they cannot consider' the holes as coming from 'the events' of Jan. 29, 2022. Laposata, the forensic pathologist, testified that O'Keefe's arm injuries were 'very consistent' with an animal attack. She then testified about X-rays that she reviewed of O'Keefe's chest, arm and legs. She said she did not see any defects to his right hand, and that the bones were intact without any breaks or fractures. 'It's a normal right arm,' Laposata said. Then, at a later point, she said, 'The bones were 100 percent intact.' An expert witness for the prosecution said during his testimony in a previous week that there were no X-rays of O'Keefe's arm that he reviewed. The last witness of the trial, Andrew Rentschler, bolstered Laposata's opinions that O'Keefe's injuries were inconsistent with a car collision. Rentschler is another ARCCA accident reconstructionist, and he said on Wednesday that O'Keefe's arm had 36 superficial abrasions on his right arm, which he terms a conservative estimate. He said there would need to be 36 points of contact to piece the sweatshirt and the skin, but there were 'nine defects' on the right sleeve of his sweatshirt. Rentscheler also criticized a test done by the prosecution's crash reconstructionists using blue paint transferred from a taillight onto the arm of an analyst. The analyst did not take any measurements of where the blue paint extended on the man's arm and did not 'say with scientific certainty that that area of paint corresponds to where the abrasions are,' Rentschler said. Brennan sought to undermine Rentschler's testimony by making him appear to jurors as cozy with the defense team. Rentschler admitted to having eaten a ham sandwich during a lunch with defense lawyers after his testimony at the first trial. Brennan asked if Rentschler was discussing the case and 'laughing it up a little bit' with the defense. 'Whatever was spoken about at the table, I'm sure I heard,' Rentschler said. After Rentschler's testimony, the defense rested its case. In an unexpected twist, Brennan decided against calling rebuttal witnesses. Earlier in the week, he'd indicated he wanted to recall an accident reconstructionist from Aperture, the company retained by prosecutors, and another expert to testify about dog DNA. If Karen Read is convicted, what happens next? Karen Read trial recap: No verdict reached, deliberations to resume Monday Karen Read prosecutors intended to call witnesses in rebuttal. Why didn't they? Karen Read trial: Lawyers hammer out jury instructions as retrial hurtles to a close Karen Read trial: What to expect from charge conference on Thursday Read the original article on MassLive.
Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Fox News True Crime Newsletter: Karen Read's deliberations, Travis Decker's manhunt, Madeleine McCann's search
POETIC JUSTICE: Fate of Karen Read now in jury's hands as murder trial reaches critical phase FEDS ON HIS TAIL: US Marshals escalate manhunt for fugitive dad wanted in daughters' murders TOXIC DOSE: Chiropractor accused of poisoning wife with lead during divorce now claims he was a victim too: report 'YOU'RE A PRISONER': Former sex trafficking victim pardoned by President Trump reveals disturbing secrets of legal brothel DEFENSE IN THE DARK: How Bryan Kohberger's notoriously mum defense attorney is using the media to her advantage CLOSING TIME: Karen Read trial nears its finale: What each side is banking on WITNESS SHOWDOWN: Karen Read trial testimony ends with defense expert dismantling Lexus crash allegation WORD OF WARNING: California lawmaker warns Menendez brothers' case is driving return of bill to release thousands of killers SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER LETHAL OBSESSION: Mother sensed 'strong danger' from son-in-law weeks before daughter's murder during camping trip REASONABLE DOUBTS?: Final defense witness in Karen Read trial pumps brakes on Lexus collision theory DEFENSE STRATEGY: Karen Read announces she will not testify in her defense as Massachusetts trial nears conclusion after 30 days 'SECURE YOUR HOMES': Father who allegedly killed his three daughters possibly spotted hiding in remote wilderness by hikers POKING HOLES: Defense attorney's dramatic courtroom move has legal experts talking in Karen Read murder trial DEATH SCENE DOUBTS: Karen Read's defense links John O'Keefe head wound to fall, not vehicle impact TACTICAL SHIFT: Feds take over manhunt for suspected killer dad as authorities reveal three daughters' cause of death 'HIRED GUNS' SHOWDOWN: Jury skepticism of experts could determine outcome in Karen Read murder trial: former judge BURIED SECRETS: Madeleine McCann search resumes as suspect's prison release looms after years behind bars
