Trolling, attacks and name-calling: Inside the restaurant wage fight
One-star Google reviews, boycotts and harassing phone calls: This is what Denver restaurants are experiencing as a result of their support for legislation that allows reduced wages for tipped workers in certain localities.
Why it matters: The vitriolic atmosphere surrounding House Bill 1208 is unlike any political battle at the state Capitol in recent years and is poised to leave an embattled restaurant industry even more bruised.
State of play: The aggressive opposition is led by the local chapter of the far-left Working Families Party, labor unions and the national advocacy group One Fair Wage.
Through online campaigning, the organizations are focusing the debate on cutting wages of tipped workers, which is a possibility under the legislation.
Opponents are targeting restaurants and breweries that testified or spoke in favor of the bill with bad reviews online that tell others to not visit.
What they're saying: The effort is being compared to a "jihad" by one supporter, and the Colorado Restaurant Association called the trolling tactics "disgusting."
"I've not seen it this bad, ever," the association's CEO, Sonia Riggs, tells Axios.
The other side: Saru Jayaraman, president of One Fair Wage, tells us that she can't believe lawmakers are "cruel enough or stupid enough" to reduce worker pay at a time when Denver is becoming less affordable.
"Most tipped workers in Denver and Colorado are struggling to make ends meet," she said, noting that many of these workers are women and lower-income earners.
How it works: In Colorado, employers can pay tipped employees a wage of $3.02 an hour less than the minimum in law only if tips get them to the minimum wage. All employees must make at least the state minimum wage of $14.81 per hour.
The legislation — which would only apply to the handful of counties and municipalities with minimum wage rates greater than the state level — would allow restaurant owners to lower the base minimum wage for tipped workers.
Supporters say this is necessary to help struggling restaurants stay afloat amid a wave of closures.
The other localities affected are the city and county of Boulder and Edgewater.
By the numbers: The minimum wage for tipped workers in Denver would drop $4 from $15.79 to $11.79. But all employees must still make at least the $18.81 minimum wage if tips aren't sufficient.
A full-time employee could make $640 less a month, according to critics. But the reduction could also save the city's restaurant owners more than $50,000 a year, supporters say.
The big picture: The legislation is driving a deep wedge between the Democratic Party and the restaurant industry with supporters and opponents on both sides.
In Denver, where the minimum wage is the eighth-highest among states and localities in the nation, Mayor Mike Johnston supports the measure while city council members and the auditor are opposed.
Johnston recently floated the idea of a 20% surcharge to help restaurant employees.
The bottom line: The legislation recently survived its first test — an 11-2 committee vote with two Democrats in opposition. But its future is murky as the opposition accelerates and lawmakers look for a compromise deal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Goldman Sachs wants students to stop using ChatGPT in job interviews with the bank
Goldman Sachs is cautioning its young job-seekers against using AI during the interview process. Instead, the $176 billion bank is encouraging applicants to study up on the firm in preparation. Other businesses like Anthropic and Amazon have also warned candidates against deploying AI—and if they're caught, they could be disqualified. While many companies are boasting about all the efficiencies that will come with AI, some are dissuading potential hires from using it to get a leg up in interviews with recruiters and hiring managers. Goldman Sachs' campus recruitment team for the bank's private investing academy in EMEA recently sent out an email to students reminding them of its expectations for interviews, as reported by eFinancialCareers. Goldman uses video interviewing platform HireVue to pre-assess candidates and maintains a set of best practices for job-seekers. Based on the best practices guidelines, the young applicants are encouraged to prepare for interviews by studying the $176 billion firm's financial results, business principles, and core values. But they can't bank on AI to help them out. 'As a reminder, Goldman Sachs prohibits the use of any external sources, including ChatGPT or Google search engine, during the interview process,' the email noted, according to someone who saw the message. HireVue is an AI-powered talent evaluation platform, known for asking behavioral questions that reveal applicants' skills. Gen Z job-seekers might be tempted to use ChatGPT or other chatbots to game the recruitment process—but it's discouraged, and isn't the most viable option. The typical Goldman Sachs virtual interview allows for 30 seconds of prep after the question, followed by a two-minute response time, according to research from eFinancialCareers. That makes it hard for job-seekers to quickly type a prompt into the chatbot, churn out an answer, and decide what the line of attack is. Plus, the responses aren't tailored and unique to the individual, potentially hurting the interviewee more than helping. Goldman's job-seeker AI policy could seem ironic, as half of the firm's 46,000 employees have access to the technology. But other companies are navigating that same paradox as they try to fully flesh out their AI strategies in an ever-changing technological environment. Goldman Sachs isn't the only major company warning its applicants not to use AI during recruitment. The $61.5 billion AI giant Anthropic went on a hiring spree last month, but told job-seekers that they can't use the advanced technology to fill out their applications. The company argued that it wants to test the communication skills of potential hires, and AI use clouds that assessment. 'Please do not use AI assistants during the application process,' Anthropic wrote in the description for its hundreds of job postings. 'We want to understand your personal interest in Anthropic without mediation through an AI system, and we also want to evaluate your non-AI-assisted communication skills.' Retail giant Amazon also doesn't like it when potential talent uses AI tools during the recruitment process. Earlier this year, the $2 trillion behemoth shared guidelines with internal recruiters, stressing that candidates who are caught using AI during job interviews should be disqualified. According to Amazon, the tools give an 'unfair advantage' that masks analysis of someone's 'authentic' capabilities. 'To ensure a fair and transparent recruitment process, please do not use gen Al tools during your interview unless explicitly permitted,' the guidelines, as reported by Business Insider, noted. 'Failure to adhere to these guidelines may result in disqualification from the recruitment process.' This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump response to LA protests an ‘escalation of fear' for immigrants, a top Utah Democrat says
House Minority Leader Angela Romero, D-Salt Lake City, is pictured on the first day of the legislative session at the Capitol in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, Jan. 16, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch) As the nation continues to watch protests happening in Los Angeles — with more demonstrations planned across the U.S. — a top Utah Democrat criticized President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard members to California over objections from Gov. Gavin Newsom. 'Over the past few days, we have witnessed federal agents conducting large-scale workplace raids across Los Angeles,' House Minority Leader Angela Romero, D-Salt Lake City, — who is also Latina — said in a prepared statement Wednesday. 'These actions, along with President Trump's deployment of thousands of National Guard members, represent both an abuse of power and an escalation of fear within our immigrant communities,' she said. Romero's comments come the day after Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, a Republican, said he was 'grateful' for Trump's move to intervene. He also issued a warning that Utah would be 'overprepared' to quickly respond to any protests here that turn violent or destructive. With eye on LA protests, Gov. Cox warns Utah will be 'overprepared,' won't tolerate violence Cox and members of Utah's Republican supermajority Legislature have defended the Trump administration's efforts to deport immigrants who are in the country illegally. Romero, while saying she agrees the focus should be on those with criminal records, said Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids have gone too far. 'I agree with my colleagues across the aisle that undocumented immigrants with serious criminal records should be held accountable,' she said. 'However, raiding elementary schools, separating families, and targeting hardworking individuals does nothing to achieve that goal.' Romero added that she will 'not stand by as the president of the United States instills fear, disappears individuals, and escalates peaceful protests with tear gas, rubber bullets, and flashbangs.' Romero agreed that 'violence, destruction and vandalism are unacceptable,' but she argued it's up to California's leaders to act — not Trump. 'While the vast majority of protestors have remained peaceful, those engaging in criminal behavior must be held accountable,' she said, adding: 'That said, it is the responsibility of Los Angeles law enforcement and California's elected officials to manage these situations — not President Trump.' Romero said aggressive actions will only deepen divides between Americans. 'These actions are not collaborative,' she said. 'They are theatrical displays of power that only inflame tensions.' After four straight days of escalating protests, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass on Tuesday issued a curfew on most of downtown Los Angeles. She said it was necessary to curb the actions of 'bad actors who do not support the immigrant community,' the L.A. Times reported. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Google delivers a harsh message to loyal employees
When it comes to the jobs everyone wants in the tech field, Google (GOOGL) ranks high on most people's wish lists. When it was first founded in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Google was one of several search engines on the market, alongside Yahoo, Netscape, AltaVista, and many more. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter But with time, Google pulled ahead of the pack, and by the time it bought YouTube in 1996, it was well on its way to becoming the tech behemoth it is today. While it seems like a solid bet to work for such a wildly successful company, in the last few years, working for Google has been anything but. Related: Google resolves major privacy issue In 2023, Google revealed plans to lay off 12,000 employees in a massive cut, one that CEO Sundar Pichai called "a difficult decision to set us up for the future." "Over the past two years we've seen periods of dramatic growth. To match and fuel that growth, we hired for a different economic reality than the one we face today," Pichai explained in the letter that accompanied the layoff. Two more rounds came in 2024, and now, Google has announced it's time for another. Image source: Crabb/Digital First Media/East Bay Times via Getty Images On June 10, Google offered buyout deals to employees across many of its teams, including Communications, Marketing, Research, Core, and Knowledge & Information. The latter works on Search, Business Insider reported. More Tech Stocks: Palantir gets great news from the PentagonAnalyst has blunt words on Trump's iPhone tariff plansOpenAI teams up with legendary Apple exec Senior Vice President of Core Systems Jen Fitzpatrick sent an internal memo on the deals, saying, "We're offering a Voluntary Exit Program (VEP) for Core Googlers in the U.S. (in my reporting org)." "We've seen positive feedback across the company in other orgs who have offered similar programs, and I wanted to extend the same option to eligible Core Googlers in the U.S. who would like to leave the company voluntarily with severance." Related: Google sends a harsh message to employees after layoffs The memo goes on to say that the exit program may be a fit for Core Googlers "who aren't feeling excited about and aligned with Core's mission and goals, or those who are having difficulty meeting the demands of their role." The memo also addressed the company's remote work policy, saying all Core Googlers in the U.S. within 50 miles of an office must return to a 3/2 hybrid schedule. When it comes to Google's true reasons for this round of voluntary layoffs, it may have something to do with the fact that internet searchers are flocking en masse to ChatGPT to answer their questions instead of using Google Search. ChatGPT has 400 million active users as of May, with OpenAI Sam Altman sharing via X last month that "ChatGPT daily active users have increased >4x over the last year." Per a recent Vox Media survey, 61% of Gen Z and 53% of Millennials opt to use AI tools to answer questions, rather than employing Google or other search engines. There's more than just AI to blame. People have been having a harder time as of late finding what they want in Google when they do use it. According to a survey of 1,000 people done by digital marketing firm Scorpion, 54% said they look through more search results than they did five years ago. Take that frustration, and hand those same people an easy-to-read AI summary, and it's easy to see why people would opt for that over combing through search results that don't deliver what they want. Related: Google quietly launches genius new app The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
