
Rebellion is in the air. Starmer will struggle to calm it
Labour is not enjoying power. When I recently asked a first-time Labour MP if she and colleagues were planning a party to celebrate July's one-year anniversary of their first election, she replied: 'What is there to celebrate?'
Getting hammered in the polls by Nigel Farage while being told to vote for welfare cuts isn't what new MPs were dreaming of when they celebrated their landslide win last year. 'This isn't what I came into politics to do' could be the official motto of the welfare rebels.
The prospect of more than 100 Labour MPs rebelling over welfare reforms doesn't just matter because of its potential impact on the public finances. It raises questions. Can a gloomy Parliamentary Labour Party stomach the messy business of governing? And Keir Starmer's plan for government in particular?
Whereas Conservatives tend to see government as their natural habitat, Labour often finds the experience troubling. When Starmer struck his trade agreement with Donald Trump, the PM's team got more messages of congratulations from Conservatives than from their own side. 'We find the purity of opposition more comfortable than actually doing things,' one Labour MP concedes.
Meanwhile the job of being an MP has become even more pressurised. New-intake Labour MPs were chosen by local associations expecting them to be local champions, responsive to every local whim. Slaves to their inboxes, some MPs report getting hundreds of emails a day – and feel obliged to answer them all, for fear of grievances aired on social media. Add in antisocial hours, family dislocation and real fears for personal safety and you have the perfect recipe for discontent.
Then there's the fundamental disjunction of this Labour government, between the voters who put it in power and voters some Labour MPs instinctively want to please.
To over-simplify, the first group of voters tend to live in towns, not cities and the north not the south. They work and might own their own home but still feel economically insecure. They have previously voted Tory, or not voted at all, and they are now open to voting Reform. They gave Labour a chance in 2024 not because Starmer inspired them, but because they were sick of the other lot and wanted a change.
These voters' views explain Starmer's moves to cut aid spending and boost defence, trim welfare bills and talk tough on immigration and crime. Weekend headlines about 'making convicts fill potholes' are laser-guided to this audience.
All those things are popular with the electorate as a whole and with Starmer's swing voters in particular. Yet they still meet resistance from Labour MPs challenging No 10's electoral maths. Even as Starmer declares Reform is his party's main opponent, some Cabinet ministers argue that Labour's biggest electoral threat comes from the second group of voters 'progressives' who might defect to the Greens and Lib Dems.
Some say this reflects the power of the postbag. 'A lot of our MPs are much more likely to hear from Guardian-reading liberal graduates than from potential Reform voters on estates – that's who the members are, that's who sends emails about Gaza,' says a minister. The persistent Labour belief that the real threat is on the Left is what psychologists call 'motivated reasoning', constructing arguments to suit your beliefs – often to avoid painful, contradictory truths. Here the avoided dissonance is that Labour is a Left-wing party that won power with the votes of people who lean Right.
Or at least, Right on social issues such as migration and crime. On the economic issues that are likely to be the biggest test of Labour discipline later this year, things are more complicated.
The Treasury last week justifiably celebrated quarterly growth figures that were above expectations. But much of the economic outlook is now decided outside the UK – trade deals and Trump tantrums could determine whether the Autumn Budget sees Rachel Reeves raising yet more money to try to balance the books.
Could the parliamentary Labour Party really accept more welfare cuts, as some Government advisers are advocating? Many MPs say absolutely not, and there are already signs that No 10 is preparing to compromise with the rebels – talk of concessions on winter fuel payments and child poverty is a sign that the PM can't just steamroller over scores of unhappy colleagues.
All of which increases the chances that the Treasury will have to go looking for more cash later in the year. If so, where? Intriguingly, some senior Labour figures now talk about an 'emerging consensus' between Labour and Reform voters favouring Left-wing economic policies. That's less surprising than it might sound. Farage has shifted Left on economics this year, praising trade unionists, traditional industry and even Jeremy Corbyn.Apella Advisors polling shows that many Reform voters actually lean Left on some economic issues, favouring state protection for key industries and even nationalisation of utility companies. Could Reform's rise move Labour leftwards on economic policy?
Here, the financial services sector is on tenterhooks, waiting for whispered cuts in cash ISA allowances and possibly to tax breaks for higher-earners' pension contributions. Some Labour economists also see scope for a populist kick at the Bank of England to pause the 'quantitative tightening' process that pushes up Government borrowing costs. In a similar vein, Reform wants the Bank to charge high street banks interest on overnight reserves, a technical-sounding tweak that would extract billions.
Magicking up money by annoying wealthy savers and bankers might just allow the Chancellor to please both Labour MPs and Reform voters at the same time - but Labour can't afford to take the City lightly. Bond investors say the gilt market wants higher taxes or additional cuts at the Autumn Budget. And if they're not reassured? Goldman Sachs last week warned that the gilt market is now 'susceptible to damage' where skittish investors demand higher interest rates on Britain's loans. Ask Liz Truss how that story ends.
Labour hasn't taken much joy from its first year in power, but there may be worse to come. The message from the centre of government to unhappy backbenchers will have to get tougher: You won't save your seat by complaining about the government – but you might spook the markets into a crisis that guarantees you lose it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
More than nine of out ten of the Tory rank-and-file want Kemi Badenoch to purge 'wets' from the party in order to meet the challenge of Nigel Farage and Reform UK
More than nine out of ten Tory supporters want Kemi Badenoch to mount a purge of 'wets' in the Tory party in order to meet the challenge of Nigel Farage, new polling has found. According to a survey by the Popular Conservatism group, known as PopCon, 92 per cent of Conservative members and voters agree that there should be a 'big shake-up' in the party, including 'getting rid of the wets who aren't really Conservative' and 'getting rid of the MPs who are big state, pro-EU and arrogantly elitist'. The poll offers support for Ms Badenoch, with 93 per cent agreeing with her vow to abandon Net Zero targets. A total of 91 per cent want to quit the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), while 89 per cent want to reverse Sir Keir Starmer 's EU deal. Despite the party languishing in the polls, Ms Badenoch receives backing for her approach. However, 42 per cent of her supporters want her to establish a formal relationship with Reform. Separate polling published today by Lord Ashcroft in The Mail on Sunday reveals that voters do not think Sir Keir is sincere when he promises to cut immigration.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
MARK LITTLEWOOD: A full-blooded agenda can help revive the Tory Party's fortunes - but we must act fast
These are tough times for the Tory party. The Conservatives are struggling to get 'cut-through' in the national media and in the public debate. Because of the party's lowly poll ratings, such coverage as there is tends to focus on whether the Tories are minded to embark upon yet another leadership election. Some ask whether the party can survive at all. Good news for Kemi Badenoch has been thin on the ground. But she can draw some real comfort this weekend from a survey conducted by my grassroots organisation, Popular Conservatism. We asked hundreds of rank-and-file Tories how the party should seek to get back on its feet and how it should rebuild. Tory supporters are not overwhelmed with unalloyed hope and optimism – they would be delusional if they were. A vast majority thought last month's local election results were as bad as to be expected, or even worse. A good chunk of those surveyed are tempted by Reform and think Nigel Farage will be the next prime minister. On Kemi herself, 60 per cent think she is doing something from a reasonable to an excellent job in what have obviously been difficult circumstances. On policy and strategy, the messages they sent back are pretty clear. They expect a full overhaul of Tory party headquarters and more powers given over to the membership – rather than central office parachuting favoured sons and daughters into desirable seats. But it's on policy where Kemi should take the most heart. She has already pivoted away from the 2050 carbon Net Zero commitment and 93 per cent agree with her. She has now opened an internal commission into whether the UK should withdraw from the ECHR – 91 per cent think we should. There is also overwhelming support for slashing back quangos (95 per cent) and dramatically reducing the size of the Civil Service (93 per cent). Scrapping the Supreme Court (78 per cent), abolishing the Equality Act (76 per cent) and curtailing the independence of the Bank of England (79 per cent) also curry significant favour. Taken together, these measures could add up to the sort of full-blooded agenda that Tory members think could revive the party's fortunes. And they want it rolled out fast, with 86 per cent demanding that policy positions be adopted more rapidly than has been the case thus far. Tory members don't seem to think that Kemi is facing the wrong way, they just want her to run, rather than walk, in the direction she has set.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Obama's doctor says Biden's physician should have given him cognitive tests
Former President Joe Biden 's doctor should have given him more cognitive tests, according to the doctor of former President Barack Obama. Jeffrey Kuhlman, who served as Obama's doctor between 2009 and 2013, told the New York Post on Saturday that Biden and any politician over the age of 70 should be given "a few hours" of annual mental exams that should be accessible to the public. 'My position is that a 78-year-old candidate, Trump at the time, an 82-year-old president [Biden] would both benefit from neurocognitive testing,' Kuhlman said. He went on to say that "any politician over the age of 70 has normal age-related cognitive decline," and pointed out that he's been recommending annual mental exams for more than a year. Biden's doctor, Kevin O'Connor, oversaw three physicals for the president during his time in office, but Kuhlman says the physical reports did not include notes from a neurocognitive specialist. He also pointed out that Biden did not take the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, which Donald Trump agreed to take during his first term. That test is a two-minute screening test of about 30 questions that probes for signs of dementia, according to Kuhlman. Obama's doctor said that he had "no doubts" that Trump "aced" the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, but said he believes that the White House should also release the CT scans taken after Trump's attempted assassination last year. While the Montreal test is able to detect some basic signs of dementia, the doctor noted that it wasn't adequate for determining more serious cognitive issues. According to Kuhlman, mental processing speed and spacial visualization all begin to decline around the age of 60. Kuhlman said he respected O'Connor's medical judgement, but added that "sometimes those closest to the trees miss the forest." O'Connor told the New York Post in July 2024 — just days after the then-president announced he would not run for re-election — that Biden's cognitive health was "excellent." Then-White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre insisted to the public that Biden didn't "need a cognitive test" because he "passes a cognitive test every day." She has since decided to leave the Democratic Party and write a tell-all book about her time in the White House, earning her a savaging by some Democrats. Visitor logs to the White House show that Biden did submit an evaluation form to an expert in Parkinson's Disease, but O'Connor said that the meeting was part of Biden's annual physical. Kuhlman says that the doctor who evaluated Biden in that visit, Kevin Cannard, had been evaluating Biden for 14 years, and that he trusts the doctor's evaluation. O'Connor was subpoenaed by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee on Thursday to stand for questioning about Biden's mental abilities during a hearing on June 27. Shortly after the House investigation was launched, the Trump administration issued a memo stating that it was issuing its own investigation into whether or not people other than Biden used an autopen signature device to sign off on executive actions during the late period of Biden's presidential term. Both investigations follow the release of a book by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, titled Original Sin, that alleges a mass coverup of Biden's cognitive impairment by those closest to him.