‘Calm and measured dialogue' required after Trump tariffs blocked, says Tanaiste
Ireland's deputy premier has called for calm dialogue on trade after a US court blocked Donald Trump from imposing sweeping tariffs.
The ruling from the New York-based Court of International Trade came after several lawsuits arguing the US president has exceeded his authority, left American trade policy dependent on his whims and unleashed economic chaos.
The Trump administration is expected to appeal.
Tariffs must typically be approved by the US Congress, but Mr Trump says he has the power to act because the country's trade deficits amount to a national emergency.
Simon Harris, who is Ireland's deputy premier and foreign affairs minister, said 'calm and measured dialogue' represents the 'best way forward' to resolving trade differences between the EU and the US.
'We note the ruling of the US Court of International Trade in relation to tariffs and also the fact that this ruling is being appealed,' the Tanaiste said.
'I want to stress the position once again today that what is required now is for both sides, the EU and the US, to engage in calm and measured dialogue, and to do so in good faith.
'The continuing uncertainty over tariffs is the source of serious concern for businesses, here in Ireland but also across the EU and the US.
'Businesses that are concerned about their cost base, their workers, and their plans to invest.
'We will continue to monitor the implications of the court decision in the US while keeping our main focus on the negotiations at hand.'
It comes after Mr Trump said he will pause his threatened 50% tariffs on the EU until July 9, following a 'very nice call' with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen.
In April, Mr Trump announced a 20% tariff on EU goods being sold into the US. He later reduced that to 10% until July 9 to allow for time for talks with Brussels on a potential agreement.
On Friday, the president claimed the talks were 'going nowhere' and said he was recommending the 50% tariff rate comes into effect on June 1.
He rowed back on the decision on Monday, claiming Ms von der Leyen called him asking for an extension to the date.
Irish premier Micheal Martin said earlier this week that tariffs are 'not good for our economy'.
He added: 'It's absolutely important that we can get a realistic and reasonable deal between Europe and the United States to help consumers, to help citizens across the world.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How Starmer became Reeves's biggest enemy
Rachel Reeves has one eye on the bond market and the other on her own backbenchers. The Chancellor has been forced to spend the last few weeks focusing on rebellions over benefit cuts and spending plans that she must stick to if she wants to balance the books. Now, though, her authority is starting to be undermined much closer to home. The latest challenge is not coming from investors, the Red Wall or Reform UK. Instead, it is the man next door – her partner at the top of the Government – the Prime Minister. Two bold announcements from Sir Keir Starmer shed some light on the issue. Starmer's pledge to restore the winter fuel allowance to pensioners and his hint that the cap on benefits for families with more than two children will be removed were welcomed by the party faithful. However, they have left Reeves to count the cost, putting Britain on a path to higher taxes in the autumn. Restoring winter fuel payments to all pensioners and scrapping the two child benefit cap entirely would cost a combined £5bn a year if each policy was fully reversed, according to the Resolution Foundation think tank. That's a significant amount considering Reeves only has a £10bn buffer to meet a self-imposed goal of ending borrowing to fund day-to-day spending. But with less than a fortnight until she locks in Whitehall spending plans for the next three years, Starmer appears to have decided that it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission. For the Government, though, it will be seen as a sign of a breakdown in relations. This chaotic approach to policy-making is understood to have stemmed from growing tensions in Downing Street, particularly in the leader's office itself. Some blame Liz Lloyd, No10's director of policy, delivery and innovation. Lloyd, who also served as Sir Tony Blair's deputy chief of staff, is being singled out as the trigger of a wave of recent adviser departures, including one who was accused of 'mansplaining' the economy to Reeves. Lloyds is said to have clashed with Stuart Ingham, Starmer's longest-serving aide, who was appointed alongside career civil servant Olaf Henricson-Bell to run the No10 policy unit. 'They're all in each other's business,' says a source. 'Stuart threatened to resign if Liz was appointed. Yet they are both there and have a toxic relationship with each other. Olaf is fed up with both.' Several others in the unit are said to feel frozen out, although Labour Party HQ says it doesn't recognise the tensions and insists it is business as usual. However, few can deny that it is resulting in incoherent policymaking, including a flat-out denial of reports detailing changes to the winter fuel allowance that were subsequently vindicated just weeks later, and a Downing Street that doesn't look like it has anywhere near a majority of more than 170 seats. Another battle is under way over a cap on benefits that means that families can only claim child tax credit and universal credit for their first two children if they were born after April 2017. Morgan McSweeney, Sir Keir's chief of staff, is said to be against the policy. Many of the Labour Left are making it their mission to reverse it. One Labour source summarises the party's dilemma. 'The two child cap is a political bind,' they say. 'On the one hand, how can the state subsidise poor people to have three kids when it's too costly for middle class couples to have one? On the other, how is it morally ethical for a Labour government to choose to keep kids in poverty?' At the same time, Starmer is facing the biggest rebellion of his premiership over £5bn in welfare cuts that will affect hundreds of thousands of people claiming disability benefits. Reports suggest another £500m climbdown is on the cards, in a move that could allow up to 200,000 people to keep their cash. However, it is understood that while options for further tweaks to the policy are on the table, changes are being kept on the back burner for now as Starmer and Reeves focus on other electoral carrots. Part of this will come from big spending in infrastructure in Red Wall seats to combat the threat of Reform. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) highlights that choices around health spending until 2030 will also determine how much other Whitehall departments receive. For example, if Reeves chooses to raise health spending by 3.4pc per year in real terms – or roughly the long-run average, departments outside defence face a 1pc real terms cut to their budgets. That's less funding for schools, policing and prisons. What's more, if Starmer wants to get defence spending to 3pc of GDP by 2030, it implies real terms cuts of 1.8pc. While it would not be anything like the austerity presided over by George Osborne as chancellor, for some departments where the low-hanging fruit was plucked a decade ago, it will feel like it. 'Sharp trade-offs are unavoidable,' the IFS warns in a report. Public sector pay continues to be a headache for the Chancellor. An announcement that public sector workers in England will receive a pay rise of between 3pc and 5pc this year – higher than the 2.8pc budgeted for by the Chancellor – will cost about £3bn. Reports suggest that as many as 50,000 civil service jobs could go as Reeves wields the axe as part of the Spending Review on June 11. But stopping the public sector workforce growing further above the current level of 6m will be a hard task. Keeping costs down while allowing those already on the payroll to be paid more is in theory a good idea. The IFS estimates that if public sector employment stayed constant between now and 2028–29, and the pay pot grew at 1.2pc each year in real terms in line with the overall spending envelope that has already been set out, pay awards could average 2.6pc per year in cash terms. However, Bee Boileau, an economist at the IFS, says this may not be realistic. 'Constraining the growth of the overall public sector will be tricky in the context of an NHS workforce plan that implies growth in the health service workforce of 3.1pc to 3.4pc per year, a manifesto promise to hire 6,500 more teachers, and a likely reluctance to reduce the number of police officers, prison officers or members of HM Forces,' she says. There is also a bigger problem: weak growth. JP Morgan believes Starmer's trio of trade deals with the US, EU and India will reduce borrowing by around £2.5bn. However, it thinks this will be more than offset by a tariff hit of £7.3bn and weaker growth delivering another £9bn blow to the public finances. This, together with a reversal on winter fuel, benefits for families and another fuel duty freeze is expected to turn a £9.9bn borrowing buffer into a black hole of around £15bn. Capital Economics says higher UK bond yields and expectations that interest rates will remain higher for longer also currently imply £4.4bn more will be devoted to servicing the Government's interest payments by 2030. It also warns that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is likely to say the Government's policy to cut migration 'by up to around 100,000 per year', will reduce growth 'and therefore raise the OBR's borrowing forecast by £6bn in 2030'. In short, there could be another £25bn of extra tax rises coming this autumn. With the threat of more tax raids around the corner, Starmer has voiced concerns about the fiscal watchdog itself. While its authority is not being questioned, the Prime Minister has asked why Reeves faces adjusting taxes and spending twice a year if she is deemed to have missed her borrowing rules when she only has one Budget. There is little appetite within Downing Street to change fiscal rules that have already been altered nine times in 16 years. 'Ripping up her so called 'iron-clad' and 'non-negotiable' rules only a year after introducing them could erode the Chancellor's political credibility,' says Ruth Gregory at Capital Economics. However, some in government are now thinking about whether one official economic forecast a year is more sensible. Such a move would require legislation. Either way, Reeves is likely to keep coming under pressure to spend more in the next few years. The bond vigilantes may be watching. But so is Starmer.
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Hugh Jackman reveals what he REALLY thinks of Andy Lee's new Aussie-themed pub
Hollywood superstar Hugh Jackman has weighed in on Andy Lee 's new pub in New York. Lee, 43, opened his Australian-themed pub, Old Mates, in Manhattan, back in February. And on Tuesday the Wolverine star, 56, took to social media to gush over the venture which is backed by an owner's group that includes Hamish Blake, surfing legend Mick Fanning, as well as Jackman himself. 'Old Mates - how Aussie's eat in NYC. This pub is amazing!' Jackman posted on Instagram. He also shared a gallery of snaps including one which shows the fan favourite flashing his famous grin and posing in front of the venue with his arm around Lee. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. Jackman also shared a photo taken inside the bar with Lee and Australian-born NYC restaurateur Eddy Buckingham, who is also an investor in Old Mates. A third post shared to Hugh's account shows a stained glass window feature of the bar which spells out 'New York'. Located in Downtown Manhattan's Financial District, the pub is in a heritage-listed 1840s Greek Revival building that spans all three floors. With the staff dressed in iconic, hard-yakka-inspired blue collared shirts and rugby polos, the pub wouldn't look out of place in The Rocks or at the end of Collins Street. The investors also include Andy Stone (Bluestone Lane), Pat Cummins, Ash Barty, Mick Fanning and Patty Mills. It comes after Lee recently revealed how a tribute to Jackman in his pub went horribly wrong. Speaking to Nine Entertainment in May, the funnyman revealed that he wanted to place secret nods to the backers on the walls of the pub. 'I asked them what's their favourite pub in Australia, their favourite drink?' he said. 'There's little nods to all of them. Everyone's favourite pub in Australia is framed and hanging on the wall.' However, Jackman's tribute did not last the first full day of trading, falling victim to a workplace accident. 'Unfortunately we smashed Jackman's on day one accidentally,' Andy admitted. 'It was hanging above the register and one of the employees walked around the corner and knocked it off and smashed the glass!' The Hundred host did reveal however that Hugh's favourite place to grab a beer Down Under is the iconic Sydney watering hole The Oaks Hotel in Neutral Bay. He first announced his plans to open a New York pub back in December last year.
BreakingNews.ie
19 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
More than 70 attacks or death threats against journalists in North recorded
There have been more than 70 attacks and death threats against journalists in the North over the last six years, a report by Amnesty International has found. The region has been described as the most dangerous place in Ireland and Britain to be a reporter following the report which includes accounts from journalists under threat. Advertisement Occupational Hazard? Threats And Violence Against Journalists In Northern Ireland reveals that reporters have been told they will be shot or stabbed, threatened with bombs under their car and given 48-hour ultimatums to leave. Lyra McKee was killed in 2019 (Family handout/PA) Two journalists, Martin O'Hagan and Lyra McKee, were killed in 2001 and 2019 respectively, while others have been physically attacked, had equipment damaged and cars battered with poles laced with nails. Many journalists have taken safety measures in their homes with bulletproof windows and doors with alarms linked up to police stations. The report has added up more than 70 incidents of threats or attacks on journalists in Northern Ireland since the start of 2019. Advertisement Most of the threats have come from a range of proscribed paramilitary groups – loyalist and republican – as well as from armed organised crime groups, some with links to paramilitaries. The report also finds that most threats against journalists go unpunished, and there have been no prosecutions for any threats from paramilitary groups. Some journalists interviewed by Amnesty for the report said they feel the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) has failed to effectively investigate attacks and threats against them. Since June 2022, there have been only two successful prosecutions for threats against journalists. Advertisement The report additionally finds that with journalists excluded from the Government's home protection scheme, which funds the installation of security measures, many have been left feeling at risk. The report makes a number of recommendations, including the establishment of a new media safety group by Justice Minister Naomi Long, with representatives from the PSNI, Public Prosecution Service (PPS), media organisations and the NUJ, to deliver a new journalist safety strategy. It also calls for the PSNI to review its procedural response to threats and attacks against journalists and conduct investigations capable of leading to successful prosecutions, and to produce new guidance and training for officers on the protection of journalists during public disorder. The Northern Ireland Office and Department of Justice have been urged to ensure at-risk journalists can access the home protection scheme. Advertisement The UK government has also been urged to establish an independent public inquiry into the 2001 murder of Martin O'Hagan if the expected Police Ombudsman's investigation finds serious failings or wrongdoing by the police. Seamus Dooley of the National Union of Journalists (Liam McBurney/PA) Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty International UK's Northern Ireland director, said Northern Ireland is the most dangerous place in the UK for journalists. 'They are being threatened, attacked and even killed for shining a light on paramilitary groups and others who seek to exert control through violence,' he said. 'This creates a climate of fear that many assumed was consigned to history when the Good Friday Agreement was signed. Advertisement 'Yet there has not been a single prosecution for threats against journalists from paramilitary groups. This sense of impunity only emboldens those behind the threats. 'When journalists are under attack, press freedom is under attack. The state must create a safe environment where journalists can work freely and report without fear of reprisals. It is currently failing to do so.' National Union of Journalists assistant general secretary Seamus Dooley added: 'In what is supposed to be normalised society, post the peace process, journalists are living in fear and behind high-security measures. 'That really is not the sign of a normal functioning democracy.' Responding, Chief Superintendent Sam Donaldson, who acts as the PSNI lead for journalist safety, said police have received the Amnesty report and 'will take time to consider the contents and recommendations'. 'The Police Service of Northern Ireland takes the safety of journalists very seriously and has been very much involved in developing both national and local plans to tackle this issue over the last couple of years,' he said. 'As a result, we have developed a joint strategy and joint plan with NUJ and with local editors. 'We have appointed two Journalist Safety Officers, established an internal Journalist Safety Group, implemented screening arrangements within our contact management centre and ensured that reports of threats and crimes by journalists are investigated by detectives. 'The Police Service has also arranged a number online seminars for local media around internet and personal safety. 'Journalists do not have to tolerate threats and crimes as part of their role. That has been our recent, consistent message. If any journalist needs advice in relation to an incident, threat or crime which is connected to your role as a journalist, please contact 101 and report the matter. 'I would also encourage journalists to speak with one of the Journalist Safety Officers in our Strategic Communications and Engagement Department.'
