Ford's Megazilla 2.0 Crate Engine Is a 7.3L V-8 with 1000-Plus HP
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
Ford is supercharging its 5.0-liter and 7.3-liter crate engines, and they'll likely cost about $22K and $33K, respectively.
With a 3.0-liter Whipple supercharger, the 5.0-liter should make 810 hp and 615 pound-feet of torque, and it's street-legal with a warranty.
The 7.3-liter Megazilla 2.0 aims for more than 1000 horsepower but is for off-road use only.
The Ford Performance site is loaded with temptation for horsepower freaks, particularly those who are looking to repower a project vehicle or complete a kit build. And the choices just got more interesting, with the introduction of supercharged versions of Ford's 5.0-liter Coyote V-8 and 7.3-liter Megazilla V-8. Not that either of those engines are weaklings in naturally aspirated form, but if you're looking for more power, then a 3.0-liter Whipple supercharger is a good place to start.
The current basic crate Coyote makes 460 horsepower and costs $11,500, while the naturally aspirated Megazilla—a modified version of the Godzilla truck engine—serves up 612 hp and goes for $22,995. We'd expect both prices to increase by at least $10,000 since Ford already sells the supercharger by itself. The standalone bolt-on version costs $9995 for the 2024–2025 Mustang GT and Dark Horse. We're not sure where this leaves the supercharged 5.2-liter Raptor R crate engine, which makes 760 hp and costs $29,500.
Curiously, the supercharger itself carries a three-year, 36,000-mile warranty when installed by a Ford dealer or ASE-certified mechanic, while the supercharged crate engine only gets a two-year, 24,000-mile warranty. The supercharger kit includes other uprated hardware that should apply to the new crate engine, including GT500 fuel injectors, a new throttle body, and an intercooler. On a Mustang with active exhaust, the package is good for 810 hp and 615 pound-feet of torque. Cars without active exhaust make 10 fewer horsepower—see, it's not just about making noise!
Details are thinner on the Megazilla variant, but it will be for off-road use only. The naturally aspirated version is built with sturdy hot-rod hardware, including forged Callies H-beam connecting rods, forged Mahle pistons, and a hot cam. It'll need a lot of boost to add 400 or so horsepower, but the 7.3 is a lot of engine—literally, as the naturally aspirated one weighs 673 pounds.
Both engines will be available in the fourth quarter of this year. But if you've already got a 2024 or newer Mustang, the supercharger kit is on sale now.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Steel Tariffs 'Hits Straight On Ford's Core:' Analyst Sees Higher Input Costs And Eroding Pricing Power For Tesla Rival
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Donald Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum are likely to have a deep impact on the input costs of the U.S. automaker Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F), explains Alex Tsepaev, the chief strategy officer at B2PRIME Group. What Happened: Unlike globalized automakers like Stellantis NV (NYSE:STLA), Ford remains deeply tied to U.S.-centric manufacturing, Tsepaev told Benzinga, suggesting that 'A 50% tariff could inflate COGS significantly just as pricing power erodes in both EV and ICE segments.' The cost of goods sold, or COGS, refers to the input costs paid by the firm to manufacture its final products. Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Thus, according to Tsepaev, 'Trump's call to double steel tariffs hits straight on Ford's core. Steel makes up more than half of the weight of a vehicle, and Ford can't do anything with this reality. In 2018, similar tariffs were estimated to cost Ford over $1 billion annually. When your business runs on metal and tariffs make the metal more expensive, Wall Street notices it.' Earlier in May, Ford suspended its financial guidance during the first quarter results, which included full-year adjusted EBIT and adjusted free cash flow, due to tariff-related uncertainty. According to Tsepaev, this was due to a 65% decline in profits, with revenues falling to $40 billion. He forecasts that increased input volatility for Ford could lead to downward revisions. 'In today's environment, policy uncertainty is the new supply chain risk. For investors, Ford looks exposed, rigid, and margin-constrained in all the wrong places,' Tsepaev It Matters: Trump doubled U.S. tariffs on imported steel from 25% to 50% on May 31, which took effect on June 4. Trump said he initially considered a 40% tariff but raised it after feedback from industry leaders. 'At 25% they can sorta get over that fence,' he said, adding, 'At 50% nobody's getting over that fence.' In 2018, Trump-era tariffs prompted a minor rise in U.S. steel production. However, a 2023 report by the International Trade Commission found that these same tariffs increased costs for downstream industries, leading to a more than $3 billion reduction in output for vehicle, machinery, and tool sectors by 2021, suggesting a net negative economic impact. Shares of Ford ended 1.58% higher on Friday, and they have risen by 6.32% on a year-to-date basis, but it was down 17.12% over the last year. In premarket on Monday, the stock was up 0.05%. Read Next: In terms of getting money back, these bank accounts put traditional checking and savings accounts to shame. Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down taxes: Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation. Image via Shutterstock This article Trump's Steel Tariffs 'Hits Straight On Ford's Core:' Analyst Sees Higher Input Costs And Eroding Pricing Power For Tesla Rival originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Ford Sets Bold Condition to Stay in Formula One Amid V8 Talks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ford Performance has laid out a bold condition to remain in Formula One as it partners with Red Bull Powertrains for the new era of regulations beginning in 2026. Next year marks a big reset in F1, as new cars powered by an equal ratio of electric power and internal combustion on sustainable fuels will zip through Grand Prix circuits. Given Ford's expertise in the electrification department, its partnership with Red Bull is a result of the new regulations. Though the plans for 2026 are on course, and as teams develop their challengers in full swing, discussions about the return of cars powered by V8 engines running on sustainable fuels have led many to question whether F1 cars will rely on electric power in the distant future. Charles Leclerc of Monaco driving the (16) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 and Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 battle for track position during the F1 Grand Prix of Spain... Charles Leclerc of Monaco driving the (16) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 and Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 battle for track position during the F1 Grand Prix of Spain at Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya on June 01, 2025 in Barcelona, Spain. MoreWhile the developmental path ahead seems unclear at this stage, Ford has made it clear that it will stay in the sport as long as the cars remain electrified. Ford Performance global director Mark Rushbrook said: "For Ford Motor Company, we believe there should be some form of electrification in there. "That's part of what attracted us to the 2026 rules. It's all about that balance between the ICE and electrification. Does it need to be 50-50? No, not necessarily. "As long as we have the opportunity to contribute, to learn and to bring knowledge to our road cars, then that's ideally what we're looking for." Rushbrook confirmed that the American brand was committed to the future of the sport. He added: "That is definitely our intent. We're committed to working with all the other stakeholders for what is the right thing for the future of this sport. "Is it going to be exactly what any single manufacturer wants? No. But that's part of the process, because at the end of the day, if that discussion is exactly what we want and every other manufacturer leaves, then it's not a healthy sport either. "We know that and the other manufacturers know that as well. So you've got to work together for the good of the sport, the health of the sport and that basically means being partners off the track. "You want to race each other fiercely on the track, but you need to work together off the track." 2026 marks the first year when Red Bull will roll out its own F1 engines in collaboration with Ford, after ending a successful partnership with Honda. The Japanese automaker joined hands with Aston Martin to develop power units for cars of the new era.
Miami Herald
10 hours ago
- Miami Herald
IIHS Crash Tests: The Toyota Prius Is Officially Safer Than The Ford Bronco
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has released the results of its latest crash tests, and while most models achieved the organization's 2025 Top Safety Pick+ award - indicating the highest possible safety standards - Ford won't be pleased with the outcomes for two of its best SUVs. The Bronco and Bronco Sport SUVs both missed out on a Top Safety Pick+ award following new ratings, while at least three much smaller cars achieved better safety scores. While this does not mean that the SUVs are unsafe, they each failed to protect occupants according to the agency's highest standards. Here, we'll look at exactly where the Bronco and Bronco Sport fell short. To qualify for the Top Safety Pick award, a vehicle has to achieve the following in IIHS crash tests: Good ratings for the small overlap front and update side testsAcceptable or Good ratings in the pedestrian front crash prevention testAcceptable or Good ratings for headlights, applicable to all trimsAcceptable rating for the updated moderate overlap front test Furthermore, the Top Safety Pick+ award is only achievable if a Good rating for the updated moderate overlap front test is received. The IIHS regularly updates its testing procedures with tougher tests, so a vehicle that qualified for a Top Safety Pick+ award a few years ago may not get one now. The Bronco may look like a safe place to be in a crash, given its tall stance and beefy bodywork, but it didn't do enough to ace its crash tests. Marginal ratings for the moderate overlap, pedestrian front crash prevention, and headlight tests held the SUV back. For the moderate overlap test, the IIHS noted a higher risk of chest injuries when the rear crash dummy was assessed. Then again, even minivans were found to do an inadequate job of protecting second-row passengers, and those are dedicated family movers. The Bronco still received Good ratings for the small overlap front, updated side, and seat belt reminder tests, though. Its vehicle-to-vehicle crash prevention system got an Acceptable score, as did the ease of using the LATCH system. It must be noted that the LATCH system, seat belt reminder, and vehicle-to-vehicle crash prevention scores are not factored into the award criteria. Overall, the Bronco could be improved, but previous tests show it's still safer than its Jeep Wrangler rival. Thanks to LED projector headlights instead of the Bronco's LED reflector headlights, the Bronco Sport gets off to a better start than its bigger sibling, with a Good rating for its headlights. The Bronco Sport's pedestrian crash prevention system also performed better, with a Good rating. In the updated moderate overlap front test, the Bronco Sport got the same Marginal score as the Bronco. The post-crash analysis showed that the rear dummy's lap belt slid up onto its abdomen, which poses a higher risk of internal injuries. This is in addition to elevated chest, neck, and head injuries for rear-seat passengers. The Acceptable rating in the side test was due to a risk of injury to the driver's pelvis. Interestingly, smaller cars like the Toyota Prius, Hyundai Elantra, and Kia K4 achieved better ratings than the Ford SUVs, proving that vehicle size has nothing to do with occupant protection. Take the Prius, for example. Besides an Acceptable rating for its headlights, it received a Good score in every crash test. However, since no two accidents are exactly the same, the Bronco and Bronco Sport still have every chance of adequately protecting occupants in a crash. Both come with a decent roster of passive and active safety features. These IIHS tests do, however, show that there is some room for improvement in this area for the Ford twins. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
