
The Pentagon's DEI purge ignores lessons from America's biggest military disasters
Some soldiers prove their valor in battle. Lt. Roland Christensen revealed his character on another proving ground—with a split-second decision that would change another Navy pilot's life.
On March 17, 1947, Christensen gathered with other flight instructors at a naval air base in Glenview, Illinois. They appraised a group of nervous trainees who had assembled for the first day of selective flight training. The stakes were high — an average of 10 pilots per day washed out of Glenview.
One of the trainees had another reason for nerves. He was a slim, Black man named Jesse Leroy Brown. The son of Mississippi sharecroppers, Brown was attempting to become the Navy's first Black pilot. One flight instructor told him 'You'll never sit your Black a** in a Navy plane.' Others dubbed him 'oil slick' or called him 'n***er.' The other instructors ignored Brown as they greeted trainees and peeled off for their first training flights.
But Christensen approached him with an outstretched hand.
'You'll be flying with me today,' Christensen said, ignoring the snickers and glares from the other White trainers. Brown snapped to attention with a hearty, 'Yessir!'
Brown would go on to break the Navy's color barrier, becoming its first Black pilot. He would earn the Distinguished Flying Cross for valor during the Korean War. A Navy ship would eventually be named after him, and his life would inspire a bestselling book and movie.
But Brown never would have taken off without Christensen's moral courage. These are the type of stories that have long helped make the modern US military so distinctive. The military is the most racially integrated institution in America. This is not just reflected in numbers but also in power: Although problems with deep-rooted racism persist, people of color have risen to the top echelons of the US military.
That integration, though, goes beyond race. The military is one of the few large institutions left in America where citizens voluntarily form close relationships with people of different religions, socio-economic backgrounds and ethnicities — all in service of a common national purpose.
Combat veterans in particular talk about the brotherhood, and sisterhood, formed in battle.
'The enduring emotion of war, when everything else has faded, is comradeship,' William Broyles Jr., a combat veteran in Vietnam, wrote in a classic essay. 'A comrade in war is a man you can trust with anything, because you trust him with your life.'
But now some of America's leaders are telling a different story. The Trump administration has launched a purge of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives throughout the armed forces and military academies. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says a culture of 'wokeness and weakness' has made the military less lethal.
Hegseth, who wrote in a book published last year that 'America's white sons and daughters are walking away' from military service, says he wants to restore the 'warrior' mentality to America's military.
'I think the single dumbest phrase in military history is 'Our diversity is our strength,' Hegseth said in February in a speech at the Pentagon.
But the strongest rebuttal to Hegseth's argument is military history itself. Many of the nation's biggest military blunders occurred because there wasn't enough diversity in the armed forces.
Consider one the worst military disasters to befall the US: the Japanese's navy's 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, which triggered the nation's entrance into World War II. Most history books describe the event simply as a Japanese sneak attack. At least 2,400 Americans were killed and images of the massive USS Arizona destroyer, engulfed in flames and billowing black smoke, represent one of the nation's most humiliating military failures.
But the US had ample warnings that the Japanese might attack. Why didn't they heed those warnings?
One factor was racism, some military historians say.
America's military leadership in the mid-20th century was all-White, and many commanders harbored stereotypes about the Japanese. When Admiral Husband Kimmel, commander of Pearl Harbor's navy base, was later asked about the intelligence failures that led to the attack, he said, 'I never thought those little yellow sons of bitches could pull off such an attack, so far from Japan.'
US military leaders had succumbed to 'groupthink,' which often occurs when there's not enough diversity in a decision-making body.
The term was popularized by psychologist Irving Janis. It comes from an essay he wrote in the 1970s that described how groupthink leads to military failures. It describes a dynamic where a group unwittingly creates a culture of conformity when making decisions. The desire for group consensus blocks out alternative points of view. No one feels empowered to disagree. The risk for groupthink increases with homogeneous groups, or groups with members who share the same background and experience.
Janis wrote that American military commanders didn't pay attention to warnings of an impending attack in part because of groupthink. They saw Japan 'as a midget that would not dare to strike a blow against a powerful giant.'
He also wrote that groupthink led to other American military blunders, including the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba under President Kennedy and President Truman's ill-fated decision to invade North Korea, which brought China into the Korean War.
Groupthink also led to the debacle in Vietnam. The Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Barbara Tuchman wrote the US lost that war in part because the Kennedy and Johnson administrations lacked anyone with a deep understanding of Vietnamese culture, politics and history.
She had a term for that groupthink failure: 'The March of Folly.'
With its DEI purge, the Trump administration is making the same mistake that American military leaders made in the past, says Kyle Bibby, an infantry captain in the US Marines who served in Afghanistan. He cited several recent decisions: Trump's firing of Charles Q. Brown, the second Black person to serve as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (Colin Powell was the first); and Hegseth's firing of Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the chief of the Navy.
The Defense Department has also banned using official resources to celebrate cultural awareness events such as Black History and Hispanic Heritage months. The US Naval Academy last month banned nearly 400 books in its library that dealt with racial justice, gender and LGBTQ+ issues. The library, however, reportedly still retained two copies of 'Mein Kampf' by Adolf Hitler.
'They're trying to make a very clear statement to the military that this is a White man's military and the rest of you will fall in line,' says Bibby, co-founder of the Black Veterans Project, a group that preserves the legacy of Black veterans and secures restitution for Black soldiers denied benefits.
Bibby says the purge doesn't make business sense, either.
'There's no one on Earth who genuinely thinks that having differing opinions and experiences wile coming together to solve issues or build products is a bad thing for a team,' Bibby tells CNN. 'The only people who think like that are people who believe in groupthink.'
Yet research shows it's not enough for a military to be diverse. Numbers don't mean much if women or non-White soldiers don't feel valued and heard. This belief led to one of the most important victories in the Iraq War, one American general recently wrote in an essay.
Gen. Mark Hertling was commanding an Army division during the Iraq War in 2008 when he noticed an increase in suicide bombings carried out by Iraqi women, often in crowded public places. He couldn't figure out how to stop it. Cultural prohibitions prevented men from touching and searching women.
The solution came from a junior female officer. At her suggestion, the military arranged a conference for Iraqi women to convince them that they had a stake in their country's future. Within months, 60 female officers were fanning out across Iraqi provinces.
Would a woman officer feel comfortable approaching a male general with an out-of-the-box suggestion in today's anti-woke culture?
Hertling, who is now retired and a CNN commentator, doesn't answer that question in his essay, but he says that female officer saved lives.
'By the time 1st armored division rotated home, not only was the female suicide-vest cell almost completely destroyed, but the overall level of violence in northern Iraq was down significantly,' Hertling wrote.
The scenario Hertling described would not have possible not too long ago. This is not the US military's first DEI purge. The voices and contributions of women and people of color were overlooked and erased through much of America's military history.
Black soldiers were routinely treated as second-class citizens, held menial jobs such as cooks and were forced to serve in racially segregated units. Women in the military routinely experienced — and still do — discrimination and sexual harassment.
President Truman began to change this culture in 1948 when he issued an executive order desegregating the US military. Today, 32% of active-duty members are racial minorities and 17.7% are women, according to a 2023 Department of Defense study.
The military's march to diversity faced some of its stiffest challenges in Vietnam. The racial tensions of 1960s America spilled over into the battlefield. There were constant reports of 'fragging,' incidents in which US soldiers killed their comrades. Racial tensions between White and Black soldiers led to many fragging incidents.
The military created many of its diversity programs after Vietnam because they learned that a racially divided army cost lives, says Matthew Delmont, author of 'Half-American: The Epic Story of African Americans Fighting World War II at Home and Abroad.'
'It wasn't about being politically correct,' Delmont says. 'It was about we're going to be less effective fighting wars if we can't sort out this racial business.'
One Vietnam veteran recalls how racial tension affected his soldiers. Karl Marlantes, was then a young White man from a coastal logging town in Oregon when he commanded a platoon in Vietnam. He recalls the sensation of fighting two battles—one against the North Vietnamese, and another to hold marines together in the rear.
'I can just remember the sadness I felt in my platoon,' says Marlantes, who wrote about his war experiences in 'Matterhorn,' and 'What It Is Like to Go to War.' 'We would all work together in the bush but when we got off the chopper, all the Black kids are in one part and the White kids in another part.'
Marlantes tells CNN he once tried to persuade a Black soldier to hang out with White soldiers as well but the soldier refused.
'He said I don't want to be the one Black guy hanging out with a bunch of White guys when suddenly there's a riot,' Marlantes says. 'There was a lot of fear.'
That type of fear can lead to defeat. Armies that are divided by racial and ethnic tensions that bleed over from civilian life underperform, says Jason Lyall, author of 'Divided Armies: Inequality and Battlefield Performance in Modern War.'
Lyall says he studied nearly 850 armies in 250 wars fought since 1800 and made a discovery: inclusive armies fight harder, suffer lower rates of desertion and exhibit more creative problem solving on the battlefield.
'Victory on the battlefield over the past 200 years has usually gone to the most inclusive armies,' Lyall wrote in a 2020 essay, 'not the largest or best equipped.'
There was another reason the American military decided to become more diverse after World War II. They saw what happened to Nazi Germany.
People sometimes forget that Nazi Germany was built on, and destroyed by, racism. A racist demagogue persuaded Germans that other groups were inherently inferior. The Nazis' demonization of ethnic and religious minorities, as well as political opponents, led to the Holocaust.
Many of the American soldiers who liberated the concentration camps were stunned that an advanced country like Germany could turn so barbaric. Some of them were Black veterans like Leon Bass, who simmered in anger over the racist treatment he received in the segregated Army. Then he entered the Buchenwald Concentration camp.
There he encountered what he called the 'walking dead'— emaciated survivors who wordlessly stumbled toward him with sores across their naked bodies.
'Segregation, racism, can lead to the ultimate (horror) … that's what I saw in Buchenwald,' says Bass, who died at 90 in 2015.
Fear of a similar democratic collapse motivated Americans like Bass after World War II. They resolved to, as the author David Brooks said, never 'fall for the strongman's deductive promise of domination.' They invoked, without irony, America's traditional motto, 'E Pluribus unum,' meaning 'Out of many one.'
No other idea captured the nation's imagination like racial integration during the 1950s and '60s, says Leonard Steinhorn, co-author of 'By The Color Of Our Skin.'
'We saw ourselves as the big melting pot where everyone blended together and all the characteristics of different groups added to the pot,' Steinhorn tells CNN. 'We wanted to believe that we could be better, that we weren't bound by the prejudices, hatreds and outdated ideologies of old.'
But in recent years the desire for common ground seems to have evaporated. Our schools and communities remain widely segregated. Diversity programs are being driven out of academia and corporate America. People are self-sorting into political enclaves where they have little contact with people with different opinions.
The military is a last bastion of integration in America. Not even college and pro sports teams approach its commitment to the concept. Communities with large military installations dominate the list of the least segregated metropolitan areas of the US. There are higher rates of intermarriage among military members.
That diversity serves a vital military interest, some of the country's leading military leaders recently said. Thirty-five retired senior defense officials, including four former chairmen of the joint chiefs of staff, signed an amicus brief in 2022 supporting diversity as vital for the nation's armed services.
'History has shown that placing a diverse Armed Forces under the command of a homogeneous leadership is a recipe of internal resentment, discord, and violence,' they wrote.
That diversity is also needed more than ever because of another factor: In recent years the military has faced a severe recruiting shortage. The Army, for example, missed its recruitment goal by nearly 25% in 2022 and 2023. An uptick in recruiting that began last summer has carried over into 2025 so far. But a fundamental challenge remains: an all-volunteer force must consistently attract large numbers of people of color if it's going to remain effective.
Here's another intangible reason why diversity makes the military stronger. Some of the biggest beneficiaries of this diversity are White men. They may become hidden casualties in this war on wokeness.
Diversity not only increases the chance that they will succeed in war zones. It teaches them how to negotiate differences with someone who is different — a vital skill for preserving a multiracial and multicultural democracy.
Bibby says Black Marines swelled with pride when they saw his captain bars, but it was also important that White soldiers saw him. There are numerous historical examples of White soldiers who harbored racist attitudes being transformed by serving with, and fighting alongside, Black soldiers.
'We don't talk enough about how much it means to young White men who have never seen a Black captain to understand that I'm a part of this damn story,' Bibby says. 'It's important that they see Black and women officers and they understand that we're all part of the same team.'
Marlantes says he has a comfort level with Black people he probably wouldn't have otherwise if not for his experiences in the Marines. He says he met all sorts of soldiers who expanded his perspective.
'We had an artillery forward observer whose great-grandfather owned Hilton Head,' says Marlantes of the popular South Carolina tourist destination. 'He was rich. And he was in there with us, eating cold beans and being miserable while trying to save our ass by bringing in artillery.'
Christensen, the naval instructor who taught the Navy's first Black pilot, was also transformed by an unlikely friendship. A descendent of Danish immigrants, he grew up on a Nebraska farm where he knew no Black people. But he was also poor and knew what it felt like to be an outsider.
He bonded with Brown over those shared experiences. The two men later exchanged letters that Christensen kept in a cedar chest in his home for more than 60 years.
Their friendship reflected the profound bonds that often form between people who serve together in the armed forces. 'It is,' Philip Caputo wrote in his classic Vietnam War memoir, 'A Rumor of War, 'unlike marriage, a bond that cannot be broken by a word, by boredom or divorce, or by anything other than death.'
Their friendship ended when Brown was killed in action in 1950 during the Korean War. He was shot down and died before a rescue helicopter could ferry him to safety. After hearing about Brown's death, Christensen became a helicopter rescue pilot and saved six pilots during the Korean War.
Before he died at 91 in 2014, he made an admission to his daughter, Nancy King.
'He told me that there wasn't a single week that had gone by since 1950 that he didn't think about Jesse Brown,' King said. 'He said, 'I dream about it.' '
Critics of DEI will say that the friendship between Brown and Christensen fulfills their vision of a colorblind military. They want a military meritocracy, where only competence matters.
But integration of any kind never happens naturally in any large institution. The old hierarchies from civilian life can easily reassert themselves in the military. Armies splinter, groupthink leads to disasters and people die.
The Trump administration's DEI purge ignores those hard-won lessons. It will go down as an epic case of friendly fire, a self-inflicted wound that harms more than helps.
It's another march of folly.
John Blake is a CNN senior writer and author of the award-winning memoir, 'More Than I Imagined: What a Black Man Discovered About the White Mother He Never Knew.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
Brave The Awkward: Because Real Connection Requires Embracing Discomfort
We've never been more connected—yet we've rarely felt more alone. Chances are, you've witnessed it too: a group of young people sitting around a table at a restaurant, each staring at their phones instead of conversing with each other. They'd sooner take a selfie and post it than lay down their devices and talk about the insecurity that's driving their deep need to be seen and validated by 'likes' on the latest post. I call this the connection paradox: surrounded by communication tools, yet starved of real connection. At the heart of this paradox? Our growing reluctance to brave the awkward moments that real connection demands. The technology that's connected us has made it too easy to avoid the discomfort of genuine connection. The technology that's connected us has made it too easy to avoid the discomfort of genuine connection. We've become masters of impression management but amateurs at vulnerability. We filter our flaws, script our replies, and polish our professional personas—all while dodging the discomfort of direct, human-to-human interaction. From awkward silences to unresolved tensions, most of us would rather scroll, text, or disappear than risk a moment of raw, honest connection. The pressure to look like we've got it together—to say the right thing, to be perceived the right way—is amplified by status anxiety. Social psychologist Amy Cuddy calls this "presence under threat"—when fear of judgment overrides our ability to be authentic and present. Our natural need for approval has made us vulnerable to technologies that exploit our insecurities. Just last week, I heard through a mutual friend that someone had misinterpreted something I'd said. My first thought was to send a text, explaining the misunderstanding. But I caught myself and picked up the phone. Within five minutes, what could have become a drawn-out misunderstanding was resolved through the warmth of actual conversation where she could hear the tone of my voice—something that would have taken days of back-and-forth messages, if it could be resolved at all. Yet I constantly hear of people having conflicts via text exchanges because it feels safer. The data tells the story: in 1990, 75% of Americans had a best friend and only 3% had no close friends at all—today, those figures have plummeted to 59% and 12% respectively Digital communication can never replace the human When we choose AI-scripted messaging over less polished but fully human conversation—when we trade authenticity for something sanitized and 'perfect'—we cut ourselves off from the deep connection we crave and the many benefits it brings. We end up in carefully controlled exchanges that protect our ego but starve our soul. I call it the 'timidity tax'—the hidden cost we pay in our relationships, workplaces, and communities when we avoid the awkwardness of showing up fully human. In the end, it's our raw edges—not our perfection—that give others something real to hold onto. Younger generations are particularly vulnerable. While they may be fluent in memes and emojis, many haven't developed the interpersonal muscles needed for meaningful dialogue, emotional nuance, or face-to-face disagreement. The pandemic made this worse. Just when many young people should have been building the relational skills essential for navigating life's complexities, they found themselves isolated at home, tethered to devices that promised connection but delivered only its shadow. Those formative years—when resilience is built through awkward conversations, messy disagreements, and the trial-and-error of human interaction—were replaced by the sanitized safety of screens. Here's the thing: if the quality of our relationships is determined by the quality of the conversations we have within them, then those who've never learned to navigate the awkward terrain of addressing tension or sharing a personal challenge will struggle in the years ahead. They're entering marriages, friendships, and yes—workplaces—without the conversational courage needed to work through inevitable disagreements constructively, express vulnerability, or build the level of trust needed to sustain relationships over time. The more we rely on technology, the more we must practice what makes us human This connection crisis isn't contained to our personal lives—it's reshaped how we work too. A recent Gallup report revealed that only 23% of employees strongly agree they feel connected at work. According to McKinsey, Gen Z reports the highest levels of anxiety and loneliness in the workplace. This isn't coincidence—it's the predictable outcome of a generation that knows how to post but not how to pause, reflect, and connect through discomfort. Think about the executive who sends three carefully crafted emails instead of making a two-minute call that could resolve the issue. Or the team member who stays silent in meetings—not because they lack ideas, but because they fear saying the "wrong" thing might damage their reputation. The result? Declining engagement, rising burnout, and teams that struggle to collaborate beyond surface-level interactions. In the end, our willingness to express vulnerability will be our greatest source of strength, connection, and true security in a GenAI world that's increasingly scripted and superficial. Online relationships are more prone to becoming less human—reduced to performative exchanges that lack the messy authenticity of real connection. Digital interactions, no matter how frequent or clever, cannot replicate the subtle dance of in-person communication: reading between the lines, sitting with uncomfortable silences, or finding resolution through the shared vulnerability that is felt when two people occupy the same physical space. Connection doesn't happen by accident—it happens through shared discomfort, mutual vulnerability, and the courage to show up without a script. It requires us to step away from our screens and into the uncertain territory of genuine human interaction, where miscommunication is possible, feelings might get hurt, and resolution isn't guaranteed with the click of a button. The connection we crave most lays the other side of the awkwardness we least want to risk. If we want to build relationships and communities that unite people across generations, identities, and perspectives, we must be willing to 'brave the awkward'. That means embracing the awkward silences, leaning into our nervous vulnerability, and starting the conversations we'd sooner avoid. This requires courage—the courage to lay our vulnerability on the line, to show up fully, speak honestly, and risk the judgment we fear. It demands connection built on empathy, trust, and our common humanity. In a world where we can quickly curate our communication, outcomes won't be shaped by those who can say the smartest thing in the most polished way. Rather it will be shaped by those willing to brave the awkward and say the real thing—even when their words don't come out perfectly, even when the silence stretches too long, and even when there's no emoji to capture what needs to be said. Actually, especially then.


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
American Airlines plane that caught fire in Denver had loose and incorrectly installed parts, NTSB report says
A preliminary report from the National Transportation Safety Board found indications maintenance errors could be at fault for an American Airlines plane that caught fire after making an emergency landing at Denver International Airport in March. Investigators say airport cameras captured video showing a trail of fluid following the plane as it taxied after diverting to Denver due to an engine issue. When investigators looked at the plane's engine, they discovered some parts were loose and appeared to be installed incorrectly, with one "allowing fuel to leak from the fitting." "The way this is looking is that there was a maintenance issue that led to this fire and we've gotta figure out where that error occurred so we can keep that error from happening again," said former NTSB chair Robert Sumwalt, CBS News transportation safety analyst. Passengers of flight 1006 wait for help getting off the wing of the plane at Denver International Airport on Thursday evening. Alexandria Cullen Passengers escape plane The NTSB says the fire was put out in less than a minute by ground crews in Denver. The report describes the chaos in the cabin after passengers, who were flying to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, saw flames under the engine. "Everyone was screaming, 'There's a fire. There's a fire,'" Helen Prager, who was on the plane, recalled. "Literally at the gate and I was screaming, 'Get the doors open.'" As that was happening, the NTSB said a flight attendant called the pilots, but "did not get an answer." Another flight attendant knocked on the cockpit door to alert the pilots of the fire outside and the smoke inside. Some of the 172 passengers evacuated to the wing, but an escape slide jammed, preventing the use of the cabin doors. "When it did not deploy properly and it jammed the door, that's a problem," Sumwalt said. "So the NTSB is going to want to drill down into that. … Did it come from the factory that way, or was it a maintenance problem?" Twelve people were taken to a hospital with minor injuries following the fire, officials said following the incident. The plane took off from Colorado Springs. In a statement, American Airlines told CBS News, "The safety of our customers and team members is our top priority and we are cooperating with the National Transportation Safety Board in its investigation." Aviation incidents in 2025 The plane fire in Denver is one in a string of aviation incidents so far this year. In January, a midair collision where a Blackhawk helicopter struck an American Airlines plane near Reagan National Airport killed all 64 people on board the regional jet and the three soldiers in the helicopter. The flight was coming from Wichita, Kansas. A Delta Air Lines regional jet crashed and flipped upside down during its landing at Toronto International Airport in February. The incident left 21 people injured, but all 80 on board, including the crew, were able to escape the wreckage. Members of Congress were on a plane sitting on the tarmac at Reagan National Airport in April when it was clipped by another aircraft. No injuries were reported in the incident. Meanwhile, the FAA is investigating outages that have happened at the Philadelphia air traffic control center, which is responsible for operating flights out of Newark airport. Multiple outages have occurred since April. Last month, the Trump administration announced plans to overhaul the system. Despite high-profile incidents this year, a CBS News analysis based on NTSB and Bureau of Travel Statistics data shows .02% of domestic flights were involved in accidents in 2024.


News24
2 hours ago
- News24
MultiChoice warns of ‘unprecedented financial disruption' in trading update
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now Show Comments ()