Pfizer scientist claimed delay of COVID jab results until after 2020 election ‘wasn't a coincidence,' House GOP panel alleges
WASHINGTON — The release of COVID-19 vaccine results after the 2020 election may have not been a 'coincidence' — and could have been part of an effort by senior Pfizer executives to 'deliberately slow down' the testing, according to bombshell allegations from a Republican-led congressional panel.
The House Judiciary Committee revealed Thursday that Pfizer's former Global Head of Vaccines Research and Development, Dr. Philip Dormitzer, may have 'conspired to withhold public health information to influence' the presidential contest between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
5 he release of COVID-19 vaccine results days after the 2020 election may have not been a 'coincidence' — and could have been part of an effort by senior Pfizer executives to 'deliberately slow down' the testing, a House panel alleged.
frank – stock.adobe.com
The London-based drugmaker GSK in an April 16 letter to Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) disclosed that Dormitzer 'approached a representative from the GSK human resources team to speak about a potential relocation abroad' in November 2024.
According to the HR rep, the ex-Pfizer vaccine scientist was 'visibly upset' in the meeting and asked to be moved to Canada 'due to concerns that he could be investigated by the incoming Trump Administration over his role in developing Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine.'
When the GSK employee asked what his reasons were for requesting the relocation, Dormitzer apparently responded: 'Let's just say it wasn't a coincidence, the timing of the vaccine.'
5 'My Pfizer colleagues and I did everything we could to get the FDA's Emergency Use Authorization at the very first possible moment,' Dormitzer said in March in response to the allegations.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
Pfizer used independent experts to review the effectiveness and safety of its vaccines and broadcast the results being shared by its scientists just five days after polls closed for the 2020 election on Nov. 3.
GSK also divulged in the letter that some of its employees heard from the scientist 'in late 2020, the three most senior people in Pfizer R&D were involved in a decision to deliberately slow down clinical testing so that it would not be complete prior to the results of the presidential election that year.'
But the drugmaker, in its letter, also denied that Dormitzer was copping to 'delaying disclosure of completed results,' characterizing his statements as being part of 'a situation of slowing down results before disclosure became necessary.'
The Judiciary panel still fired off a pair of letters to Dormitzer and Pfizer's chairman and CEO, Dr. Albert Bourla, on Thursday demanding all records — including emails, texts, meeting notes and other documents — showing data from the clinical trials or communications with federal public health agencies.
5 The House Judiciary Committee revealed Thursday that the former head of Global Head of Vaccines Research and Development may have 'conspired to withhold public health information to influence' the 2020 election.
AP
'This new information appears to suggest that you and other senior Pfizer executives conspired to withhold public health information to influence the 2020 presidential election,' Jordan wrote to Dormitzer.
'Due to the seriousness of these allegations, the Committee is compelled to request additional information to inform our oversight.'
The responsive files are supposed to cover the period between March 2020 and the present, per the letters.
5 Dormitzer's comments to GSK employees were first made in the course of a federal probe by Manhattan prosecutors, which, along with the Judiciary letters, was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
LightRocket via Getty Images
Jordan's panel has also demanded Dormitzer schedule a transcribed interview no later than May 29.
Dormitzer's comments to GSK employees were first made in the course of a federal probe by Manhattan prosecutors, which, along with the Judiciary letters, was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
The scientist has denied that he or anyone at Pfizer tried to delay the vaccine, and said his comments to his colleagues at GSK were misinterpreted.
'My Pfizer colleagues and I did everything we could to get the FDA's Emergency Use Authorization at the very first possible moment,' Dormitzer previously told Reuters in a statement amid the investigation by the US Attorneys' Office for the Southern District of New York.
5 President Trump has touted how 'proud' he was of 'Operation Warp Speed' being able to get Americans vaccinated from COVID.
Getty Images
'Any other interpretation of my comments about the pace of the vaccine's development would be incorrect.'
'Pfizer is in receipt of the letter asking about allegations made in a Wall Street Journal story, and we will respond directly to the Committee,' a rep for the pharmaceutical company said in a statement.
'The COVID-19 vaccine development process was driven by science and guided by the U.S. FDA back in 2020,' the rep added.
'We have consistently and transparently reiterated the facts and the timeline of the tireless work of scientists, regulators, and thousands of clinical trial volunteers who made the vaccine possible. Theories to the contrary are simply untrue and being manufactured.'
Reps for GSK did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
President Trump has touted how 'proud' he was of 'Operation Warp Speed' being able to get Americans vaccinated from COVID, with the purchase of 200 million doses of Pfizer's vaccine and 200 million doses of the Moderna shot.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Miami Herald
12 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Meta commits absurd money to top Google, Microsoft in critical race
Apparently, Meta Platforms (META) CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been up to more than just making the rounds on the podcast circuit. In recent months, the man behind the company that runs Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and Oculus has been on seemingly every manosphere podcast out there. Related: Facebook (Meta) makes a big deal with UFC In May, he debuted yet another new look on This Past Weekend with Theo Von, where he talked about how college doesn't do a good job of preparing people for their careers. In January, he appeared on The Joe Rogan Experience to speak about online censorship, the Covid vaccine, bots on Facebook, and encrypted messaging, among other things. More recently, he spoke with Ben Thompson of Stratechery about AI and where he sees social media going in the future. More on Meta: Meta (Facebook) shocks retail world with unexpected newsMeta quietly plans rude awakening for employees after layoffsSurprising earnings send Meta Platforms stock soaring While the interviews are great at increasing Zuckerberg's profile, they don't do much to move the needle for investors looking for Meta to debut its next big thing. For years, Zuckerberg's focus was the metaverse, but after tens of billions of dollars and years of development, the project hasn't gained the user base Meta was hoping for. Meta's Horizon Worlds virtual social platform had less than 200,000 monthly active users shortly after its launch in 2022, well short of the company's expectations of 500,000 users. Meta has shifted its focus to AI growth in recent years, and on Tuesday, a new report shows just how serious the company has become about topping its rivals. Mark Zuckerberg is applying the same focus he brought to building the metaverse to building out Meta's artificial intelligence capabilities. Zuckerberg is personally overseeing the creation of a "superintelligence" team, and the company is offering nine-figure compensation packages to attract top talent, according to a Bloomberg report. He believes Meta can beat competitors like Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI to achieve artificial general intelligence. AGI is the theoretical limit of what AI can achieve - machines performing tasks as well as, or better than, humans. Related: Gig work CEO warns of scary future for job seekers Bloomberg reported that the superteam will feature about 50 people, most of whom Zuckerberg will recruit personally. He's arranged the desks at the company's headquarters so the new staff will sit near him. The team is only one aspect of Meta's AGI strategy. According to a report in The Information on Tuesday, Meta is close to finalizing a $15 billion investment in Scale AI. If completed, the deal would become the company's largest-ever acquisition. Scale AI provides training data to everyone from Microsoft to Google to OpenAI. The investment would give Meta a 49% stake in the company, and CEO Alesandr Wang would join the superteam. The push for artificial intelligence that can perform tasks as well as or better than humans will inevitably lead to societal upheaval. The most immediate concern is about the jobs that will be lost to automation. When big companies like Meta and Alphabet want to save on costs, headcount is often one of the first places they look. Meta is currently laying off about 3,600 employees, whom the company says are underperforming. The company says it is eliminating redundancies, and it's true the tech sector went on a hiring spree during the pandemic. Now, however, it is replacing many of those positions with machine learning engineers. Machine learning is a subset of artificial intelligence focused on enabling machines to learn from data without explicit programming from humans. In other words, Meta has been laying off workers to hire other workers to build products, which will eventually lead to more layoffs. Related: Meta turns to powerful ally in battle against Europe The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Politico
13 minutes ago
- Politico
Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic nomination for NJ governor
Democrats chose Rep. Mikie Sherrill as their nominee for governor of New Jersey, as the party attempts to defy odds by holding onto the governorship for a third term in a row. The Associated Press called the race just under an hour after polls closed. The four-term member of Congress prevailed in the crowded Democratic primary field on Tuesday to succeed term-limited Gov. Phil Murphy. She'll face Republican Jack Ciattarelli, setting up a high-stakes battle of two party establishment favorites. Both sides acknowledge that November's election will be competitive. Although the electorate does favor Democrats, it's been decades since Democrats have won the governorship three terms in a row in the Garden State. But in recent history, the candidate of the party opposite of the one that controls the White House typically wins the race for governor. Still, Republicans are emboldened by President Donald Trump's closer-than-expected loss in New Jersey last November, as well as the gains they've made to cut into Democrats' voter registration advantage. And Republicans argue it helps that they have a candidate with high name ID: Ciattarelli ran for governor two times prior and narrowly lost to Murphy in 2021.
